Monday, December 26, 2011

Re: CNN Lied. Surprised?

Snall potatos after CBS/Rahter-Gate

On Dec 26, 12:09 pm, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would only be suprised if CNN told the truth.
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: P
>
> > Plop plop fizz fizz, oh what a lier CNN is.....
>
> > But then again, is that a surprise?
>
> >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078343/Raw-footage-shows-Ron...
>
> > __._,_.___
> > Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
> > Messages in this topic (1)
> > Recent Activity:
>
> > Visit Your Group
> > .....the forum for free & fair debate, Everyone welcome. Hate Obama's
> > health care plan, tell us!
> > MARKETPLACE
>
> > Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on -
> > Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.
>
> > <
> >http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=6800472a-2fc8-11e1-94e2-43dc8082a6cf&T=1cc...
>
> > <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif>
> > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
> > .
> > <
> >http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=23857963/grpspId=170529175...
>
> > __,_._,___
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Bill Buckley and National Review: Whites Are 'the Advanced Race'

Ah, the cherry pick,

Q: Did he ever recant his opposition to the civil rights movement? —
Chris

A: Yes, he did. He said it was a mistake for National Review not to
have supported the civil rights legislation of 1964-65, and later
supported a national holiday honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., whom
he grew to admire a good deal, above all for combining spiritual and
political values.

New York Times, February 2008

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

@Twitter Evades Explaining Indirect Support For Online Jihad, Breaking U.S. Law



New post on Creeping Sharia

@Twitter Evades Explaining Indirect Support For Online Jihad, Breaking U.S. Law

by creeping

via Twitter Continues To Evade Explaining Its Breaking of U.S. Law and Its Indirect Support For Online Jihad: The Case of Hizbullah and Al-Manar TV. As part of its research, the MEMRI Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor follows the multiple ways in which jihadi groups are using Twitter – "tweeting" news flashes, reporting attacks, battles, [...]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/twitter-evades-explaining-indirect-support-for-online-jihad-breaking-u-s-law/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

New Years Prediction

The Annointed One


Well, here it goes again. This time the Saudis and the LAS are
joining
the fray by fanning the flames of fear.

The greatest fear of course should be the achievement of a small but
widely dispersing "dirty bomb" (really easy to produce) and not the
mushroom cloud nuke of Bikini fame.

The fact that nations other than the US and its allies want one
should
not be a big surprise, The US has a military budget that far
overshadows that of the next 5-10 nations on the list depending on
which report you care to believe. It is an "offensive" force to be
reckoned with regardless of the misnomer meaning of the second "D" in
DoD.

In the minds of "lesser" nations the only "equalizer" would be
possession of "THE BOMB" and that terrifies people.

Only the US is supposedly Moral enough to have this weapon.

At this point in time it would be a simple matter to simply take out
any proven production facilities... the problem is the word "proven".
There are none. It is at this time all talk. That, however, will not
stop the Hawks of the world from spreading the fear.

The powers that be are planning yet another unneeded, unnecessary war
that will use the Kennedy stance in a most hypocritical and truly ugly
manner.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Nukes and the Game of "preventative" war.

The Annointed One

Well, here it goes again. This time the Saudis and the LAS are joining
the fray by fanning the flames of fear.

The greatest fear of course should be the achievement of a small but
widely dispersing "dirty bomb" (really easy to produce) and not the
mushroom cloud nuke of Bikini fame.

The fact that nations other than the US and its allies want one should
not be a big surprise, The US has a military budget that far
overshadows that of the next 5-10 nations on the list depending on
which report you care to believe. It is an "offensive" force to be
reckoned with regardless of the
misnomer meaning of the second "D" in DoD.

In the minds of "lesser" nations the only "equalizer" would be
possession of "THE BOMB" and that terrifies people. Only the US is
supposedly Moral enough to have this weapon.

At this point in time it would be a simple matter to simply take out
any proven production facilities... the problem is the word "proven".
There are none. It is at this time all talk. That, however, will not
stop the Hawks of the world from spreading the fear.

The powers that be are planning yet another unneeded, unnecessary war
that will use the Kennedy stance in a most hypocritical way.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: [The_Fair_Forum] CNN Lied. Surprised?

I would only be suprised if CNN told the truth. 

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com> wrote:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: P
 

Plop plop fizz fizz, oh what a lier CNN is.....
 
But then again, is that a surprise?
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078343/Raw-footage-shows-Ron-Paul-DIDNT-storm-CNN-interview-racist-newsletters--interview-simply-done.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
 
 

__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group
.....the forum for free & fair debate, Everyone welcome. Hate Obama's health care plan, tell us!
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

<http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=6800472a-2fc8-11e1-94e2-43dc8082a6cf&T=1cc9dj92n%2fX%3d1324907358%2fE%3d1705291755%2fR%3dgroups%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d2.1%2fW%3dH%2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d531014471%2fH%3dY29udGVudD0iRmxpY2tyO1RWO0NhbGVuZGFyO05ld3M7TWFwcztXZWF0aGVyO1NtYWxsX0J1c2luZXNzO0JyaWVmY2FzZTtFZHVjYXRpb247VHJhdmVsOyIgZGlzYWJsZXNodWZmbGluZz0iMSIgc2VydmVJZD0iNjgwMDQ3MmEtMmZjOC0xMWUxLTk0ZTItNDNkYzgwODJhNmNmIiBzaXRlSWQ9IjQ0NTI1NTEiIHRTdG1wPSIxMzI0OTA3MzU4MjY0MzE2IiA-%2fQ%3d-1%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3dAC238962&U=13c7s18t3%2fN%3dMJKwNkoGYnE-%2fC%3d493064.14543979.14562481.13298430%2fD%3dMKP1%2fB%3d6060255%2fV%3d1>
<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif>
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=23857963/grpspId=1705291755/msgId=48749/stime=1324907358/nc1=5758219/nc2=3848627/nc3=4025373>
__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

CAIR going after our children



New post on Fellowship of the Minds

CAIR going after our children

by DCG

Taxpayer funded children's museum to hold Muslim program

Examiner: The New York City, taxpayer-funded Children's Museum of New York is planning a major exhibition titled, "Muslim Worlds" which is scheduled to begin a long-term engagement in 2014.   

According to information provided by the controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), "Muslim Worlds" will have hands-on exhibits, performances and other events geared toward getting children involved with the thousands of years of cultural heritage that has come from the Muslim world.  Besides hosting individual visitors, the Children's Museum will extend invitations for school groups including those from public schools.
 
Although the museum promises to "bring to life the similarities and differences of Muslim cultures," John Jay College Sociology Professor Mucahit Bilici said that exhibits like this operate on the assumption that Muslim people are separate from American society.

Visitors to the Children's Museum of Manhattan dance as part of a festival celebrating Muslim culture."I would say that the major problem with this project is that it treats Muslims as exclusively external people -- as foreigners," he said. "I'm sure that a significant percentage of their audience, like the kids who will visit that exhibition, will be Muslim. I wish that they would be aware of this and that they would frame it in a much more inclusive way."

Cyrus McGoldrick, the civil rights manager of the New York Council on American Islamic Relations, argues that the exhibit will do good things for the Muslim community. He said a lot of the civil rights violations that he investigates happen to Muslim kids who are mocked by their peers at school.

But many detractors believe this is an example of liberal-left hypocrisy.  Imagine a group of Methodists or Anabaptists holding an exhibition in a government-funded facility? Does anyone believe the politicians and the ACLU would allow such a show to be held in a city-financed facility with audiences being brought in by public school teachers? How long would that last?" asks political strategist and consultant Mike Baker.

"Tolerance is one thing," says former NYPD Officer Edie Aquina, "but why are we bending over backwards for the sake of political correctness. This group CAIR, for example, has repeatedly attacked the NYPD for trying to protect New Yorkers and Americans from radical Islamic terrorists. Will this Muslim World exhibition feature the role of Islam in the slaughter of 3,000 people on 9-11? Or the hate speech directed at Jews?"

Question: Will this museum show beheadings and stonings of women?

h/t Orbusmax

DCG

DCG | December 26, 2011 at 7:05 am | Tags: CAIR | Categories: Children, Culture War, Islam | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-bqM

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/cair-going-after-our-children/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: [The_Fair_Forum] CNN Lied. Surprised?

Thanks for sharing this article Bruce.   Crazy Uncle Ron left the interview before it was over,  no question.   Moreover, the kitchen is about to get a little hotter:
 
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com> wrote:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: P
 

Plop plop fizz fizz, oh what a lier CNN is.....
 
But then again, is that a surprise?
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078343/Raw-footage-shows-Ron-Paul-DIDNT-storm-CNN-interview-racist-newsletters--interview-simply-done.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
 
 

__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group
.....the forum for free & fair debate, Everyone welcome. Hate Obama's health care plan, tell us!
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

<http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=6800472a-2fc8-11e1-94e2-43dc8082a6cf&T=1cc9dj92n%2fX%3d1324907358%2fE%3d1705291755%2fR%3dgroups%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d2.1%2fW%3dH%2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d531014471%2fH%3dY29udGVudD0iRmxpY2tyO1RWO0NhbGVuZGFyO05ld3M7TWFwcztXZWF0aGVyO1NtYWxsX0J1c2luZXNzO0JyaWVmY2FzZTtFZHVjYXRpb247VHJhdmVsOyIgZGlzYWJsZXNodWZmbGluZz0iMSIgc2VydmVJZD0iNjgwMDQ3MmEtMmZjOC0xMWUxLTk0ZTItNDNkYzgwODJhNmNmIiBzaXRlSWQ9IjQ0NTI1NTEiIHRTdG1wPSIxMzI0OTA3MzU4MjY0MzE2IiA-%2fQ%3d-1%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3dAC238962&U=13c7s18t3%2fN%3dMJKwNkoGYnE-%2fC%3d493064.14543979.14562481.13298430%2fD%3dMKP1%2fB%3d6060255%2fV%3d1>
<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif>
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=23857963/grpspId=1705291755/msgId=48749/stime=1324907358/nc1=5758219/nc2=3848627/nc3=4025373>
__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Family gun guide




New post on Fellowship of the Minds

Family gun guide

by DCG

DCG

DCG | December 26, 2011 at 6:26 am | Categories: Culture War, Second Amendment | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-bqd

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/family-gun-guide/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Documents Show Obama’s Green Energy Scheme is “Infused with Politics at Every Level”



New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

Documents Show Obama's Green Energy Scheme is "Infused with Politics at Every Level"

by Scotty Starnes

The man of hope and change is nothing more than a lying politician who is lining the pockets of those who helped him get elected. Of course, Team Obama and the media claim there is no scandal, but the pattern of Obama rewarding political donors is well established. Solyndra, Signa Technologies, LightSquared and a host of other politically connect Obama bundlers have been rewarded trillions in tax dollars as the White House and media try to spin the facts.

From The Washington Post:

///Meant to create jobs and cut reliance on foreign oil, Obama's green-technology program was infused with politics at every level, The Washington Post found in an analysis of thousands of memos, company records and internal ­e-mails. Political considerations were raised repeatedly by company investors, Energy Department bureaucrats and White House officials.

The records, some previously unreported, show that when warned that financial disaster might lie ahead, the administration remained steadfast in its support for Solyndra.

The documents reviewed by The Post, which began examining the clean-technology program a year ago, provide a detailed look inside the day-to-day workings of the upper levels of the Obama administration. They also give an unprecedented glimpse into high-level maneuvering by politically connected clean-technology investors.

They show that as Solyndra tottered, officials discussed the political fallout from its troubles, the "optics" in Washington and the impact that the company's failure could have on the president's prospects for a second term. Rarely, if ever, was there discussion of the impact that Solyndra's collapse would have on laid-off workers or on the development of clean-
energy technology.

That's because it was never about JOBS. It was about rewarding Obama's billionaire bundlers with trillions of taxpayer dollars. The scheme involved pretending to be about job creation even as the pay-to-play sham was evolving. This is why the White House refuses to obey a subpoena that calls for Obama's communication records with Solyndra. The most "transparent" administration is stone-walling the investigation.

"What's so troubling is that politics seems to be the dominant factor," said Ryan Alexander, president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog group. "They're not talking about what the taxpayers are losing; they're not talking about the failure of the technology, whether we bet on the wrong horse. What they are talking about is 'How are we going to manage this politically?' "

The administration, which excluded lobbyists from policymaking positions, gave easy access to venture capitalists with stakes in some of the companies backed by the administration, the records show. Many of those investors had given to Obama's 2008 campaign. Some took jobs in the administration and helped manage the clean-
energy program...

The Washington Post is covering the fact that Obama's administration is filled with lobbyists but they have to spin the truth to hide the fact that Obama lied from day one. Over 200 Obama donors have received taxpayer-funded jobs and huge no-bid contracts. The media doesn't want voters to know these facts. This is the same administration who holds meetings with lobbyist outside the White House to avoid disclosure laws.

Officials acknowledged that some of the records provide an unvarnished view that they might have preferred to keep private — such as a senior energy adviser's reference to a conference call about Solyndra as a "[expletive] show," or a company investor writing that when Solyndra was mentioned in a meeting, Biden's office "about had an orgasm."

...Solyndra eventually realized that it had to lay off workers to stay afloat — no small step for a company that the president had backed to create jobs in a recession. But ­records indicate that the Energy Department urged company officials to delay the move until after the contentious November 2010 midterm elections, which imperiled Democratic control of Congress.

Despite the effect that timing might have on workers, one e-mail among company investors ended the discussion by asserting: "No announcement till after elections at doe request." An Energy Department spokesman did not respond to requests for comment for this article.

Continue to read the article and you will see that billionaire George Kaiser, an Obama bundler, is tied to Solyndra and Obama. Of course the liberal media wants to act like this isn't a scandal but when the taxpayers lose trillions thanks to Obama's "pay-to-play" Chicago politics, it is a scandal.

 

Continue reading>>>

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/documents-show-obamas-green-energy-scheme-is-infused-with-politics-at-every-level/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

**JP** Fw: ! Kya Bat Kar Rahy hain?



--- On Mon, 26/12/11, Farhan Safeer Qureshi <qureshiqureshiqureshi@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Farhan Safeer Qureshi <qureshiqureshiqureshi@gmail.com>
Subject: ! Kya Bat Kar Rahy hain?
To: "Farhan Safeer Qureshi" <qureshiqureshiqureshi@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, 26 December, 2011, 12:43 PM



http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/387639_179529878811826_141905259240955_292388_561724076_n.jpg 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Re: Bill Buckley and National Review: Whites Are 'the Advanced Race'

McMaken's article is thought provoking. 
 
I don't think there is any question that by today's standards,  William Buckley, as well as most if not all of the writers of the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s National Review,  would have to be classified as racist.  (I am reminded of Buckley's ongoing battles with Willis Carto, who Travis knows quite well by the way,  but the point being, is that Buckley,  the National Review, and to a small degree, E. Howard Hunt of Watergate fame, sued Carto and the Liberty Lobby on several occasions,  over allegations that  Buckley was a racist.....Buckley claimed that Carto was an anti-semite, and that the Elders of Zion manuscript was a forgery.  All of these allegations were for naught, and made several attorneys a lot of money.
 
The big distinction here, is that Buckley never ran for President.   Ron Paul is running for President, and remarks made fifteen years ago, or even twenty or twenty five years ago, are still pertinent to the man's character.......As McMaken points out.  
 
Bottom line?  Crazy Uncle Ron is a racist too.   It makes no difference that Buckley was a racist, or that Lou Rockwell or Murray Rothbard are/were crackpots.  Lou and Murray never ran for President, or their charming little ditties that they have written over the years would be up for scrutiny also.
 

On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 4:25 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

Bill Buckley and National Review: Whites Are 'the Advanced Race'
Posted by Ryan W. McMaken on December 24, 2011 02:00 PM

I find it interesting that the remnants of the Buckleyite wing of the right wing are trying to read Ron Paul out of the movement for his alleged racism. Yes, much better to profess a belief in equality for all ethnic groups, and then proceed to favor policies like the drug war that overwhelmingly punish non-whites more than whites. And then there is the mass murder of various brown-skinned foreigners by Obama, which will no doubt continue under any successor to Obama who is not named Ron Paul.

The disciples of Buckley of course conveniently forget National Review's position on civil rights. Let us remember Buckley's comments on how the whites in the South have a right to government-enforced segregation because they are "the advanced race":

"The central question that emerges­and it is not a parliamentary question or a question that is answered by merely consulting a catalog of the rights of American citizens, born Equal­is whether the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically? The sobering answer is Yes­the White community is so entitled because, for the time being, it is the advanced race."

Buckley and NR then go on to defend the use of government violence against anti-Jim Crow protests:

"National Review believes that the South's premises are correct. If the majority wills what is socially atavistic, then to thwart the majority may be, though undemocratic, enlightened. It is more important for any community, anywhere in the world, to affirm and live by civilized standards, than to bow to the demands of the numerical majority. Sometimes it becomes impossible to assert the will of a minority, in which case it must give way; and the society will regress; sometimes the numerical minority cannot prevail except by violence: then it must determine whether the prevalence of its will is worth the terrible price of violence"

Note how NR contrasts alleged "civilized standards" with opposition to the brutal use of government force, via Jim Crow, against tax-paying blacks strictly on the basis of race. In other words, voluntary free association among individuals is not the "civilized" choice. And, if need be, the white minority, which asserts segregation, is entitled to use violence to preserve its state-enforced prohibition on free association. Thus is the ideological patrimony of Rich Lowry and Ramesh Ponnuru and all the other scions of conservatism who now try to crush the libertarian Ron Paul who has always opposed such collectivist nonsense.

Later, Buckley said that Martin Luther King may have been to blame for his own assassination:

"the cretin who leveled his rifle at the head of Martin Luther King may have absorbed the talk, so freely available, about the supremacy of individual conscience, such talk as Martin Luther King, God rest his troubled and compassionate soul, had so widely and indiscriminately made."

­ (Found in Buckley's 1969 book The Jeweler's Eye)

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

**JP** Daily Quran and Hadith

THE NAME OF "ALLAH"
Assalamu'alaikum Wa Rahmatullah e Wa Barakatuhu,

 

 



 




 

Note : If Quran and Hadith is not viewable CLICK HERE to Read Today Quran and Hadith.



--

Thanks & Best regards,
 
Imran Ilyas
Cell: 00971509483403

****People oppose things because they are ignorant of them****

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

[The_Fair_Forum] CNN Lied. Surprised?



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: P
 

Plop plop fizz fizz, oh what a lier CNN is.....
 
But then again, is that a surprise?
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078343/Raw-footage-shows-Ron-Paul-DIDNT-storm-CNN-interview-racist-newsletters--interview-simply-done.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
 
 

__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group
.....the forum for free & fair debate, Everyone welcome. Hate Obama's health care plan, tell us!
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

<http://us.bc.yahoo.com/b?P=6800472a-2fc8-11e1-94e2-43dc8082a6cf&T=1cc9dj92n%2fX%3d1324907358%2fE%3d1705291755%2fR%3dgroups%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d2.1%2fW%3dH%2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d531014471%2fH%3dY29udGVudD0iRmxpY2tyO1RWO0NhbGVuZGFyO05ld3M7TWFwcztXZWF0aGVyO1NtYWxsX0J1c2luZXNzO0JyaWVmY2FzZTtFZHVjYXRpb247VHJhdmVsOyIgZGlzYWJsZXNodWZmbGluZz0iMSIgc2VydmVJZD0iNjgwMDQ3MmEtMmZjOC0xMWUxLTk0ZTItNDNkYzgwODJhNmNmIiBzaXRlSWQ9IjQ0NTI1NTEiIHRTdG1wPSIxMzI0OTA3MzU4MjY0MzE2IiA-%2fQ%3d-1%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3dAC238962&U=13c7s18t3%2fN%3dMJKwNkoGYnE-%2fC%3d493064.14543979.14562481.13298430%2fD%3dMKP1%2fB%3d6060255%2fV%3d1>
<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif>
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=23857963/grpspId=1705291755/msgId=48749/stime=1324907358/nc1=5758219/nc2=3848627/nc3=4025373>
__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: **JP** WAH WA PPP.

bismillah hirrahman nirrahim
asslamualaikum

really that is sad,i dont know when we will be out of that protocal  and vip culture . in islam  there is no existence of such and so many these things that we have adopted know .

i think we need to follow the islamic values and try to practiclly implement them in our lives in its true sense.

i am very pleased and feeling satisfaction to join the group , you people are doing great job   for not only the muslim community but for every human being as well .

hopefuuly i will continue to receive these email in the future from all the members as well as from muhammad nadeem atta  from saudia arabia.

regards
dr jawad alam.
lahore
2011/12/27 JoinPakistan <joinpakistan@gmail.com>

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

http://daily.urdupoint.com/news_167538_1_5_2011-12-25_2.html

Best Regards,

Muhammad Nadeem Atta

Jubail, Saudi Arabia.

P please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ عِلْمَاً نَافِعَاًً وَرِزْقَاً وَاسِعَاًَ وَشِفَاءً مِنْ كُلِّ دَاءٍ

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

30 Things You Wish You Got For Christmas


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: NDAA, AKA 'Indefinite Citizen Imprisonment w/o Trial Act' is still open to veto

Just in case you missed it:
 
(b) Applicability to United States Citizens and Lawful Resident Aliens-
  (1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
Good Morning.
 
I am genuinely hoping that you will respond to this post.  As a side note, last week, we had Crackpots and Moonbats claiming that this piece of legislation,  (which is renewed every year since 1961, with various modifications)   was setting up camps to imprison American citizens,  (I assume Ron Paul supporters)  until level heads pointed out to these Moonbats and Crackpots that the legislation didn't say anything of the sort.
 
What in particular, are you, and others who oppose this legislation,  opposed to?  Here is the section that you reference, (which by the way, does not say what you claim it says).  I suggest that all of the Moonbats, and all of the Crackpots read the legislation before they listen to other Crackpots and Moonbats, and get their proverbial panties in a wad:
 
 
 

Subtitle D--Counterterrorism

SEC. 1021. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.

    (a) In General- Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the law of war.

    (b) Covered Persons- A covered person under this section is any person as follows:

      (1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.

      (2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.

    (c) Disposition Under Law of War- The disposition of a person under the law of war as described in subsection (a) may include the following:

      (1) Detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.

      (2) Trial under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code (as amended by the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (title XVIII of Public Law 111-84)).

      (3) Transfer for trial by an alternative court or competent tribunal having lawful jurisdiction.

      (4) Transfer to the custody or control of the person's country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity.

    (d) Construction- Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force.

    (e) Authorities- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.

    (f) Requirement for Briefings of Congress- The Secretary of Defense shall regularly brief Congress regarding the application of the authority described in this section, including the organizations, entities, and individuals considered to be `covered persons' for purposes of subsection (b)(2).

SEC. 1022. MILITARY CUSTODY FOR FOREIGN AL-QAEDA TERRORISTS.

    (a) Custody Pending Disposition Under Law of War-

      (1) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in paragraph (4), the Armed Forces of the United States shall hold a person described in paragraph (2) who is captured in the course of hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40) in military custody pending disposition under the law of war.

      (2) COVERED PERSONS- The requirement in paragraph (1) shall apply to any person whose detention is authorized under section 1021 who is determined--

        (A) to be a member of, or part of, al-Qaeda or an associated force that acts in coordination with or pursuant to the direction of al-Qaeda; and

        (B) to have participated in the course of planning or carrying out an attack or attempted attack against the United States or its coalition partners.

      (3) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR- For purposes of this subsection, the disposition of a person under the law of war has the meaning given in section 1021(c), except that no transfer otherwise described in paragraph (4) of that section shall be made unless consistent with the requirements of section 1028.

      (4) WAIVER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY- The President may waive the requirement of paragraph (1) if the President submits to Congress a certification in writing that such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States.

    (b) Applicability to United States Citizens and Lawful Resident Aliens-

      (1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.

      (2) LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to a lawful resident alien of the United States on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States.

    (c) Implementation Procedures-

      (1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall issue, and submit to Congress, procedures for implementing this section.

      (2) ELEMENTS- The procedures for implementing this section shall include, but not be limited to, procedures as follows:

        (A) Procedures designating the persons authorized to make determinations under subsection (a)(2) and the process by which such determinations are to be made.

        (B) Procedures providing that the requirement for military custody under subsection (a)(1) does not require the interruption of ongoing surveillance or intelligence gathering with regard to persons not already in the custody or control of the United States.

        (C) Procedures providing that a determination under subsection (a)(2) is not required to be implemented until after the conclusion of an interrogation which is ongoing at the time the determination is made and does not require the interruption of any such ongoing interrogation.

        (D) Procedures providing that the requirement for military custody under subsection (a)(1) does not apply when intelligence, law enforcement, or other Government officials of the United States are granted access to an individual who remains in the custody of a third country.

        (E) Procedures providing that a certification of national security interests under subsection (a)(4) may be granted for the purpose of transferring a covered person from a third country if such a transfer is in the interest of the United States and could not otherwise be accomplished.

    (d) Authorities- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the existing criminal enforcement and national security authorities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation or any other domestic law enforcement agency with regard to a covered person, regardless whether such covered person is held in military custody.

    (e) Effective Date- This section shall take effect on the date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to persons described in subsection (a)(2) who are taken into the custody or brought under the control of the United States on or after that effective date.

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Constitutional.Reset <constitutional.reset@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, A Very Merry Christmas! The remembrance of close friends in high
places is right on time - We need the guidance, courage and help.
There is lower business that needs attending.

While there is still time, Please ask BHO to veto the H.R.1540, AKA
NDAA & 'Indefinite Citizen Imprisonment w/o Trial Act' legislation for
cause of its provisions not pursuant to our US Constitution in:
"Subtitle D. SEC. 1021 (c)(1)Detention under the law of war without
trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization
for the Use of Military Force" where covered persons are defined by
the administration's assignment of guilty status not by properly
sufficient evidence in a proper civilian court of law - the option to
apply that to US Citizens is retained by omission of the exclusion.
See Subtitle D. SEC. 1022 (b)(1)
===========================
Contact BHO at
http://www.whitehouse.gov/webform/comment-legislation?billname=H.R.+1540+-+National+Defense+Authorization+Act+for+Fiscal+Year+2012
View legislation pending a POTUS signature (non-void) at
http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/pending-legislation
View H.R.1540 at ( http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr1540enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr1540enr.pdf
)
=============================
If not vetoed by BHO please ask your Congressmen to enact due
amendment.

If not vetoed by BHO it may be necessary to promptly attack BHO's void
ab inito standing as POTUS using indictment under state laws and in
state courts. If not vetoed this could not safely wait until after BHO
is selected as 2012's POTUS candidate.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Education of America" group.
To post to this group, send email to the-education-of-america@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to the-education-of-america+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/the-education-of-america?hl=en.



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.