dictator's tomb. — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 24, 11:42 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes it is.... and that Q is pronounced G (I was thinking we were speaking
> English here.. Been there done that and met the asshole in the 80's.
>
> Your source ?? His own web site says it is Gathafi.
>
> the official site of Muammar *Al* - Welcome to the official site of
> *...*<http://www.algathafi.org/html-english/index.htm>
> <http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/algathafi.org?pip=false&premium=true...>
> Welcome to the official site of Muammar *Al Gathafi*.
> Welcome to the official site of
> ...<http://www.algathafi.org/html-english/video-en.htm>
> - Analysis of the current Crisis of
> ...<http://www.algathafi.org/html-english/cat_03_10.htm>
> - Contact Us <http://www.algathafi.org/html-english/contactus.htm>
> www.*algathafi*.org/html-english/index.htm -
> Cached<http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:N86OzbAVwy8J:www...>
> - Similar<http://www.google.co.cr/search?hl=en&nfpr=1&q=related:www.algathafi.o...>
>
> Any other questions ??
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > His name in Arabic is *Muʿammar al-Qaḏḏāfī. *
>
> > On 04/24/2011 08:29 PM, Mark wrote:
>
> > I am a Tico. We have monkeys. ..... Belgiums per capita income is no where
> > near The US...It is much lower... Moslems are welcome here.... I never said
> > I support Gaddafi.. please learn to spell his name if you are going to talk
> > about him.
>
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> >> Mark: Where do you live with monkeys in your back yard? India?
> >> Because of the beauty of Belgium, making it a choice vacation
> >> destination, the per capita income in Belgium is higher than in the
> >> USA. You should move there. But my guess is that Muslims wouldn't be
> >> welcomed (said because you have defended Qadaffi). — J. A. A. —
>
> >> On Apr 22, 12:00 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > What is happening in Belgium is not History but rather Current Events.
>
> >> > They have law enforcement, welfare (higher percentage that the US) their
> >> > food is protected and as you say ...on and on. All the shutdown causes
> >> > (without explicit instructions from congress and the President) is that
> >> > nothing NEW can take place. Supervisors still supervise, all State
> >> functions
> >> > still happen, all taxes are paid.
>
> >> > One would think that something as basic as
>
> >> > "Do we need Congress, a President, or the Supreme Court to survive?"
> >> > (answer is a resounding "No")
>
> >> > would be really important to a Constitutionalist. The States and those
> >> > Federal departments that are necessary to "the Public Welfare" are left
> >> > operating as usual.
>
> >> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> >> >wrote:
>
> >> > > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about Belgium. The
> >> > > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had
> >> > > government contracts would shut down; there would be no protected food
> >> > > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would surge; the
> >> > > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would start using
> >> > > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started
> >> > > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA can't
> >> > > survive without some the public order that is provided by well
> >> thought-
> >> > > out and agreed-to laws.
>
> >> > > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the masses) laws
> >> > > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient government will
> >> > > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their laws. Our
> >> > > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because Congress
> >> > > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run things.
> >> > > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!! Read my
> >> > > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen,
> >> > > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any government
> >> > > employee or elected official, including the President! — J. A.
> >> > > Armistead — Patriot
>
> >> > > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > Onestone,
>
> >> > > > At one full year with no government it is way past the
> >> "experimental"
> >> > > stage.
> >> > > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that cares.
> >> Just
> >> > > why
> >> > > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause civil war ??
> >> The
> >> > > laws
> >> > > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples needs.
>
> >> > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein <
> >> noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> >> > > >wrote:
>
> >> > > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would
> >> be
> >> > > > > in civil war... — J. A. A. —
>
> >> > > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley <
> >> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > John,
>
> >> > > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age
> >> without
> >> > > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national government for
> >> more
> >> > > than
> >> > > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't
> >> make
> >> > > much
> >> > > > > > of a difference in their daily lives."
>
> >> > > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an
> >> untra-
> >> > > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of
> >> anyone,
> >> > > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
> >> > > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the
> >> exact
> >> > > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more
> >> > > conservative
> >> > > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone
> >> ages'
> >> > > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your
> >> "ideal"
> >> > > of
> >> > > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth.
> >> Is
> >> > > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead
> >> �
> >> > > > > Patriot
> >> > > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> >> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >> John,
>
> >> > > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be
> >> "right" of
> >> > > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER
> >> answer
> >> > > > > > >> questions posed to you.)
>
> >> > > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is
> >> socialist. I
> >> > > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning
> >> > > government.
> >> > > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very
> >> long
> >> > > on
> >> > > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. �
> >> > > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> >> > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >> > > > > > >>> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist
> >> > > constitution.
> >> > > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the
> >> capitalist
> >> > > system
> >> > > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that
> >> government
> >> > > > > should
> >> > > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that
> >> you
> >> > > even
> >> > > > > ask
> >> > > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you
> >> are a
> >> > > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The
> >> remaining
> >> > > 5%
> >> > > > > are
> >> > > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A.
> >> > > Armistead
> >> > > > > �
> >> > > > > > >>>>> Patriot
> >> > > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> >> > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >> > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> John,
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades
> >> > > websites
> >> > > > > based
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much
> >> about
> >> > > your
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom
> >> of
> >> > > > > expression means.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and
> >> social
> >> > > harm
> >> > > > > to the
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including
> >> Hitler"
> >> > > seems
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able
> >> to
> >> > > pull
> >> > > > > off this
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> tremendous task?
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American
> >> > > multinational
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View,
> >> > > California.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways
> >> you are
> >> > > > > very
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's
> >> neck
> >> > > from
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those
> >> who
> >> > > commit
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on
> >> > > > > moderation
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should
> >> be
> >> > > > > killed?
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect
> >> those who
> >> > > > > kill
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of
> >> Americans
> >> > > have
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the
> >> lack of
> >> > > jobs
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> resulting from Obama's
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment