Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Re: Guess people are wising up

They still have newscasts?

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:06 AM, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
   Note that ABC and CBS even newscasts hit new low ratings


   http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/romenesko/125721/piers-morgan-has-most-watched-cnn-show-in-q1/

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Obama Names George W Bush Top Advisor On Libya









CAP News
Obama Names George W Bush Top Advisor On Libya
Obama Names George W Bush Top Advisor On Libya
Bush tries to figure out where Libya is while Obama convinces his chief of staff he knows what he's doing.

WASHINGTON (CAP) - Faced with mounting criticism over his decision to commit American troops to the international military action against Moammar Gadhafi in Libya, President Barack Obama has tapped former President George W. Bush to serve as his primary advisor on the conflict.

"We are assigning U.S. forces to a dangerous mission in a Muslim nation that poses no real threat to us, but whose instability could mire us in an expensive, pointless conflict for years to come," said Obama. "I though, who knows more about that than President Bush?"

Bush, reached by CAP News at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, admitted he was surprised when he first got the call.

"But that's mainly because when Laura said Obama was on the phone, I got him mixed up with Osama again," said Bush, chuckling. "When I first retired, [Bin Laden] used to call and taunt me sometimes ... Still want me dead or alive, you dumb infidel? - that kind of thing. But it turned out to be [former White House press secretary] Scotty McClellan trying to gaslight me."

But Bush said he was more than happy to heed the current president's call, saying he's already offered Obama some advice on the situation in Libya.

"For one thing, I would have declared Mission Accomplished days ago," said Bush. "Then I would have gone on vacation for a few weeks, you know, just to keep everybody distracticated."

Bush also advised Obama to start wearing a flight suit whenever possible. "A nice green one with the belts and straps and all the doohickeys," said Bush. "America loves doohickeys."

He then added, "I still wear mine around the ranch sometimes and give the cattle little inspirational decitations. We have seen the end of major grazing operations! That kind of thing."

Bush's appointment as an Obama advisor has prompted criticism from some quarters, however, including from another former president, Bill Clinton.

"People don't seem to remember that President Bush grossly mishandled the Iraq war, and is on record as having completely forgotten about it for a period of several months during his presidency," noted Clinton. "And he's been a huge disappointment to his father, my best friend."

"Well, I might have asked President Clinton to advise me, but the last time he accompanied the secretary of state to Libya he wound up disappearing for hours with Mr. Gadhafi's Ukrainian nurse," noted President Obama, adding that Clinton's suggestion that Gadhafi and his nurse might want to take part in his bi-partisan nude summit didn't help matters.

"I'm confident that President Bush's unique experience will help us move in the right direction in Libya," Obama continued. "For instance, when he was in office he was very decisive, whereas naming him an advisor is the only actual decision I've made in months."

"I'm just hoping if I do a good job, Obama'll make me commissioner of baseball," said Bush, apparently unaware that team owners appoint the commissioner, despite the fact that he once owned the Texas Rangers.

"Well, I was more of a figurehead when it came to the Rangers," Bush said when confronted. "Dick Cheney made most of the decisions."
CAUGHT ON FILM
Sarah Palin supporters: they have conviction, if nothing else.
FROM THE VAULT
Sadr City Disneyland On Hold
March 05, 2007

TO UNSUBSCRIBE, HIT REPLY AND ASK TO BE REMOVED FROM FUTURE MAILINGS.


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Governor Rick Scott's Kabuki Dance with the Muslim Brotherhood in Tallahassee

When you "Dance with muzzies" you don't "Tiptoe through the tulips."







The Iconoclast

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

Governor Rick Scott's Kabuki Dance with the Muslim Brotherhood in Tallahassee

 

by Jerry Gordon

 

http://www.newenglishreview.org/images/clear.gif

 

Florida Governor Rick Scott

It was the third annual Florida Muslim Capitol Day in Tallahassee organized by ex-Tampa CAIR director, Egyptian-born Ahmed Bedier, former spokesperson for convicted terror supporter Sami al Arian, and founder of United Voices for America (UVA). There were Florida National Guardsmen armed with sub-machine guns patrolling the courtyard of the Capitol Rotunda building. Unlike last year there was relative calm this year.

Last year Joe Kaufman of Americans Against Hate and The United West (TUW) videographer, J. Mark Campbell were involved in separate assaults and battery by a Muslim professor at Florida Atlantic University and Islamic Center of Boca Raton leader, Bassem Abdo Alhalabi on Florida Muslim capitol day on March 11, 2010. Alhalabi was a research assistant of convicted felon Sami al Arian, a former computer science Professor at the University of South Florida convicted of raising funds for Palestinian terrorist group, Islamic Jihad. Professor Alhalabi pled guilty to the assault and battery charges against Kaufman and Campbell in a Tallahassee court decision in February, 2011.

This year on Florida Muslim Capitol day, Bedier got an endorsement from Governor Rick Scott. This despite evidence that Rich Swier in a Red County article "Florida Muslim Brotherhood Organizes Muslim Capitol Day" portrayed Bedier's "two faces" –speaking about grass roots democracy in both Florida and Egypt while advancing the Muslim Brotherhood's green flag. Bedier, according to Swier, wants Democracy for the Muslim Brotherhood and not for the rest of us.

Scott may have been under the influence of a Muslim sympathizer and noted conservative, Grover Norquist.  Red-bearded Norquist was seen frequently on Governor Scott's campaign bus during the 2010 gubernatorial election campaign in Florida. Norquist is the doyenne of Conservative lobbyists on Washington's, K-street. He is viewed by many as the architect of the Bush tax cuts.   He was instrumental in inviting Washington conservative Muslim American Lawyer and former Congressional aide Suhail Kahn to join the American Conservative Union (ACU) board.  ACU sponsors the annual, well attended, Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington; a must stop for GOP Presidential candidates and conservative icons. Suhail Kahn in a video answer to TUW activist J. Mark Campbell's question at the 2011 CPAC said that "Sharia doesn't exist in America".

For whatever reason today Governor Scott chose to do a 'Kabuki dance' with Bedier and his UVA contingent while stiff arming  anti-Sharia activists  organized  by the newly formed  TUW organization led by Tom Trento of the Florida Security Council.  24 TUC activists showed up, including six teenagers, in Tallahassee to distribute information about the activist group and materials in support of the Florida versions of the "American Laws for American Courts", SB 1294 and HB 1217.  Earlier in the day, several TUC activists approached the Governor's office and inquired whether he would meet with Bedier and several hundred UVA supporters.  They were informed that nothing was listed on his appointment scheduled.  However, later he did show up at the UVA meeting.

TUW activist and videographer J. Mark Campbell approached Governor Scott three times following the meeting with Bedier and specifically asked him why he was meeting with a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood and the revolution in Egypt. Scott simply opined, send me your information.  Campbell noted to this writer, "either Scott is totally ignorant or he is complicit". Or was this part of Governor Scott's 'kabuki dance' with the Muslim Brotherhood, without revealing his cards.

We interviewed several TUW activists who were present at the Bedier encounter with Governor Scott.  Here were their impressions of what occurred.

What Bedier said to the roughly 200 or more UVA attendees and 20 TUW activists to the gathering.  The UVA meeting was held in a room on the 22nd floor of the office building adjacent to the Capitol rotunda in Tallahassee.  TUW activists spoke  of constantly being hassling and their pictures taken by security people at the UVA meeting. Some were threatened with being ejected.  TUW event coordinator Alan Kornman was told to leave the public area by a Capitol police officer who previously told him that his presence was a disruption. Kornman complied, but then later returned. TWU videographer, Campbell wasd also ordered to leave but refused. Capitol police later agreed with Campbell's right to stay.

Bedier  told his audience that American Muslims had to become empowered by entering into the political process and standing for elective office.  On specific initiatives this year he focused on their opposition to the Florida  Senateand House anti-Sharia bills, sic 'American Laws for American Courts' legislation, as an affront to their dignity and freedom of worship as American Muslims. Bedier argued that undocumented aliens should not be subject to criminal prosecution and their children permitted to attend public universities. That was a reference to Florida HB 55 introduced by  State Rep. Bullard exempting so-called undocumented students from paying non-resident tuition in the Florida College System. That fit Bedier's portrayal of undocumented aliens as impoverished immigrants. 

Gov. Scott spoke about his themes from election campaign: jobs, reducing taxes and attracting business to the Sunshine state. He did not endorse their anti- anti-Sharia and pro undocumented aliens stands.   While he did pose for a group picture,  and a picture with Bedier who blocked the Governor's exit. When the governor  was asked by a TWU activist later why he made the appearance at the UVA event, he answered that he was just doing his job.

Following his departure and the conclusion of the UVA meetings, Governor Scott held a press conference at which J. Mark Campbell posed his questions about the UVA Muslim Brotherhood connections that received no good answers.

Bedier will clearly use the pictures as evidence of an endorsement by Governor Scott.  We can visualize the Governor's media minder  spinning  the argument that he was simply making a courtesy stop with his 'constituents'  visiting the State Capitol

TUW activists present on Florida Muslim Capitol Day said that there were not as many people present as were at last year's event. Moreover, there were not many young people with the exception of a couple with two small children used as props for supporting 'education' aid. The usual assortment of women swathed in head covering were present including an American convert to Islam.  Bedier said the UVA gathering was evidence of Muslims in Floridagaining power and that they should smile at opponents and act superior. Because they represent a superior culture, or so they believe. 

I found the interview with the teenage  TUW volunteer to be precious and an uplifting experience.  She was compelled to come  along with her Godmother, becauseshewas concerned about women being oppressed and denied equal rights under Sharia.  She commented that it was an empowering experience for her and the other young people who came to the TWU- sponsored event because they got to see how government works and how advocacy can affect outcomes. She is 17 and will be off to college next year with the intent of possibly entering the law.  She was articulate and thoughtful -a harbinger of the next generation of activists in the TUW "boots on the ground" mold.

It would appear that she knows more about the subject of Sharia and the Muslim Brotherhood than does Governor Scott who appears to have struck a Hogan's Heroes Sgt Schultz pose saying "I know nothing".  But then it's all politics, right?

 





--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Obama Raises American Hypocrisy to a Higher Level


Obama Raises American Hypocrisy to a Higher Level
by Paul Craig Roberts

What does the world think? Obama has been using air strikes and drones against civilians in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and probably Somalia. In his March 28 speech, Obama justified his air strikes against Libya on the grounds that the embattled ruler, Gadhafi, was using air strikes to put down a rebellion.

Gadhafi has been a black hat for as long as I can remember. If we believe the adage that "where there is smoke there is fire," Gadhafi is probably not a nice fellow. However, there is no doubt whatsoever that the current US president and the predecessor Bush/Cheney regime have murdered many times more people in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia than Gadhafi has murdered in Libya.

Moreover, Gadhafi is putting down a rebellion against state authority as presently constituted, but Obama and Bush/Cheney initiated wars of aggression based entirely on lies and deception.

Yet Gadhafi is being demonized, and Bush/Cheney/Obama are sitting on their high horse draped in cloaks of morality. Obama described himself as saving Libyans from violence while Obama himself murders Afghans, Pakistanis, and whomever else.

Indeed, the Obama regime has been torturing a US soldier, Bradley Manning, for having a moral conscience. America has degenerated to the point where having a moral conscience is evidence of anti-Americanism and "terrorist activity."

The Bush/Cheney/Obama wars of naked aggression have bankrupted America. Joseph Stiglitz, former chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers, concluded that the money wasted on the Iraq war could have been used to fix America's Social Security problem for half a century. Instead, the money was used to boost the obscene profits of the armament industry.

The obscene wars of aggression, the obscene profits of the offshoring corporations, and the obscene bailouts of the rich financial gangsters have left the American public with annual budget deficits of approximately $1.5 trillion. These deficits are being covered by printing money. Sooner or later, the printing presses will cause the US dollar to collapse and domestic inflation to explode. Social Security benefits will be wiped out by inflation rising more rapidly than the cost-of-living adjustments. If America survives, no one will be left but the mega-rich. Unless there is a violent revolution.

Alternatively, if the Federal Reserve puts the brake on monetary expansion, interest rates will rise, sending the economy into a deeper depression.

Washington, focused on its newest war, is oblivious to America's peril. As Stiglitz notes, the costs of the Iraq war alone could have kept every foreclosed family in their home, provided health care for every American child, and wiped out the student loans of graduates who cannot find jobs because they have been outsoured to foreigners. However, the great democratic elected government of "the world's only superpower" prefers to murder Muslims in order to enhance the profits of the military/security complex. More money is spent violating the constitutional rights of American air travelers than is spent in behalf of the needy.

The moral authority of the West is rapidly collapsing. When Russia, Asia, and South America look at Europe, Australia and Canada, they see American puppet states that contribute troops to the aggressive wars of the Empire. The French president, the British prime minister, the "president" of Georgia, and the rest are merely functionaries of the American Empire. The puppet rulers routinely sell out the interests and welfare of their peoples in behalf of American hegemony. And they are well rewarded for their service. One year out of office former British prime minister Tony Blair had a net worth of $30 million.

In his war against Libya, Obama has taken America one step further into Caesarism. Obama did Bush one step better and did not even bother to get congressional authorization for his attack on Libya. Obama claimed that his moral authority trumped the US Constitution. The hypocrisy reeks. How the public stands it, I do not know:

"To brush aside America's responsibility as a leader and – more profoundly – our responsibilities to our fellow human beings under such circumstances would have been a betrayal of who we are. Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different. And as president, I refused to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action."

This from the Great Moral Leader who every day murders civilians in Afghanistan and Pakistan and Yemen and Somalia and now Libya and who turns a blind eye when "the great democracy in the Middle East," Israel, murders more Palestinians.

The American president, whose drones and air force slaughter civilians every day of the year went on to say Libya stands alone in presenting the world with "the prospect of violence on a horrific scale." Obviously, Obama thinks that one million dead Iraqis, four million displaced Iraqis, and an unknown number of murdered Afghans is just a small thing.

The rest of Obama's speech showed a person more capable of DoubleSpeak and DoubleThink than Big Brother and the denizens of George Orwell's 1984.

How does a person as totally absurd as Obama expect to be taken seriously?


http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts03292011.html

Re: Obama To Set Goal of One-Third Cut in Oil Imports

Ta Dah!

Bush stimulus bad. Ramp it up

Bush bailout bad. Buy 61% of GM

Bush TARP bad. Ramp it up

Bush Surge bad. Ramp it up.

Bush Faith Based Initiative bad, sorry illegal and unconstitutional.
. Ramp it up FIVE HUNDRED PERCENT!!!

Bush wiretapping bad. Vote to EXPAND as senator and ramp up as POTUS
like nothing any Bush ever dreamed of

Its all good, cuz he has a D next to his name.

He is more Bush, that BUSH!!!!

On Mar 30, 12:09 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> And of course whatever he says is something you can depend on - if he
> states something you can take it to the bank that he will back it up - /sarc
>
> I wonder how many people link up what he says to what he does.  I note
> that most academics never do. They follow what he says and ignore
> everything else from what I can see online.  How about the general
> public.  Other than the Tea Partiers, the rest of the population seems
> to have the memory span of a small gnat who is already old.
>
> On 03/30/2011 11:54 AM, GregfromBoston wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Why would he start doing something to help the US!"
>
> > Because he said, emphatically, that he would.  TWICE now.  Nukies too!
>
> > On Mar 30, 11:37 am, dick thompson<rhomp2...@earthlink.net>  wrote:
> >> No, but he is prepared to give billions to Brazil and the Soros
> >> supported Brazilian oil industry and let them drill all they want - and
> >> right off the coast of the USA close to where we already have an oil
> >> industry.  Why would he start doing something to help the US!
>
> >> On 03/30/2011 09:56 AM, GregfromBoston wrote:
>
> >>> "The administration is not prepared to open new public lands and
> >>> waters to drilling"
> >>> Really?
> >>> He said he was.  TWICE!
> >>> On Mar 30, 9:30 am, MJ<micha...@america.net>    wrote:
> >>>> Obama To Set Goal of One-Third Cut in Oil Imports"Mr. Obama will propose a mix of measures, none of them new, to help the nation cut down on its thirst for oil. He will point out the nation's tendency, since the first Arab oil embargo in 1973, to panic when gas prices rise and then fall back into old gas-guzzling habits when they recede. . . .
> >>>> The administration is not prepared to open new public lands and waters to drilling, officials said, but will use a new set of incentives and penalties to prod industry to develop resources on the lands they already have access to." (New York Times)Panic or prices guess which one the State prefers.Let's Not Be Energy IndependentDavid R. Henderson
> >>>> October 2008 • Volume: 58 • Issue: 8 •
> >>>> "Energy independence" is a term that sounds good but falls apart on closer examination. Although the United States could achieve energy independence, we could do so only at an enormous cost. Energy "dependence" is much cheaper and much more desirable.
> >>>> Before considering the costs and benefits of energy independence, I should define my terms. What is energy independence? Various advocates and analysts have proposed various definitions, but two come up again and again. The first is that a country is energy independent if it is self-sufficient -- that is, if it imports no energy from any other country. The second is that a country is energy independent if changes in world energy markets have no effect on that country's price of energy. The first definition is more commonly used.
> >>>> Although I could consider the issue of energy independence abstractly, it is more illuminating to examine it in the context of the actual U.S. economy. And I'll focus on the major form of energy for which many Americans want independence: oil.
> >>>> Currently, the United States uses about 20 million barrels per day (mbd) of oil and petroleum products and imports about 60 percent -- or 12 mbd -- of that. The most straightforward way to reduce imports to zero would be to ban imports or to impose a stiff tariff on oil designed to reduce imports to zero. With 12 mbd gone from the U.S. daily supply, there would be only eight mbd to serve consumers who were accustomed to using 20. A substantial rise in price would result. As it rose, the amount demanded would fall and the amount supplied domestically would rise. The price would increase until the two were equal.
> >>>> How high would the price have to go? The honest answer is that no one knowseven the most seasoned, informed energy economist. The reason is that to compute the new equilibrium price, one would have to know the elasticities of supply and demand -- that is, the measures of sensitivity to price changes of the amount supplied and demanded. We have reasonable measures of those elasticities for the range of prices of oil that we are used to. But the current price of oil (about $125 per barrel at this writing) is, even adjusted for inflation, above that usual range, and so we know little about elasticities at that price or above.
> >>>> Yet, even if the elasticities of supply and demand were each as high as 1 (they are generally thought to be much less than that)so that a 1-percent increase in price would lead to a 1-percent increase in quantity supplied and a 1-percent decrease in quantity demandedit would still take a price increase of at least 40 percent to equate the amount supplied domestically to the amount demanded. That would imply a price of over $180 per barrel. And few economists believe that the elasticities of demand and supply are as high as 1. The lower they are, the higher the price must go to equate the domestic amount supplied to the amount demanded. It would probably go to over $200 per barrel.
> >>>> This means that to be self-sufficient in oil, Americans would have to pay in excess of $180 a barrel when, instead, they could be "dependent" on other countries' supplies and pay the world market price of $125. That's not a good deal for Americans. To put it in terms that everyone who drives a car understands, a $180-per-barrel price of oil would increase the price of gasoline by about $1.20 a gallon (the $50 increase in price divided by 42 gallons to the barrel).Comparative Advantage and DependenceEnergy "dependence" is much cheaper. In fact, the case for being "dependent" on other countries for oil is the same as the case for being dependent on other countries for bananas or coffee. At some tariff-protected price, the United States could be self-sufficient in bananas or coffee. If the price were high enough, someone would grow bananas and coffee plants in greenhouses. But why would we want that? Why would we want to pay more for coffee and bananas than we need to? Another way of saying that we would pay more is that we would give up more of our resources (capital, labor, and land) to have domestic bananas and coffee than we now give up by producing other things with these resources and using the proceeds to buy coffee and bananas more cheaply abroad. We would be poorer. The reasoning doesn't change when the good is oil. By preventing people from importing oil, either with a ban on imports or a tariff on oil, the government would make us poorer.
> >>>> Or think of it another way. Do you ever take your shirts to the local cleaner to be washed? If so, you are "dependent" on the cleaner. You could wash your shirts yourself, but you don't. The reason you don't is that your time is more valuably used producing other things, some of which you sell, and using some of the proceeds to pay the cleaner.
> >>>> Moreover, think about the word "dependence." The image the word creates is of a poor, helpless waif. I picture Oliver Twist in the musical Oliver, who after eating a meager amount of food, says, "Please, sir, I want some more." But U.S. consumers of oil are not poor, helpless waifs seeking the good will of oil-producing nations that are giving us oil out of kindness. Rather, they sell us the oil. We "need" the oil and they "need" the money. To the extent that dependence exists, it is mutual. International trade in oil is just that: trade. Since both sides gain from trade, each is therefore "dependent" on the other. Producers of oil are dependent on the dollars, euros, and yen that buy the oil. This fact is commonly recognized when the topic is U.S. exports; many Americans worry that we don't export enough because they want our exporters to earn money from people in other countries. In other words, they see that our exporters need the dollars, yen, and euros that they earn on their exports. But, somehow, they fail to see that this is true of foreign exporters too. Exporters in the Middle East, Venezuela, and Canada need the income from exporting oil. "Dependence on foreign oil," because it is so one-sidedly misleading, is a term that belongs in the dustbin of history.
> >>>> But isn't it important to avoid depending on oil when so much of it is produced in the politically unstable Middle East? It would be nice if the Middle East were less unstable. But whoever is in charge of the oil wants to produce it to make money. So, it matters little, from the viewpoint of oil supply, which particular tyrant runs which particular oil-producing country.Dependence and Government OwnershipIt is true, and troublesome, that the world oil industry is largely a government-run industry with all the problems that accompany government enterprisehigh cost, slow reaction times, little innovation, and so on. And it would be nice if governments in Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, Britain, Norway, and Canada denationalized their oil supplies. But until that happens, it's still better to pay the lower price that producers in the world market charge rather than the higher price that would result from "independence."
> >>>> Some people worry that a government in a major oil-producing country -- Saudi Arabia, for example -- might get upset at the U.S. government and take it out on Americans by refusing to sell us oil. But such a selective embargo is bound to fail. Imagine that Saudi Arabia cuts oil exports to the United States, but maintains total exports. Then it must sell these suddenly freed-up oil supplies somewhere else. Let's say that it ships the additional oil to buyers in China. Then those buyers will want to buy that much less oil from their old suppliers. Presto! The American buyers' problems are solved because they can get this oil.
> >>>> In short, when the government of one country tries to selectively target people in another country, but still wishes to maintain output, it cannot succeed. The
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

London USED Clothing Store !

eMarketing by Connect Marketing Services (354,891 Email Addresses - 98% All Over Pakistan)



This email is Broadcast by a marketing company "Connect Marketing Services". If you no longer
wish to receive promotion emails, please click to unsubscribe. For customer service inquiry please email or call us.
We are not responsible for any commitment made by the advertiser. Connect Marketing Services will be fully responsible for this activity only.
 
©2011 Connect Marketing Services -All rights reserved. Terms and Prices are subject to change.

Send Gifts to Your Clients and Boost your Business!


eMarketing by Connect Marketing Services (354,891 Email Addresses - 98% All Over Pakistan)




This email is Broadcast by a marketing company "Connect Marketing Services". If you no longer
wish to receive promotion emails, please click to unsubscribe. For customer service inquiry please email or call us.
We are not responsible for any commitment made by the advertiser. Connect Marketing Services will be fully responsible for this activity only.
 
©2011 Connect Marketing Services -All rights reserved. Terms and Prices are subject to change.

Purell Can Help You Kill Up To 99.99% Germs

eMarketing by Connect Marketing Services (354,891 Email Addresses - 98% All Over Pakistan)



This email is Broadcast by a marketing company "Connect Marketing Services". If you no longer
wish to receive promotion emails, please click to unsubscribe. For customer service inquiry please email or call us.
We are not responsible for any commitment made by the advertiser. Connect Marketing Services will be fully responsible for this activity only.
 
©2011 Connect Marketing Services -All rights reserved. Terms and Prices are subject to change.

PJTV on the Obama Speech - well worth watching

http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=105&load=5170

Darfur, anyone!!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Does Obama's meddling in the Middle East uprisings mean he is in cahoots with Iran?

He is in cahoots with anything and anybody that hates America.


Does Obama's meddling in the Middle East uprisings mean he is in cahoots with Iran?

barenakedislam | March 29, 2011 at 8:16 PM | Categories: EnemyWithin-foreign | URL: http://wp.me/peHnV-rJf

New evidence has emerged that the Iranian government sees the current turmoil and upheavals in the Middle East as a signal that the Mahdi--or Islamic messiah--is about to appear. CBN NEWS - has obtained a never-before-seen video produced by the Iranian regime that says all the signs are moving into place -- and that Iran will [...]

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Barack Hussein Obama is the iPresident

"I" as in the letter that follows "SH" and comes before "T" in describing what he actually is.


Barack Hussein Obama is the iPresident

Scotty Starnes | March 29, 2011 at 8:31 PM | Tags: iPresident, President Obama | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-4TW

The iPresident...a broke model of an inept community organizer.

I guess Obama never learned there is no "I" in TEAM. The iPresident used his favorite pronoun, "I," 25 times during his speech on Libya.

Americans are still waiting for the day Obama says "I am responsible for making things worse" followed by "I resign." This will never happen because Obama is a narcissist.

America will have to suffer for another 2-years with the iPresident. In 2012, we can exchange the current iPresident for a newer, more sleek version with lots of apps and experience.

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.