Thursday, March 24, 2011

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.


And yet under the guise of 'no reply' we again receive another fallacy spewing reply that fails to address the exposure of his previous foolishness.
Does anyone suppose that someplace within that Constitution which has yet to be produced in this forum ,,, he proclaims himself Supreme Ruler and Decider?

Regard$,
--MJ

Much of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas Sowell



At 12:20 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:
MJ, the party crasher, socialist-communist is bent on destroying, not
saving the USA.  So, that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly
undeserving of a reply.  — J. A. A. —
>
On Mar 23, 12:48 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> The proper function of government is to pass only
> the minimum number of laws to be sure capitalism—the concept of which
> has existed for millennia—doesn't become unfair or burdensome to the
> people.  There are no "czars" or government officials required to pull
> any of the strings.
> Which is necessarily ZERO laws. As Capitalism is the system in which people are free to use their private property without outside interference.
> As already pointed out from one of the 'snippets' of this constitution you allowed others to 'see' ... your constitution intervenes in the free use of property.Maximum civil liberties parallel having the MINIMUM of government
> interaction with the people.  And that is NOT anarchy.  My New
> Constitution clearly defines the limits of both business, social, and
> governmental influences of our lives.
> You contradict the FIRST section (above) with this section.
> Again, what is it you imagine 'civil' liberties to entail?
> Regard$,
> --MJContradictions do not exist. Whenever you think that you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong.  -- Francisco d'Anconia

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment