saving the USA. So, that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly
undeserving of a reply. — J. A. A. —
>
On Mar 23, 12:43 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> If you find what I'm writing to be interesting enough to read every day, then you are either very much in favor of what I'm saying or very threatened and thus opposed.
> Fallacy of bifurcation The "tone" of my document is pro control of government by the people; maximum civil liberties; having the most efficient use of tax dollars; respect for the environment; and respect for the rights of others. I suspect you can't see the positive tone, because
> you are jealous of my commitment and talent to accomplish what I have.
> By WHICH people?
> What is a 'civil liberty'?
> Most efficient as defined by whom? Why them? You do realize by clinging to 'taxation' you are endorsing what you previously suggested that you opposed.If you are FOR the people, Mark, embrace my New Constitution.
> Fallacy ofAudiatur et altera pars as well asDenial of the antecedent -- among others.If you are AGAINST the people, then stop replying on my posts. No
> socialist-communists are welcomed in the USA! — John A. Armistead —
> I think you uphold Inigo Montoya's observation quite well.
> "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
> YOU DO REALIZE THAT THIS IS YELLING!?!?
> Regard$,
> --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellPatriot>
> On Mar 22, 7:50 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The biggest problem Einstein will have with his "New Constitution" is that
> > we CAN READ AND COMPREHEND.
> >
> > The other immediate problem is that he can't remember one day to the next
> > what he says.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Asked and answered -- only you tried to change the subject while pretending
> > > it did not occur. ELSEWHERE in THIS thread: Socialism and communism are
> > > the anti-thesis of a representative republic or a democracy. My New
> > > Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the People and will fire, jail or
> > > hang those in government who support socialism and communism. When you
> > > attack my New Constitution with your "include me" talk, you are attacking
> > > THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get
> > > lost, Jonathan! J. A. A.
> > > And now HERE in THIS thread the same person:
> > > I am personally recommending that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and
> > > Unemployment Insurance ALL be privatizedwhile continuing to "cover" only
> > > those older or sicker people who have no other means of surviving or of
> > > getting first rate care.
> >
> > > The implications are rather OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see
> > > his EMBRACE of socialism.
> >
> > > There is ALSO this from the same person:
> > > Businesses or professions meeting licensing standards germane to the type
> > > and scope of work such perform, and being regularly apprised of substantive
> > > new developments, may control their own work without governmental sanction,
> > > nor, once licensed, being required to be other than self-trained to maintain
> > > continuing competency for doing safe work within their chosen type.
> > > Professionals qualified by training, testing and experience who perform safe
> > > and acceptable work within an area of their competency shall not be
> > > sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job class or licensing
> > > jurisdictionbeyond fair registration cost. No more than 25% of regulatory
> > > board members shall have been employed in the profession or industry
> > > regulated.
> > > Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism.
> >
> > > It should no longer be a 'mystery' why this 'constitution' is NEVER fully
> > > presented NOR that the author cannot support what drivel he presents. <sigh>
> > > Sad.
> >
> > > As noted, were you to actually PROVIDE the text ... one would see MORE
> > > examples -- one might easily conclude THAT is essentially the reason you
> > > refuse to present and merey proclaim.
> >
> > > Regard$,
> > > --MJ
> >
> > > Much of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It
> > > has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside
> > > and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or
> > > contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual
> > > process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as
> > > a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power
> > > in unbridled ways. -- Thomas Sowell
> >
> > > At 06:43 PM 3/22/2011, you wrote:
> >
> > > MJ: You are a deranged, socialist-communist who is clearly LYING about
> > > the people-oriented content of my New Constitution! Please reference
> > > a single location whereby intervention is allowed in how private
> > > property is used. You can't do that, I'm sure! Ha, ha, HA! — John
> > > A. Armistead — Patriot
> >
> > > On Mar 22, 1:03 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > Capitalism is the FOUNDATION of a successful USA! You
> > > > aren't telling me anything that I don't tout, daily. You are probably
> > > > doing so to make the readers think it is you who have the right Ideas
> > > > and I the converse.
> > > > It only takes a cursory review of those pieces you have offered to see
> > > how it fails to embrace capitalism -- much less utilize it as a foundation.
> > > > Capitalism is the system in which people are free to use their private
> > > property without outside interference.
> > > > Your 'constitution' is filled with intervention.
> > > > Regard$,
> > > > --MJ "Bureaucrats write memoranda both because they appear to be busy
> > > when they are writing and because the memos, once written, immediately
> > > become proof that they were busy" -- Charles Peters.If you agree with me say
> > > something like this: "I
> > > > applaud your New Constitution! We need less, more efficient
> > > > government and the return of lost civil liberties. Outlawing career
> > > > politicians from Congress seems like a great place to start. Good
> > > > luck in everything you are seeking to do for the good of the country!
> > > > — J. A. Armistead —
> >
> > > > On Mar 21, 11:54 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > John,
> >
> > > > > eBay is a perfect example of capitalism at work. Over 2,000
> > > transactions
> > > > > are performed every minute throughout the world with no need for
> > > > > government. Both parties involved in those transactions report they are
> > > > > happy with the transaction 96% of the time.
> >
> > > > > There is no need for government involvement in commerce.
> >
> > > > > On 03/21/2011 07:15 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Socialism and communism are the anti-thesis of a representative
> > > > > > republic or a democracy. My New Constitution RETURNS civil liberties
> > > > > > to the People and will fire, jail or hang those in government who
> > > > > > support socialism and communism. When you attack my New Constitution
> > > > > > with your "include me" talk, you are attacking THE most pro
> > > capitalism
> > > > > > and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan!
> > > �
> > > > > > J. A. A. �
> > > > > > On Mar 19, 10:57 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> Civil liberties require government permission. As I choose to be a
> > > free
> > > > > >> sovereign, I do not consent.
> >
> > > > > >> As for free enterprise, I sell on eBay. No government interference,
> > > 96%
> > > > > >> successful transactions worldwide. That is as pro free enterprise as
> > > it
> > > > > >> gets.
> >
> > > > > >> On 03/19/2011...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment