>
On Mar 3, 7:43 pm, Sage2 <wisdom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> John,
>
> Opine as you wish, but the next time you take a moon shot
> make sure the trajectory is accurate. Or not!
>
> *************************************************************************** *****************************************************
>
> On Mar 3, 9:44 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Sage 2: Supposedly, a "Sage" is someone who has wisdom.
> > However, you don't seem to realize that the present Constitution is so
> > weak, that such didn't prevent the 'progressive' decline of our
> > government from the ideals of the Founding Fathers. My New
> > Constitution INCLUDES every single worthy concept of the original!
> > And it builds upon those. Our problems are primarily PERSONNEL ones.
> > In dozens of ways, I control the quality of the people who can become
> > public servants. Those will KNOW that they work for the public,
> > because I empower ever law-abiding citizen, who is conversant on the
> > New Constitution, to fire any public employee who violates his or her
> > civil rights or the New Constitution. And there will be little second-
> > guessing of that citizen's decision, because contesting such will put
> > the one fired in jeopardy of going to prison if they fail.
>
> > "This New Constitution empowers every Citizen with broad civil rights
> > that they may invoke at will without the necessity for the prior
> > involvement of counsel or of a judicial authority. Those in or
> > working for governments shall be subordinate to any Citizen demanding
> > civil rights. The rightfulness of any such demand may be brought into
> > question only by just and comprehensive proof—delivered at a later
> > date in writing—with the apt named official(s) being in full jeopardy
> > of such punishments as are herein defined, if they are in error."
>
> > — John A. Armistead — Partiot
>
> > On Mar 2, 11:26 pm, Sage2 <wisdom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hi Keith,Mark and John
>
> > > The weakness is not in the Constitution but in the fact that
> > > we have moved away from it's original intent. To make a long history
> > > short we have become a two party oligarchy whereby the politicians
> > > represent themselves their "shadows" and their " phantoms"; not the
> > > American public nor The Constitution. This is evident in the fact
> > > that many in both parties try to undermine and discredit the
> > > grassroots movement known as The Tea Party. It is their worse
> > > nightmare. Fortunately it is a nightmare they will have to live with
> > > for a long time. The process then is not to rewrite The U.S.
> > > Constitution but to restore IT and restore power back to the American
> > > people. Only then will the intentions of the " founding fathers " be
> > > realized again !
> > > *************************************************************************** ********************************************************
>
> > > On Feb 27, 7:14 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Dear Sage 2: Consider this: If our original Constitution was so
> > > > perfect, how has it been possible that government evolved away from
> > > > the ideals of the Founding Fathers? It did so because that document
> > > > is WEAK! There was an assumption that elected officials would be
> > > > motivated to do what is best for the country (ha!). But everyone
> > > > knows politicians do what they know gives them the best chance of
> > > > getting re elected. Making socialist-communist promises to the lazy
> > > > wasn't nixed by any language of the Constitution. But my New
> > > > Constitution will hang for treason anyone advocating socialism—the
> > > > anti-thesis of the democratic ideals of the Founding Fathers. I
> > > > suspect that you are far more left than the country can tolerate.
> > > > Please give the readers a capsule description of your feelings about
> > > > the free-market capitalist system that made the USA great. And about
> > > > your ideas on the role of government in such an economy. Thanks. —
> > > > John A. Armistead, — Patriot —
>
> > > > On Feb 26, 11:11 pm, Sage2 <wisdom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hey Keith, Mark et al,
>
> > > > > Suffice it to say that OUR Constitution need never be rewritten
> > > > > nor changed, but from time to time revisited to it's original intent
> > > > > and meaning, less personal interpretation. " It is what it is " and
> > > > > was not intended to be anything more nor anything less than that. The
> > > > > only true recourse the founding fathers wisely gave us was the "
> > > > > amendment " and even they should be rare and few. We should not try to
> > > > > fix what ain't broke by breaking that which don't need fixing !
>
> > > > > *************************************************************************** *********************************************************
>
> > > > > On Feb 26, 6:31 am, KeithInSeoul <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Greetings from Seoul Korea John!
>
> > > > > > Uhm.....This seems to me, to be, "Much Ado, About Nothing".....
>
> > > > > > We'd all like to read your "New Constitution"; but if ya don't want to
> > > > > > share it with the group, that is your perogative.
>
> > > > > > The purpose of Political Forum is to share political thought, ideas,
> > > > > > commentary and opinion, as well as to comment on government, politics, world
> > > > > > affairs and current events. (And occasionally, pro football and
> > > > > > baseball!) Your posts I find sometimes interesting and usually thought
> > > > > > provoking, so therein lied my initial interest in you posting your, "New
> > > > > > Constitution". It was never my intent to get a shit storm started!
>
> > > > > > If you take the time to read both Jonathan's and Michael's posts, you will
> > > > > > find that both men are thoughtful, and probably share many of the same
> > > > > > concerns as you do. I consider myself a conservative libertarian, (not so
> > > > > > much a capitalist as I am one who beleives in protection of free market
> > > > > > enterprise, and I believe that there is a distinction between a, "free
> > > > > > market" versus an economic system such as capitalism, of which I also
> > > > > > support and subscribe to. Jonathan and Michael are damn near anarchists,
> > > > > > (and I say that with a smile on my face, I don't think either would agree
> > > > > > with me!!) but the point being, is that instead of taking the route of many
> > > > > > of the nasty, hateful rhetorical smear merchants from the far left, (e.g.;
> > > > > > the Wacko left socialist-elitist Moonbats) who from time to time and on
> > > > > > occasion chime in here; I would like to think that the thoughtful, well
> > > > > > reasoned conservative voices of Politicall Forum can have discussion, as
> > > > > > well as disagreement with a little more civility!
>
> > > > > > At any rate, have a good Saturday....Mine is almost over!
>
> > > > > > KeithInSeoul
>
> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:16 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > MJ: You are NOT wanted on this post! In the last few weeks you've
> > > > > > > managed to give your cook-booked quotations of others, and your own
> > > > > > > breakfast-table-written "constitution" of sorts. But you have not
> > > > > > > even gone back into my thread to read about my New Constitution, which
> > > > > > > is detailed in essays that highlight the apt portions of my document.
> > > > > > > And you obviously have no "Regard$" for anyone but yourself. ***
> > > > > > > Since my base philosophy is pro-capitalism and pro minimumist
> > > > > > > government, when you attack me—the author-messenger—you are revealing
> > > > > > > yourself to be a socialist and probably a communist. If it offends
> > > > > > > you that I have figured you out, take your "quotes" and your "regards"
> > > > > > > elsewhere. You are not wanted here! — J. A. A. — Patriot
>
> > > > > > > On Feb 25, 10:45 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > And yet ANOTHER fallacy spew.
> > > > > > > > Let's see this panacea of yours. What -- exactly
> > > > > > > > -- are you afraid of? That it is shit?
>
> > > > > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > > > > --MJ
>
> > > > > > > > "We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the
> > > > > > > > consequences of evading reality" -- Alyssa Rosenbaum
>
> > > > > > > > At 10:36 AM 2/25/2011, you wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > >Dear MJ: You sir, are a total BUM! What I have written describing my
> > > > > > > > >New Constitution and how such would be apt to events in the news would
> > > > > > > > >fill several "War and Peace"-size novels. Not a single WORD of what I
> > > > > > > > >have written supports socialism nor communism! I am in favor of
> > > > > > > > >having a super-efficient, minimum-size government that has close to
> > > > > > > > >zero interaction with individual citizens. 'My' government will no
> > > > > > > > >longer keep records on the law-abiding citizens, because taxes will be
> > > > > > > > >value-added, only. And I have nixed having the government maintain
> > > > > > > > >records of criminal investigations of anyone found to be innocent.
> > > > > > > > >Those on-file records tend to prejudice law enforcement to "convict"
> > > > > > > > >the person they failed to convict the last time. My corrections of
> > > > > > > > >corrupt law enforcement practices, alone, should be justification
> > > > > > > > >enough to ratify my New Constitution! Presently, the USA is a police
> > > > > > > > >state—with the strings being pulled by corrupt public figures. And
> > > > > > > > >the courts have done whatever the political leaders dictate. I've put
> > > > > > > > >them in their place, big time!
>
> > > > > > > > >You, MJ, are little more than a party-crasher. I do not appreciate in
> > > > > > > > >the least having you post your elementary version of "A"
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment