can have their way, but any politician who is swayed by the votes of
such rascals, and who proposes anything socialist or communist for
America will be arrested and hanged for TREASON in short order. No
group influence shall ever be allowed to have more power than one-
person-one vote. And since the most basic structure of the
Constitution is a REPUBLIC, any person advocating changing that must
go the route of adapting a New(er) Constitution, because under the
present Constitution, subverting the Constitution is a treasonable
offense. That goes, especially, for Barack Obama, because he hasn't
supported doing the Will of the People from day one! — J. A.
Armistead — Patriot
>
On Apr 22, 2:17 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Too much Democracy IS socialism/communism.
>
> On Apr 22, 9:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about Belgium. The
> > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had
> > government contracts would shut down; there would be no protected food
> > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would surge; the
> > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would start using
> > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started
> > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA can't
> > survive without some the public order that is provided by well thought-
> > out and agreed-to laws.
>
> > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the masses) laws
> > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient government will
> > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their laws. Our
> > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because Congress
> > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run things.
> > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!! Read my
> > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen,
> > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any government
> > employee or elected official, including the President! — J. A.
> > Armistead — Patriot
>
> > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Onestone,
>
> > > At one full year with no government it is way past the "experimental" stage.
> > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that cares. Just why
> > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause civil war ?? The laws
> > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples needs.
>
> > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be
> > > > in civil war... — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > John,
>
> > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without
> > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national government for more than
> > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make much
> > > > > of a difference in their daily lives."
>
> > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra-
> > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
> > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
> > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
> > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative
> > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
> > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" of
> > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is
> > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead �
> > > > Patriot
> > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> John,
>
> > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> > > > > >> questions posed to you.)
>
> > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I
> > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government.
> > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on
> > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. �
> > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution.
> > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system
> > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government
> > > > should
> > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even
> > > > ask
> > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5%
> > > > are
> > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. Armistead
> > > > �
> > > > > >>>>> Patriot
> > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>> John,
> > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites
> > > > based
> > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your
> > > > > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of
> > > > expression means.
> > > > > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm
> > > > to the
> > > > > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems
> > > > > >>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull
> > > > off this
> > > > > >>>>>> tremendous task?
> > > > > >>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> > > > > >>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California.
> > > > > >>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are
> > > > very
> > > > > >>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from
> > > > the
> > > > > >>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> > > > > >>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on
> > > > moderation
> > > > > >>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be
> > > > killed?
> > > > > >>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who
> > > > kill
> > > > > >>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> > > > > >>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> > > > > >>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has
> > > > caused
> > > > > >>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person
> > > > who
> > > > > >>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> > > > > >>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government
> > > > and
> > > > > >>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard
> > > > arrested,
> > > > > >>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution
> > > > for
> > > > > >>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> > > > > >>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's
> > > > viewed
> > > > > >>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you
> > > > are so
> > > > > >>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> > > > > >>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some
> > > > couch-
> > > > > >>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> > > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Einstein,
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the
> > > > present, or
> > > > > >>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the
> > > > standard
> > > > > >>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> > > > > >>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US
> > > > law.
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> > > > > >>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of
> > > > "reasoning" in
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why
> > > > Jews
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be
> > > > such
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for
> > > > successful
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds
> > > > Muslims
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> feel.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that
> > > > the USA
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?)
> > > > saying
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my
> > > > New
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.
> > > > If you
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm
> > > > saying,
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New
> > > > Constitution has
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.
> > > > The last
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted
> > > > heads
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for
> > > > the 85%
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become
> > > > available.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as
> > > > part of
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why
> > > > this
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed
> > > > things
> > > > > >>>>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A.
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment