1. Get our government out of the entitlement business! Privatize
Social Security; Medicare; Medicaid; and Unemployment Insurance, etc.
Like the Republicans are now planning to do, protect those now in
programs from being hurt who are close to retirement. But unlike
Republicans, once and forever, get the USA out of managing the
entitlement business! If government pulls any of the strings, things
will start getting bad again, soon.
Please explain how one privatizes Social Security -- or why such needs to be privatized.
Similarly, do the SAME for Medicare/Medicaid, etc.
These unconstitutional programs should be abolished.
2. Inform China and our other creditors that the USA will not be
paying them any interest on their loans. We will repay the principal,
but only when doing so won't jeopardize our recovery.
Will have to consider what the unintended consequences might entail ...
3. Bring home 90% of US troops within 90 days. Leave 10% of the
troops in bases around the world to serve as a front guard in case
redeployment is necessary.
What happened to that Constitution thingy? Bring home 100% of the troops ... 90 days may work. Dismantle the unconstitutional standing army OR pass an amendment to keep it. IMMEDIATELY slash the so-called 'defense' budget by at least half -- further cuts to follow.
4. Stop wasting billions and billions of dollars on political
campaigns! That money is going into the pockets of the media. Those
media rascals salivate over the ad money they generate by "talking up"
how 'close' the elections are going to be. Britt Hume, though a
conservative, keeps pumping air into Obama by talking about the money
Obama can spend (waste!) to get re elected. Barack Obama is a cash
cow for the media. That's why no one in the media will call the
majority of Democrats CROOKS!
<sigh>
Government should spend ZERO on campaigns.
Individuals (and their created groups, etc.) have the freedom and liberty to spend as many dollars as they desire.
Remove the ability for Politicians to peddle pull (ie. follow the constitution as written) and you eliminate the bulk. If Archer Daniels Midland, for instance, does not reap zillions in subsidies and other advantages (read: regulations), they are unlikely to be concerned with pumping millions into various campaigns. If they receive nothing, who cares if they continue to give millions.
5. 'Fat cats' should stop being wimps! Government has become no-
longer-legal STEALING from the supposed rich to give to the poor. The
Democrats talk about how Republicans are wanting to give tax breaks to
the wealthy while denying women medical screenings. Republicans
should be talking about how "Democrats are criminals for seeking
stolen benefits for themselves and other criminals!"
That you fail to realize that Ds and Rs are effectively the same is troubling.
The Income Tax should be abolished (thus ending the bulk of the class warfare). Required dollars should be apportioned between the Sovereign States -- with the States paying from dollars they raise as they choose (50 of them in competition for Citizens) coupled with an across-the-board 3% tariff. No borrowing is permissible EXCEPT for cash flow needs UNLESS War (in accordance with AIS8C11) and then all extra proceeds go ONLY to that cause.
1. The Constitution does NOT allow political parties! Those are
quasi governmental bodies which get to decide who our candidates for
public office can be, and decide who "the leaders" in Congress are.
Because our country was conceived as a Representative Republic, such
fact tacitly mandates that each representative shall have identical
power! Seniority nor party affiliation can give more power to ANYONE!
The Constitution *does* allow Congress to make its OWN rules. Additionally PEOPLE will organize into various factions (which is their liberty to do so).
What is needed, rather, is to eliminate the various CAMPAIGN and ELECTION laws -- which have zero Constitutional basis -- which enable the Duopoly to maintain their positions.
2. The US Senate is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL oligarchy of elitists who
effectively have been running-the-USA-into-the-ground since the birth
of this nation. Senators aren't determined by having a parity of the
population which they each serve. Though the Senate was begrudgingly
included in the 'words' of the Constitution, it has never been within
the SPIRIT of the Constitution!
Huh? The Senate served as the Representatives of the States -- you know, those parties to the Constitution? Those parties that put it into effect? Those parties charged with the power/authority to amend that agreement?
Amendment 17 (which is unconstitutional per Article V -- 10 states have STILL not ratified) should be rescinded/repealed/abolished.
This STATE check against Federal usurpation (along with others) need to be restored.
3. The principle of FAIR representation makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to
allow the State of Iowa to have more "power" in determining who our
candidates for President can be. And by the same general reasoning,
it makes the entire primary system UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because the
states with earlier-dated primaries always have the most influence in
determining who can run.
Again, this is part and parcel to the Election/Campaign laws which maintain the Duopoly along with the ability of Politicians to peddle pull.
Having some utopian same date primary changes neither.
The underlying idea of the system was to have the House choose the President from the 'search committee' provided by the various State Legislature chosen electors (remember those States who are party to that Constitution thingy). By choosing two, it was expected that the Electors would NEVER reach the required majority.
ADDITIONALLY, having the top two vote getters (presumably persons with DIFFERENT ideals/positions) restores yet ANOTHER check eliminated.
4. Political party conventions are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because those
are "governed" by the unsanctioned and UNCONSTITUTIONAL rules of the
UNCONSTITUTIONAL political parties!
This is nonsensical.
Again, your problem *is* and *remains* that unconstitutional Election/Campaign laws have been made. There are no 'Federal' Elections. The ONLY thing the Congress *is* charged with concerning such is that they may set a uniform date as to when the Electors are to be chosen and other time/dates associated with those electors.
5. The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow any
individual or group to have more influence on the outcome of an
election or referenda than one-person-one vote. That criminalizes
entertainment or media celebrities who use their influence to garner
votes for any candidate. And it makes any group—such as labor unions—
who seek more 'power' than could ever be manifested by just their
members' votes, criminals. Labor unions and other unconstitutional
group influences, effectively, have been blackmailing candidates by
implying… "You vote for 'us' or you won't get elected." Since the
latter is a SUBVERSION of the Constitution that shifts the par of
power away from individuals and toward specific groups, the leaders of
such groups are guilty of TREASON!
More nonsensical bullshit.
As noted previously, Government becomes important SOLELY because Government has dictated rules, regulations, advantage, etc. which people seek to influence. It is GOVERNMENT which should be prohibited (which they largely are already according to the Constitution as written) from providing advantage to some at the expense of everyone else (which LIMITS Government to securing the (natural) right of ALL <period>). As long as the Government provides advantage, people will be trying to influence that process.
6. The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to give equal
time to discuss any socialist idea! Since socialism and communism
aren't fair, then it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow democrats to
represent anyone in Congress!
Who is 'giving' this equal time? Individuals may do with their property as they choose -- if they wish to shout 'socialism' and 'communism', such is most certainly their prerogative.
It is not 'unconstitutional' for the (socialist) democrats to represent anyone any more than the (socialist) republicans.
<snip> too much deluded silliness
Section 9 & 10: Other than the President or his agents, no person,
news medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within
government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives
while such are in Washington. However, invited persons or groups can
make scheduled depositions provided they don't communicate with the
representatives otherwise. A representative's constituents shall be
allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes
only while they are in their home states or districts.
I chose this randomly to illustrate the absolute STUPIDITY of this approach -- it is no wonder that you refuse to post the entire waste of three decades or whatever it was you constantly blather.
HERE is what will occur under your delusion: Factions will CONTINUE to exist, only they will be 'unnoticeable'. Communication will continue to occur -- as your verbiage is written, it is COMPLETELY 'legal' for the Representative to contact anyone he chooses, for his staff to do the same AND for the staff to be contacted. Oops.
It is far simpler.
Congress may do A, B and C <period> -- where A, B and C serve to secure the (natural) rights of all. Since the Congress can do NOTHING else, of what concern is it that Congressman X freely associates with G? That some group gives Congressman X zillions of dollars in pursuit of the seat? That Congressman X has been in office 97 years? Your approach curtails and restricts liberties and freedoms.
This one sentence summarizes the SPIRIT of both the original
Constitution and my New Constitution: "Fair play and democracy shall
have supremacy in the USA!" Long shall the USA survive and prosper!
What is 'fair' and why should 50%+1 force 50%-1 to do as they desire?
Trump? Really?
I can already summize the fallacy spew that will follow. A true pity.
Regard$,
--MJ
"[T]he notion that the alleged incompetence of the individual is a basis for turning responsibility over to the collective reduces to the absurdity that those who are incompetent to run their own lives, in which everything is at stake for them, are thereby qualified to run the lives of others, in which virtually nothing is at stake for them." -- George Reisman
No comments:
Post a Comment