or abroad, and are alleged to be connected to the al Queida or any
other
terrorist group, have the right to a court hearing
---
if detaining a citizen w/o a hearing is necessary to stop an attack
then so be it
On Jan 17, 11:01 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also point out, that Santorum did in fact understand the law of the land
> last night, and none of the other candidates, including Dr. Paul, did, or
> at least spoke correctly about the current law....It may have been a time
> limitation as to why they didn't clarify their knowledge of the law
>
> That is to say, that American citizens, whether they are caught in the U.S.
> or abroad, and are alleged to be connected to the al Queida or any other
> terrorist group, have the right to a court hearing. Non-citizens do not
> enjoy that right, and can be held indefinitely.
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I actually agreed with Dr. Paul on this issue last night during the
> > debate. Until Dr. Paul put on his "Crazy Uncle Ron" persona, and started
> > talking about the Golden Rule in a combat zone, he was winning the debate!
>
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:31 AM, plainolamerican <
> > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> our authorities should have everything they need to catch the bad
> >> guys, including the ability to apprehend and detain threats as
> >> necessary, citizen or non-citizen
>
> >> On Jan 16, 7:51 pm, Daniel Seigler <danielseig...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Gentlemen,
>
> >> > As you should know, President Obama signed into Law the National
> >> Defense Authorization Act of 2012 which contained language that would
> >> violate both the American sense of justice and the Constitutions of both
> >> Oregon (Article I, Sections 10, 12, 14, 22, 23, 27 as available on the
> >> Leg.state.ore website) and the United States of America (Article I,
> >> Section 9, paragraph 2, Amendment IV, Amendment V, Amendment VI, and
> >> Amendment IX).
> >> > According to WND.com's Bob Unruh, Representative Daniel P. Gordon
> >> Jr. of Rhode Island has proposed "a resolution to exempt his constituents
> >> from sections of the federal law." And you are doing what to protect your
> >> constituents from an over-reaching Federal Government?
>
> >> > sign me
> >> > daniel karl seigler, born in Fort Benning, Cussetta County, Georgia,
> >> son of
> >> > Clarance Roland O'Neil Seigler, born in Ozark, Dale County, Alabama,
> >> son of
> >> > Thomas Malcolm Seigler, born somewhere in Alabama
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment