Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Re: Is This Obama's Birth Certificate From Mombasa, Kenya?

This is very simply just more anti-American Reich wing nut birther
false smear crap.


On 2/1/11, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashleyii@lavabit.com> wrote:
> *I'm just posting the link. You decide.
> *
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *
> Is This Obama's Birth Certificate From Mombasa, Kenya?
> http://rense.com/general92/birthcert.htm
>
> *
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *As noted on the website, "This story has been shredded by Snopes.
> However, in the interest of reporting the full scope of what is being
> discussed and displayed online, we post the following story. 1-31-11"
>
> *
> *--
> "Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state becomes lawless
> or corrupt."
> - Mahatma Gandhi
>
> What act of civil disobedience did you perform today?
>
> **For less than the cost of one hour with most lawyers, you can learn
> how to control judges and lawyers
> <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> yourself!*
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

What Is Happening In Egypt Is Not Our Business

Gee Maw! There is still one sane person working for a major media outlet. Who'da thunk it?

What Is Happening In Egypt Is Not Our Business
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peteroborne/100073950/what-is-happening-in-egypt-is-not-our-business/

Peter Osborne writes:

The United States, Britain and our allies have an atrocious record in the Middle East. We have consistently given our support to a series of despotic, murdering, torturing regimes including Egypt, Tunisia and, for a long time, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. These eruptions in the Middle East present a moral challenge to Western governments. There is no question that we will feel very tempted to try and control events and maintain regimes which, however morally loathsome, are seen as sympathetic to the West.

We must resist that temptation. The future of Egypt, Tunisia and other Middle Eastern countries is not up to us. Over the coming days we are likely to hear from a number of commentators who will claim that we must intervene in order to prevent victory for "international Islam" or some other bogeyman. It is very very important that we ignore these voices.

Remember the example of Algeria, where in 1991 an Islamic movement secured victory in democratic elections. The West refused to accept the result and, as a consequence, plunged that country into a decade of civil war in which more than 160,000 people were killed.

The lesson is straightforward: that America, Britain, France and other Western countries do not have a legitimate role in determining what kind of government Egypt and other countries around the world choose for themselves.
--
"'My country, right or wrong' is a thing that no patriot would think of saying except in a desperate case. It is like saying 'My mother, drunk or sober.'"
- Gilbert Keith Chesterton

For less than the cost of one hour with most lawyers, you can learn how to control judges and lawyers yourself!

Re: Tommy, on notice !!!

If the shoe fits, 'Lil Keithie Keith.

On 2/1/11, Keith In Köln <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, well if the term, "NoBama" is not gonna be tolerated, then the term,
> "Reich Wing"; "Orange Boner"; "Grand Obstructionist Party"; (or any
> derivations thereof) "Tea Baggers"; and all of your other hateful monikers
> must stop Lil' Tommie!!
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> NoMarkie-
>>
>> Calling the Preident Of The United States "Nobama" is offensibve and
>> anti-american.
>>
>> I hereby place YOU on notice that such behavior will not be tolerated.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/1/11, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Tommy,
>> >
>> > You have today alone responded to various posts using the identical
>> > phrase from Mr. Frankilin and nothing more.
>> >
>> > Continued activity such as this is considered SPAM. This is your
>> > second notice. Further similar acts such as this will be reason to
>> > place you on moderation and I will cull what is and what is not
>> > pertinent to a discussion.
>> >
>> > Just like Nobama says (but does not do), I believe in transparency.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >
>> > * Visit our other community at
>> > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> Have a great day,
>> Tommy
>>
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at
>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Should We Ban Walking While Wired? The Nanny State Targets Hand-Held Gadgets

"Making laws is a bit like being a pedestrian: It's important to know when to go, but also when to stop."

Should We Ban Walking While Wired? The Nanny State Targets Hand-Held Gadgets
http://reason.com/archives/2011/01/31/should-we-ban-walking-while-wi
--
"I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub."
- Grover Norquist

For less than the cost of one hour with most lawyers, you can learn how to control judges and lawyers yourself!

Re: If you are at all political, this is must reading along with the court decision

So, Markie Mark, are you now the self proclaimed group DICTATOR?


I find you officious, negative isulting post to be highly offensive,
and I will not stand for it.


On 2/1/11, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tommy,
>
> Posting the SAME supposed response (and nothing more) on several
> different strings is SPAM.... this is your SECOND warning. Further
> actions such as these will mandate your moderation and I will cull
> what is and is not appropriate.
>
> On Feb 1, 8:25 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ‎"Half a truth is often a great lie." ~Benjamin Franklin
>>
>> On 2/1/11, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >http://libertypundits.net/article/judge-vinson-strikes-down-obamacare...
>> > <http://libertypundits.net/article/judge-vinson-strikes-down-obamacare...>
>>
>> > Melissah Clouthier is live blogging her reading of the court decision
>> > and explaining it.
>>
>> >http://libertypundits.net/article/judge-vinson-strikes-down-obamacare...
>> > <http://libertypundits.net/article/judge-vinson-strikes-down-obamacare...>
>>
>> > and here is the ruling itself:
>>
>> >http://www.scribd.com/doc/47905955/Vinson-opinion
>>
>> > --
>> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --
>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> Have a great day,
>> Tommy
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Didn't that show go off the air in just a year or so? — NE —

On Jan 31, 5:24 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 1:06 am, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's kinda' like Star Trek, where they never show you how the bathroom
> > operates because they can't envision how it could.
> > Might they just beam the poop out of you and turn it into food with
> > the replicator?
> > Might you be able to beam poop into someones mouth that annoys you?
> > Might someone who annoys you be beamed into space, or simply scrambled
> > into atoms at the touch of a button form thousands of miles away?
>
> > Funny how the greatest weapon on Star Trek is not a weapon at all.
>
> > Yeah, the Constitution will guide you through that!
>
> And while I'm on the topic of Star Trek...
>
> Also notice how they don't use money anymore.
> It's not based on capitalism as we know it, though the "money" is only
> referred to as "credits".
> This also is not explained in detail, the only thing they know is,
> there won't be money or capitalism as we know it... because it's not
> adequate for a future civilization.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

On Jan 31, 1:06 am, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 11:38 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> >      Obama promises 'changes'… while he is leading us to our doom.
> > But be it known: "A fair, just and pro democracy NEW CONSTITUTION is
> > the only 'change' that we need!"  
>
> I've written before that the Old Constitution is not adequate for a
> modern society because it lacked vision, and couldn't possibly see
> what the future would or could bring.
>
Dear Studio: While writing my New Constitution, I constantly asked
myself what the Founding Fathers would think of what I just wrote. My
HUGE advantage over them is that I have had the benefit of actually
seeing what works and what doesn't work in this country. There is an
OLD HAT ploy in Washington: Praise our weak Constitution as if we
are... "Lucky" to have the God-damned Supreme Court make most of the
big decisions. The Founding Fathers would turn-over in their graves
knowing how 9 corrupt people are bypassing their principles! In a
nutshell: The fundamental premise of our Constitution is that the
PEOPLE be in charge of government. Also, this sentence summarizes the
entire document: "Fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the
USA!"
>
> It's kinda' like Star Trek, where they never show you how the bathroom
> operates because they can't envision how it could.
> Might they just beam the poop out of you and turn it into food with
> the replicator?
> Might you be able to beam poop into someones mouth that annoys you?
> Might someone who annoys you be beamed into space, or simply scrambled
> into atoms at the touch of a button form thousands of miles away?
>
> Funny how the greatest weapon on Star Trek is not a weapon at all.
>
> Yeah, the Constitution will guide you through that!
>
> > Pass it on!  — NoEinstein —  AKA
> > John A. Armistead, Patriot
>
> Never call yourself a Patriot.
> The term is given to you by others and not self proclaimed.
>
WRONG! At the Alamo, a line was drawn in the sand. Those willing to
fight for the Texas cause were asked to cross that line. In short,
those willing to fight for a cause determine their own place in
history. My Dictionary defines patriot: "One who loves his country,
and zealously guards its welfare; especially a defender of popular
liberty." If my spending fourteen plus years of my life writing my
New Constitution to SAVE the USA doesn't qualify as patriotism, I
don't suppose anyone can qualify. — John A. Armistead — Patriot!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Neocon Take on Egypt

I was kind of listening to MSNBC news today, and one of the news
anchors was interviewing someone and asked;
"do you fear another Tiananmen Square taking place"?

This is something we should fear now???
Are you kidding me?

Mubarak needs to get to steppin' before he's hanged.

I could care less about who's in charge of Egypt or how it effects our
insane foreign policy.
Let them go back to the Russians if they want... as if Russia really
wants them.

Another failed case of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend BS".

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Laughing your head off in Liberal Land

You mean the ones that air photos show as twice as big as the ones the
Libs talk about?

On 01/31/2011 05:42 PM, studio wrote:
> On Jan 31, 5:37 pm, dick thompson<rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> You obviously try to ignore the public protests then provided it is the
>> liberals protesting. Figures. Fingers in the ears and shouting la la
>> la la I can't hear you.
> Well, maybe that's because liberal protests are bigger and better?
> Not the ones where 25,000 people show up with guns on their hips and
> Fox News estimating 1 million.
>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: PA Auditor: Release Non-Violent Prison Offenders And Save $350 Million

On Jan 31, 5:44 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> They shouldn't be in jail for victimless crimes.

I'll buy that for $1.
Unfortunately, Conservatives and some liberals would only buy it if
it's an unlimited amount of $'s.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

lol... how many times you gonna post this?

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: PA Auditor: Release Non-Violent Prison Offenders And Save $350 Million

They shouldn't be in jail for victimless crimes.

On 1/31/2011 2:20 PM, plainolamerican wrote:
working prisoners are not a drain on the taxpayers  they should be made to work 6-8 hr days like most of our citizens   ton Jan 31, 3:45 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote: 
A Auditor: Release Non-Violent Prison Offenders And Save $350 Millionhttp://gocl.me/gFNEni -> "Law is force, pure and simple. The only time the use of force is appropriate is in self defense." - Shaeffer Cox  **For less than the cost of one hour with most lawyers, you can learn how to control judges and lawyers <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> yourself!* 
 

--
For less than the cost of one hour with most lawyers, you can learn how to control judges and lawyers yourself!

Re: Laughing your head off in Liberal Land

On Jan 31, 5:37 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> You obviously try to ignore the public protests then provided it is the
> liberals protesting.  Figures.  Fingers in the ears and shouting la la
> la la I can't hear you.

Well, maybe that's because liberal protests are bigger and better?
Not the ones where 25,000 people show up with guns on their hips and
Fox News estimating 1 million.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Republicans looking to do what Democrats refused to do...Regulate Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae




Republicans looking to do what Democrats refused to do...Regulate Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae

Many followers of the 'hope and change' gang have no clue that the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill did nothing to regulate Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Many of these same dolts also have no clue about the Obama regime raising the debt ceiling for these two GSEs up to $400 billion dollars. In other words, if Fannie and Freddie were to fail, the taxpayers are covering the bill.

I must also point out that Obama has refused to appoint an Inspector General to oversee these two GSEs. It seems Rahm Emanuel has something to do with the blocking of an investigation into Freddie and Fannie. Rahm just happened to sit on the board of Freddie Mac thanks to an appointment by that always trust worthy Bill Clinton. What do they have to hide?

From The Daily Caller:

Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill are planning to hold a hearing on February 9 to begin tackling reform of government sponsored enterprises (GSE) like mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The hearing will be the first in a long series of investigations by Republicans to fix what is viewed as one of the main causes of the 2008 financial crisis.

The first hearing will be held by the Financial Services subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises. The focus of the hearing and the ones that follow it will be stopping taxpayer losses on housing in the short term, preventing future bailouts and removing government from the housing markets all together.

Republican Rep. Spencer Bachus of Alabama, chairman of the Financial Services Committee, said in a statement announcing the hearings, "The Committee will be busy this year addressing the issues of concern to Americans: jobs, economic activity, Fannie and Freddie reform, and implementation of Dodd-Frank."

Maybe the taxpayers can get Darrell Issa (R-Calif) to investigate the ties between Chris Dodd (D-Conn), Barney Frank (D-Mass) and Freddie/Fannie. Dodd is retiring due to his 'sweetheart deals' and Barney was having a romance with a Fannie Mae executive.

"We will work to ensure that taxpayers are protected," he added.

Reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is shaping up to be a primary area of concern for the GOP as Republican lawmakers figure out how to address the two financial institutions that were left out of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform and Consumer Protection Act that was passed last summer.

Both Freddie and Fannie received bailout money but the Democrats left them free from regulation. Why?

Continue reading>>>

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Folks: The readership of my essays has increased considerably since I
first wrote the following. I've rediscovered these earlier writings
while looking for that "summation" essay urging Chief Justice John G.
Roberts, Jr. to disqualify Obama from becoming President—because of
his daily felonious acts. Of course, Roberts had gotten so seduced by
the "power" and the ritual in Washington that, for him, swearing-in-a-
President carries with it no responsibilities on his part. I'll bet,
that when Roberts is arrested for treason, he will think differently.

8/17/08

AN OBAMA NATION WOULD BE AN ABOMINATION!

Later this month Barack Obama is slated to make his acceptance speech
for the Democratic nomination for President. Such will be on the
August 28th anniversary of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s, "I have a
dream…" speech. Like King, Obama is a good speech maker. And like
King, he sometimes can drawn big crowds. But Barack Obama is head and
shoulders below Martin Luther King, Jr. in every principle worthy of
fighting for.

King's 'non-violence' movement should be the watchword for every
minority or group experiencing discrimination. King sought unity of
purpose, and unity of resolve. He was smart enough to know that
nothing is more divisive—within a group, or without—than violent
dissention. Because of his 'non-violence' attitude, many whites
recognized the rightfulness of King's cause and began supporting the
movement. They knew that the time had come to start correcting wrongs
against Blacks that were happening just because of their race.

Primarily, King's dream was to have unfair discrimination against
Blacks come to an end. To have that happen, the plight of Blacks had
to be continually informed to the world—until the message was
received. If King had been asked: "Do you want Blacks to be in
control of this country?", he would probably have seen a symbolic
value in having such a thing be possible. But he would have preferred
that the unfair discrimination stop, and that Blacks be accepted as
'non-blacks' (colorless) by society as a whole. The latter process
was well under way until Barack Obama entered the picture. Because of
him, group-against-group dissention is increasing. Very effectively,
Obama is polarizing the voters with his unfulfillable promises.
Blacks, and 'for change' whites, aren't going to be happy campers when
things don't go as Obama is promising with each fateful speech that he
delivers.

Russia's invasion of Georgia is unpleasant world news. Our pseudo
President, Barack Obama, held his own press conference on the event,
before George Bush had addressed the press. Obama's tone and his
demeanor was that of a movie or TV actor portraying "a" President. In
his selfish mind, if he can just "act" being President well enough,
perhaps he can convince people that he could be President in real
life, too. But the voters should see through his act.

When Obama addressed that huge crowd in Germany, he talked as if he
was the Commander in Chief and said: "The USA and Germany will work
together to solve the problems in the Middle East." Many of you will
recall that both Germany and France refused to be "our allies" in
going after Sadom Hussein. Now, we have this pseudo American
President, Barack Obama, flying out of this country to tell those
German jerks that they will be "involved" in determining the future of
the Middle East—the very responsibility which Germany and France had
shirked. Is Barack Obama Presidential? Or is he certifiably INSANE?

Having unfair discrimination end in the USA is certainly what this
country needs. My New Constitution has been written with those
objectives in mind. But Barack Obama's continued candidacy for
President is pumping hot air into the perennially failed "two party"
system of government that has been bringing, and will bring this
country down. When the DNC decreed that it's acceptable to slash in
half the "democratic" vote of those in FL and MI, democracy is being
raped. As the main beneficiary of that rape, Obama talked proudly
about how important it is to obey "the rules". But aren't the rules
of democracy important, too? And shouldn't Barack Obama have cared?

Four years ago, Obama was running for, but had not won, his Senate
seat. After he did so, that still-wet-behind-his-big-ears, ego maniac
has been campaigning to become President as if he's the panacea for
everything ailing this country. Obama is deluded to think that by his
making of "good" speeches, that those in Washington will just be
bowled-over. In his sick mind, he will be dictating this "program" or
that. In such regard, Barack Obama is like Adolph Hitler. But the
parties aren't going to "unite" just because Obama keeps saying so in
his speeches. For most of our history, the Democratic and Republican
Parties have split the USA right-down-the-middle. And unless we very
quickly kick political parties to oblivion, as by adapting my New
Constitution, the future of the USA is very dim, indeed.

Muslim extremists, or their clones, who were responsible for 9/11 are
still out there. Unless the USA starts doing the right things, from
the Muslim point of view, terrorism will return to the USA. And that
will be true whether Barack Obama or John McCain get elected
President. *** The first requirement for lessening the threat of
Muslim extremists is simply to stop "backing up" Israel with the
military might of this country. *** As has been the case throughout
history, where there are Jews, there is unfairness and resentfulness
of their unfairness.

Jews effectively control government and the media in the USA. They
have become… the clearing house for what we are allowed to read or
see, and they are the clearing house for what laws are allowed to be
passed. Only by NEGATING the undeserved and ruinous power of Jews in
the world, will there be hope for the long survival of the human race.

Muhammad was a wise and good man. But the rules he laid down for
daily living were most apt for the seventh century. At that time, the
rituals of daily life were intended to unify a largely illiterate
people. Daily prayers allowed Muslims to see and to recognize who
one's 'friends' are. But more and more, the continuation of rituals,
of any kind, is increasing divisiveness. Divisiveness, carried to
extremes, is placing the world in danger of nuclear war. There will
only be one WW III, and it will be short.

When much of the world either has given, or is giving women equal
rights, Muslims largely oppress women. That one "difference" causes
Muslims not to be well liked. Those not well liked tend to be
withdrawn and suspicious. By having anything different—manner of
dress, conspicuous rituals, etc. which call attention to themselves,
Muslims are viewed as outsiders. Those who stand out as being
different aren't very welcome in any, otherwise homogeneous, society.

Muhammad would be appalled that Muslims are killing Muslims over
issues of control. In the primitive age when that great man lived,
fighting and dieing for the right, was a noble thing. But I'm sure
that Muhammad wouldn't approve of having Muslims become so isolated in
mixed societies that they consider anyone who is different to be their
enemy. The main 'enemy' of Muslims is their own insistence on
'obedience' to rituals that have long since out-lived their purposes
and their desirability.

If we allow our political parties to continue business-as-usual,
especially, as relates to how the USA does business throughout the
world, we will be inviting more terrorism. As I have said several
times before, the USA will not be content to, again, take-it-on-the-
chin if thousands of our citizens are killed. Our guns are cocked,
and Muslims will be the tender that starts us on the road to the
destruction of the human race. But that final battle need NOT happen!

The false hope that Barack Obama promulgates: "that 'minorities' can
be powerful", is placing the world in grave danger. *** Minorities
must NEVER be allowed to become powerful! *** Democracies are the
strength of the MAJORITY! To realize our attainable goals of having
peace and prosperity in the world, ALL that is required is for people
to RELAX their divisive group loyalties, and embrace the common bonds
that we all share! We should become color blind, and GROUP blind. No
rituals or group objectives are important enough to threaten the
entire human race!

Barack Obama is the Anti-Christ! Any votes for him will seal our
doom. Simply by rejecting, and correcting, our form of government,
the entire world can be set on the right course! When everyone begins
caring about our neighbors as much as we care about ourselves,
everything will turn out just fine. "Pay it forward!"

Be it known: "A New Constitution is the only 'change' that we need!"
Pass it on! And be sure to vote for the Libertarian candidates—to
send the "right message" to the rest of the World!

Respectfully submitted,

— NoEinstein —

AKA John A. Armistead

P. S.: I realized decades ago that the USA was headed in the wrong
direction, with fewer liberties and higher and higher taxation. I
invite those of you who might be interested to read my recently
published book: "The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity."
Such is available at Amazon and Barnes & Noble. Thanks!

>
On Jan 30, 11:38 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Folks:  Understanding the fix the USA is in will be easier if more of
> you can read my highly expert analysis of Barack Obama's and Ronald
> Reagan's handwriting.  Please talk about what I'm saying.  For too
> long, people in this country have been letting the media crooks do
> most of the talking.
>
> 8/05/08
>
> Dear Tom:  No two people could be more different than Ronald Reagan
> and Barack Obama!  If you haven't read, I am a lifelong graphologist—
> one of, if not the best analyzers of handwriting in the entire World!
> Ronald Reagan's handwriting shows someone with a nervous temperament.
> But that's not a "losing it" nervous temperament like John McCain
> has.  Reagan was a conventional thinking man; i.e., his value system
> was like that of most good people.  His personality showed that he was
> responding to pressures from various fronts, but he could bend rather
> than break.  What that means is: Reagan never compromised his
> principles!  Those who show a legible, normal-sized and formed
> writing, that also have a nervous but controlled temperament, are salt-
> of-the-Earth people!
>      Reagan's letter forms were legible, but not fussily exact.  That
> means that he was practical-minded and not overly concerned with
> details.  Writers like that are like the majority of good executives:
> They can delegate authority, and are trusting enough to leave the
> 'petty details' to subordinates.  Reagan's signature and the body of
> his texts were similar and conventional.  His letter forms were
> consistently rounded and easy-flowing.  So, I know that he was
> friendly and well liked.  The latter was the primary social trait of
> Reagan, which was evident in his smile, humor, easy body language, and
> gestures.  Those things caused Reagan to inspire trust and confidence!
>      On the personal side, Reagan was lonely.  That fact is indicated
> by the above average space between his words.  He'd speak his mind,
> then leave people alone to do the work required.  His relationship
> with his family was more detached than he wanted.  He had simple, non-
> materialistic ideals.  The achieving of worthy goals meant more to him
> than riches.  And those were off-the-table if there were family
> pressures.  The goals came first, the family second.  He was a
> trusting parent—not an overly doting one.  To him, hard knocks helped
> build strong character.  Sometimes that was tough-love, but it was
> love!
>
>      Barack Obama is as artificial and unconventional as his biracial
> parentage tells.  From birth, he had identity issues that are ruling
> him to this day.  He has an almost schizophrenia-like way of bottling-
> up his emotions.  As a kid, he learned to keep his true feelings to
> himself.  That's why he never developed the facial expressions and
> body language of a normal person.  Such a lack was the first abnormal
> thing I noticed about him when he addressed the 2004 Democratic
> Convention.
>      Obama's inferiority complex demanded that he rise above his
> heritage.  With each little success, his ego swelled—as did his
> capital letters.  Those with huge egos make very poor executives.
> It's their way or no way.  Obama would be a misfit in any group
> dynamic such as in the Executive Office.  He would keep getting in the
> way of even desirable goals.  People will resist him, because he is so
> cock sure.  The ideas of others seem small by comparison.
>      Yes, Obama has charisma.  Basically, that means that he draws
> attention to himself because of his bearing and "poise" in public
> situations.  But the majority of what passes as "poise" with Obama is
> his from-birth, personality flaw of not showing appropriate emotions.
> Many must be impressed that he doesn't show nervousness.  His control
> over his outward emotions is so developed—but is actually pathological—
> that he could pass any lie detector test with ease.  The man is
> emotionally dead.  Obama's dominant 'tone' is that of someone who
> isn't happy.  He seems to be successful in rallying those who are too
> shy to express their own unhappiness.
>      Obama PRINTS too many of his letters.  Even in the body of his
> writing he uses printed letters.  He makes those forms with such
> exactness that he reveals himself to be a pedant and a perfectionist.
> Both of those characteristics mean that he has few if any friends.
> He's an individualistic, loner.  His best contribution would be to be
> left alone to work out the details, but he insists on controlling
> every aspect of every activity around him.  Obama has the personality
> of a dictator and a demagogue, not a "Reagan-like" delegater and
> listener.
>      Most people with unique personalities, whose writing shows flare
> that's lacking in average people, have superior intelligence.  But
> Obama has excessive deliberateness in his writing.  Deliberateness
> means artificiality, lack of spontaneity, phoniness, self-centeredness
> and being overbearing.  It also shows someone who places form above
> substance.  Because printing is slower than cursive writing, his IQ
> isn't as high as his verbal fluency hints.  When Obama must express
> his feelings, extemporaneously, he does so in a most broken and
> halting matter, and his talking speed is much too slow!  Some view
> that as his being "really affected" by what he is saying.  But I view
> it as the expressions of someone with such mixed emotions about things
> that he must PLAN his words.  People who do that are UNTRUSTWORTHY.
> That's why I keep referring to Obama as: THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE.
> Those who are too impressed by his poise-under-fire need to realize
> that he's got the selfish ego of the anti Christ.  With Obama,
> disaster will be omnipresent!
>
>      So, Tom, how is it that someone smart like you, who now lives in
> China, has the idea that Obama has a snowball's-chance-in-hell of
> improving the World condition?  The US Congress—with the majority,
> there, having huge egos, too—won't be swayed by rhetoric.  Every day,
> rhetoric slides off of their backs like water on ducks.  His "I'm
> angry-toned" speeches appeal to some would-be voters.  But after his
> first term bogs down, words won't be enough.  Obama doesn't have the
> LIKABLE personality of a "bridge builder".  He doesn't have the
> character and the "knows the difference between right and wrong"
> aptitude to be a respected leader.  For the good of the nation, Barack
> Obama should never be allowed to "get his picture" on any of our
> currency, or on any paintings hung on the Capital walls.  The survival
> of the World is depending on it!
>      Your damning characterization of "McCain" are equally true of
> Obama.  Obama has already addressed those Jewish jerks, live, while
> standing in front of that rusting war junk in Israel.  In unambiguous
> words, Obama promised to "support" Israel (with our military might).
> He is being held captive by those &@$#1 Jews, too.  But I'm using
> every ounce of my being to see to it that NEITHER Obama nor McCain
> become President!  Electing LIBERTARIANS will send a massage to the
> World that we Americans are as fed-up with our government as those in
> foreign countries are.  My New Constitution will instate—for the first
> time in our history—democracy and FAIR PLAY in America!  And there
> will be swift consequences to any American business not being fair and
> respectful to those less fortunate in other lands.  By "cleaning-up-
> our-own-act", here, the World will soon know that the USA is its best
> friend.
>      Obama promises 'changes'… while he is leading us to our doom.
> But be it known: "A fair, just and pro democracy NEW CONSTITUTION is
> the only 'change' that we need!"  Pass it on!  — NoEinstein —  AKA
> John A. Armistead, Patriot
>
> On Jan 29, 11:47 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Readers:
>
> > It continues to enlighten me how "right-on" many of my previous
> > essays, relating to my odyssey to save the USA, have been.  Here is
> > one which I wrote to counter the LIE that Tim Russert had been an
> > admirable public figure:
>
> > 6/24/08
>
> > TIM RUSSERT PERSONIFIED WHAT'S WRONG ABOUT THE MEDIA.
>
> > Many would suppose that it is… the 'American way' to advance from a
> > lowly Washington reporter to have been one of the 'most watched'
> > leaders of the media.  But Tim Russert was about as anti-American as
> > they come.  Yes, he used smiles to punctuate his trademark attacks on
> > the 'weaknesses' of his many guests.  And he sometimes punctuated
> > those attacks with looks of cynicism.  But, getting good Nelson
> > Ratings shouldn't be the standard by which any media figure is judged.
>
> > While Russet's star was just rising, I had the 'inside scoop' on
> > felonious acts committed by one of our most notorious US senators.
> > Sounds like… 'news', doesn't it?  But over several years—while I kept
> > trying to get my story out—I learned that the media is corrupt-to-the-
> > core.  To wit: The media assumes that so-called 'public figures'
> > aren't required to live by the same standards of lawfulness as other
> > citizens.
>
> > Because Tim Russert seemed to be someone who 'attacked' his news
> > stories, I poured-my-heart-out to him in a letter that also included
> > pages of documentation copied on the old 3.5" floppy disks.  But
> > Russert, nor any of the thirty or so other media 'icons' whom I
> > contacted would even consider that… 'news' might come from someone who
> > isn't a celebrity.  What gets covered as news in this country must
> > pass through layers of… editors, before some of it leaks through.  It
> > is that same process—that eventually found Tim Russert at or near the
> > top of the media pecking order—that allows me to rightly peg Russert
> > as anti-American.  The tacit role of the media is to inform the
> > Citizens.  Tim failed to properly do so, because of his bias
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Laughing your head off in Liberal Land

You obviously try to ignore the public protests then provided it is the
liberals protesting. Figures. Fingers in the ears and shouting la la
la la I can't hear you.

On 01/31/2011 05:32 PM, studio wrote:
> On Jan 31, 4:49 pm, dick thompson<rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> And yet you are one of the ones complaining about the commentary
>> against Obama. Check the Zombietime website to see how the liberals
>> treated a former president then.
> I don't have to check a Web site to know; they gave him everything he
> wanted.
>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: What Stimulus?

On Jan 31, 11:53 am, JSM <ekrub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What Stimulus?<http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=20277&utm_source=new...>
>
> "There was little if any net stimulus," resulting from President Obama's
> $862 billion package, according to a new report from Stanford University
> economists...

Uh, it was President Bush Jr. who came up with the $750 billion figure
and spent half while giving the other half to Obama to do as he wished
with it.

That there's been no significant pay-off doesn't surprise me and
everyone else at all.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

State Mandates Food Cops in Every Restaurant |


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Laughing your head off in Liberal Land

On Jan 31, 4:49 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>      And yet you are one of the ones complaining about the commentary
> against Obama.   Check the Zombietime website to see how the liberals
> treated a former president then.

I don't have to check a Web site to know; they gave him everything he
wanted.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: PA Auditor: Release Non-Violent Prison Offenders And Save $350 Million

On Jan 31, 5:20 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> working prisoners are not a drain on the taxpayers

No, but they take away jobs and contracts from others who aren't in
jail.

I thought you were against government programs creating jobs?
Just not for law breakers apparently.

> they should be made to work 6-8 hr days like most of our citizens

And what if they don't want to work?
And what kind of incentive program you going to have for good workers?

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

On Jan 31, 1:06 am, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It's kinda' like Star Trek, where they never show you how the bathroom
> operates because they can't envision how it could.
> Might they just beam the poop out of you and turn it into food with
> the replicator?
> Might you be able to beam poop into someones mouth that annoys you?
> Might someone who annoys you be beamed into space, or simply scrambled
> into atoms at the touch of a button form thousands of miles away?
>
> Funny how the greatest weapon on Star Trek is not a weapon at all.
>
> Yeah, the Constitution will guide you through that!

And while I'm on the topic of Star Trek...

Also notice how they don't use money anymore.
It's not based on capitalism as we know it, though the "money" is only
referred to as "credits".
This also is not explained in detail, the only thing they know is,
there won't be money or capitalism as we know it... because it's not
adequate for a future civilization.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: PA Auditor: Release Non-Violent Prison Offenders And Save $350 Million

working prisoners are not a drain on the taxpayers

they should be made to work 6-8 hr days like most of our citizens


ton Jan 31, 3:45 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> A Auditor: Release Non-Violent Prison Offenders And Save $350 Millionhttp://gocl.me/gFNEni
> -> "Law is force, pure and simple. The only time the use of force is
> appropriate is in self defense."
> - Shaeffer Cox
>
> **For less than the cost of one hour with most lawyers, you can learn
> how to control judges and lawyers
> <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> yourself!*

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Moonbat Tech: The Miswak


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Truth:

you would have people believe that a mythical jew was a socialist who
gave away free health care?

aren't you a little old to believe such things?

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Be interesting to see what the feds and Sarah have to say on this issue in Alaska about the oil and gas lines to the lower 48

"For all must agree with all, and they cannot know if their thoughts
are the thoughts of all, and so they fear to speak" --Ayn Rand, from
"Anthem"

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The poor are not getting poorer

On Jan 31, 4:38 pm, frankg <fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Lowering the taxes didn't seem to do anything.
>
> Clearly you missed the point. The problem will not be fixed by
> changing the tax rate, up or down.

They don't owe me a job, I don't owe them a lower tax rate.

> You're sarcastic "bye bye" has significant consequences. They go, the
> jobs go. Who do you think is going to do the employing AND who do you
> think will pay the taxes you so desperately want to rely on?

They're inconsequential to the larger picture.
Imagine, you, a guy who say's;
> US corporate executives care only how the
> company stock is trading on Wall Street. How their actions affect
> their employees, or the country as a whole, is of no concern to them.

Is that how we won WW2?
But it's exactly why we can't win all the other wars you put the US
in.

> > Of course they won't because the only thing that will in your mind is
> > lower taxes... the same lower taxes that didn't create any jobs
> > before.
>
> No where did I say lower taxes. You need to stop being so fixated on
> the raise/lower taxes argument. That IS NOT the problem.

Then why you debating it?

>Trading
> inequities and moving jobs overseas can not be fixed by increasing the
> marginal tax rate for those making more than xx dollars.

You have exactly what you wanted, free trade.
Now you make the argument that their isn't enough taxes on imported
goods?
You want things both ways, all ways, no ways, and then reformed ways.
But all you could think about during 8 years of Bush Jr. and 12 years
of a Republican Congress was.... war, security, para-military, police,
secrecy, eves dropping, intelligence gathering, etc. etc. etc.

> > It doesn't matter if there's zero taxes, they still couldn't compete
> > with countries that have $1 a day workers and $10 a day managers.
>
> Absolutely right! Likewise, a tax rate of 90% wouldn't help us
> compete, but compete we must. This is why taxes is not the answer.
> More US friendly trade agreements (monetary policies, opening markets
> to US goods, etc.) could help us compete, however. And if we're
> competitive we create more jobs, and if we create more jobs we'll have
> fewer people dependent on government and higher income from taxes.
>
> > Until they address the problem of a grossly over-paid management,
> > nothing will change.
>
> Fat cat corporate executives, corrupt 'good ole boy' corporate boards,
> etc., are all problematic. But you can't fix that problem with
> increased marginal tax rates.

You offer no answers to this.
You most certainly can fix it, you tax them into the poor house if
they don't police themselves.
Plenty other people just waiting to take their jobs at reduced
compensation.

> > Until then, you'll just have to keep blaming the unemployed, the poor,
> > the hungry, the indigent, those with poor health, Social Security,
> > unions, and all the other things Republitards typically put blame on.
>
> No disrespect, but your an idiot. You find one post of mine that
> supports such an asinine assertion and I'll apologize and buy you a
> beer.

Well let's put it this way then; when others of your party do, you say
nothing.
You are guilty by way of association.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Laughing your head off in Liberal Land

And yet you are one of the ones complaining about the commentary
against Obama. Check the Zombietime website to see how the liberals
treated a former president then.

On 01/31/2011 04:40 PM, studio wrote:
> On Jan 31, 4:23 pm, dick thompson<rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> I guess the subject just did not interest you
>> or you agreed with what they did.
> You're right about a lame story it not interesting me.
>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

FOL rules Obama's healthcare overhaul unconstitutional

Published: January 31st, 2011 12:15 PM
Last Modified: January 31st, 2011 12:18 PM
PENSACOLA, Fla. -- A federal judge declared the Obama administration's
health care overhaul unconstitutional Monday, siding with 26 states
that sued to block it, saying that people can't be required to buy
health insurance.

U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson agreed with the states that the new
law violates people's rights by forcing them to buy health insurance
by 2014 or face penalties. He went a step further than a previous
ruling against the law, declaring the entire thing unconstitutional if
the insurance requirement does not hold up.

Attorneys for the administration had argued that the states did not
have standing to challenge the law and that the case should be
dismissed.

The final step will almost certainly be the U.S. Supreme Court. Two
other federal judges have already upheld the law and a federal judge
in Virginia ruled the insurance mandate unconstitutional but stopped
short of voiding the entire thing.

At issue was whether the government is reaching beyond its
constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce by requiring
citizens to purchase health insurance or face tax penalties.

Vinson said it is, writing in his 78-page ruling that if the
government can require people to buy health insurance, it could also
regulate food the same way.

"Or, as discussed during oral argument, Congress could require that
people buy and consume broccoli at regular intervals," he wrote, "Not
only because the required purchases will positively impact interstate
commerce, but also because people who eat healthier tend to be
healthier, and are thus more productive and put less of a strain on
the health care system."

Obama administration attorneys had argued that the health care system
was part of the interstate commerce system. They said the government
can levy a tax penalty on Americans who decide not to purchase health
insurance because all Americans are consumers of medical care.

But attorneys for the states said the administration was essentially
coercing the states into participating in the overhaul by holding
billions of Medicaid dollars hostage. The states also said the federal
government is violating the Constitution by forcing a mandate on the
states without providing money to pay for it.

Florida's former Republican Attorney General Bill McCollum filed the
lawsuit just minutes after President Barack Obama signed the 10-year,
$938 billion health care bill into law in March. He chose a court in
Pensacola, one of Florida's most conservative cities. The nation's
most influential small business lobby, the National Federation of
Independent Business, also joined.

Officials in the states that sued lauded Vinson's decision. Almost all
of them have Republican governors, attorneys general or both.

"In making his ruling, the judge has confirmed what many of us knew
from the start; ObamaCare is an unprecedented and unconstitutional
infringement on the liberty of the American people," Florida GOP Gov.
Rick Scott said in a statement.

Other states that joined the suit are: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona,
Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine,
Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington,
Wisconsin and Wyoming.

---

Associated Press Writer Curt Anderson in Miami contributed to this
report.

Read more: http://www.adn.com/2011/01/31/1676863/florida-judge-rules-federal-health.html#ixzz1CeTM70gT

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Home heating oil prices up 20% from 2009...Media Silent about Obama's plans to cause energy prices to 'skyrocet'

But that was over 8 years, not in just a little over a year which is the
record of Zero.

On 01/31/2011 04:19 PM, studio wrote:
> Still better than the 100% rise under Bush Jr.
> But who remembers that?
>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

EFF Uncovers Widespread FBI Intelligence Violations

EFF Uncovers Widespread FBI Intelligence Violations
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/01/eff-releases-report-detailing-fbi-intelligence
--
"Government exists to provide a veneer of 'legitimacy' to institutionalized extortion." - William N. Grigg

For less than the cost of one hour with most lawyers, you can learn how to control judges and lawyers yourself!

PA Auditor: Release Non-Violent Prison Offenders And Save $350 Million

PA Auditor: Release Non-Violent Prison Offenders And Save $350 Million
http://gocl.me/gFNEni
--
"Law is force, pure and simple. The only time the use of force is appropriate is in self defense."
- Shaeffer Cox

For less than the cost of one hour with most lawyers, you can learn how to control judges and lawyers yourself!

Re: Laughing your head off in Liberal Land

On Jan 31, 4:23 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>  I guess the subject just did not interest you
> or you agreed with what they did.

You're right about a lame story it not interesting me.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The poor are not getting poorer

> Lowering the taxes didn't seem to do anything.

Clearly you missed the point. The problem will not be fixed by
changing the tax rate, up or down.

> If they think some other country is better, Ok, bye bye.
> Yep. Bye bye.

You're sarcastic "bye bye" has significant consequences. They go, the
jobs go. Who do you think is going to do the employing AND who do you
think will pay the taxes you so desperately want to rely on?

> Of course they won't because the only thing that will in your mind is
> lower taxes... the same lower taxes that didn't create any jobs
> before.

No where did I say lower taxes. You need to stop being so fixated on
the raise/lower taxes argument. That IS NOT the problem. Trading
inequities and moving jobs overseas can not be fixed by increasing the
marginal tax rate for those making more than xx dollars.

> It doesn't matter if there's zero taxes, they still couldn't compete
> with countries that have $1 a day workers and $10 a day managers.

Absolutely right! Likewise, a tax rate of 90% wouldn't help us
compete, but compete we must. This is why taxes is not the answer.
More US friendly trade agreements (monetary policies, opening markets
to US goods, etc.) could help us compete, however. And if we're
competitive we create more jobs, and if we create more jobs we'll have
fewer people dependent on government and higher income from taxes.

> Until they address the problem of a grossly over-paid management,
> nothing will change.

Fat cat corporate executives, corrupt 'good ole boy' corporate boards,
etc., are all problematic. But you can't fix that problem with
increased marginal tax rates.

> Until then, you'll just have to keep blaming the unemployed, the poor,
> the hungry, the indigent, those with poor health, Social Security,
> unions, and all the other things Republitards typically put blame on.

No disrespect, but your an idiot. You find one post of mine that
supports such an asinine assertion and I'll apologize and buy you a
beer. Till then, try thinking in something other than two dimensional
terms. Your answer to everything is more taxes on the wealthy, and
when someone doesn't agree with you, you automatically assume and
label.

On Jan 31, 3:53 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 11:00 am, frankg <fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I might agree with you on tariffs.
>
> > You think increasing taxes on the wealthy will fix the problem?  
>
> Lowering the taxes didn't seem to do anything.
>
> > That
> > might only make them speed up the migration of assets overseas,
> > exacerbating the problem.
>
> If they think some other country is better, Ok, bye bye.
>
> > US corporate executives care only how the
> > company stock is trading on Wall Street. How their actions affect
> > their employees, or the country as a whole, is of no concern to them.
>
> Yep. Bye bye.
>
> > I'm no economist, but it seems to me that until we overhaul the
> > existing trade system, which should include an import tariff like most
> > other countries; until we start making corporations pay dearly for
> > moving a job overseas and until we start making American made products
> > both cost and quality competitive, our economy will continue to
> > collapse. Increasing the taxes on the wealthy might be a 'feel-good'
> > tactic to those who are not wealthy, but it will do nothing to correct
> > the current crisis we are in.
>
> Of course they won't because the only thing that will in your mind is
> lower taxes... the same lower taxes that didn't create any jobs
> before.
>
> It doesn't matter if there's zero taxes, they still couldn't compete
> with countries that have $1 a day workers and $10 a day managers.
>
> Until they address the problem of a grossly over-paid management,
> nothing will change.
> Until then, you'll just have to keep blaming the unemployed, the poor,
> the hungry, the indigent, those with poor health, Social Security,
> unions, and all the other things Republitards typically put blame on.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

ObamaCare Unconstitutional -- Read The Ruling

ObamaCare Unconstitutional -- Read The Ruling
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3174287/Opinion%20-%202.pdf
--
For less than the cost of one hour with most lawyers, you can learn how to control judges and lawyers yourself!

Re: Laughing your head off in Liberal Land

Then you are not paying attention since this was put out several days
ago about the children's theatre group in Missoula, Montana. Discussed
several places on line. I guess the subject just did not interest you
or you agreed with what they did.

On 01/31/2011 04:08 PM, studio wrote:
> On Jan 31, 11:14 am, frankg<fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Nice. I can't wait to hear how Tommy or Studio will dismiss this one.
> By<http://www.americanthinker.com/jack_kemp/> Jack Kemp
> The new tone of civility the liberals are pursuing apparently includes
> wishing violent death on Sarah Palin.
>
> Dismissing the "new tone of civility the liberals are pursuing wishing
> a violent death on Sarah Palin"?
>
> I haven't heard anything about it... well until now, after it was
> fabricated by a Conservative who offers zero proof.
> Not missed = violent death?
> You guys are wimpier than I thought.
> Lame.
>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Be interesting to see what the feds and Sarah have to say on this issue in Alaska about the oil and gas lines to the lower 48

http://www.adn.com/2011/01/30/1675873/short-gas-line-to-hub-may-be-option.html

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Home heating oil prices up 20% from 2009...Media Silent about Obama's plans to cause energy prices to 'skyrocet'

Still better than the 100% rise under Bush Jr.
But who remembers that?

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Laughing your head off in Liberal Land

On Jan 31, 11:14 am, frankg <fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice. I can't wait to hear how Tommy or Studio will dismiss this one.

By <http://www.americanthinker.com/jack_kemp/> Jack Kemp
The new tone of civility the liberals are pursuing apparently includes
wishing violent death on Sarah Palin.

Dismissing the "new tone of civility the liberals are pursuing wishing
a violent death on Sarah Palin"?

I haven't heard anything about it... well until now, after it was
fabricated by a Conservative who offers zero proof.
Not missed = violent death?
You guys are wimpier than I thought.
Lame.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The poor are not getting poorer

On Jan 31, 11:00 am, frankg <fran...@gmail.com> wrote:
I might agree with you on tariffs.

> You think increasing taxes on the wealthy will fix the problem?  

Lowering the taxes didn't seem to do anything.

> That
> might only make them speed up the migration of assets overseas,
> exacerbating the problem.

If they think some other country is better, Ok, bye bye.

> US corporate executives care only how the
> company stock is trading on Wall Street. How their actions affect
> their employees, or the country as a whole, is of no concern to them.

Yep. Bye bye.

> I'm no economist, but it seems to me that until we overhaul the
> existing trade system, which should include an import tariff like most
> other countries; until we start making corporations pay dearly for
> moving a job overseas and until we start making American made products
> both cost and quality competitive, our economy will continue to
> collapse. Increasing the taxes on the wealthy might be a 'feel-good'
> tactic to those who are not wealthy, but it will do nothing to correct
> the current crisis we are in.

Of course they won't because the only thing that will in your mind is
lower taxes... the same lower taxes that didn't create any jobs
before.

It doesn't matter if there's zero taxes, they still couldn't compete
with countries that have $1 a day workers and $10 a day managers.

Until they address the problem of a grossly over-paid management,
nothing will change.
Until then, you'll just have to keep blaming the unemployed, the poor,
the hungry, the indigent, those with poor health, Social Security,
unions, and all the other things Republitards typically put blame on.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Home heating oil prices up 20% from 2009...Media Silent about Obama's plans to cause energy prices to 'skyrocet'




Home heating oil prices up 20% from 2009...Media Silent about Obama's plans to cause energy prices to 'skyrocet'

This may be the only promise President Obama hasn't broken. He explained, during his run for the presidency, that his energy plans would cause energy prices to 'skyrocket.' He also said he would bankrupt the coal industry,' which also would cause energy prices to skyrocket since coal produces about 50 percent of our energy.

Heating oil fuel, used by many in the northeastern part of the U.S. to heat their homes, has seen a 20% increase in prices since 2009. Whose energy policy is to blame? Nobody in the liberal media is blaming Obama.

I am.

From the Union Leader:

This winter has brought a perfect storm -- a tough economy, very cold weather and high fuel prices, according to Louise Bergeron, energy director for Southern New Hampshire Services.

In fact, with home heating oil prices 20 percent higher than a year ago, some needy families have already exhausted benefits, according to the state Office of Energy and Planning.

"I'm getting a lot of calls from elderly people who are very concerned because they have already expended their full fuel assistance benefit, and we're still in January and it's still very, very cold," Bergeron said.

As of Jan. 21, there were 7,170 households across the state that had used up their $1,125 maximum fuel assistance benefit. An elderly couple Bergeron spoke to last Thursday told her they were forced to set the thermostat at 55 at 7 o'clock in the evening, even though one of them is very sick.

Obama said that Americans can't set their thermostats on 72 all the time.

"I cautioned her not to do that," she said, "that we would find a way to help if and when they needed another delivery, because I was concerned for the person who was very ill.

"You know, that shouldn't happen in our world," she said. "We don't want our grandmothers to freeze."

No, we don't but Obama does.

Continue reading>>>

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.