Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

John,

Once again you have twisted what was said to reflect what you want to hear.

I never said that Belgium was "the ideal of the world." I merely pointed out that Belgium has gone more than 300 days without a national government and they are doing just fine.

On 04/25/2011 06:15 AM, NoEinstein wrote:

Mark:  Tell that to J. Ashley.  He's holding up Belgium as the ideal of the world, and Jonathan is an out-and-out anarchist.  —  J. A. A. — 

On Apr 24, 11:37 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote: 

There is no "anarchy in Belgium: *an·ar·chy*/ˈanərkē/Noun 1. A state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority. 2. Absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal.  It is not history, it is current events.  If you are writing a constitution you should have known this. You should also know that absolute Democracy, absolute Communism and Socialism are for the most part identical in practice (if it were possible)  To say we need more Democracy as you often do is the same as saying we need more Communism and or Socialism....  Just how ignorant are you ??  On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:02 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:        

Mark:  Please find yourself a history buff.  I'm not the least interested in anarchy, in Belgium or anywhere!  — J. A. A. — 

On Apr 22, 4:33 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote: 

And it still functions without the lawmakers.... Go figure. 

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Jonathan Ashley < 

jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote: 

 John, 

"In terms of comparative social spending on welfare-related programs as 

a 

percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP), Denmark ranks first, spending more than 29 percent of GDP on its welfare-related programs. 

Next 

is Sweden (nearly 29 percent), followed by France, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, Austria, and Finland. The United Kingdom ranks in the 

middle of 

the pack in 13th place (nearly 22 percent of GDP). The United States 

ranks 

near the bottom, in 26th place (out of 29), spending less than 15 

percent of 

its GDP on social welfare programs. The United States ranks just ahead 

of 

Ireland, Mexico, and South Korea." 

http://pagerankstudio.com/Blog/2011/03/what-is-welfare-state/ 

------------------------------ On 04/22/2011 08:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: 

On average, yes they are!  Few in Belgium look to government for handouts.  In the USA, close to 45% want a government handout. Anything over 5% is excessive.  But that's why I've written my New Constitution—to get government out of the hand-out, pull-the-strings business!   —  John A. Armistead —  Patriot 

  On Apr 21, 9:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> < 

jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> 

wrote: 

 So, you're saying the People of Belgium are better People than those 

in 

the United States? 

 J. Ashley:  Run your experiments in Belgium, then!  The USA would be in civil war...   � J. A. A. � On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> < 

jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> 

wrote: 

 John, 

   It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without government. Belgium has been without a national government for more 

than 

313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make 

much 

of a difference in their daily lives." 

   On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote: 

   Jonathan:  You are showing some smarts there!  Since I am an untra- conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone, because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal.  I deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact opposite.  If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages' within one month of there being no government(s).  So, your "ideal" of no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth.  Is having you "get real" too much to ask?  ï¿½  J. A. Armistead � 

 Patriot 

On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> < 

jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> 

wrote: 

 John, Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer questions posed to you.) On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote: 

 Jonathan:  For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist.  I suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government. Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on your own.  ï¿½  J. A. A. � On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> < 

jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> 

wrote: 

 But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution. On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote: 

 Jonathan:  Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system that made this country great; and by supposing that government should control everything (with him in charge).  The fact that you even ask that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are.  The remaining 5% are just stupid.  You're in both of those groups.  ï¿½ J. A. Armistead � Patriot On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> < 

jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> 

wrote: 

 John, That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites 

based 

on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of expression 

means. 

That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull off 

this 

tremendous task? On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote: 

 Dear Mark:  I own Google stock.  It's an American multinational Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California.  Google World shows the new complex quite well.  In many ways you are very naive.  Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit TREASON every day of their existence.  Would you put on moderation someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed? Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill their citizens?  Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies.  He has caused more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler. Treason is a recognized capital offense.  Those in our government and in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested, tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for giving aid and comfort to the enemy.  Keith suggested that you, Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive".  He's viewed you all in a favorable light, before.  As for me, I suspect you are so screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a better government.  That means you have schizophrenia.  Get some couch- time, Mark.  You need it!  ï¿½  J. A. Armistead �  Patriot On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com> < 

markmka...@gmail.com>          wrote: 

 Einstein, Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law. Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s). On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> < 

noeinst...@bellsouth.net>          wrote: 

 Dear Keith:  I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such nice people.  Israel should become a training place for successful capitalism.  Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims feel. Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA is skating on?"  There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying that moderators must approve what I say.  Of course that in UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.  If you butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying, then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has now  been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.  The last 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads with, first hand.  Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85% of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available. But NOT on this forum.  The full document will be presented as part of a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this country needs a New Constitution Now.  You guys can help speed things along by talking-up my document on the NET.  ï¿½ John A. Armistead � Patriot On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com> < 

keithinta...@gmail.com>          wrote: 

 Hey John! I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,  Mark  and 

MJ are 

already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of 

them 

maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack Literal Truth 

might 

even 

 ..  read more » 

--

Freedom Is Always Illegal.

Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft