Thursday, March 24, 2011

Re: Why Were You Silent, Rush, in 2003?

At 11:20 AM 3/24/2011, you wrote:
If a bill is passed by congress and signed by POTUS, it is LAW.

CONSTUTUTIONAL law, until the judiciary says otherwise.

Its black letter man!

Uhm, no. Constitutional relates to the Constitution.

Again, by this silliness the Constitution is meaningless. Instead of a Constitutionally LIMITED Republic, we are ruled by a Congress and Executive that do whatever they please until and unless a majority of those on the Court decree otherwise (and even then it does not necessarily matter).



I don't like a lot of this any more than you do!  I'm just saying its
not unconstitutional until those empowered to determine
constitutionality, BY THE CONSTITUTION, say so.

Uhm, no. The Government does not determine what the Government may do or not do. The constitution is meaningless by such nonsensical asserion.




Hell, I think the fed Dept of Education SHOULD be unconstitutional,
citing the very same amendment you do.  But Presidents ARE allowed to
create cabinet positions, ergo, departments, and until a court agrees
with me, its just as constitutional as any law and/or amendment passed/
signed/codified in the constitution or US Code.

[You cut off your finger.] Has your finger been 'removed' only when a doctor claims it has ... or can you assess the situation and determine for yourself?

Regard$,
--MJ

An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed. -- Norton v. Shelby, 118 US 425, 442 (1886).

No comments:

Post a Comment