Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Fwd: The Truth about Earned Success



------
Friends,
 
You can expect much campaign talk in the weeks and months ahead about fairness and equality.  There will also be lots of finger-pointing at business and finance firms as the cause of our economic woes.  In short, what you'll hear is an effort to make the moral case for European-style social democracy in America.
 
So how are Europeans faring under their social democratic system?  Take my wife's native country of Spain.  Unemployment there is at 24.4 percent, with youth joblessness more than double that.  Nearly half of adults under 35 now live with their parents.  The collective happiness of Spaniards--already relatively low--has withered.
 
Faced with these realities, statists in America know they can't make the economic case for social democracy.  That's why they make the moral case instead.  How do they do it?  By arguing that the moral core of free enterprise is greed.
 
At AEI, we are showing what free enterprise is really about--earned success
 
Earned success is what our founders meant when they promised the "pursuit of happiness."  It's the ability to create value in your life or in the lives of others.  To do this, you must be able to define what success means to you and then pursue it with all your might.
 
My AEI colleagues are discussing a wide range of issues related to free enterprise and earned success.  Kevin Hassett has been addressing the human disaster of unemployment, Leon Kass the need to find meaning in America, and James Pethokoukis the growing attacks on the private sector.  (You can find more of our work here.)
 
Earned success is a major theme in my new book, The Road to Freedom.  It's also a subject I've been talking about in dozens of media outlets recently, such as Fox & Friends, Stossel, and CNBC's Squawk Box, as well as in the most recent AEI Banter podcast. 
 
I'll be discussing The Road to Freedom at a livestreamed event at AEI tonight.  If you have questions about the book or AEI's broader work on free enterprise, email them to roadtofreedom@aei.org or tweet them during the event with #roadtofreedom.  I'll answer the best ones live.
 
The fight for free enterprise is on.  Thank you for standing with us.
 
 
Arthur

If you do not wish to receive emails like this in the future, please contact Lori.Sanders@aei.org.



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

The National Debt in Pictures

This is waaaaaay to complicated for libtards to understand.


New post on therightplanet.com

The National Debt in Pictures

by Sard

This is mind-boggling . . .

One Hundred Dollars

$100 - Most counterfeited money denomination in the world. Keeps the world moving.

Ten Thousand Dollars

$10,000 - Enough for a great vacation or to buy a used car. Approximately one year of work for the average human on earth.

One Million Dollars

$1,000,000 - Not as big of a pile as you thought, huh? Still this is 92 years of work for the average human on earth.

One Hundred Million Dollars

$100,000,000 - Plenty to go around for everyone. Fits nicely on an ISO / Military standard sized pallet.

One Billion Dollars

$1,000,000,000 - You will need some help when robbing the bank. Now we are getting serious!

One Trillion Dollars

$1,000,000,000,000

When the U.S government speaks about a 1.7 trillion deficit - this is the volumes of cash the U.S. Government borrowed in 2010 to run itself.

Keep in mind it is double stacked pallets of $100 million dollars each, full of $100 dollar bills. You are going to< need a lot of trucks to freight this around.

If you spent $1 million a day since Jesus was born, you would have not spent $1 trillion by now...but ~$700 billion - same amount the banks got during bailout.

One Trillion Dollars

Comparison of $1,000,000,000,000 dollars to a standard-sized American Football field and European Football field.

Say hello to the Boeing 747-400 transcontinental airliner that's hiding on the right. This was until recently the biggest passenger plane in the world.

15 Trillion Dollars

$15,000,000,000,000 - US national debt (credit bill) has just topped the 15 trillion 2 months before Christmas 2011.

Statue of Liberty seems rather worried as United States national debt passes 20% of the entire world's combined GDP (Gross Domestic Product). In 2011 the National Debt will exceed 100% of GDP, and venture into the 100%+ debt-to-GDP ratio that the European PIIGS have (bankrupting nations).

$ 114.5 Trillion Dollars

$114,500,000,000,000. - US unfunded liabilities

To the right you can see the pillar of cold hard $100 bills that dwarfs the WTC & Empire State Building - both at one point world's tallest buildings. If you look carefully you can see the Statue of Liberty.

The 114.5 Trillion dollar super-skyscraper is the amount of money the U.S. Government knows it does not have to fully fund the Medicare, Medicare Prescription Drug Program, Social Security, Military and civil servant pensions. It is the money USA knows it will not have to pay all its bills.

If you live in USA this is also your personal credit card bill; you are responsible along with everyone else to pay this back. The citizens of USA created the U.S. Government to serve them, this is what the U.S. Government has done while serving The People.

The unfunded liability is calculated on current tax and funding inputs, and future demographic shifts in US Population.

Note: On the above 114.5T image the size of the base of the money pile is half a trillion, not $1T as on 15T image. The height is double. This was done to reflect the base of Empire State and WTC more closely.

h/t: Janyce & Russ

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.therightplanet.com/2012/05/the-national-debt-in-pictures/




--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Case of the Missing Terrorists

I disagree that torturing anyone is acceptable.  As stated, (and I think pretty much proven by fact,  despite Moonbats' assertions to the contrary);  "We've"  (as in "We, The United States")  have never tortured anyone!
 


 
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:32 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
individuals that were waterboarded,  were not
tortured.
---
torturing terrorists is justifiable

Waterboarding can cause extreme pain, dry drowning, damage to lungs,
brain damage from oxygen deprivation, other physical injuries
including broken bones due to struggling against restraints, lasting
psychological damage and death. Adverse physical consequences can
manifest themselves months after the event, while psychological
effects can last for years.

On May 16, 12:58 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Roberts'  has a very prevaricate, distorted, skewed, inaccurate, and a
> typical revisionist history account of Yoo's,  the "Rumsfeld  Defense
> Department Working Group's"  Memoranda.
>
> As Bybee, Bradbury, Yoo and "Rumsfeld's Defense Department Working Group"
> Memoranda all attest, the modern day waterboarding was a Level III enhanced
> interrogation technique, which was done after all other techniques had
> failed, and was utilized on only three individals, who clearly knew that an
> iminent attack was going to take place in the United States, e.g.; a plane
> from Southeast Asia being targeted into a Los Angeles skyscraper, and a
> dirty bomb being set off in Washington D.C.
>
> The waterboarding procedure, which took place for a maximum of 40 seconds,
> and never caused any pain, or any physical harm or mental harm, and was at
> all times monitored by both a medical doctor and a psychologist.
>
> If the enhanced interrogation technique of waterboarding is 'torture', then
> how does one survive the procedure after 183 times, without revealing the
> information that is the purpose of the waterboarding, and without suffering
> some pain, suffering, or consequential harm?
>
> As much as Roberts, and other Moonbats hate to address the real truth,  the
> three (count em' 3!)  individuals that were waterboarded,  were not
> tortured.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:03 PM, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >  *"If you were a Muslim terrorist seeking retribution for Washington's
> > crimes, would you try to smuggle aboard an airliner a bomb in your
> > underwear or shoe in order to blow up people whose only responsibility for
> > Washington's war against Muslims is that they fell for Washington's
> > propaganda? If you wanted to blow up the innocent, wouldn't you instead
> > place your bomb in the middle of the mass of humanity waiting to clear
> > airport security and take out TSA personnel along with passengers?
> > Terrorists could coordinate their attacks, hitting a number of large
> > airports across the US at the same minute. This would be real terror.
> > Moreover, it would present TSA with an insolvable problem: how can people
> > be screened before they are screened?"
>
> > **The Case of the Missing Terrorists
> > *Paul Craig Roberts
> >  May 14, 2012<http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/05/14/the-case-of-the-missing-te...>
>
> > If there were any real terrorists, Jose Rodriguez would be dead.
>
> > Who is Jose Rodriguez? He is the criminal who ran the CIA torture program.
> > Most of his victims were not terrorists or even insurgents. Most were
> > hapless individuals kidnapped by warlords and sold to the Americans as
> > "terrorists" for the bounty paid.
>
> > If Rodriguez's identity was previously a secret, it is no more. He has
> > been on CBS "60 Minutes" taking credit for torturing Muslims and using the
> > information allegedly gained to kill leaders of al Qaeda. If terrorists
> > were really the problem that Homeland Security, the FBI and CIA claim,
> > Rodriguez's name would be a struck through item on the terrorists' hit
> > list. He would be in his grave.
>
> > So, also, would be John Yoo, who wrote the Justice (sic) Department memos
> > giving the green light to torture, despite US and International laws
> > prohibiting torture. Apparently, Yoo, a professor at the Boalt School of
> > Law at the University of California, Berkeley, was ignorant of US and
> > international law. And so was the US Department of Justice (sic).
>
> > Notice that Rodriguez, "The Torturer of the Muslims," does't have to hide.
> > He can go on national television, reveal his identity, and revel in his
> > success in torturing and murdering Muslims. Rodriguez has no Secret Service
> > protection and would be an easy mark for assassination by terrorists so
> > capable as to have, allegedly, pulled off 9/11.
>
> > Another easy mark for assassination would be former Secretary of Defense
> > Donald Rumsfeld, who staffed up the Pentagon with neoconservative
> > warmongers such as Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, who in turn concocted
> > the false information used to justify the invasions of Iraq and
> > Afghanistan. Rumsfeld himself declared members of al Qaeda to be the most
> > vicious and dangerous killers on earth. Yet Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith,
> > Richard Perle, together with neoconservative media propagandists, such as
> > William Kristol and Max Boot, have been walking around safe for years
> > unmolested by terrorists seeking revenge or bringing retribution to those
> > responsible for as many as 1,000,000 Muslim deaths.
>
> > Condi Rice, Colin Powell, who delivered the Speech of Lies to the UN
> > inaugurating the invasion of Iraq, and Dick Cheney, whose minimal Secret
> > Service protection could not withstand a determined assassination attempt,
> > also enjoy lives unmolested by terrorists.
>
> > Remember the deck of cards that the Bush regime had with Iraqi faces? If
> > terrorists had a similar deck, all of those named above would be "high
> > value targets." Yet, there has not been a single attempt on any one of them.
>
> > Strange, isn't it, that none of the above are faced with a terrorist
> > threat. Yet, the tough, macho Navy Seals who allegedly killed Osama bin
> > Laden must have their identity kept hidden so that they don't become
> > terrorist targets. These American supermen, highly trained killers
> > themselves, don't dare show their faces, but Rodriguez, Rumsfeld, and Condi
> > Rice can walk around unmolested. Indeed, the Seals' lives are so endangered
> > that President Obama gave up the enormous public relations political
> > benefit of a White House ceremony with the heroic Navy Seals. Very strange
> > behavior for a politician. A couple of weeks after the alleged bin Laden
> > killing, the Seals unit, or most of it, was wiped out in a helicopter crash
> > in Afghanistan.
>
> > If you were a Muslim terrorist seeking retribution for Washington's
> > crimes, would you try to smuggle aboard an airliner a bomb in your
> > underwear or shoe in order to blow up people whose only responsibility for
> > Washington's war against Muslims is that they fell for Washington's
> > propaganda? If you wanted to blow up the innocent, wouldn't you instead
> > place your bomb in the middle of the mass of humanity waiting to clear
> > airport security and take out TSA personnel along with passengers?
> > Terrorists could coordinate their attacks, hitting a number of large
> > airports across the US at the same minute. This would be real terror.
> > Moreover, it would present TSA with an insolvable problem: how can people
> > be screened before they are screened?
>
> > Or coordinated attacks on shopping malls and sports events?
>
> > Why should terrorists, if they exist, bother to kill people when it is
> > easy to cause mayhem by not killing them? There are a large number of
> > unguarded electric power substations. Entire regions of the country could
> > be shut down. The simplest disruptive act would be to release large
> > quantities of roofing nails in the midst of rush hour traffic in Boston,
> > New York, Washington DC, Atlanta, Dallas, Chicago, Los Angeles, San
> > Francisco. You get the picture: thousands and thousands of cars disabled
> > with flat tires blocking the main arteries for days.
>
> > Before some reader accuses me of giving terrorists ideas, ask yourself if
> > you really think people so clever as to have allegedly planned and carried
> > out 9/11 couldn't think of such simple tactics, plots that could be carried
> > out without having to defeat security or kill innocent people?  My point
> > isn't what terrorists, if they exist, should do. The point is that the
> > absence of easy-to-do acts of terrorism suggests that the terrorist threat
> > is more hype than reality. Yet, we have an expensive, intrusive security
> > apparatus that seems to have no real function except to exercise power over
> > American citizens.
>
> > In place of real terrorists carrying out easy plots, we have "terrorist"
> > plots dreamed up by FBI and CIA agents, who then recruit some hapless or
> > demented dupes, bribing them with money and heroic images of themselves,
> > and supplying them with the plot and fake explosives. These are called
> > "sting operations," but they are not. They are orchestrations by our own
> > security agencies that produce fake terrorist plots that are then "foiled"
> > by the security agencies that hatched the plots. Washington's announcement
> > is always: "The public was never in danger." Some terrorist plot! We have
> > never been endangered by one, but the airports have been on orange alert
> > for 11.5 years.
>
> > The federal judiciary and brainwashed juries actually treat these
> > concocted plots as real threats to American security despite the
> > government's announcements that the public was never in danger.
>
> > The announcements of the "foiled" plots keep the brainwashed public docile
> > and amenable to intrusive searches, warrantless spying, the growth of an
> > unaccountable police state, and endless wars.
>
> > The "War on Terror" is a hoax, one that has been successfully used
>
> ...
>
> read more »
>
>  barking_moonbat3.jpg
> 18KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reasons Socialism Doesn’t Work




New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

Reasons Socialism Doesn't Work

by Scotty Starnes
Scotty Starnes | May 16, 2012 at 9:25 AM | Tags: liberals, socialism | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-73q

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/reasons-socialism-doesnt-work/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Case of the Missing Terrorists

individuals that were waterboarded, were not
tortured.
---
torturing terrorists is justifiable

Waterboarding can cause extreme pain, dry drowning, damage to lungs,
brain damage from oxygen deprivation, other physical injuries
including broken bones due to struggling against restraints, lasting
psychological damage and death. Adverse physical consequences can
manifest themselves months after the event, while psychological
effects can last for years.

On May 16, 12:58 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Roberts'  has a very prevaricate, distorted, skewed, inaccurate, and a
> typical revisionist history account of Yoo's,  the "Rumsfeld  Defense
> Department Working Group's"  Memoranda.
>
> As Bybee, Bradbury, Yoo and "Rumsfeld's Defense Department Working Group"
> Memoranda all attest, the modern day waterboarding was a Level III enhanced
> interrogation technique, which was done after all other techniques had
> failed, and was utilized on only three individals, who clearly knew that an
> iminent attack was going to take place in the United States, e.g.; a plane
> from Southeast Asia being targeted into a Los Angeles skyscraper, and a
> dirty bomb being set off in Washington D.C.
>
> The waterboarding procedure, which took place for a maximum of 40 seconds,
> and never caused any pain, or any physical harm or mental harm, and was at
> all times monitored by both a medical doctor and a psychologist.
>
> If the enhanced interrogation technique of waterboarding is 'torture', then
> how does one survive the procedure after 183 times, without revealing the
> information that is the purpose of the waterboarding, and without suffering
> some pain, suffering, or consequential harm?
>
> As much as Roberts, and other Moonbats hate to address the real truth,  the
> three (count em' 3!)  individuals that were waterboarded,  were not
> tortured.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:03 PM, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >  *"If you were a Muslim terrorist seeking retribution for Washington's
> > crimes, would you try to smuggle aboard an airliner a bomb in your
> > underwear or shoe in order to blow up people whose only responsibility for
> > Washington's war against Muslims is that they fell for Washington's
> > propaganda? If you wanted to blow up the innocent, wouldn't you instead
> > place your bomb in the middle of the mass of humanity waiting to clear
> > airport security and take out TSA personnel along with passengers?
> > Terrorists could coordinate their attacks, hitting a number of large
> > airports across the US at the same minute. This would be real terror.
> > Moreover, it would present TSA with an insolvable problem: how can people
> > be screened before they are screened?"
>
> > **The Case of the Missing Terrorists
> > *Paul Craig Roberts
> >  May 14, 2012<http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/05/14/the-case-of-the-missing-te...>
>
> > If there were any real terrorists, Jose Rodriguez would be dead.
>
> > Who is Jose Rodriguez? He is the criminal who ran the CIA torture program.
> > Most of his victims were not terrorists or even insurgents. Most were
> > hapless individuals kidnapped by warlords and sold to the Americans as
> > "terrorists" for the bounty paid.
>
> > If Rodriguez's identity was previously a secret, it is no more. He has
> > been on CBS "60 Minutes" taking credit for torturing Muslims and using the
> > information allegedly gained to kill leaders of al Qaeda. If terrorists
> > were really the problem that Homeland Security, the FBI and CIA claim,
> > Rodriguez's name would be a struck through item on the terrorists' hit
> > list. He would be in his grave.
>
> > So, also, would be John Yoo, who wrote the Justice (sic) Department memos
> > giving the green light to torture, despite US and International laws
> > prohibiting torture. Apparently, Yoo, a professor at the Boalt School of
> > Law at the University of California, Berkeley, was ignorant of US and
> > international law. And so was the US Department of Justice (sic).
>
> > Notice that Rodriguez, "The Torturer of the Muslims," does't have to hide.
> > He can go on national television, reveal his identity, and revel in his
> > success in torturing and murdering Muslims. Rodriguez has no Secret Service
> > protection and would be an easy mark for assassination by terrorists so
> > capable as to have, allegedly, pulled off 9/11.
>
> > Another easy mark for assassination would be former Secretary of Defense
> > Donald Rumsfeld, who staffed up the Pentagon with neoconservative
> > warmongers such as Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, who in turn concocted
> > the false information used to justify the invasions of Iraq and
> > Afghanistan. Rumsfeld himself declared members of al Qaeda to be the most
> > vicious and dangerous killers on earth. Yet Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith,
> > Richard Perle, together with neoconservative media propagandists, such as
> > William Kristol and Max Boot, have been walking around safe for years
> > unmolested by terrorists seeking revenge or bringing retribution to those
> > responsible for as many as 1,000,000 Muslim deaths.
>
> > Condi Rice, Colin Powell, who delivered the Speech of Lies to the UN
> > inaugurating the invasion of Iraq, and Dick Cheney, whose minimal Secret
> > Service protection could not withstand a determined assassination attempt,
> > also enjoy lives unmolested by terrorists.
>
> > Remember the deck of cards that the Bush regime had with Iraqi faces? If
> > terrorists had a similar deck, all of those named above would be "high
> > value targets." Yet, there has not been a single attempt on any one of them.
>
> > Strange, isn't it, that none of the above are faced with a terrorist
> > threat. Yet, the tough, macho Navy Seals who allegedly killed Osama bin
> > Laden must have their identity kept hidden so that they don't become
> > terrorist targets. These American supermen, highly trained killers
> > themselves, don't dare show their faces, but Rodriguez, Rumsfeld, and Condi
> > Rice can walk around unmolested. Indeed, the Seals' lives are so endangered
> > that President Obama gave up the enormous public relations political
> > benefit of a White House ceremony with the heroic Navy Seals. Very strange
> > behavior for a politician. A couple of weeks after the alleged bin Laden
> > killing, the Seals unit, or most of it, was wiped out in a helicopter crash
> > in Afghanistan.
>
> > If you were a Muslim terrorist seeking retribution for Washington's
> > crimes, would you try to smuggle aboard an airliner a bomb in your
> > underwear or shoe in order to blow up people whose only responsibility for
> > Washington's war against Muslims is that they fell for Washington's
> > propaganda? If you wanted to blow up the innocent, wouldn't you instead
> > place your bomb in the middle of the mass of humanity waiting to clear
> > airport security and take out TSA personnel along with passengers?
> > Terrorists could coordinate their attacks, hitting a number of large
> > airports across the US at the same minute. This would be real terror.
> > Moreover, it would present TSA with an insolvable problem: how can people
> > be screened before they are screened?
>
> > Or coordinated attacks on shopping malls and sports events?
>
> > Why should terrorists, if they exist, bother to kill people when it is
> > easy to cause mayhem by not killing them? There are a large number of
> > unguarded electric power substations. Entire regions of the country could
> > be shut down. The simplest disruptive act would be to release large
> > quantities of roofing nails in the midst of rush hour traffic in Boston,
> > New York, Washington DC, Atlanta, Dallas, Chicago, Los Angeles, San
> > Francisco. You get the picture: thousands and thousands of cars disabled
> > with flat tires blocking the main arteries for days.
>
> > Before some reader accuses me of giving terrorists ideas, ask yourself if
> > you really think people so clever as to have allegedly planned and carried
> > out 9/11 couldn't think of such simple tactics, plots that could be carried
> > out without having to defeat security or kill innocent people?  My point
> > isn't what terrorists, if they exist, should do. The point is that the
> > absence of easy-to-do acts of terrorism suggests that the terrorist threat
> > is more hype than reality. Yet, we have an expensive, intrusive security
> > apparatus that seems to have no real function except to exercise power over
> > American citizens.
>
> > In place of real terrorists carrying out easy plots, we have "terrorist"
> > plots dreamed up by FBI and CIA agents, who then recruit some hapless or
> > demented dupes, bribing them with money and heroic images of themselves,
> > and supplying them with the plot and fake explosives. These are called
> > "sting operations," but they are not. They are orchestrations by our own
> > security agencies that produce fake terrorist plots that are then "foiled"
> > by the security agencies that hatched the plots. Washington's announcement
> > is always: "The public was never in danger." Some terrorist plot! We have
> > never been endangered by one, but the airports have been on orange alert
> > for 11.5 years.
>
> > The federal judiciary and brainwashed juries actually treat these
> > concocted plots as real threats to American security despite the
> > government's announcements that the public was never in danger.
>
> > The announcements of the "foiled" plots keep the brainwashed public docile
> > and amenable to intrusive searches, warrantless spying, the growth of an
> > unaccountable police state, and endless wars.
>
> > The "War on Terror" is a hoax, one that has been successfully used
>
> ...
>
> read more »
>
>  barking_moonbat3.jpg
> 18KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Picture of Obama and his Ex








 

·          

Picture of Obama and his Ex

by Rodan ( 21 Comments › )    http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2012/01/22/picture-of-obama-and-his-ex/
Filed under Barack ObamaMediaSpecial Report at January 22nd, 2012 - 12:43 am

The media has trotted out Newt Gingrich's ex. They trotted out an alleged mistress of Herman Cain. Why are they so silent about Barack Husein Obama's ex?

How cute they look! Is Obama's ex still alive?

Update: Here's a video of Larry Sinclair describing his fling with Obama back in 1999


 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Could You Just Imagine?




New post on Fellowship of the Minds

Could You Just Imagine?

by catscanner150

Rush Limbaugh ponders running CNN

author-image by Joe Kovacs

PALM BEACH, Fla – No, it's not reality, but radio giant Rush Limbaugh today pondered the possibility of taking over the management of CNN and running things the El Rushbo way.

America's top-rated host was responding to a listener's question about how long it would take to turn the cable-news network around and make it similar to what Fox News is.

"A couple of days. Just the announcement that I was going to run CNN would add a million viewers a night," Limbaugh responded. "And then when we started making changes, it wouldn't take long at all."

CNN's viewership has been plunging recently, and according to Nielsen TV ratings data, it is now a distant third behind Fox News and MSNBC.

For example, on Monday night, May 14, Nielsen indicates Fox News had a prime-time audience of 2.08 million viewers. MSNBC had an estimated 835,000 and CNN had only 325,000.

Limbaugh spent a large portion of his show discussing the possibility of his being in charge at CNN.

"If it were announced that I were going to be running CNN, could you imagine the excrement storm from everywhere if that happened?" he asked rhetorically. "But the tune-in factor would be through the roof, the curiosity tune-in factor. Do any of you doubt that you could improve it? Every one of you thinks you can improve it. Just go show by show. Segment by segment. 'Nope, wouldn't have done that, here's the way to do that.' Segment by segment you could fix CNN."

He then got into specific steps he would take at CNN, saying it would not be difficult.

"Basically what I would do us have every editor there listen to this program, and then in prime time, everything we covered on this program would be treated as the news of the day, 'cause that's what I do. I do the news of the day. They ignore the stuff that we find on this program. I just put the news on that they don't find interesting or that they don't think is news. This is a broad, broad overview.

"Philosophically, what CNN's gotta do is decide who they want to be and then admit it. Right now, they've got themselves believing that they are objective, non-partisan journalists. They believe that MSNBC is liberal, that Fox is conservative and that they are Edward R. Murrow. …

"They also believe that the news should have no opinions while they're full of opinions," Limbaugh said with a chuckle. "The problem is they won't own up to their opinions, they won't admit to it. You've got to be competitive in the arena in which you choose to battle. And it's very clear what cable news has become. It's become personality-oriented opinion. Unabashed, fearless personality opinion. Anything else is pretense. And if you're going to do personality-oriented opinion and then deny that's what you're doing, then you're never gonna pull it off because people are going to realize you're not even being honest with yourself."

Limbaugh made it very clear, though, that no one should hold their breath waiting for him to ever run CNN.

"It'll never happen. Don't sweat it," he said.

Could you just imagine the mess from all those exploding heads in California, Oregon, Washington and D.C., and the northeast.

Tom in NC

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/could-you-just-imagine/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Fwd: [New post] Domestic Abuse Victim Convicted For Defending Herself: The Hypocrisy Of The ‘Stand Your Ground’ Law



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Addicting Info
Date: Monday, May 14, 2012
Subject: [New post] Domestic Abuse Victim Convicted For Defending Herself: The Hypocrisy Of The 'Stand Your Ground' Law
To: majors.bruce@gmail.com


New post on Addicting Info

Domestic Abuse Victim Convicted For Defending Herself: The Hypocrisy Of The 'Stand Your Ground' Law

by Ann Werner

If ever the Stand Your Ground law in Florida had a chance of being applied fairly, that has gone out the window in the case of Marissa Alexander, a 31-year-old mother of three who has been sentenced to 20 years for firing a warning shot at her abusive husband.

In the aftermath of the long-delayed arrest of Trayvon Martin's killer, it is incomprehensible that Alexander, who neither killed nor injured anyone, has been convicted of aggravated assault with a firearm and sentenced to 20 years in prison.

Her husband, Rico Gray, a man with a documented history of abuse including an assault on her while she was pregnant, threatened to kill her nine days after the birth of their daughter. This time, Marissa wasn't going to put up with another beating. When threatened, she fired a warning shot into the ceiling to let Gray know that the abuse was over and he'd better think twice before coming after her again.

//
//

He then ran into the street and claimed that she had threatened to kill him and his boys. On his word alone, she was arrested.

State Attorney Angela Corey, the same prosecutor who is prosecuting the Trayvon Martin case, offered a three-year sentence plea bargain but Alexander refused on the grounds that she had done nothing wrong. Alexander tried to invoke Florida's Stand Your Ground law but the judge refused.

Even though Gray recanted and even though Alexander's 11-year-old daughter took the stand and made a plea on her mother's behalf, the judge said that he had no choice but to sentence Alexander for at least 20 years.

This verdict poses serious questions about an already questionable law that is applied unevenly. Jacksonville Congresswoman Corrine Brown has stated that Alexander's case is a product of "institutionalized racism" and that she had been unable to locate a Stand Your Ground case where a black person is the beneficiary of the law. Alexander is a black woman. Brown will be calling for a national study by the U.S. Department of Justice or other entity to determine whether there are racial inequalities in the application of the Stand Your Ground defense.

In the meantime, Marissa Alexander faces a long time in prison with little hope of getting out.

There is an online petition to Florida Governor Rick Scott to grant a pardon to Marissa Alexander. You can sign it here:  Pardon Marissa Alexander

 

Twitter:  MsWerner  Facebook:  Author Ann Werner

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/05/14/domestic-abuse-victim-convicted/



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.