---
which questions?
why neocons fear iran?
why iran is a sovereign country?
who is promoting the war on iran?
why iran is not a threat to the USA?
On Jan 16, 9:54 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe your friends ought to inform the Atomic Energy Commission of their
> findings, because what you wrote is clearly in conflict with the AEC's
> findings.
>
> Once again, PlainOl dodges the pertinent questions. Typical of most Crazy
> Uncle Ron supporters. I am watching the debate, and although Paul had a
> few good moments, he pretty much is getting his lunch eaten.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have better sources than Panetta. I have FRIENDS in Iran. NONE of their
> > equipment is configured for enrichment beyond rods for a plant. The missing
> > equipment is VERY specialized and very noticeable. Iran has nothing that
> > can not be found in any decent research library. Could they? Probably. Are
> > they? not at this time. Will they? probably, just to piss people off and
> > start a war. Paul is correct bat the present.
>
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> Other than Crazy Uncle Ron's recent claims, (because Crazy Uncle Ron at
> >> first beleived that Iran was building a nuclear weapon, but didn't seem
> >> alarmed about it, and when this was pointed out to PlainOl, who also didn't
> >> care, he said, "Cite examples" which I did. Crazy Uncle Ron made the "I
> >> Don't Care About Nuclear Weapons In Iran" back during the first three
> >> debates.
>
> >> Where are you getting that there is no evidence that Iran is not
> >> attempting to make a nuclear weapon? From Panetta's recent statement?
>
> >>http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/damning-report-on-iran-shin...
>
> >>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/8866022/Ira...
>
> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> There is not a single credible report that says that they are. All the
> >>> reports that are referred to claim a certainty that Iran is in the business
> >>> of processing radioactive material solely for use in their Nuclear reactors
> >>> and medical uses. There is no proof (not a shred) that there is anything
> >>> else going on. Paul is on THAT committee. As opposed to all others he is
> >>> the only candidate that would have access to all the evidence.
>
> >>> Iran has a whole lot of oil... they have no refineries... They export
> >>> crude and import gas, oil, and other oil products... that is why Paul says
> >>> they don't even have enough gas for their cars...They don't.
>
> >>> The USA has even more oil than Iran.... why in the hell are they using
> >>> and refining the nuclear process??
>
> >>> Do I want someone that looks at and assesses all the facts before
> >>> screaming for war on unfounded bases. Why, yes, I do; if speaking of Paul.
>
> >>> If the question is about Monkey man from Iran... then, No, I do not;
> >>> fortunately there is not a shred of credible evidence that this will or can
> >>> take place.
>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>>> Why would Iran be attempting to obtain nuclear technology? What other
> >>>> reason could a Nation-State with as much oil reserves as Iran, be seeking
> >>>> nuclear power?
>
> >>>> Do you want this man in charge of a nuclear weapon?
>
> >>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:36 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <
> >>>> markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Please read the word COULD>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>> Ron Paul told Iowa voters on Friday that he would not launch a
> >>>>> preemptive strike on Iran because "they don't threaten our national
> >>>>> security."
> >>>>> "If some other country thought they had to go to war with them, that
> >>>>> is their business," he said, adding there is no proof Iran is building
> >>>>> a nuclear weapon.
> >>>>> A recent IAEA report said that Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology
> >>>>> over several years could be consistent with the building of a bomb.
> >>>>> And Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave Iran "about a year, perhaps
> >>>>> a little less" before it could have a nuclear weapon.
>
> >>>>> There exists NO credible report that says a single word in the
> >>>>> positive that Iran is or has pursued a Nuke. If there is, please post
> >>>>> it.
>
> >>>>> On Jan 13, 10:17 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> > The point being, is that you believe those facts about CNN and Dash,
> >>>>> > (along with her CNN compatriot and husband, "Jeremy"....Just as you
> >>>>> > believed that Newt Gingrich tried to divorce his wife while she was
> >>>>> > hospitalized with cancer; just as you believed that Gingrich had a
> >>>>> fair,
> >>>>> > impartial Congressional ethics hearing; just as you believed that
> >>>>> Paul
> >>>>> > opposed Iran having a nuclear weapon; the list is endless of faulty
> >>>>> > beliefs that you and other Ron Paul supporters "believe" in, which
> >>>>> turns
> >>>>> > out not to be at all accurate or truthful.
>
> >>>>> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Keith In Tampa <
> >>>>> keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>>>> > > You didn't even get your Wiki article right PlainOl, go back and
> >>>>> re-read
> >>>>> > > it.
>
> >>>>> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, plainolamerican <
> >>>>> > > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> > >> More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to
> >>>>> stay
> >>>>> > >> misinformed
> >>>>> > >> ---
> >>>>> > >> again, what I've written are facts:
> >>>>> > >> she is an anti-RP jew, married to a jewish supporter of an
> >>>>> 'important'
> >>>>> > >> US warmonger who wants the US to police the world
>
> >>>>> > >> facts, keith, nothing but facts
>
> >>>>> > >> On Jan 13, 7:18 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > >> > "Some don't forget" what?
>
> >>>>> > >> > That ABC is purportedly a Jewish network? That Dana Bash
> >>>>> allegedly
> >>>>> > >> showed
> >>>>> > >> > some type of bias against Ron Paul? That Dana Bash is married
> >>>>> to Jeremy
> >>>>> > >> > Bash?
>
> >>>>> > >> > More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to
> >>>>> stay
> >>>>> > >> > misinformed, continue to stay focused on misinformation, but
> >>>>> > >> nevertheless
> >>>>> > >> > continue to spread their misinformed views on others, treating
> >>>>> their
> >>>>> > >> > misinformation as somehow being gospel, and clinging to the
> >>>>> > >> misinformation
> >>>>> > >> > as the truth.
>
> >>>>> > >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, plainolamerican <
> >>>>> > >> plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> >>>>> > >> > > wrote:
> >>>>> > >> > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's
> >>>>> candidacy,
> >>>>> > >> > > called
> >>>>> > >> > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
> >>>>> > >> > > ---
> >>>>> > >> > > as they should ... she's another jew who is flagrantly
> >>>>> anti-RP.
> >>>>> > >> > > Bash said during a CNN report that she was worried that the
> >>>>> Ron Paul
> >>>>> > >> > > campaign continuing into the summer, and that he could "hurt
> >>>>> whomever
> >>>>> > >> > > the Republican nominee is." Revolution PAC alleged this
> >>>>> showed bias
> >>>>> > >> > > against Paul.
>
> >>>>> > >> > > Bash's father is a producer for the jewish network ABC and
> >>>>> her husband
> >>>>> > >> > > is Jeremy B. Bash, the Chief of Staff to Leon Panetta, the
> >>>>> Secretary
> >>>>> > >> > > of Defense.
>
> >>>>> > >> > > some don't forget
>
> >>>>> > >> > > On Jan 12, 7:34 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > >> > > > *Ron Paul continues assault on the media*
> >>>>> > >> > > > **
> >>>>> > >> > > > Dyland Stableford
> >>>>> > >> > > > 01.11.2011
>
> >>>>>http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/ron-paul-continues-assault-media-.
> >>>>> ..
>
> >>>>> > >> > > > Fresh off his second place finish in the New Hampshire
> >>>>> primary, Ron
> >>>>> > >> Paul
> >>>>> > >> > > > still found reasons to criticize the media's coverage of his
> >>>>> > >> presidential
> >>>>> > >> > > > campaign.
>
> >>>>> > >> > > > "You know, it's pretty amazing how sometimes if you're in
> >>>>> second
> >>>>> > >> place,
> >>>>> > >> > > > they talk about the first and the third place," Paul told
> >>>>> > >> supporters at a
> >>>>> > >> > > > campaign stop in West Columbia, S.C. on Wednesday. "But
> >>>>> last night
> >>>>> > >> was a
> >>>>> > >> > > > little different--they had a little harder time avoiding
> >>>>> the real
> >>>>> > >> > > > conversation."
>
> >>>>> > >> > > > And during another speech in New Hampshire late Tuesday, the
> >>>>> > >> 76-year-old
> >>>>> > >> > > > Texas Republican zinged the media even more.
>
> >>>>> > >> > > > "There was one other acknowledgment I wanted to make," Paul
> >>>>> said
> >>>>> > >> after
> >>>>> > >> > > > thanking his family and assorted campaign staffers. "I
> >>>>> wanted to
> >>>>> > >> thank
> >>>>> > >> > > the
> >>>>> > >> > > > Union Leader for not endorsing me."
>
> >>>>> > >> > > > He continued:
>
> >>>>> > >> > > > We don't always get the coverage or the interest shown on
> >>>>> > >> what--what is
> >>>>> > >> > > > going on, because if they did, they wouldn't--they wouldn't
> >>>>> be
> >>>>> > >> ignoring
> >>>>> > >> > > so
> >>>>> > >> > > > much of what we're doing. But, you know, I find it sort of
> >>>>> > >> fascinating
> >>>>> > >> > > when
> >>>>> > >> > > > they finally get around--and this is different people, it
> >>>>> could be
> >>>>> > >> in the
> >>>>> > >> > > > media, could be our opponents, or whatever--but I sort of
> >>>>> have to
> >>>>> > >> chuckle
> >>>>> > >> > > > when they describe you and me as being "dangerous." That's
> >>>>> one
> >>>>> > >> thing they
> >>>>> > >> > > > are telling the truth, because we are dangerous to the
> >>>>> status quo
> >>>>> > >> of this
> >>>>> > >> > > > country.
>
> >>>>> > >> > > > The media hasn't exactly been ignoring Paul. On Sunday,
> >>>>> Paul was
> >>>>> > >> forced
> >>>>> > >> > > to cut
> >>>>> > >> > > > a campaign visit to a New Hampshire diner short after a mob
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment