others as you would have them do unto you." My close second choice
is: "Fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA!" Think
those are short enough? — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 26, 5:26 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> John,
>
> How does using 160-plus words to say something that requires only 43
> words to state make anything easier to comprehend?
>
> On 04/26/2011 12:49 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > Dear J. Ashley: What you don't realize is that each paragraph in my
> > New Constitution corrects multiple problems. You are assuming that
> > every word is for correcting just one problem. I can assure you that
> > my document is the most efficient and readable wording. It is written
> > in the narrative style expressly to be comprehended by people of
> > average intelligence. Once most Americans know what my New
> > Constitution says, it will be unlikely government will ever over-step
> > its boundaries again. � J. A. A. �
> > On Apr 25, 1:16 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> John,
>
> >> I accomplished the same outcome with 43 words of clarity that you did
> >> with your convoluted paragraph of more than 160 words.
>
> >> On 04/24/2011 05:28 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> J. Ashley: How quickly YOU forget! The following is from my New
> >>> Constitution:
> >>> "Section 9& 10: Other than the President or his agents, no person,
> >>> news medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within
> >>> government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives
> >>> while such are in Washington. However, invited persons or groups can
> >>> make scheduled depositions provided they don�t communicate with the
> >>> representatives otherwise. A representative�s constituents shall be
> >>> allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes
> >>> only while they are in their home states or districts.
> >>> Representatives shall regularly contact their district offices or
> >>> return to their districts to be informed of the wishes of their
> >>> constituents, and their constituents only, and shall be held
> >>> accountable for the representativeness of their votes. The
> >>> solicitation of Citizen support is permitted, but the targeted
> >>> solicitation of representatives in any place, by any person,
> >>> organization, group, or lobby within government or without, is
> >>> prohibited. Overt solicitation, feting, or laudatory ceremony, as
> >>> above, is a felony�defined as any crime requiring a minimum three year
> >>> prison sentence, but time off for good behavior is allowed." � John
> >>> A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>> On Apr 22, 11:50 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> John,
> >>>> How quick you forget. Do you not remember when you challenged me once
> >>>> before? I posted the following problem and solution:
> >>>> (1) The lobbying of Members of Congress by any Person on behalf of
> >>>> anyone other than themselves shall be prohibited.
> >>>> (2) Any Person found guilty of lobbying under the Prohibitions of
> >>>> this Article shall be imprisoned for not less than 10 Years and/or
> >>>> deported;
> >>>> On 04/21/2011 06:38 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> J. Ashley: You never did define a single problem with our government
> >>>>> or society, and solve that problem in less than four sentences. I did
> >>>>> that for fourteen years! Convoluted or not, my New Constitution
> >>>>> solves society's problems! � J. A. A. �
> >>>>> On Apr 21, 12:06 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> John,
> >>>>>> How does your reply have anything to do with what I posted? It's no
> >>>>>> wonder YOUR New Constitution is so convoluted.
> >>>>>> On 04/20/2011 08:45 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>> Jonathan: "Polite" public figures can't go around calling everyone
> >>>>>>> stupid. There are contexts in which public health care makes sense.
> >>>>>>> But FORCED Obama Care isn't that context! � J. A. A. �
> >>>>>>> On Apr 20, 12:54 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> John,
> >>>>>>>> 1) Trump has no ideology!
> >>>>>>>> 2) The District of Criminals is filled with Republican socialists.
> >>>>>>>> On 04/20/2011 02:00 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Jonathan: That would be "the pot calling the kettle black". If Trump
> >>>>>>>>> was a socialist he would be a Democrat and pro Obama. When one's
> >>>>>>>>> ideology has failed, like yours has, blame the opposition for your own
> >>>>>>>>> socialist-communist traits. You, like Mark, are very screwed-up in
> >>>>>>>>> the head. � J. A. A. �
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 12:50 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> *John,
> >>>>>>>>>> I cannot belive you call me -- a voluntaryist/anarchist -- a socialist,
> >>>>>>>>>> yet you cannot see that Donald Trump is a full-blown socialist. Pay
> >>>>>>>>>> attention!*
> >>>>>>>>>>http://www.americablog.com/2009/02/donald-trump-is-socialist.htmlhttp......
> >>>>>>>>>> On 04/18/2011 08:48 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Folks: The following essay contains the first two articles of my New
> >>>>>>>>>>> Constitution. I'm copying it, below, so those looking in the present
> >>>>>>>>>>> post can find it. Hope you readers are having a great Spring!
> >>>>>>>>>>> Can Donald Trump �Fix� the Thin Ice that the USA is skating on?
> >>>>>>>>>>> The contrast is striking between the potential presidential candidacy
> >>>>>>>>>>> of The Donald and every other might-be candidate mentioned. For one
> >>>>>>>>>>> thing, if The Donald says he can fix something�like our broke economy�
> >>>>>>>>>>> you can damn-well take him seriously! Some of you may recall that a
> >>>>>>>>>>> certain new ice skating rink in New York�s Central Park started
> >>>>>>>>>>> leaking water and couldn�t be used. That work had been done by three
> >>>>>>>>>>> or four labor unions with each one pointing the fingers at the other.
> >>>>>>>>>>> After millions of dollars had been wasted on attempted patches, The
> >>>>>>>>>>> Donald took over the entire job and had happy skaters out on that ice
> >>>>>>>>>>> before long.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Every day when I realize how much labor unions of all kinds are
> >>>>>>>>>>> effectively screwing the US economy and preventing our having a really
> >>>>>>>>>>> �free� free enterprise system, I think of The Donald. He has been
> >>>>>>>>>>> able to find considerable success working in the morass of labor
> >>>>>>>>>>> unions and government regulations that are found in NYC. That man
> >>>>>>>>>>> THRIVES on being able to get the disparate powers-that-be to get the
> >>>>>>>>>>> job done! Part of the secret is his charisma. But most of it is
> >>>>>>>>>>> because he is a trustworthy man-of-his-word. He makes sure that all
> >>>>>>>>>>> those involved in a project realize just what their responsibilities
> >>>>>>>>>>> are, and what they are expected to do if there are any glitches. In
> >>>>>>>>>>> short, The Donald is one of the top businessmen in the country of all
> >>>>>>>>>>> time. His executive experience probably exceeds that of the governors
> >>>>>>>>>>> of most states. Under him people do their jobs and do them well.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Just having The Donald as the head man improves the quality of
> >>>>>>>>>>> projects, because it�s an honor just to be associated with one of his
> >>>>>>>>>>> projects!
> >>>>>>>>>>> Obviously, Donald Trump is politically conservative. But he doesn�t
> >>>>>>>>>>> owe-his-soul to the Republican Party like most of his would-be rivals
> >>>>>>>>>>> do even without realizing that they do. The USA has been hamstrung
> >>>>>>>>>>> trying to avoid looking like a colonialist aggressor every time we
> >>>>>>>>>>> �invade� other nations to help the oppressed. The reason oil fields
> >>>>>>>>>>> get set on fire is because those people suppose we are there� just for
> >>>>>>>>>>> their oil. By destroying the oil, they believe we will simply go
> >>>>>>>>>>> away. The blind-leading-the-blind in our government think that the
> >>>>>>>>>>> USA has the financial wherewithal to finance long wars, and will have
> >>>>>>>>>>> enough wherewithal remaining to rebuild the busted infrastructure of
> >>>>>>>>>>> the invaded countries; train the new armies; and care for those �poor�
> >>>>>>>>>>> people till they are back on their feet. All of that is being done
> >>>>>>>>>>> like forced charity from the big-hearted American People whose
> >>>>>>>>>>> standards of living keep dropping, because of the explosion in the
> >>>>>>>>>>> size and the over-control of our government. If The Donald can get us
> >>>>>>>>>>> trillions of dollars worth of oil to repay the American Taxpayers for
> >>>>>>>>>>> our sacrifices, I�ll vote for him!
> >>>>>>>>>>> Some good news is that Republicans now have trillions of dollars in
> >>>>>>>>>>> �possible� budget cuts that might save this country. The bad news is
> >>>>>>>>>>> that those takes-too-long-to-happen cuts will still leave the never-
> >>>>>>>>>>> should-have-been-there-in-the-first-place entitlement programs being
> >>>>>>>>>>> run by government. After the nearly 15 years that I�ve spent penning
> >>>>>>>>>>> and polishing my New Constitution, I have better than average ideas
> >>>>>>>>>>> how to fix our government, fast. The following 5 things aren�t
> >>>>>>>>>>> written into the New Constitution, but are of fundamental importance:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1. Get our government out of the entitlement business! Privatize
> >>>>>>>>>>> Social Security; Medicare; Medicaid; and Unemployment Insurance, etc.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Like the Republicans are now planning to do, protect those now in
> >>>>>>>>>>> programs from being hurt who are close to retirement. But unlike
> >>>>>>>>>>> Republicans, once and forever, get the USA out of managing the
> >>>>>>>>>>> entitlement business! If government pulls any of the strings, things
> >>>>>>>>>>> will start getting bad again, soon.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2. Inform China and our other creditors that the USA will not be
> >>>>>>>>>>> paying them any interest on their loans. We will repay the principal,
> >>>>>>>>>>> but only when doing so won�t jeopardize our recovery.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3. Bring home 90% of US troops within 90
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment