Thursday, March 24, 2011

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Mark, you naive wise-mouth: "Rights" and civil liberties are closely
akin. You may have heard this clause: "... are endowed by their
Creator with certain inalienable rights..." Rights come from our
Creator, not from government! Judge Andrew Napolitano explains that
very well. The socialist-communist DEMOCRATS say: "People have a
right to health care; or a right to equal standards of living compared
to the "fat-cats" who are the ones paying most of the taxes. *** The
ideal size of government is no more than 10% of the gross national
product. The many provisions of my New Constitution will move the USA
in that direction very quickly! But know this: "The LESS string-
pulling by government to keep things working smoothly, the more
smoothly the USA will function!" Quote me on that... "MJ"! — John
A. Armistead — Patriot
>
On Mar 23, 4:19 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I DON"T find it interesting.... its my JOB you idiot !!  Civil Liberties are
> SUPPLIED by the very government you say you want to control.... its simply
> hypocritical.
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:05 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > Dear Mark:  Should I be flattered that you remember what I say from
> > one day to the next?  If indeed you can read and comprehend, you
> > wouldn't need to put those words in capitals.  Unlike you and MJ, I
> > don't depend on YELLING to make my points.  If you find what I'm
> > writing to be interesting enough to read every day, then you are
> > either very much in favor of what I'm saying or very threatened and
> > thus opposed.  The "tone" of my document is pro control of government
> > by the people; maximum civil liberties; having the most efficient use
> > of tax dollars; respect for the environment; and respect for the
> > rights of others.  I suspect you can't see the positive tone, because
> > you are jealous of my commitment and talent to accomplish what I
> > have.  If you are FOR the people, Mark, embrace my New Constitution.
> > If you are AGAINST the people, then stop replying on my posts.  No
> > socialist-communists are welcomed in the USA!  — John A. Armistead —
> > Patriot
>
> > On Mar 22, 7:50 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The biggest problem Einstein will have with his "New Constitution" is
> > that
> > > we CAN READ AND COMPREHEND.
>
> > > The other immediate problem is that he can't remember one day to the next
> > > what he says.
>
> > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:47 PM, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Asked and answered -- only you tried to change the subject while
> > pretending
> > > > it did not occur. ELSEWHERE in THIS thread: Socialism and communism are
> > > > the anti-thesis of a representative republic or a democracy.  My New
> > > > Constitution RETURNS civil liberties to the People and will fire, jail
> > or
> > > > hang those in government who support socialism and communism.  When you
> > > > attack my New Constitution with your "include me" talk, you are
> > attacking
> > > > THE most pro capitalism and pro civil liberties person on the planet!
> >  Get
> > > > lost, Jonathan!  ­ J. A. A. ­
> > > > And now HERE in THIS thread the same person:
> > > > I am personally recommending that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid
> > and
> > > > Unemployment Insurance ALL be privatized­while continuing to "cover"
> > only
> > > > those older or sicker people who have no other means of surviving or of
> > > > getting first rate care.
>
> > > >  The implications are rather OBVIOUS, but perhaps the author fails to
> > see
> > > > his EMBRACE of socialism.
>
> > > > There is ALSO this from the same person:
> > > > Businesses or professions meeting licensing standards germane to the
> > type
> > > > and scope of work such perform, and being regularly apprised of
> > substantive
> > > > new developments, may control their own work without governmental
> > sanction,
> > > > nor, once licensed, being required to be other than self-trained to
> > maintain
> > > > continuing competency for doing safe work within their chosen type.
> > > > Professionals qualified by training, testing and experience who perform
> > safe
> > > > and acceptable work within an area of their competency shall not be
> > > > sanctioned for being unlicensed in another job class or licensing
> > > > jurisdiction­beyond fair registration cost.  No more than 25% of
> > regulatory
> > > > board members shall have been employed in the profession or industry
> > > > regulated.
> > > > Again continuing to EMBRACE socialism.
>
> > > > It should no longer be a 'mystery' why this 'constitution' is NEVER
> > fully
> > > > presented NOR that the author cannot support what drivel he presents.
> > <sigh>
> > > > Sad.
>
> > > > As noted, were you to actually PROVIDE the text ... one would see MORE
> > > > examples -- one might easily conclude THAT is essentially the reason
> > you
> > > > refuse to present and merey proclaim.
>
> > > > Regard$,
> > > > --MJ
>
> > > > Much of the intellectual legacy of Marx is an anti-intellectual legacy.
> > It
> > > > has been said that you cannot refute a sneer. Marxism has taught
> > many-inside
> > > > and outside its ranks-to sneer at capitalism, at inconvenient facts or
> > > > contrary interpretations, and thus ultimately to sneer at the
> > intellectual
> > > > process itself. This has been one of the sources of its enduring
> > strength as
> > > > a political doctrine, and as a means of acquiring and using political
> > power
> > > > in unbridled ways. -- Thomas Sowell
>
> > > > At 06:43 PM 3/22/2011, you wrote:
>
> > > > MJ: You are a deranged, socialist-communist who is clearly LYING about
> > > > the people-oriented content of my New Constitution!  Please reference
> > > > a single location whereby intervention is allowed in how private
> > > > property is used.  You can't do that, I'm sure!  Ha, ha, HA!  —  John
> > > > A. Armistead —  Patriot
>
> > > > On Mar 22, 1:03 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > Capitalism is the FOUNDATION of a successful USA!  You
> > > > > aren't telling me anything that I don't tout, daily.  You are
> > probably
> > > > > doing so to make the readers think it is you who have the right Ideas
> > > > > and I the converse.
> > > > > It only takes a cursory review of those pieces you have offered to
> > see
> > > > how it fails to embrace capitalism -- much less utilize it as a
> > foundation.
> > > > > Capitalism is the system in which people are free to use their
> > private
> > > > property without outside interference.
> > > > > Your 'constitution' is filled with intervention.
> > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > --MJ "Bureaucrats write memoranda both because they appear to be busy
> > > > when they are writing and because the memos, once written, immediately
> > > > become proof that they were busy" -- Charles Peters.If you agree with
> > me say
> > > > something like this:  "I
> > > > > applaud your New Constitution!  We need less, more efficient
> > > > > government and the return of lost civil liberties.  Outlawing career
> > > > > politicians from Congress seems like a great place to start.  Good
> > > > > luck in everything you are seeking to do for the good of the country!
> > > > > — J. A. Armistead  —
>
> > > > > On Mar 21, 11:54 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > John,
>
> > > > > > eBay is a perfect example of capitalism at work. Over 2,000
> > > > transactions
> > > > > > are performed every minute throughout the world with no need for
> > > > > > government. Both parties involved in those transactions report they
> > are
> > > > > > happy with the transaction 96% of the time.
>
> > > > > > There is no need for government involvement in commerce.
>
> > > > > > On 03/21/2011 07:15 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Socialism and communism are the anti-thesis of a representative
> > > > > > > republic or a democracy.  My New Constitution RETURNS civil
> > liberties
> > > > > > > to the People and will fire, jail or hang those in government who
> > > > > > > support socialism and communism.  When you attack my New
> > Constitution
> > > > > > > with your "include me" talk, you are attacking THE most pro
> > > > capitalism
> > > > > > > and pro civil liberties person on the planet!  Get lost,
> > Jonathan!
> > > > �
> > > > > > > J. A. A. �
> > > > > > > On Mar 19, 10:57 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> Civil liberties require government permission. As I choose to be
> > a
> > > > free
> > > > > > >> sovereign, I do not consent.
>
> > > > > > >> As for free enterprise, I sell on eBay. No government
> > interference,
> > > > 96%
> > > > > > >> successful transactions worldwide. That is as pro free
> > enterprise as
> > > > it
> > > > > > >> gets.
>
> > > > > > >> On 03/19/2011 07:45 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > >>> Jonathan Ashley isn't pro civil liberties nor pro free
> > enterprise.
> > > > > > >>> So, like I first assumed, he is a socialist-communist bent on
> > > > tearing
> > > > > > >>> down this country rather than saving it.  He should be
> > railroaded
> > > > out
> > > > > > >>> of the USA!  ï¿½ J. A. A. �
> > > > > > >>> On Mar 18, 5:49 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>> Wanna-Be-Dictator John A. Armistead has spoken once again!
> > > > > > >>>> He wants to close down all news networks and outlaw political
> > > > parties.
> > > > > > >>>> He also thinks world government proponent Newt Gingrich has
> > "the
> > > > smarts
> > > > > > >>>> and the temperament to be President."
> > > > > > >>>> On 03/18/2011 02:35 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>> Bill O'Reilly and Chris Wallace get hot-under-the-collar if a
> > > > "guest",
> > > > > > >>>>> like Sarah Palin, avoids answering questions that tie her
> > hands
> > > > on
> > > > > > >>>>> issues that are in flux.  Those two Fox jerks suppose that
> > since
> > > > they
> > > > > > >>>>> are high paid and elitist, that people must do exactly like
> > they
> > > > say
> > > > > > >>>>> or face ridicule.  Within one week after my New Constitution
> > is
> > > > > > >>>>> ratified, the entire Fox News Network will likely be closed
> > down
> > > > for
> > > > > > >>>>> not being in the best interest of the country.  But not to
> > > > worry!  The
> > > > > > >>>>> other News Networks will be shuttered as well.  The "problem"
> > is
> > > > that
> > > > > > >>>>> NEWS, and commentary on that news, cannot occur on the same
> > > > network.
> > > > > > >>>>> Of course that is only for news relating to elections or
> > > > "politics".
> > > > > > >>>>> I put that word in quotes, because political parties will be
> > > > > > >>>>> outlawed!  Socialism will become a non issue, because any
> > > > "politician"
> > > > > > >>>>> proposing anything like socialism will be hanged for TREASON!
> > > > Believe
> > > > > > >>>>> me, people, I can straighten out this country faster than any
> > > > yellow-
> > > > > > >>>>> livered politician.  Newt Gingrich has the smarts and the
> > > > temperament
> > > > > > >>>>> to be President. But he is too much in love with our FAILED
> > > > system of
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment