Nov 29, 2011 || World News

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Re: New Hampshire Union Leader: For President, Newt Gingrich

I agree with all of your facts regarding "[n]ewt, and totally support
each
and every position that he has taken to date.
---
of course, he an interventionist and zionist xian

What specifically is it that you have an issue with in the events that
he
has either published,or broadcast, or written?
----
he a zionist xian who would use our tax dollars and military for the
defense of israel regardless of the cost to Americans

Why is it that you are not
as harsh over the crackpot "[z]ionists who are pushing the naive and
sometimes incoherent Dr. Ron Paul? Why do Jews get a pass with you
when
they support a Crackpot?
---
show me a jew that supports RP ... so far they've been crawling out
from under the rocks to criticize RP

On Nov 28, 10:29 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with all of your facts regarding "[n]ewt, and totally support each
> and every position that he has taken to date.
>
> What specifically is it that you have an issue with in the events that he
> has either published,or broadcast, or written? Why is it that you are not
> as harsh over the crackpot "[z]ionists who are pushing the naive and
> sometimes incoherent Dr. Ron Paul? Why do Jews get a pass with you when
> they support a Crackpot?
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:29 PM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > and who cares what Joseph W. McQuaide thinks about the newt?
> > his family's paper was bought out by a jewish competitor and now
> > reduced to weekly community papers
>
> > Without the zionist xian vote Newt, a catholic convert, is nothing but
> > a scared puppy.
> > In 2007, Gingrich authored a book, Rediscovering God in America,
> > arguing that the Founding Fathers actively intended the new republic
> > to not only allow, but encourage, religious expression in the public
> > square. Following publication of the book, he was invited by Jerry
> > Falwell to be the speaker for the second time at Liberty University's
> > graduation, on May 19, 2007, due to Gingrich having, "dedicated much
> > of his time to calling America back to our Christian heritage".[162]
>
> > Between 2008 and 2011, his production company produced three films on
> > religion,[103] one on energy, one on Ronald Reagan, and one on the
> > threat of radical Islam. All were joint projects with the conservative
> > group Citizens United.[104] In 2011, Newt and Callista appeared in A
> > City Upon a Hill, on the subject of American exceptionalism.
>
> > yes, he is just another islamaphobe warmonger
>
> > On Nov 28, 2:27 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > **
> > > **
> > > *America is at a crucial crossroads. It is not going to be enough to
> > merely
> > > replace Barack Obama next year. We are in critical need of the
> > innovative,
> > > forward-looking strategy and positive leadership that Newt Gingrich has
> > > shown he is capable of providing.*
> > > *
> > > *By JOSEPH W. McQUAID
>
> > > New Hampshire Union Leader Publisher
> > > This newspaper endorses Newt Gingrich in the New Hampshire Presidential
> > > Primary.
>
> > > America is at a crucial crossroads. It is not going to be enough to
> > merely
> > > replace Barack Obama next year. We are in critical need of the
> > innovative,
> > > forward-looking strategy and positive leadership that Gingrich has shown
> > he
> > > is capable of providing.
>
> > > He did so with the Contract with America. He did it in bringing in the
> > > first Republican House in 40 years and by forging balanced budgets and
> > even
> > > a surplus despite the political challenge of dealing with a Democratic
> > > President. A lot of candidates say they're going to improve Washington.
> > > Newt Gingrich has actually done that, and in this race he offers the best
> > > shot of doing it again.
>
> > > We sympathize with the many people we have heard from, both here and
> > across
> > > the country, who remain unsure of their choice this close to the primary.
> > > It is understandable. Our nation is in peril, yet much of the attention
> > has
> > > been focused on fluff, silliness and each candidate's minor miscues.
>
> > > Truth be known, many in the liberal media are belittling the Republican
> > > candidates because they don't want any of them to be taken as a serious
> > > challenger to their man, Obama.
>
> > > Readers of the Union Leader and Sunday News know that we don't back
> > > candidates based on popularity polls or big-shot backers. We look for
> > > conservatives of courage and conviction who are independent-minded,
> > > grounded in their core beliefs about this nation and its people, and best
> > > equipped for the job.
>
> > > We don't have to agree with them on every issue. We would rather back
> > > someone with whom we may sometimes disagree than one who tells us what he
> > > thinks we want to hear.
>
> > > Newt Gingrich is by no means the perfect candidate. But Republican
> > primary
> > > voters too often make the mistake of preferring an unattainable ideal to
> > > the best candidate who is actually running. In this incredibly important
> > > election, that candidate is Newt Gingrich. He has the experience, the
> > > leadership qualities and the vision to lead this country in these trying
> > > times. He is worthy of your support on January 10.
>
> > >http://www.unionleader.com/article/20111127/NEWS0605/711279999
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>
>
> Newt2012..jpg
> 9KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: New Hampshire Union Leader: For President, Newt Gingrich

I agree with all of your facts regarding "[n]ewt, and totally support
each
and every position that he has taken to date.
---
of course, he an interventionist and imperialist

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: A neo-Can goes over the border in attacking Ron Paul

What apparently upsets the Crackpot faction, is this one comment:

Krauthammer is asked which of the contenders for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination he could support.

"Probably everyone except Ron Paul, who is living in the 20s, who thinks we can have a moat around the United States and if we ignore the world, the world will ignore us,"

Pretty much an accurate, logical conclusion based on Dr. Paul's "Kum-bay-Yah/We Are The World, We Are The Children" comments during the last six or eight debates. Dr. Paul does not have a good grasp on the dangers that face the United States and its people, or Western Civilization as we know it today. Neither does PlainOl, neither does Michael.

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:47 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:

Charles Krauthammer is just another jew attacking RP

RP will cut the charity and military support given to the jews and
they know it

they would rather have a disgraced zionist xian pos like Newt

On Nov 28, 8:47 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> A neo-Can goes over the border in attacking Ron PaulPublished: Monday, November 28, 2011, 2:22 PM Updated: Monday, November 28, 2011, 3:44 PMbyPaul Mulshine/The Star Ledgerhttp://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2011/11/a_neo-can_goes_over_the_border.html#ooid=RzYXkxMzrXO6LlbTIUPgQrLSdayTFo25Only in Washington could a former Walter Mondale speechwriter who was raised in Canada be permitted to pose as a conservative.
> That's Charles Krauthammer, who is seen above making an attack on Ron Paul that is positively bizarre.
> Krauthammer is among a group of what I call the "Neo-Cans." There are liberal internationalists who have snuck in from Canada disguised as conservatives. Mark Steyn and David Frum also meet the definition.
> In the above clip Krauthammer is asked which of the contenders for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination he could support.
> Probably everyone except Ron Paul, who is living in the 20s, who thinks we can have a moat around the United States and if we ignore the world, the world will ignore us, he responds.
> This is dumb even by neo-Can standards. Of course we can't put a moat around the entire country. How would you dig a moat in the ocean? Doesn't Krauthammer have a map? Most of our borders are already defined by The Atlantic Ocean, the Pacific Ocean and Gulf of Mexico.
> As for the two countries with which we have land borders, neither is or ever will be a military threat.
> That's just dumb. But that comment about the 1920s is just plain crazy.
> Back then there were no nuclear weapons and no long-range bombers. We had a powerful navy to protect our coastlines.
> And who was going to attack us? Assuming this neo-Can knows his history - never a safe assumption with neocons - he has to be aware that Germany was in the midst of an economic collapse back then.
> And assuming he's aware of that, what would he have had the United States do back then?
> Should we have mounted a preemptive strike on Germany before Hitler came to power?
> Should we have assembled a fleet and attacked Japan for no reason whatsoever?
> Krauthammer is a psychiatrist. And here he is making a real advance in his field. He has provided us with irrefutable proof that neoconservatism is a form of insanity.http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2011/11/a_neo-can_goes_over_the_border.html

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: A neo-Can goes over the border in attacking Ron Paul

Charles Krauthammer is just another jew attacking RP

RP will cut the charity and military support given to the jews and
they know it

they would rather have a disgraced zionist xian pos like Newt

On Nov 28, 8:47 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> A neo-Can goes over the border in attacking Ron PaulPublished: Monday, November 28, 2011, 2:22 PM Updated: Monday, November 28, 2011, 3:44 PMbyPaul Mulshine/The Star Ledgerhttp://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2011/11/a_neo-can_goes_over_the_border.html#ooid=RzYXkxMzrXO6LlbTIUPgQrLSdayTFo25Only in Washington could a former Walter Mondale speechwriter who was raised in Canada be permitted to pose as a conservative.
> That's Charles Krauthammer, who is seen above making an attack on Ron Paul that is positively bizarre.
> Krauthammer is among a group of what I call the "Neo-Cans." There are liberal internationalists who have snuck in from Canada disguised as conservatives. Mark Steyn and David Frum also meet the definition.
> In the above clip Krauthammer is asked which of the contenders for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination he could support.
> Probably everyone except Ron Paul, who is living in the 20s, who thinks we can have a moat around the United States and if we ignore the world, the world will ignore us, he responds.
> This is dumb even by neo-Can standards. Of course we can't put a moat around the entire country. How would you dig a moat in the ocean? Doesn't Krauthammer have a map? Most of our borders are already defined by The Atlantic Ocean, the Pacific Ocean and Gulf of Mexico.
> As for the two countries with which we have land borders, neither is or ever will be a military threat.
> That's just dumb. But that comment about the 1920s is just plain crazy.
> Back then there were no nuclear weapons and no long-range bombers. We had a powerful navy to protect our coastlines.
> And who was going to attack us? Assuming this neo-Can knows his history - never a safe assumption with neocons - he has to be aware that Germany was in the midst of an economic collapse back then.
> And assuming he's aware of that, what would he have had the United States do back then?
> Should we have mounted a preemptive strike on Germany before Hitler came to power?
> Should we have assembled a fleet and attacked Japan for no reason whatsoever?
> Krauthammer is a psychiatrist. And here he is making a real advance in his field. He has provided us with irrefutable proof that neoconservatism is a form of insanity.http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2011/11/a_neo-can_goes_over_the_border.html

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Newt Gets Another Big Endorsement

Today Speaker Gingrich received the coveted endorsement of one of the country's most important conservative publications, the Manchester Union-Leader. The Manchester Union-Leader was among the first to champion Ronald Reagan and has a history of endorsing eventual New Hampshire primary winners! This is just further evidence that Speaker Gingrich is the conservative frontrunner to be the Republican nominee for President!

From today's front-page editorial:

"America is at a crucial crossroads. It is not going to be enough to merely replace Barack Obama next year. We are in critical need of the innovative, forward-looking strategy and positive leadership that Gingrich has shown he is capable of providing.

"He did so with the Contract with America. He did it in bringing in the first Republican House in 40 years and by forging balanced budgets and even a surplus despite the political challenge of dealing with a Democratic President. A lot of candidates say they're going to improve Washington. Newt Gingrich has actually done that, and in this race he offers the best shot of doing it again."

This campaign is peaking at just the right moment. With bold policy initiatives and a history of conservative leadership, Speaker Gingrich has established himself as the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney. Governor Romney is well funded and has a strong organization that has been built during his nearly 5-year Presidential run. If you are ready for bold policies that go beyond timid tinkering around the edges offered by Governor Romney, then we need you to endorse Newt too! We need to 20,000 people to endorse Newt this week by making financial contribution of any amount to this campaign!

Voting begins right after the holidays and we need your help to get out the vote in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and beyond! Will you invest in a conservative future by making a generous financial contribution of $25, $50, $100, up to the maximum contribution of $2500?

Thank You,

Michael Krull
Newt 2012
Campaign Manager

To Donate By Mail Please Send Checks To:

Newt 2012
Post Office Box 550769
Atlanta, GA 30355

Contributions to Newt 2012 are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. The maximum an individual may contribute to Newt 2012 is $2,500 for the primary election and an additional $2,500 for the general election. Couples may contribute up to $5,000 for each election; joint contributions require the signature of both spouses. Federal multicandidate PACs may contribute up to $5,000 for each election. By submitting your contribution, you agree that the first $2,500 of a contribution will be designated for the 2012 election, and any additional amount, up to $2,500 will be designated for the 2012 general election. Contributions from corporations, foreign nationals, and federal government contractors are prohibited. Contributions must be made from personal funds and may not be reimbursed by any other person. Federal law requires us to use our best efforts to obtain and report the name, mailing address, occupation, and name of employer for each individual whose contributions aggregate in excess of $200 in an election cycle.

Paid for by Newt 2012

This message was intended for: keith.eidson@gte.net
You were added to the system September 8, 2011. For more information
click here.
Update your preferences | Unsubscribe

Re: cain is toast

Martinis for breakfast this morning PlainOl?

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:44 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:

the only thing that Newt has is a zionist xian following ... everyone
else remembers his shameful political past and won't forget the way he
treats women

On Nov 28, 11:04 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:19 PM, geoffrey theist <gtheist...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > i think you are right.they beat him down i am afraid barack is going to be
> > re-elected.cain has/had? the best chance to beat obama.
>
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:09 PM, plainolamerican <

> > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> WASHINGTON – An Atlanta businesswoman said Monday she and Republican
> >> presidential contender Herman Cain had a 13-year extramarital affair
> >> that ended right before Cain announced his campaign.
>
> >> Ginger White told Fox 5 in Atlanta she met Cain in the late '90s while
> >> he was chairman of the National Restaurant Association and that the
> >> relationship was "pretty simple."
>
> >> "It wasn't complicated. I was aware that he was married. And I was
> >> also aware I was involved in a very inappropriate situation,
> >> relationship," White told WAGA-TV." The accusation I had a 13-year
> >> affair with her, no," Cain said.
>
> >> Cain said the allegations will not cause him to drop his bid for the
> >> presidency.
>
> >> Cain said he found out about the allegations when the television
> >> station contacted his lawyer, Lin Wood, for comment.
> >> In a statement to the Atlanta station, Wood called White's depiction
> >> of her relationship with Cain "private, alleged consensual conduct
> >> between adults" and "not a proper subject of inquiry by the media or
> >> the public."
> >> "This is not an accusation of harassment in the workplace — this is
> >> not an accusation of an assault — which are subject matters of
> >> legitimate inquiry to a political candidate," he said.
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>

> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/

> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>
>

> Newt.2012..jpg
> 7KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: cain is toast

the only thing that Newt has is a zionist xian following ... everyone
else remembers his shameful political past and won't forget the way he
treats women

On Nov 28, 11:04 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:19 PM, geoffrey theist <gtheist...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > i think you are right.they beat him down i am afraid barack is going to be
> > re-elected.cain has/had? the best chance to beat obama.
>
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:09 PM, plainolamerican <
> > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> WASHINGTON – An Atlanta businesswoman said Monday she and Republican
> >> presidential contender Herman Cain had a 13-year extramarital affair
> >> that ended right before Cain announced his campaign.
>
> >> Ginger White told Fox 5 in Atlanta she met Cain in the late '90s while
> >> he was chairman of the National Restaurant Association and that the
> >> relationship was "pretty simple."
>
> >> "It wasn't complicated. I was aware that he was married. And I was
> >> also aware I was involved in a very inappropriate situation,
> >> relationship," White told WAGA-TV." The accusation I had a 13-year
> >> affair with her, no," Cain said.
>
> >> Cain said the allegations will not cause him to drop his bid for the
> >> presidency.
>
> >> Cain said he found out about the allegations when the television
> >> station contacted his lawyer, Lin Wood, for comment.
> >> In a statement to the Atlanta station, Wood called White's depiction
> >> of her relationship with Cain "private, alleged consensual conduct
> >> between adults" and "not a proper subject of inquiry by the media or
> >> the public."
> >> "This is not an accusation of harassment in the workplace — this is
> >> not an accusation of an assault — which are subject matters of
> >> legitimate inquiry to a political candidate," he said.
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>
>
> Newt.2012..jpg
> 7KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

RE: JP Tsunami of Change

its all about leadership ... Imran khan knows how and when to play the particular card .. so its very early to blame him . He is still way better than nawaz and ppp

Muhammad Haris Haneef

Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:35:54 +0500
Subject: Re: **JP** Tsunami of Change
From: aslam1950@gmail.com
To: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com

Dear Ashfaq Saheb

Apparently it seems that the person behind is Musharraf.

Musharraf wants to come back and he could be scared of Nawaz Sharif.

Musharraf may be playing a game by using Imran Khan, as we see that Imran is mainly talking against Nawaz, particularly in Punjab, as if Nawaz is the main culprit. Imran's speeches are not strong any more at all against what is happening in the country now and also he is quite about what has happened in the Musharraf era.

If Mr Warraich has joined Imran then it could also be a part of Musharraf's plan.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Muhammad Ashfaq <ashfaq.ahmad@colonygroup.com> wrote:

Dear All,

Yesterday Tsunami crossed Rahim Yar Khan and Zafar Iqbal Warraich Joined PTI. Zafar Iqbal Warraich was the minister of state for interior with Musharraf for five years and Supervised the massacre and carnage in Laal Masjid. He was the head of Islamabad administration and police which dragged the Chief Justice on the constitution avenue and all 60 Judges were house arrested on his watch. Is it tsunami of change or Musharraf tram repackaged under a new Leader ?

Regards,

Muhammad Ashfaq

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Re: Fwd: Duke Arrested.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

extreme right wing "nazi" race based speech is banned in
Europe
---
pro-white speech labeled as 'nazi' race based speech by jews

nothing would make the jews happier than to get hate speech laws
passed in the US

Laws prohibiting hate speech are unconstitutional in the United
States, outside of obscenity, defamation, incitement to riot, and
fighting words.[48][49][50] The United States federal government and
state governments are broadly forbidden by the First Amendment of the
Constitution from restricting speech.[51]

On Nov 29, 8:59 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you watch the speech that he also did not get to give (but
> recorded) in the Czech Republic it is rather obvious as to why he was
> detained. extreme right wing "nazi" race based speech is banned in
> Europe. He knows that.
>
> On Nov 29, 4:17 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From:
> > Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2011
> > Subject: Duke Arrested.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
> > To: ITSALLGONERO...@freedoms.lost
>
> > 11/27/2011
>
> > What Would Happen If Jesse Jackson Were Arrested in Europe?
>
> > <http://www.davidduke.com/images/Copy-of-dukespeaksSweden.png>
> > Maim-stream Media Ignores the Arrest of Dr. David Duke in Germany.
> > by James Buchanan
> > Dr. David Duke was invited by German patriots to give a speech in the city
> > of Cologne. He was arrested before he could say one word and has been held
> > in isolation since Friday (but is now free) pending resolution of charges
> > in court at a later date.
> > Now let's alter this scenario a little bit. Instead of a pro-White
> > activist, let's say a pro-Black activist, Jesse Jackson had been visiting
> > Europe to organize the many recent African immigrants in Europe into a
> > voting block. Let's say Jackson stepped off an airplane in Cologne and
> > before he could give a scheduled speech, he was surrounded by
> > submachine-gun-toting policemen and hauled off to a prison as if he were a
> > serious criminal, who had been robbing banks.
> > To make matters worse, let's say the German police held Jackson with little
> > -if any- communication with his friends and family. Under those
> > circumstances, the mainstream media would let out howls of rage over the
> > brutal police state tactics and the lack of freedom in the so-called
> > "Republic" of Germany. The US government would similarly react in outrage
> > and begin threatening Germany with sanctions if they failed to immediately
> > release the US citizen or if they ever repeated such tyrannical actions
> > against a US citizen in the future. (more…)
>
> >http://www.davidduke.com/

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

this may interest some of you

Protectionism Crushes Consumer Choice

Posted by David White | Posted in Wine Rules | Posted on 04-05-2011

Tom and his husband, Cy, at Gloria Ferrer.

"Considering the geographic proximity, it's simply ridiculous that I can't ship wine to Maryland," reasoned Tom Natan, the owner of Washington DC-based First Vine Wine Imports + Sales, as we sat down over coffeeto discuss the real-life impact of Maryland's anti-consumer wine laws.

Maryland's oenophiles would probably agree. First Vine imports an array of wines from France, Spain, and even Malta. For most of these wines, First Vine is the only importer in the United States. And all the wine is affordable — most bottles range in price from $10 to $35.

Yet consumers in Maryland (and most other states) are legally prohibited from purchasing wine from First Vine and other out-of-state retailers. Such laws stifle consumer choice and keep prices artificially high.

First Vine's story begins about ten years ago. At the time, Tom was a chemical engineer with the National Environmental Trust, and doing lots of international travel as a "roving pollution inventory expert."

On one trip to Mexico, he met an environmental consultant who lived on a vineyard in France. He had always loved wine, so asked for more details – and soon learned that this woman's husband grew grapes in Provence, co-owned the village wine cooperative, led wine tastings for English-speaking tourists, and helped represent a number of small wine producers.

A view from the middle of the ridge in Vinsobres, France, looking south toward Mont Ventoux. Vinsobres is the village First Vine first imported wine from.

Over a few visits to Provence, Tom fell in love the cooperative's wines. They weren't available in the United States, so Tom thought he could start a business importing those wines.

He was right. Washington DC is one of the only places in the country that allows retailers to import wines directly from overseas producers, so in 2007 — after hiring a liquor attorney, securing a few licenses, and paying several fees — Tom jumped in. It's been his full-time job since 2008.

Today, First Vine sells about 50 cases of wine each month.

"We're a virtual business," Tom explained, as he told me about his growing business. "Our retail license is for where we store our wine, but all of it is delivered. Most is purchased on our website, and most of our customers are local."

In Washington DC, First Vine's products aren't that hard to find.

Interested customers can check out the company's blog and/or Facebook page, where Tom alerts people to upcoming events. About twice each month, First Vine's wines are poured at places like Hill's Kitchen, a gourmet kitchenware store, GoodWood, a quirky furniture boutique, or Alliance Française. Tom can't sell at these tastings, but he can direct people to his website. Tom is also the main wine supplier to many large events, as DC law requires caterers to purchase from a retailer. First Vine was also the only retailer at this year's International Wine & Food Festival.

As one might guess, many of the folks who taste these wines – and then inquire about purchasing them – live in Maryland. The Maryland/DC border, after all, is just four miles from where First Vine stores its wine.

But Tom always refuses the opportunity. "A felony conviction just isn't a risk I'm willing to take," he said. Since 1999, it has been a felony for an out-of-state retailer to ship alcoholic beverages to a Maryland consumer, punishable by up to two years in prison. As Tom (understandably) explained, "that's just not a line I'm willing to cross."

Of course, Maryland residents can skirt the law by using a DC office as their delivery address. Many undoubtedly do.

"If lawmakers are so concerned about Maryland residents ordering wine, perhaps the state police should set up stings at the border crossings," Tom joked.

His larger point was convincing, though. Who, exactly, are Maryland lawmakers protecting?

First Vine carries a unique selection of wines not available anywhere else. The wines are affordable, too — because First Vine is an importer and a retailer, there's no distributor taking a cut. Plus, Tom, his husband Cy, and their business partner, Dare Wenzler, are extremely knowledgeable about the wines they carry. So they can help customers find exactly what they're looking for.

Tom with Valérie Chaume-Arnaud, one of the producers in Vinsobres whose wine he imports.

Yet Maryland lawmakers insist on protecting citizens from what Reason magazine writer Jacob Sullum sarcastically described as the "horror of online wine sales."

Many Maryland lawmakers, like House Economic Matters Committee chairman Dereck Davis, maintain that out-of-state retailers like First Vine would threaten the livelihood of local liquor store owners "during the worst economic recession in modern times" if allowed to ship into the state.

In Tom's opinion, this is nonsense.

"I don't pose a threat to any Maryland retailers," Tom argued. "Most liquor shops rely on walk-in business – think of the corner store where people stop on their way home from work to pick up a bottle of wine to have with dinner. I pose no threat to those stores.

"The larger wine shops aren't carrying the same labels I am, because the producers I import can't afford to deal with our country's three-tier system," Tom continued. "It isn't possible for any wine store to carry everything.

"If you have an unserious, unsustainable business that doesn't take customer service seriously, maybe opening up the market to competition will hurt you," Tom admitted. "But those shops probably deserve to go out of business anyway, and will eventually regardless of the law."

And then there are all the ways Maryland could benefit. First Vine does ship to Virginia, collecting both sales and excise taxes for the state. Plus, First Vine had to purchase a $160 "shipper's license" from the state.

"Why doesn't Maryland see this as a revenue generator?" Tom wondered.

The answer, of course, is the power and influence of Maryland's well-heeled special interest groups, who see larger legal and strategic issues at play with the efforts to liberalize Maryland's liquor market. Such protectionist laws, though, are anti-consumer and anti-choice – and must be reformed.

Re: A muslim author/philosopher challegens Americans at Ground Zero (video)

*What is the only true and functioning democracy in the middle east
that
allows it's minority citizens to vote?*
---
democracies always fail so who cares if any country in the middle east
is democratic or allows it's minority citizens to vote?
their countries ... their rules

political and military intervention by the United States prefers
authoritarian regimes because this simplifies the business environment
while enriching the governing elite

On Nov 29, 10:04 am, Bear Bear <thatbear...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *Very good Annointed. Nice to hear some home truths. You only left out one
> question that I would have put in. *
> *
> *
> *What is the only true and functioning democracy in the middle east that
> allows it's minority citizens to vote?*
> *
> *
> *bear*
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> On 26 November 2011 21:31, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > May be sage has no idea... I do... not about you but about the mid-
> > east. On my last visit I was to meet three old friends at the border
> > crossing just south of Jerusalem.... the missile hit them on the
> > Israeli side when I was about 200 meters away...
>
> > Israel did not respond. There are MANY MANY cases where Israel does
> > not respond... when they do respond they do it right. 20% of the
> > voting population of Israel are Muslim. Why is it that they have no
> > problem other than being placed on Palestinian hit lists?
>
> > Who built the new shopping mall? Who built the new Olympic sized
> > pools? who pays the light bill? who sees to it that every shipment
> > that does not carry arms is delivered? (they do this in their own
> > country as well), who sees to it that Palestine has the same monthly
> > payment for social welfare as its own citizens?
>
> > Who attacked who in every war that land was won and delivered to
> > Israeli control under treaty terms? Who is it that is now back-
> > peddling?
>
> > Who is it that has fired first in EVERY armed conflict Israel has had
> > with neighbors or the Palestinians. What is the ONLY country that a
> > Palestinian can get a visa to enter in the mid-east (HINT.... Israel)
> > Even their Arab/Muslim brothers will not allow them in.
>
> > Who is it that places military rocket sites and headquarters in public
> > schools and hospitals?
>
> > Who is it that time and again has agreed to "Free Palestine" in
> > exchange for the simple right to exist as a state only to be refused
> > every time.
>
> > Who is it that swears orally and in writing that all Israelis
> > (remember 20% are Muslims) must be exterminated?
>
> > Who is it that has a government that is comprised entirely of a known
> > terrorist organization?
>
> > Please answer these questions honestly.
>
> > On Nov 26, 8:12 pm, Democrat <edipyuk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sage you have no clue about me and my position. I am not a Sunni, nor
> > > an Arab. Every person with sense of justice that follow the events in
> > > the Middle East knows well that Israel is the bully, the agressor, the
> > > land-grabber, the occupying military power, while at the same time the
> > > the crying victim.
>
> > > History will condemn Israel as a fascist apertheid state. Thank God
> > > many Americans and Europians, despite the Zionist propaganda and
> > > finance, are realizing this fact. I am member of a few Jewis
> > > organizations that promote peace (not the fake peace-process led by
> > > the USA-Inc), justice and liberty.
>
> > > With the change in the Arab world, which will take a few more years,
> > > Israel will be the only militarist regime (faking democracy) and the
> > > only theocratic regime besides Iran. Wait and see.
>
> > > Peace,
> > > Edip
>
> > > On Nov 26, 9:21 am, Sage2 <wisdom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > The bottom line is quite simple for any argument as it
> > > > relates to Arab , Israeli relations. The Arabs are a culture of hate
> > > > for Jews and never intend to make peace with them. History proves Edip
> > > > Yuksel wrong time & time again. One need only read the 1928 Muslim
> > > > Brotherhood Manifesto. If it had not been for the Western countries
> > > > during WWII fighting for the worlds freedom the Arabs would be slaves
> > > > to the Germans, even with the Brotherhood having assisted them in war
> > > > crimes against the Jews.
>
> > > > On Nov 26, 10:22 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Good Morning from Tampa Florida Edip,
>
> > > > > I have ony watched a portion of your video, and seen only a smidgeon
> > of
> > > > > your writings.
>
> > > > > I'll take your challenge, albeit I would like for the stakes to be a
> > > > > little higher. How about we debate, "*mano-y-mano*", and the loser
> > cover
> > > > > all expenses of the winner?
>
> > > > > I am prepared to come to New York, or for you to come to Tampa
> > Florida.
> > > > > If you come to Tampa, I can arrange for public broadcasting on cable
> > > > > television, but either way, our debate will be broadcast on
> > You-Tube.
>
> > > > > Put your money where your mouth is.....
>
> > > > > Respectfully,
>
> > > > > KeithInTampa
> > > > > KeithInTampa@gmail,com
>
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Democrat <edipyuk...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > Edip Yuksel chellenges fellow Americans at Ground Zero.
>
> > > > > >http://www.edip4president.com/challenge/-Hidequotedtext -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Fwd: Check out "Congress to Vote Next Week on EXPLICITLY Creating a Police State" on As A Mom...

1867 exempts US citizens and aliens. Lets get that straight

On Nov 29, 12:01 pm, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> **
> As A Mom... <http://www.asamom.org/>
> A Sisterhood of Mommy Patriots
> [image: Erin~Dir of
> M…]<http://www.asamom.org/profile/Erin497?xg_source=msg_share_topic>
> Erin~Dir of Membership<http://www.asamom.org/profile/Erin497?xg_source=msg_share_topic>
> Check out the discussion 'Congress to Vote Next Week on EXPLICITLY
> Creating a Police State'
> This is being debated today! Be sure you are knowledgeable about this
> issue, and call your Senator now!!!
>
> Discussion posted by Scarlett
> B<http://www.asamom.org/profile/ScarlettB?xg_source=msg_share_topic>
> :
>
> Why now? . The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial
> provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill,...
>
> Discussion link:
> Congress to Vote Next Week on EXPLICITLY Creating a Police
> State<http://www.asamom.org/forum/topic/show?id=4124144%3ATopic%3A1622855&x...>
>
> About As A Mom...
> Our mission is to empower Moms and Moms at Heart in preserving our
> Constitution, country and children's future.
> [image: As A Mom...] <http://www.asamom.org> 81421 members
> 17504 discussions
> 1172 Events
> 11159 blog posts
>
> To control which emails you receive on As A Mom..., click
> here<http://www.asamom.org/profiles/profile/emailSettings?xg_source=msg_sh...>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Fwd: Check out "Congress to Vote Next Week on EXPLICITLY Creating a Police State" on As A Mom...

As A Mom...

A Sisterhood of Mommy Patriots

Erin~Dir of Membership

Check out the discussion 'Congress to Vote Next Week on EXPLICITLY Creating a Police State'

This is being debated today! Be sure you are knowledgeable about this issue, and call your Senator now!!!

Discussion posted by Scarlett B:

Why now? . The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill,...

Discussion link:

Congress to Vote Next Week on EXPLICITLY Creating a Police State

About As A Mom...

Our mission is to empower Moms and Moms at Heart in preserving our Constitution, country and children's future.

81421 members
17504 discussions

1172 Events
11159 blog posts

To control which emails you receive on As A Mom..., click here

Clemency for Umesh Yadav

30^th November 2011

His Majesty King 'Abdullah Bin 'Abdul 'Aziz Al-Saudi, The Custodian of the two Holy Mosques
Office of His Majesty the King
Royal Court, Riyadh
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Fax: +966 1 403 1185

Your Majesty Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al-Saud,

As Salam alaykum wa Rahmatullah wa Barakatuhu

Re: Clemency for Umesh Yadav

I am writing to request that you act urgently to prevent the imminent execution of Umesh Yadav, a Nepali migrant worker convicted of murder and sentenced to death by a Saudi Arabian court.

I am informed that Umesh Yadav, a Nepali migrant worker convicted of murder of a Pakistani citizen Mohammad Latish Wasir, who was accidentally killed by Yadav in 2006.

Your Excellency, Yadav, who came from Machijhitakaiya village of Dhanusha district of Nepal , had reached Saudi Arabia five years ago. Less than two months after reaching the kingdom, Yadav unfortunately engaged in a brawl with Wasir. Yadav is a very poor man , he has a wife, Sanju Devi Yadav, and two sons, Kamalesh and Nitesh, at home. Yadav confirmed that he did not kill Wasir intentionally, it was an accident.

I am informed that the Nepali embassy in Riyadh has also asked the kingdom to put off the execution of the verdict for the time being. I am informed by the Nepali government officials that the Nepali embassy in Riyadh has officially asked the kingdom to not announce the date of execution of the death sentence until it succeeds or fails in persuading the relatives of the victim into granting pardon to Yadav in exchange for blood money.

Your Excellency , I am also informed by the Nepali embassy in Riyadh that they had requested the Pakistani embassy to find out the kin of Wasir and talk them into pardoning Yadav by accepting a certain amount of blood money.

Upon the request of the Nepali embassy, the Riyadh-based Pakistani embassy has already approached the only brother of Mohammad Latish Wasir, who was accidentally killed by Yadav in 2006, for clemency.

"In its preliminary conversations with the brother of the victim, the embassy has found him interested in settling the case by agreeing upon a certain amount of blood money," But Wasir´s who was married and his wife is the rightful claimant of blood money. Wasir´s wife, now married to someone else, though married to someone else now, she was Wasir´s wife until his death. Therefore, her consent is equally necessary. I am informed that the Pakistani embassy is trying to find her. If she gives her consent, Yadav will not have to die.

Your Excellency, I believe in your justice and mercy, I therefore urge you to use your royal rights to delay Yadav's execution and spare his life. Your intervention will save a human and the reward of which is equivalent to saving the whole of humanity.

I look forward to your response on this urgent matter.

Yours sincerely

William Nicholas Gomes
Journalist & Human Rights Activist
80/ B Bramon Chiron, Saydabad,
Dhaka-1203, Bangladesh.
Cell: +88 019 7 444 0 666
E-mail:William [at] williamgomes.org,editorbd[at]gmail.com
Skype: William.gomes9
Face book: www.facebook.com/williamnicholasgomes
Twitter: twitter.com/williamgomes
Web site :www.williamgomes.org

Link : http://nicholasgomes.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/clemency-for-umesh-yadav/

--
William Nicholas Gomes
Journalist & Human Rights Activist
80/ B Bramon Chiron, Saydabad,
Dhaka-1203, Bangladesh.
Cell: +88 019 7 444 0 666
E-mail:William [at] williamgomes.org,editorbd[at]gmail.com
Skype: William.gomes9
Face book: www.facebook.com/williamnicholasgomes
Twitter: twitter.com/williamgomes
Web site :www.williamgomes.org

Gallup Poll: All Ideologies Think Obama Sucks

New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

Gallup Poll: All Ideologies Think Obama Sucks

by Scotty Starnes

Everyone is disappointed in the failure named Obama. Across the political spectrum, all ideologies think Obama sucks.

Gallup:

Obama's approval rating has decreased among all six partisan/ideology groups Gallup tracks on a regular basis since January, but it has dropped the most -- 10 percentage points, from 40% to 30% -- among pure independents. These are the roughly 14% of national adults who neither identify with one of the two major parties nor indicate a leaning. Obama's approval rating has declined by nearly as much -- eight points -- among moderate/liberal Republicans, from 29% to 21%.

Obama's approval rating has changed the least in 2011 among the two groups on the far left and right of the U.S. political spectrum. Most liberal Democrats and very few conservative Republicans approved of him in January and this remains the case today. Additionally, conservative Democrats' views also showed little change -- likely because their approval was already at a dampened 70% at the start of the year.

Approval among moderate Democrats fell by six points from 81% to 75%.

Scotty Starnes | November 29, 2011 at 10:57 AM | Tags: Gallup Poll, ideologies, Independent Voters, President Obama, presidential approval ratings | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-6cP

Comment

See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/gallup-poll-all-ideologies-think-obama-sucks/

Thanks for flying with

WordPress.com