And yet ANOTHER response parading as though a response is somehow undeserving -- complete with fallacy spew.
Is it any wonder he chooses fallacy and name-calling over the 'defense' of his nonsense exposed for what it actually is?
Regard$,
-MJ
Much of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas Sowell
At 12:08 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:
MJ, the party crasher, is bent on destroying, not saving the USA. So,
that YELLING, quotation-mad jerk is rightly undeserving of a reply. —
J. A. A. —
>
On Mar 22, 6:47 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> Asked and answered -- only you tried to change the subject while pretending it did not occur.ELSEWHERE in THIS thread:Socialism and communism are the anti-thesis of a representative republic or a democracy. My New Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the People and will fire, jail or hang those in government who support socialism and communism. When you attack my New Constitution with your "include me" talk, you are attacking THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan! J. A. A.And now HERE in THIS thread the same person:I am personally recommending that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Unemployment Insurance ALL be privatizedwhile continuing to "cover" only those older or sicker people who have no other means of surviving or of getting first rate care. The implications are rather OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to see his EMBRACE of socialism.There is ALSO this from the same person:Businesses or professions meeting licensing standards germane to the type and scope of work such perform, and being regularly apprised of substantive new developments, may control their own work without governmental sanction, nor, once licensed, being required to be other than self-trained to maintain continuing competency for doing safe work within their chosen type. Professionals qualified by training, testing and experience who perform safe and acceptable work within an area of their competency shall not be sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job class or licensing jurisdictionbeyond fair registration cost. No more than 25% of regulatory board members shall have been employed in the profession or industry regulated.Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism.It should no longer be a 'mystery' why this 'constitution' is NEVER fully presented NOR that the author cannot support what drivel he presents.<sigh> Sad.As noted, were you to actually PROVIDE the text ... one would see MORE examples -- one might easily conclude THAT is essentially the reason you refuse to present and merey proclaim.
> Regard$,
> --MJMuch of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy. It has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught many-inside and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the intellectual process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring strength as a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political power in unbridled ways. -- Thomas SowellAt 06:43 PM 3/22/2011, you wrote:MJ: You are a deranged, socialist-communist who is clearly LYING about
> the people-oriented content of my New Constitution! Please reference
> a single location whereby intervention is allowed in how private
> property is used. You can't do that, I'm sure! Ha, ha, HA! — John
> A. Armistead — Patriot
> >
> On Mar 22, 1:03 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > Capitalism is the FOUNDATION of a successful USA! You
> > aren't telling me anything that I don't tout, daily. You are probably
> > doing so to make the readers think it is you who have the right Ideas
> > and I the converse.
> > It only takes a cursory review of those pieces you have offered to see how it fails to embrace capitalism -- much less utilize it as a foundation.
> > Capitalism is the system in which people are free to use their private property without outside interference.
> > Your 'constitution' is filled with intervention.
> > Regard$,
> > --MJ "Bureaucrats write memoranda both because they appear to be busy when they are writing and because the memos, once written, immediately become proof that they were busy" -- Charles Peters.If you agree with me say something like this: "I
> > applaud your New Constitution! We need less, more efficient
> > government and the return of lost civil liberties. Outlawing career
> > politicians from Congress seems like a great place to start. Good
> > luck in everything you are seeking to do for the good of the country!
> > — J. A. Armistead —
> > >
> > On Mar 21, 11:54 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> > > John,
> > >
> > > eBay is a perfect example of capitalism at work. Over 2,000 transactions
> > > are performed every minute throughout the world with no need for
> > > government. Both parties involved in those transactions report they are
> > > happy with the transaction 96% of the time.
> > >
> > > There is no need for government involvement in commerce.
> > >
> > > On 03/21/2011 07:15 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Socialism and communism are the anti-thesis of a representative
> > > > republic or a democracy. My New Constitution RETURNS civil liberties
> > > > to the People and will fire, jail or hang those in government who
> > > > support socialism and communism. When you attack my New Constitution
> > > > with your "include me" talk, you are attacking THE most pro capitalism
> > > > and pro civil liberties person on the planet! Get lost, Jonathan! �
> > > > J. A. A. �
> > > > On Mar 19, 10:57 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >> Civil liberties require government permission. As I choose to be a free
> > > >> sovereign, I do not consent.
> > >
> > > >> As for free enterprise, I sell on eBay. No government interference, 96%
> > > >> successful transactions worldwide. That is as pro free enterprise as it
> > > >> gets.
> > >
> > > >> On 03/19/2011 07:45 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > >
> > > >>> Jonathan Ashley isn't pro civil liberties nor pro free enterprise.
> > > >>> So, like I first assumed, he is a socialist-communist bent on tearing
> > > >>> down this country rather than saving it. He should be railroaded out
> > > >>> of the USA! � J. A. A. �
> > > >>> On Mar 18, 5:49 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>> Wanna-Be-Dictator John A. Armistead has spoken once again!
> > > >>>> He wants to close down all news networks and outlaw political parties.
> > > >>>> He also thinks world government proponent Newt Gingrich has "the smarts
> > > >>>> and the temperament to be President."
> > > >>>> On 03/18/2011 02:35 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > >>>>> Bill O'Reilly and Chris Wallace get hot-under-the-collar if a "guest",
> > > >>>>> like Sarah Palin, avoids answering questions that tie her hands on
> > > >>>>> issues that are in flux. Those two Fox jerks suppose that since they
> > > >>>>> are high paid and elitist, that people must do exactly like they say
> > > >>>>> or face ridicule. Within one week after my New Constitution is
> > > >>>>> ratified, the entire Fox News Network will likely be closed down for
> > > >>>>> not being in the best interest of the country. But not to worry! The
> > > >>>>> other News Networks will be shuttered as well. The "problem" is that
> > > >>>>> NEWS, and commentary on that news, cannot occur on the same network.
> > > >>>>> Of course that is only for news relating to elections or "politics".
> > > >>>>> I put that word in quotes, because political parties will be
> > > >>>>> outlawed! Socialism will become a non issue, because any "politician"
> > > >>>>> proposing anything like socialism will be hanged for TREASON! Believe
> > > >>>>> me, people, I can straighten out this country faster than any yellow-
> > > >>>>> livered politician. Newt Gingrich has the smarts and the temperament
> > > >>>>> to be President. But he is too much in love with our FAILED system of
> > > >>>>> government to save the country from economic doom. The Donald has a
> > > >>>>> good idea to make IRAQ pay for all we have done for those people. We
> > > >>>>> should do those things AND tell China they will get back ONLY the
> > > >>>>> principle on their loans to the USA. �Walk tall and carry a big
> > > >>>>> stick!� Only tough-love can save this country... NOT more God-damned
> > > >>>>> politics and wasted campaign money... as usual. After Barack Obama
> > > >>>>> has been hanged and has rotted to the ground for TREASON, this country
> > > >>>>> will be on the path to...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment