Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Re: Interesting little video - now what will the MSM have to say about all of this

the trick is to make them believe that we need their oil until their
oil supplies are depleted


On Jul 20, 1:45 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> http://www.parkwayreststop.com/archives/10006598

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Obama's Curious Foreign Policy

Got this from Jim Miller on Politics - sounds like what Zero is trying
to do to me. How soon can we get rid of this idiot and get a decent
president and when will those who voted for this creep ever admit they
screwed up:

Pseudo-Random Thoughts


[Back to Main Politics Page]
<http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/index.html>

*Kudos To Cynthia Tucker: *For admitting error, and for coming out
against race-based districting
<http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2011/06/01/voting-rights-act-i-was-wrong-about-racial-gerrymandering/>.


I won't procrastinate. I'll get the most difficult part of this
column over right now: I was wrong. I was shortsighted, naïve and
narrow-minded to endorse the concept of drawing Congressional
districts to take racial demographics into account.
. . .
Unfortunately — like so many measures designed to provide redress
for historic wrongs — those racially gerrymandered districts also
come with a significant downside: They discourage moderation.
Politicians seeking office in majority-black or -brown districts
found that they could indulge in crude racial gamesmanship and
left-wing histrionics.

I've opposed this kind of districting for years, though not as
vigorously as I should have, because I knew that it helped my party,
net. But I have always thought that it was wrong, and that it had many
bad side effects.

By way of Jay Nordlinger
<http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/272213/obama-and-reagan-c-jay-nordlinger>.

(There is talk here in Washington state of creating a
"majority-minority" congressional district. We need one, some say, even
though we elected Norm Rice <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_Rice>
mayor of our largest city, Ron Sims
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Sims> head of our largest county, and
Gary Locke <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Locke>, governor.

Perhaps those who support that district hope it would give us more
"crude racial gamesmanship and left-wing histrionics".)
- 9:03 AM, 20 July 2011 [link]
<http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/July2011_3.html#jrm10093>


*Wikileaks Versus Hacky Leaks: *Bret Stephens says that they are
"largely the same story"
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303795304576453722472758028.html>.


In both cases, secret information, initially obtained by illegal
means, was disseminated publicly by news organizations that believed
the value of the information superseded the letter of the law, as
well as the personal interests of those whom it would most directly
affect. In both cases, fundamental questions about the lengths to
which a news organization should go in pursuit of a scoop have been
raised. In both cases, a dreadful human toll has been exacted: The
British parents of murdered 13-year-old Milly Dowler, led to the
false hope that their child might be alive because some of her voice
mails were deleted after her abduction; Afghan citizens, fearful of
Taliban reprisals after being exposed by WikiLeaks as U.S. informants.

Both, in short, are despicable instances of journalistic
malpractice, for which some kind of price ought to be paid. So why
is one a scandal, replete with arrests, resignations and
parliamentary inquests, while the other is merely a controversy,
with Mr. Assange's name mooted in some quarters for a Nobel Peace
Prize?

Good question.

But you shouldn't expect anyone at the /New York Times/ or the
/Guardian/ to answer it.
- 7:36 AM, 20 July 2011 [link]
<http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/July2011_3.html#jrm10092>


*Mt. Rainier Has A New Web Cam: *This one
<http://www.nps.gov/webcams-mora/muir.jpg> at Camp Muir
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_Muir>.

Naturally, I've added a link to it, over on the right, with the rest of
the Rainier links.

So far, I haven't seen any spectacular views, and you won't either —
most days. The higher that you go on Mt. Rainier, the more likely you
will be in, or under, a cloud.)

(Years and years and years ago when I climbed the mountain, it was sunny
on the top, but we were under a cloud cap so that we could see down
slope, but not out from the mountain.)
- 1:07 PM, 19 July 2011
*But when you can see,* the view will be interesting and, very
occasionally, spectacular. This morning I can see the top of Mt. Adams
and most of Mt. St. Helens. (Adams is on the left, St. Helens on the
right.) On the rare clear day, you will be able to see Mt. Hood in
Oregon, and perhaps farther.

The camera does not update very often. They are probably using solar
power to run the system, since batteries would have to be brought in by
backpack, which is tiresome, or by helicopter, which is expensive. And
those running the park would not want a diesel generator at Muir, I
suspect.
- 7:54 AM, 20 July 2011 [link]
<http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/July2011_3.html#jrm10091>


*Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard Is In Trouble* with her voters
<http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/national/national/general/labor-hits-record-poll-low/2229271.aspx>.


Over the past month, [opposition leader] Tony Abbott has opened an
11-point lead as preferred prime minister - the first time he has
been ahead of Ms Gillard. The government would be wiped out in a
huge landslide if an election were held now.

In results that will send waves of fear through the government,
approval for Ms Gillard's performance has tumbled another 3 points
to 34 per cent, while her disapproval rating has jumped 3 to 62 per
cent.

Why? Because, to put in terms most Americans will understand, she
believed Al Gore.

And because she didn't tell Australian voters the truth about her plans
before the election.

Gillard believes, like Gore, that we are facing a possible climate
catastrophe, and that it can be avoided only by reducing our production
of carbon dioxide. So she has proposed a complex "carbon tax" in an
effort to reduce Australia's contribution to the problem. (Incidentally,
many economists would favor something like her plan, because it would be
an /efficient/ way to reduce carbon dioxide.)

There are, however, two difficulties with her plan: First, though
Australia has a high per person CO2 production, it has a small
population (about 23 million), so this policy change would have almost
no effect on the world's climate.

Second, during last year's election campaign
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_federal_election,_2010>,
Gillard promised
<http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/is-it-possible-to-salvage-the-labor-wreck-julia-gillard-has-delivered-asks-andrew-bolt/story-e6frezz0-1226097883556>
not to introduce a carbon tax.

Everyone knows it. "There will be no carbon tax under a government I
lead," the Prime Minister said, just days before the last election.

This is Labor's original sin. As a result, Gillard lacks legitimacy,
and so does Labor.

More dangerously, even government itself seems to some to be suspect.

All this damage was recklessly inflicted by Labor, whose urgent job
now is to admit to it, apologise for it and fix it as best it can.

Since she stayed prime minister by the narrowest of margins
<http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/September2010_1.html#jrm9119>,
it is reasonable to conclude that she would have lost the election if
she had been honest about her plans.

Why wasn't she honest? Why did she propose this tax, after promising not
to? It is hard to say without knowing more about her than I do, but I
would guess that she thought she could pass it and have enough time to
placate voters before the next election.

And that — and here is where I think she may have been listening to too
much Al Gore — this is so important that she should take this step, in
spite of the political risks. Voters should be saved from this
catastrophe, she may think, in spite of themselves.
- 10:09 AM, 19 July 2011 [link]
<http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/July2011_3.html#jrm10090>


*Obama's "Curious" Foreign Policy: *Jackson Diehl is puzzled
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/if-we-retreat-from-iraq-will-iran-take-over/2011/07/14/gIQA4ZscKI_story.html?wpisrc=nl_opinions>.
(Or says he is, for the sake of an effective lead paragraph.)

One of the most curious features of the Obama administration's
foreign policy is the contrast between the silky,
non-confrontational public diplomacy it employs when dealing with
dictatorships and adversaries, such as Russia, China and Venezuela —
and the brusqueness with which it often addresses U.S. clients and
allies.

Others are less puzzled
<http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/272087/road-obama-runs-through-libya-stanley-kurtz>.


For the unhappy details of the foreign-policy outlook Obama is
advancing, consult Feith-Cropsey yourself. There you will find
material, not only from the writings of Samantha Power, but from
other key Obama aides like Anne-Marie Slaughter and Harold Koh.
Feith and Cropsey summarize by claiming that Obama's goals amount to
a fundamental break with seven decades of American foreign policy,
Republican and Democrat, realist and idealist. That divide, after
all, is what the many presidential apologies for our past policies
are meant to signal. In sum, say Feith and Cropsey, Obama "cares
more about restraining America than about accomplishing any
particular result in Libya. . . . The critics who accuse Obama of
being adrift in foreign policy are mistaken. He has clear ideas of
where he wants to go. The problem for him is that, if his strategy
is set forth plainly, most Americans will not want to follow him."

If Obama "cares more about restraining America" than traditional foreign
policy goals, we have an explanation for the language that puzzles
Diehl, and much else about Obama's foreign policy, including his odd
halfway policy toward Libya.

That goal, restraining America, has been popular on the far left in this
country for decades. (And even more popular in Europe.)

But it has never been popular with the American people, who alternate
between reluctant engagement and isolationism. And so Obama is forced to
conceal his long-term foreign policy goals from us, and even to take
actions, from time to time, that conflict with those goals.
- 8:02 AM, 19 July 2011 [link]
<http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/July2011_3.html#jrm10089>


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Interesting little video - now what will the MSM have to say about all of this

http://www.parkwayreststop.com/archives/10006598

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Another Green Failure - be sure to read the comments on this one

http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/008713.html

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

"Discussion"

Its here:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discussion

or

Definition of DISCUSSION
1: consideration of a question in open and usually informal debate
2: a formal treatment of a topic in speech or writing

When there's THREE pages of "Messages 1 of 1", it aint workin'!

DISCUSSION!!!!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Allen West tirade: Wasserman Schultz ‘vile…despicable…not a Lady’


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

A Young Man’s Guide to Understanding Retirement Accounts: The 401(k)

 





Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
Help us reach our goal of 100,000 Facebook Fans! Please Follow us on Facebook! Thanks!


A Young Man's Guide to Understanding Retirement Accounts: The 401(k)

Chicks dig a man with an awesome retirement account.

If you're a young man, you're probably not giving much thought to retirement right now. It's understandable. It's hard to plan and think about something that's 40 years away (maybe many more–the traditional idea of retirement will likely undergo a lot of changes in the next several decades). Moreover, many young men put off saving for retirement because they're intimidated by the entire process. They feel like they don't have the requisite knowledge to get started.

Over the next few months we're going to take a look at some of the different retirement accounts out there, see how they work, and explore their advantages and disadvantages. My goal is that by the end of this series, you'll have a basic understanding of these accounts and feel confident enough to get started with saving for your retirement.

Why You Need to Start Saving For Retirement Today

Because time is your biggest ally when investing. The longer your money has to grow, the more money you'll have when you retire. To show you the power of time on your investments, let's look at an example from the book Get a Financial Life:

Suppose you set aside $1,000 a year from age 25 to age 64 in a retirement account that earns 5% a year (historically, stocks return about 8%, but we'll be conservative). That's $39,000 total you invest. By the time you turn 65, you'll have have $126,840. If you don't get started with saving until you're 35, you'll only have $69,760. Starting just ten years earlier would have doubled your total. Yes, doubled.

Pretty dang cool, huh?

Here's another reason you should start saving today. If you've been paying attention to the news lately, you've probably heard a lot about our country's budget woes. Social programs that many people currently rely on during retirement might not be around or will be severely diminished by the time a person in their 20s retires. Saving for retirement today will ensure you won't have to worry about about whether Social Security will be around when you're old and decrepit. So you can show up to town halls someday and yell about something else that bothers you.

Finally, saving for retirement is a great way to activate that Provider Switch that we have deeply imbedded in our male psyche. A man has a vision for his family and their future.

What Is a Retirement Account?

With fewer and fewer companies offering pensions to retiring employees, the U.S. government saw a need to encourage Americans to save for their golden years. Starting in the 1980s, Congress passed laws that created a variety of  tax-advantaged retirement accounts such as the 401(k), the 403(b), IRAs, and Roth IRAs. There are more, but those are the big ones.  Fast fact: Why are 401(k)s called 401(k)s? It takes its name from subsection 401(k) in the IRS code that creates this retirement account.

If you're a young man just starting out in life, this alphabet soup of letters and numbers can be sort of intimidating. I know when I was in college, I really didn't have a grasp of what a retirement account was and how it worked.

One thing I see many young men get confused about is the difference between a retirement account and investments. Many mistakenly think that a retirement account is an investment. It's an easy mistake to make. The way people talk about retirement sometimes makes it sound like retirement accounts and investments are synonymous.  They're not, though.

Investments are things like stocks, mutual funds, bonds, and index funds. A retirement account is more like an empty box for holding your investments. You open a retirement account and fund it with whatever investments you want–stocks, bonds, index funds. Because of special tax codes, you won't get taxed every year on the earnings your investments make while sitting in that retirement account.

I read a great analogy that beautifully explains the difference between retirement accounts and investments in The Bogleheads' Guide to Retirement. The author likens retirement accounts to luggage and investments to stuff like clothes and socks. Just as certain luggage and clothing have advantages and disadvantages depending on where you're going, certain retirement accounts and investments have advantages and disadvantages depending on your financial goals.

The most important thing to remember is that retirement accounts allow your investments to grow tax-free. The less money you have to pony up to Uncle Sam, the more money you'll have to go on cruises and spoil your grandkids. Depending on the type of retirement account, the tax savings can happen when you put the money into the account or when you withdraw the money from the account. More on that later.

401(k)s, 403(b)s, TSPs

401(k)s, 403(b)s and TSPs are retirement accounts that you typically open with your employer. 401(k)s are offered by private businesses, 403(b) plans are offered to public education and non-profit employees, and Thrift Savings Plans (TSPs) are offered to federal government employees.

All three plans work essentially the same way, so for the purpose of this post, we'll just be talking about 401(k)s.

Tax Benefits of Traditional 401(k)s

Remember, the biggest advantage of retirement accounts are the tax savings. Here's how traditional 401(k)s save you money. Every payday, your company will automatically deduct a pre-determined amount from your paycheck to buy investments in your 401(k) retirement account. The money you invest in that account won't be taxed until you actually withdraw the money when you retire. This is called a pretax contribution.

To see how this works, let's look at an example. Let's say you make $50,000 a year at your job and you decide to set aside $5,000 a year for retirement in your 401(k). That $5,000 will go into your account, but at tax time, you'll only be taxed for $45,000. For the next 40 years that $5,000 you put in your account will grow tax free. When you retire and start making withdrawals from your account, the $5,000 will finally be taxed.  Because your money grows untaxed for so many years, paying taxes later rather than sooner can put more money in your pocket when you're old and lounging around in running suits.

Picking Your Investments

When you opt into the 401(k), you'll have to pick which investments you want to fund your retirement account with. Your employer typically works with some sort of investment broker to create a menu of different investments for you to choose from.They're usually mutual funds. Unfortunately, you're stuck with the menu your employer creates, and oftentimes the menu is pretty crappy. But I wouldn't let not so good investment options discourage you from investing in your company's 401(k). Investing in less than ideal funds is better than not investing at all.

As far as which funds from the menu you actually pick? That's entirely up to you. Take a look at the prospectus, do some research, and pick the fund that has a risk level you're comfortable with. We'll come back in a later post to go into more detail on how to pick an investment.

Deciding How Much to Set Aside

You tell your company how much of your paycheck you want set aside for your 401(k). You have complete control over how much or how little you contribute to your 401(k). Most financial experts agree that you should save at least 10% of your paycheck for retirement. The more the better, but 10% is a good number. It can be tough to put money aside because every dollar you put towards your 401(k) is one less dollar you can spend and enjoy now. My suggestion would be to set up an automatic contribution with each paycheck and then just forget about it. After awhile, you won't even notice the extra money being socked away.

Employer Matching

This is one of the big advantages of 401(k)s. Many employers will match a portion of the amount you contribute with a contribution of their own, up to a fixed amount. For example, a company might match you $.50 to a $1 for every $1 you contribute to your 401(k) on the first 5% of your salary you invest.

Let's see that in action. Let's say you make $50,000 a year and your employer says he will match you $1 for every dollar you contribute to your 401(k) on the first 5% of your salary you invest. You decide to save 10% of your salary in your 401(k). That's $5,000 that YOU contribute out of your pocket to your 401(k).

Now here comes your employer's contribution. He'll match your contribution dollar for dollar up to 5% of your salary. That means your employer will contribute $2,500 to your account. That's $2,500 of FREE money and a 50% return on your initial investment of $5,000.

If your employer offers 401(k) matching, contribute at least the minimum amount for which you're eligible to receive matching funds. But the more, the better.

Contribution Limits

The government has set limits on what we can contribute to our 401(k). I guess they wanted to give people a tax break, but not too big of one.

  • For employees ages 49 and below, the maximum amount they can contribute out of pocket is $16,500 a year. The maximum combined employee and employer contribution is $49,000 a year.
  • For employees who are older than 50, the government allows you to contribute a bit more so you can catch up on your savings as you prepare to stop working. The maximum employee contribution is $22,000 a year. The maximum combined employee and employer contribution is $54,000 a year.

Withdrawing from Your 401(k)

You can start withdrawing money from your 401(k) without any kind of penalty when you're 59 and 1/2 or if you're 55 and you have left your employer. When you withdraw money, you finally pay income tax on the money you've invested (and the interest it has made).

If you withdraw before you're 59 and 1/2, you will incur a 10% penalty in addition to any normal income taxes you'd have to pay. So let's say you're only 40 and you decide to withdraw $10,000 from your 401(k)–you'll have to pay $1,000 in a penalty plus pay income taxes on that $10,000. Basically, if you withdraw early, you're losing the tax savings you'd normally get with a 401(k). Bottom line: don't withdraw early.

Borrowing from Your 401(k)

There is a way to get early access to the money in your 401(k) that doesn't incur a penalty. You can actually take out a loan from your 401(k). How much you can borrow from your fund will depend on your company. Typically, you can borrow up to half of the money YOU have contributed (many companies don't allow you to borrow from employer matched funds). You usually have five years to pay the loan back. If you don't repay the loan on schedule, the loan converts to a withdrawal, and you'll have to pay the 10% penalty, plus any income taxes.

Do everything you can to prevent borrowing from your 401(k). While it's tempting to tap into it as an emergency fund or to help pay for a down payment on a home, your 401(k) should be your last ditch resource for such things. You don't want to risk not being able to pay back your loan on time and incurring the taxes and penalty of early withdrawal.

Rolling Over Your 401(k)

Whenever you leave a company, you have a few options with what you can do with your 401(k). You can just leave the money there and let it keep growing within that company's 401(k). When you get another job, you can open up a new 401(k) with them. However, if you leave and start several jobs, the number of different 401(k)s you'll have to manage will multiply quickly.

To simplify managing your retirement, financial experts recommend rolling over your 401(k). When you leave a company, you can take the money in your 401(k) with you by rolling it over tax free into a rollover IRA. We'll be talking about IRA's next time, but the important thing to know today is that an IRA is another type of tax free retirement account. You can keep your money in that rollover IRA where it will continue to grow tax free until you retire, or you can take the money in your IRA and apply it to your investments in your new 401(k).

The big takeaway on rollovers is that it's a method for you to transfer your retirement money to different accounts without losing the tax savings benefits of your 401(k).

Roth 401(k)s

Some employers are starting to offer Roth 401(k)s. Instead of offering pre-tax money to your account, with a Roth 401(k) you invest after-tax money. You don't get the upfront tax break that you'd get with a traditional 401(k), but when you withdraw money from your Roth 401(k) at retirement, you don't have to pay any income tax. There are some other benefits to Roth-type retirement accounts, but I'll be talking more about that in our article on IRAs. Stay tuned for that.

Next time: IRAs

Did I miss anything? What's been your experience with 401(k)s? Any advice to the young men out there who are just getting started with their retirement accounts? Share your insights with us in the comments.

Related posts:

  1. 3 Lame Excuses For Not Saving Money
  2. Heading Out on Your Own: A Young Man's Guide to Health Insurance
  3. 30 Days to a Better Man Day 16: Create a Budget
  4. 5 Personal Finance Discussions To Have Before Getting Hitched





The Latest from the AoM Trunk








Copyright (C) 2011 Art of Manliness, LLC All rights reserved.

The Art of Manliness, LLC
PO Box 978
Tulsa, OK 74037



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

PIGlossary of Terms


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: **JP** MY PAKISTAN

I agree that Shahbaz Shareef is doing better than all. But the party whose leader is corrupt cannot do anything for the country. There are always good and bad people in the party. But this party has corrupt leadership. If you wanna see his corruption, see Nawaz Shareef's wealth growing day by day by doing nothing but corruption. His property under construction in illford, London http://www.panoramio.com/photo/50539490. This would be costing in millions of Pounds.  Watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5CUuvhtF3s


From: Zubair Mukhtar <zubairmukhtar@mtmho.com>
To: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 8:22 AM
Subject: RE: **JP** MY PAKISTAN

Mr. Wali Ahmad:
Shahbaz Sharif doing better than all others.
It's a common sense we not have to feed every person till he struggle himself. Govt of Punjab will support the improving and self motivation persons but not to feed them in their homes. So please encourage the current govt of our beloved province.
 
Thanks Mr Shahbaz Sharif
 
Zubair Mukhtar
 
From: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com [mailto:joinpakistan@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Wali Ahmad
Sent: 11,June,11 11:07 AM
To: JOIN PAKISTAN
Subject: **JP** MY PAKISTAN
 
HAM ALAM PANAH AMERIKA KI MADAD SE, KHUSH HAALI LAA KAR RAHAIN GAY, AUR KOI BHI GHAREEB RAHNAY NAHI DENGAY....  C.M.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197


**JP** Fw: ZADARI"S VISIT TO UK SEVEN CROR EXPENSES IN 11 DAYS

LOTO  PAKISTAN  LOTO PAKISTANI KE AJAB KAHANI  LOTO  MOOJ  ARAO

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "journalist.hasnain@yahoo.com" <journalist.hasnain@yahoo.com>
To: journalist.hasnain@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:50 PM
Subject: journalist.hasnain@yahoo.com sent you a link to content of interest

journalist.hasnain@yahoo.com sent you a link to the following content:

Zardari's Visits to UK: Seven crore expenses in 11 days
http://www.columnpk.com/zardaris-visits-to-uk-seven-crore-expenses-in-11-days/

The sender also included this note:

LEADERS ENJOYING WITH NATIONAL MONEY WITH THEIR FAIMLY MEMBERS
PRESIDENT PM SPEAKERS ASSEMBLIES?

--
Sent via a FeedFlare link from a FeedBurner feed.
http://www.google.com/support/feedburner/bin/answer.py?answer=78966&topic=13246


9 1 1

 

 Casey Anthony placed a call to 911 in fear of her life


(Dispatcher) What is your emergency?

(Casey) Please help me, I have a bunch of people trying to kill me. 

(Dispatcher) Okay ma'am, calm down. What is your name? 

(Casey) Casey Anthony. 

(Dispatcher) Okay Miss Anthony try to stay calm, an officer will be there in 31 days.

__._,_.___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: 130 Republicans Who Are In Congress Today Voted To Hike The Debt Ceiling Under Bush Without Hostage Threats

And POTUS voted against it, citing, lack of leadership.

ThinkProgess miss that?

LOL

On Jul 19, 10:41 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> 130 Republicans Who Are In Congress Today Voted To Hike The Debt Ceiling Under Bush Without Hostage ThreatsByZaid Jilanion Jul 19, 2011 at 7:30 pm
> There was a time when House Republicans chose not to threaten the nation with default to get their agenda passed.
> White House and congressional negotiators are currently in the process of striking a deficit reduction deal, as most Republicans in Congress are refusing to raise the federal debt ceiling without deep cuts to public investments and social insurance programs like Social Security and Medicare. By doing so, these Republicans are essentially holding the country hostage, threatening the United States with default unless Democrats agree to these cuts.
> Yet these Republicans were not always demanding hostages in exchange for allowing the country to pay its own bills. In November of 2004, Congress voted in both the House and Senate to hike the U.S. debt limit by $800 billion, whichraised the total ceiling to $8.1 trillion.
> A ThinkProgress review of the votes in both theHouseandSenatefinds that a whopping 130 congressional Republicans voted to hike the debt ceiling that November thatremain in the U.S. Congress today(either in their same seats or by coming to the Senate). These members of Congress did not demand draconian cuts in public investment that would've driven up unemployment and threatened the economy in return.
> Of course, there was one other difference between then and today. President George W. Bush was in the White House, and Republicans did not have an incentive to try to politically damage him by holding the debt ceiling hostage. In 2002, during another hike in the nation's debt limit under Bush, his press secretary Ari Fleischer said it was important to raise the debt ceiling because it was not the time "toengage in activitesthat could in any way raise questions about the full faith and credit of the United States":MR. FLEISCHER: The Senate passed, 68-29, a clean increase in the debt limit. The President praises the Senate's action. The debt limit is a very important issue. This is not the time to play any this is not the time to engage in any activities that could in any way raise questions about the full faith and credit of the United States. And the President urges the House to follow the Senate's action on this matter.These votes also prove that these Republicans, when faced with the default of their country, are willing to vote to raise the debt ceiling; this indicates that it is perhaps unneccesary to strike any sort of deficit reduction deal at all to win their votes. If Republicans and Democrats want to strike a grand bargain on deficit reduction, they can certainly do that in the context of the budget appropriations process rather than holding the debt limit hostage.http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/07/19/273349/130-republicans-voted-debt/

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

**JP** KHWARJI'S AS INFORMED EARLIER BY RASUL ALLAH (sallallah o alaihe w'alehi wasallam)



 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

**JP** خسارے کا شکار۔۔ محکمہ ریلوے

اسلا م علیکم
 سر ! میں نے یہ کالم محکمہ ریلوے کے حوالے سے لکھا ہے امید ہے کہ پسند آئے گا ۔  شکر یہ 
عینی نیا زی
 خسارے کا شکار۔۔ محکمہ ریلوے

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Fwd: [New post] White House operative heading 'birther' smear campaign?



White House operative heading 'birther' smear campaign?

Jerome R. Corsi, WND 7/19/2011   Former Fannie Mae chief allegedly manages 100-strong attack team from Pennsylvania Ave A top Democrat, apparently operating with the full approval and cooperation of the president, has been directing a team of up to 100 who are paid to publish disinformation on a wide variety of websites to discredit [...]

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post



WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

**JP** NO COMMENTS



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Re: Fwd: [DailyKos] *? 2 ALL: HOUSE PASSES TEA-PARTY BACKED DEBT CEILING PLAN - WHAT ARE YOUR COMMENTS?*

DOA = Dead On Arrival

On Jul 20, 8:29 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you say that when Obama, the Constitutional Law Professor, extended
> domestic partner benefits to federal employees -- and DOMA immediately made
> it null and void?
>
> Because the two choices there for Obama felchers are:  1) Obama is an idiot
> or 2) it was all for show, just a campaign gesture.
>
> If you choose the latter then why can't GOPsters do gestures too?
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:15 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > DOA.  Constitutional amendments take years.  Dumb
>
> > On Jul 20, 6:52 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > how the leftovers see the news
>
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Greg Dempsey <gregdemp...@sti.net>
> > > Date: Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:43 AM
> > > Subject: [DailyKos] *? 2 ALL: HOUSE PASSES TEA-PARTY BACKED DEBT CEILING
>
> > > PLAN - WHAT ARE YOUR COMMENTS?*
> > > To: greg dempsey <gregdemp...@sti.net>
>
> > > **
>
> > > **
>
> > > *
> > > [image:http://i.huffpost.com/gen/311343/thumbs/r-ZOMBIES-huge.jpg]
> > > *
> > > ***
>
> > > Hi Team!
> > > *
>
> > > **
> > > **? 2 ALL: *
> > > **
> > > *HOUSE PASSES TEA-PARTY BACKED DEBT CEILING PLAN - *
>
> > > [image:
> >http://i.huffpost.com/gen/311373/thumbs/r-CUT-CAP-AND-BALANCE-VOTE-hu...]
>
> > > Jennifer Bendery reports on the Huffington Post:
>
> > > "House Republicans easily passed their 'Cut, Cap and Balance' fiscal plan
> > on
> > > Tuesday, a proposal that boosts their standing among Tea Party supporters
> > > but has no chance of becoming law.
>
> > > "The bill passed, 234 to 190, on a largely partisan vote.
>
> > > "Five Democrats, including Reps. Jim Cooper (Tenn.), Health Shuler (N.C.)
> > > and Dan Boren (Okla.), sided with Republicans in passing the measure.
> > Nine
> > > Republicans opposed the bill, including Tea Party favorite and GOP
> > > presidential candidate Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.). In a statement issued
> > > after the vote, Bachmann said the bill "does not go far enough" and
> > should
> > > have included provisions to defund health care reform.
>
> > > "Other Republican defectors included Reps. Walter Jones (N.C.), Francisco
> > > Canseco (Texas), Scott DesJarlais (Tenn.), Connie Mack (Fla.) and Ron
> > Paul
> > > (Texas). Paul said he has never voted for a debt ceiling increase and
> > never
> > > will. In addition, he took issue with Republicans for not including
> > defense
> > > cuts in the mix of discretionary cuts.
>
> > > "'All spending must be deemed discretionary and reexamined by Congress
> > each
> > > year,' Paul said in a statement. 'To allow otherwise is pure cowardice.'
> > > [image: Cut Cap Balance House Republicans Vote]
>
> > > "Tuesday's vote comes after weeks of Republicans touting the bill as
> > proof
> > > of their commitment to conservative principles. It includes three
> > > provisions: substantial spending cuts, statutory spending caps, and a
> > > constitutional amendment to require the government to balance its books
> > each
> > > year.
>
> > > "Republicans say the proposal is just the kind of shot in the arm needed
> > to
> > > address the nation's staggering $14.4 trillion debt. Specifically, it
> > calls
> > > for cutting more than $100 billion in fiscal 2012 and makes drastic
> > spending
> > > cuts in areas that Democrats have prioritized as opportunities for
> > > investment: clean energy, infrastructure, education and job training. The
> > > biggest concern for Democrats, however, is the bill's proposal to gut
> > > Medicaid funding by one-third over the next decade.
>
> > > "Both parties know the bill has next to no chance of passing the
> > > Democratic-controlled Senate, and President Barack Obama has already
> > > threatened a veto. But Republicans have pushed for a record vote on it
> > ahead
> > > of the 2012 elections.
>
> > > "Democrats spent much of Tuesday's four-hour debate bashing Republicans
> > for
> > > wasting time on a political stunt.
>
> > > "'This bill panders, even grovels, to Tea Party extremists,' Rep. Betty
> > > McCollum (D-Minn.) said. 'Thank goodness this bill will never pass the
> > > United States Senate. Thank goodness this bill will never become law.'"
>
> > > [image:
> >http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/POLITICS/07/19/debt.talks/t1main.bu...]
> > >   *"Cut, Cap And Balance": House passes tea party-backed debt ceiling
> > plan -
> > > what are your comments? *
> > > *Greg Dempsey
> > > **http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SECULARHUMANIST/*<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SECULARHUMANIST/>
> > > *Voice of the People*
>
> > >  __._,_.___
> > >   Reply to sender<
> > gregdemp...@sti.net?subject=Re%3A%20%2A%3F%202%20ALL%3A%20HOUSE%20PASSES%20TEA-PARTY%2
> > ­0BACKED%20DEBT%20CEILING%20PLAN%20-%20WHAT%20ARE%20YOUR%20COMMENTS%3F%2A>|
> > > Reply
> > > to group<
> > Daily...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Re%3A%20%2A%3F%202%20ALL%3A%20HOUSE%20PASSES%20TEA
> > ­-PARTY%20BACKED%20DEBT%20CEILING%20PLAN%20-%20WHAT%20ARE%20YOUR%20COMMENTS­%­3F%2A>|
> > > Reply
> > > via web post<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DailyKos/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJyYWNtbDFsBF9T...>|
> > > Start
> > > a New Topic<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DailyKos/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbDFpNmpnBF9T...>
> > > Messages in this
> > > topic<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DailyKos/message/42001;_ylc=X3oDMTM3ODl...>(
> > > 1)
> > >  Recent Activity:
>
> > >  Visit Your Group<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DailyKos;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbWNudGlzBF9TAzk3M...>
> > >  [DailyKos]
> > > A group for readers of DailyKos and other progressive sites.
> > > Group Email Addresses
> > > Post message:       Daily...@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subscribe:       DailyKos-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > > Unsubscribe:       DailyKos-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
> > > List owner:       DailyKos-ow...@yahoogroups.com
> > >  MARKETPLACE
>
> > > Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on -
> > Get
> > > the Yahoo! Toolbar
> > > now.<
> >http://global.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15oclmipe/M=493064.14543979.14365478....>
> > >    [image: Yahoo!
> > > Groups]<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJldDcwdmg1BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycEl...>
> > > Switch to: Text-Only<
> > DailyKos-traditio...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Change+Delivery+Format:+Traditional
> > >,
> > > Daily Digest<
> > DailyKos-dig...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Email+Delivery:+Digest>•
> > > Unsubscribe <DailyKos-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> •
> > Terms
> > > of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> > >    .
>
> > > __,_._,___
>
> > >  r-CUT-CAP-BALANCE-HOUSE-REPUBLICANS-VOTE-large570.jpg
> > > 35KViewDownload
>
> > >  r-CUT-CAP-AND-BALANCE-VOTE-huge.jpg
> > > 81KViewDownload
>
> > >  r-ZOMBIES-huge.jpg
> > > 146KViewDownload
>
> > >  t1main.budget.passes.house.tv.jpg
> > > 48KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: **JP** Daily Express News Story

انکل  "  مُفاد " کی پیدائش اسی دن ہوئی جس دن پاکستان معرضِ وجود میں آیا ،پاکستان کے ساتھ ساتھ موصوف بھی بڑے ہوتے گئے اور اب بھی وہ پاکستان میں ہی رہائش پذیر ہیں پاکستان کے تمام سیاستدان ،بیوروکریٹس اور امیر افراد انکل " مُفاد " کے ساتھی اور دوست ہیں ،کہیں قربانی دینے کا وقت ہو  یا کسی کی قیمت لگانے کا ،کوئی سودے بازی ہو یا کسی پارٹی کو چھوڑنا ہو ، کسی پارٹی میں کیڑے نکالنے ہوں یا کسی سیاسی پارٹی کی تعریف کرنی ہو ،کبھی کسی کے خلاف بیان دینا ہو یا کسی کے حق میں نعرے لگانے ہوں ،امریکا جانا ہو یا وہاں سے کسی کو آنا ہو  یا یہ کہہ لیں کہ وہاں سے کسی کو لا کر پاکستانیوں پر بٹھانا ہو "، پاکستان کے خوبصورت علاقوں کو  بارُود کی بدبُو سے تہس نہس کرنا ہو ، کسی کو مارنا ہو یا کسی کو مروانا ہو "آگ لگوانی ہو یا آگ پر قابُو پانا ہو " خود کش بمبار پکڑنا ہو یا اسے چھوڑنا ہو " ہڑتال کروانی ہو یا ہڑتال ختم کروانی ہو "، ٹریفک جام کرنی ہو یا ٹریفک کو  رواں  دواں کرنا ہو " چینی غائب کرنی ہو یا چینی ڈھونڈنی ہو "، آٹا غریب کی دسترس سے دُور کرنا ہو " یا کسی کا  " پی پا " آٹے سے بھرنا ہو " پاکستان کے کسی علاقہ سے بجلی غائب کرنی ہو ·" یا کسی کو ہر وقت بجلی دینی ہو "، گیس کی پائپ لائن اُڑانی ہو " یا کسی کے کارخانے کو بلا جواز گیس کی فراہمی کرنی ہو "، کسی صوبے میں اپنا  " سکہ " جمانا ہو  یا  وہاں اپنا سکہ چلانا ہو "، کہیں اسلحہ بیچنا ہو " یا کہیں سے اسلحہ لینا ہو "، کبھی دریاوں میں  زیادہ پانی کی وجہ سے سیلاب آنا ہو " یا سیلاب کے نقصانات کو پورا کرنے سے آنے والا فنڈ کھانا ہو "، ریمنڈ ڈیوس کو پکڑنا ہو " یا اسے چھڑانا ہو "، ڈاکٹر عافیہ کو پکڑوانا ہو  "یا     ایمل کانسی  کو زہر کا ٹیکہ لگوانا ہو "، ایٹمی طاقت بننا ہو " یا ایٹمی تنصیبات امریکیوں کے ہاتھ میں دینا ہو  "، پاکستان آرمی کو بم باندھ کر ٹینکوں کے نیچے لیٹنا ہو " یا  جی ایچ کیو میں دہشت گردوں کو گُھسانا ہو "، مہران بیس میں تخریب کاری کرنی ہو یا " مہران بیس سے تخریب کاروں کو چپکے سے بھگانا ہو "، یہ سب کچھ اور اس طرح کے سب کام انکل " مُفاد " سے مل کر اور اس کے مشورہ سے کئے جاتے ہیں ، ایک پارٹی سے نکل کر کسی دوسری سیاسی پارٹی میں جانے والے سیاستدان کے پیچھے انکل" مُفاد " کا ہاتھ ہوتا ہے "، وہ سیاستدان لاکھ کہے کہ ہم ملک یا قوم کے وسیع تر مفاد کے لئے دوسری پارٹی میں آئے ہیں  بالکل غلط ہو گا کیونکہ جب سیاستدان یہ کہہ رہا ہوتا ہے اس وقت انکل " مُفاد " پیچھے کھڑا مُسکرا رہا ہوتا ہے "
 
ہمارے ملک کے ہر بڑے جرنیل ،سیاستدان اور بیورو کریٹ کا انکل " مُفاد" کے ساتھ چولی دامن کا ساتھ ہے یہ افراد انکل موصوف کے بغیر زندہ نہیں رہ سکتے "، انکل "مُفاد " نے پاکستان کے ان افراد کی ۔ زندگی میں ایک نئی  رُوح پھونکی  ہے "، انکل کے ان افراد پر اتنے احسانات ہیں کہ  اتارنے پر بھی نہیں اتارے جا سکتے "، ہمارے ملک کے سارے بڑے انکل " مُفاد" کے احسانوں تلے  دبے ہوئے ہیں "
کئی دفعہ یہ بھی ہُوا ہے کہ راہ چلتے ہوئے اگر انکل " مُفاد " سامنے آ گئے تو سب بڑوں کی نظریں ان کے احترام میں جُھک گئیں "، اب تو انکل " مُفاد " کی پہنچ پاکستان کے ہر فرد تک پہنچ گئی ہے " پہلے تو پاکستان کے بڑے انکل سے تعلقات کا شور کرتے  تھے لیکن اب تو  پاکستان کا ہر فرد ان کا تابع نظر آتا ہے "، چیف جسٹس کو بحال کروانے کے لئے پاکستان کی غریب عوام ہی سڑکوں پر نکلی تھی "، اب وہ عوام نہ تو مہنگائی کے خاتمے کے لئے نکل رہی ہے اور نہ ہی لوڈ شیڈنگ اور گیس کی بحالی کے لئے لاکھوں کا مجمع نظر آرہا ہے"، ریمنڈ ڈیوس تین پاکستانی بیٹوں کو مار کر رہائی پا گیا کچھ نہ ہُوا "، اس کا مطلب یہی ہُوا ناں کہ انکل " مُفاد " کسی نہ کسی شکل میں ہر فرد کے ساتھ ہے "، غریب آدمی اپنے بچوں کے لئے چینی تلاش کرے یا ہنگامے کرنے سڑکوں پر آئے " یہ بات غریب آدمی کے ذہن میں انکل " مُفاد " نے ہی تو ڈالی ہے "، انکل "مُفاد " اکیلا پاکستان کے ساتھ پیدا ہُوا تھا لیکن اب اس کی اولاد بھی جوان ہو گئی ہے ، اسی لئے تو انکل " اپنی اولاد کو اور اس کے کام دیکھ کر اتراتا رہتا ہے "
انکل "مُفاد " کی ساری اولاد  مختلف قسم کے خاندان یعنی " مُفادات " پر مبنی ہے 
جن میں عبدالمفاد ، چوہدری مفاد ، گیلانی مفاد ، قریشی مفاد ، میاں مفاد ، ترین مفاد ، پگاڑا مفاد ، خان مفاد ، بھائی مٍفاد ، بگٹی مفاد ، رانا مفاد ، راجہ مفاد ، نیازی مفاد ، کائرہ مفاد ، ملک مُفاد ، قابل ذکر ہیں ان مفادات کے بڑوں  نے اپنے آباو اجداد یعنی خاندانِ مُفاد ات کو  پاکستان میں زندہ و جاوداں رکھا ہُوا ہے " ، جس کے لئے انکل " مُفاد " اپنے ان بیٹوں پر بڑا ناز کرتا ہے "




On 20 July 2011 12:27, <urdu@urduhamasr.dk> wrote:

یہ کالم نویس، حا لات سے بے خبر، خوابوں کی

دنیا کا باسی دکھائی دیتا ہے اور یہ تحریر، کسی بھی طرح سے

حالات کے حقیقی سیاسی تجزیئے پر پوری نہیں اترتی اور بکواس محض ہے ۔

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On 20/07/2011 07:24 baazi81@gmail.com wrote:

Please read a reality ..... great column by Oriya ....
http://www.express.com.pk/epaper/PoPupwindow.aspx?newsID=1101290968&Issue=NP_LHE&Date=20110720#.TiZmcKa7IgI.email

---
This message was sent by baazi81@gmail.com via http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThis does not verify email addresses.

Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar: http://www.addthis.com/go/toolbar-em

To unsubscribe, visit http://www.addthis.com/privacy/email-opt-out?e=1mrdH44cjwWAHogGlRSPNYYajhKNEIYHjgCRBs8Wjhjf in your web browser.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197



--
SHAFQAT ALI RAZA
President
Pak Spain Press Club 
United Forum Overseas Pakistanies 
Humanity Forever Welfare Association

 
Chief Editor
www.PAKNEWS.es
+34 671 894 570  /  +34 672 500 061

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197