Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Einstein,

Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).

On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Dear Keith:  I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> nice people.  Israel should become a training place for successful
> capitalism.  Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> feel.
>
> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> is skating on?"  There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> that moderators must approve what I say.  Of course that in
> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.  If you
> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> now  been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.  The last
> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> with, first hand.  Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> But NOT on this forum.  The full document will be presented as part of
> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> country needs a New Constitution Now.  You guys can help speed things
> along by talking-up my document on the NET.  — John A. Armistead —
> Patriot
>
> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hey John!
>
> > I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,  Mark  and MJ are
> > already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> > maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> > even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
>
> > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > Stay tuned, People!  Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> > > explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> > > processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> > > or otherwise stupid.  —  John A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up.  The
> > > > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> > > > (happiness) of your grandchildren.  There won't be any more fortunes
> > > > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes.  By adapting
> > > > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured!  — John
> > > > A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> > > > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.).  I'm thrilled that
> > > > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> > > > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism).  That book explains
> > > > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution.  Simple things can
> > > > turn this country around!  And none of them involving conducting...
> > > > business-as-usual in Washington!  Trust me, Folks!  I know what I am
> > > > doing.  99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
>
> > > > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Mark:  If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> > > > > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens.  Stalin didn't give a
> > > > > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers).  He killed them by the
> > > > > millions.  Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> > > > > citizens?  Ha, ha, HA!  Then you can't read, for sure!  — J. A. A.
> > > > > —
>
> > > > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
>
> > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> > > > > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >  John,
>
> > > > > > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
> > > differs
> > > > > > > from yours. How fascist of you!
>
> > > > > > > On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > > No, Jonathan!  Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> > > > > > > can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> > > > > > > The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
> > > great
> > > > > > > Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did.  Barbara Walters, a
> > > > > > > celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> > > > > > > What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to
> > > > > > > have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the
> > > > > > > street?  As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about
> > > a
> > > > > > > candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or
> > > their
> > > > > > > network closed.  Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a
> > > game
> > > > > > > with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing
> > > > > > > polls.  Those who would like our government to be run the way the
> > > > > > > People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a
> > > candidate
> > > > > > > say, should rally behind my New Constitution—a document for the
> > > > > > > people!  —  J. A. A. —
>
> > > > > > >   On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > >  John,
>
> > > > > > > You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but
> > > > > > > instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do.
>
> > > > > > > That you believe celebrities should have less right to voice their
> > > > > > > opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what you mean
> > > when
> > > > > > > you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have
> > > a
> > > > > > > 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the
> > > > > > > celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have more
> > > influence
> > > > > > > at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic).  Of course,
> > > that
> > > > > > > shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and
> > > democracy."
>
> > > > > > > Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play" means
> > > and why
> > > > > > > someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play" in your
> > > world.
>
> > > > > > > And, John, you'd better do it fast. I think your time on this forum
> > > is
> > > > > > > about up.
>
> > > > > > > On 04/08/2011 09:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > >  Jonathan:  Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have
> > > a
> > > > > > > "following" which would be cesseptable to vote like the celebrities
> > > > > > > vote.  The means celebrities would have more influence at the poles
> > > > > > > than the man-on-the-street.  Of course, that shift of power runs
> > > > > > > counter to principles of fair play and democracy.  The 1st
> > > Amendment
> > > > > > > says: "... the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other
> > > > > > > medium".  Having a pro-democracy press means that no one like Mark
> > > is
> > > > > > > allowed to push socialism nor communism. His threatening me because
> > > I
> > > > > > > correctly peg him as anti-America, would shut down Google, if
> > > Google
> > > > > > > didn't FIRE Mark, post haste!  ï¿½ J. A. A. �
>
> > > > > > >  --
>
> > > > > > >       Freedom Is Always Illegal.
>
> > > > > > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft<
> > >http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/> <
> > >http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Freedom Is Always Illegal.
>
> > > > > > > Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft<
> > >http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> > > > > > *
> > > > > > *
> > > > > > *
> > > > > > *
>
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.