Monday, April 25, 2011

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Mark: The main standard of fairness is: "Do unto others as you would
have them do unto you." And if all government employees and public
officials obey this mandate, there will be few problems: "Fair play
and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA!" — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 22, 2:15 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your absolute ignorance of what does and does not work in the world
> (especially Belgium) is beaming brightly with that answer. Without the
> examples to follow and those not to follow it is quite impossible to create
> any form of government that has a prayer of working.
>
> As to the obvious disregard for idea exchange whether it be by a group or an
> individual with their representative in government .... good luck with that.
> I have an unalienable right to speak to whom I please on any subject I
> please, both corporately and individually. I have an absolute and undeniable
> right to protect my interests in any format and in any country I so choose.
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:41 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On average, yes they are!  Few in Belgium look to government for
> > handouts.  In the USA, close to 45% want a government handout.
> > Anything over 5% is excessive.  But that's why I've written my New
> > Constitution—to get government out of the hand-out, pull-the-strings
> > business!   —  John A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > On Apr 21, 9:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> > > So, you're saying the People of Belgium are better People than those in
> > > the United States?
>
> > > > J. Ashley:  Run your experiments in Belgium, then!  The USA would be
> > > > in civil war...   � J. A. A. �
> > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >> John,
>
> > > >> It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without
> > > >> government. Belgium has been without a national government for more
> > than
> > > >> 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make
> > much
> > > >> of a difference in their daily lives."
>
> > > >> On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > >>> Jonathan:  You are showing some smarts there!  Since I am an untra-
> > > >>> conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
> > > >>> because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal.  I
> > > >>> deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
> > > >>> opposite.  If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative
> > > >>> than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
> > > >>> within one month of there being no government(s).  So, your "ideal"
> > of
> > > >>> no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth.  Is
> > > >>> having you "get real" too much to ask?  ï¿½  J. A. Armistead �
> >  Patriot
> > > >>> On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>> John,
> > > >>>> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> > > >>>> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> > > >>>> questions posed to you.)
> > > >>>> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > >>>>> Jonathan:  For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist.  I
> > > >>>>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning
> > government.
> > > >>>>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on
> > > >>>>> your own.  ï¿½  J. A. A. �
> > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution.
> > > >>>>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> Jonathan:  Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist
> > system
> > > >>>>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government
> > should
> > > >>>>>>> control everything (with him in charge).  The fact that you even
> > ask
> > > >>>>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> > > >>>>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are.  The remaining 5%
> > are
> > > >>>>>>> just stupid.  You're in both of those groups.  ï¿½ J. A.
> > Armistead �
> > > >>>>>>> Patriot
> > > >>>>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com
>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> John,
> > > >>>>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades
> > websites based
> > > >>>>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about
> > your
> > > >>>>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of
> > expression means.
> > > >>>>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm
> > to the
> > > >>>>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler"
> > seems
> > > >>>>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull
> > off this
> > > >>>>>>>> tremendous task?
> > > >>>>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> Dear Mark:  I own Google stock.  It's an American multinational
> > > >>>>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California.
> >  Google
> > > >>>>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well.  In many ways you are
> > very
> > > >>>>>>>>> naive.  Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from
> > the
> > > >>>>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who
> > commit
> > > >>>>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence.  Would you put on
> > moderation
> > > >>>>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be
> > killed?
> > > >>>>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who
> > kill
> > > >>>>>>>>> their citizens?  Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> > > >>>>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of
> > jobs
> > > >>>>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies.  He has
> > caused
> > > >>>>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person
> > who
> > > >>>>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> > > >>>>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense.  Those in our
> > government and
> > > >>>>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard
> > arrested,
> > > >>>>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the
> > Constitution for
> > > >>>>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy.  Keith suggested that you,
> > > >>>>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive".  He's
> > viewed
> > > >>>>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before.  As for me, I suspect you
> > are so
> > > >>>>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having
> > a
> > > >>>>>>>>> better government.  That means you have schizophrenia.  Get
> > some couch-
> > > >>>>>>>>> time, Mark.  You need it!  ï¿½  J. A. Armistead �  Patriot
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>
> >        wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Einstein,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the
> > present, or
> > > >>>>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the
> > standard
> > > >>>>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it.
> > It
> > > >>>>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US
> > law.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> > > >>>>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their
> > law(s).
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
> >      wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Dear Keith:  I sensed that there was a common thread of
> > "reasoning" in
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining
> > why Jews
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be
> > such
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> nice people.  Israel should become a training place for
> > successful
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> capitalism.  Only the latter can start to heal the deep
> > wounds Muslims
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> feel.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that
> > the USA
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> is skating on?"  There was a message (Mark's responsibility?)
> > saying
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say.  Of course that in
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my
> > New
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.
> >  If you
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm
> > saying,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New
> > Constitution has
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> now  been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.
> >  The last
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted
> > heads
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> with, first hand.  Once people begin showing appreciation for
> > the 85%
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become
> > available.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> But NOT on this forum.  The full document will be presented
> > as part of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for
> > why this
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now.  You guys can help
> > speed things
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET.  ï¿½ John A.
> > Armistead �
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Patriot
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com>
> >          wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey John!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,
> >  Mark  and MJ are
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise
> > and one of them
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack
> > Literal Truth might
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next
> > missive!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<
> > noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay tuned, People!  Tomorrow I will write you another
> > essay
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our
> > political-governmental
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic
> > resources,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> or otherwise stupid.  ï¿½  John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
> >          wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and
> > fix-up.  The
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> present
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment