By Kevin Bogardus - 03/12/12 07:56 PM ET
Liberal interest groups, watchdogs and unions on Monday threatened to
boycott, protest and publicly embarrass corporations that spend money
trying to sway the outcome of the November election.
Gathered Monday at the Washington headquarters of the Service
Employees International Union (SEIU), the groups issued a call to arms
for the 2012 campaign, vowing to aggressively challenge companies that
contribute to super-PACs and 501(c) nonprofit groups.
"If you secretly contribute and scheme to buy our elections, we're
going to come knocking on your door," said Aaron Black of the Occupy
Wall Street movement. "And it's not just going to be a couple of us.
It's going to be thousands of us. Everywhere you turn your head."
Representatives of the coalition, which includes Common Cause, Health
Care for America Now, Public Citizen and Occupy, among others, said
they'd push for legislation and regulations that would require
companies to disclose all of their political spending.
"We're saying to corporate America that enough is enough. We're not
going to stand for our democratic system being overwhelmed by money,"
said Bill de Blasio, the New York City public advocate.
One challenge for the pressure campaign is that some corporate
donations that could go toward political activities do not have to be
disclosed to the public.
Super-PACs can raise and spend unlimited campaign funds, but must
disclose their donors to the Federal Election Commission. But 501(c)
nonprofit groups, some of which are affiliated with super-PACs, do not
have to reveal their donors.
Americans United for Change, a liberal group that has received labor
backing, plans to offer a $25,000 cash reward to the first
whistleblower who can prove a company has donated to a nonprofit
without disclosing it.
"We're going to challenge those donations. We're going to challenge
efforts to hide donations through (c)4s and (c)6s," de Blasio said,
referring to nonprofit groups.
De Blasio noted that the retailer Target faced a boycott campaign in
2010 for donating to a group that supported a Republican gubernatorial
candidate in Minnesota. He said that protest is only a foretaste of
things to come.
"What happened to Target was child's play compared to the strength
that all of these organizations can bring to bear against companies
that decide they're going against the people's will and involve
themselves unduly in the political process," de Blasio said.
Ethan Rome, executive director of Health Care for America Now, said if
companies make political gifts without disclosing them, they risk
endangering their brand and their reputation.
"If corporations want to use corporate dollars to influence elections,
we will expose them. They will do so at their own risk," Rome said.
"The groups represented in our coalition … all have different programs
that will inflict economic damage on offending companies."
Watchdog group Common Cause plans to organize rallies against
political spending this spring at shareholder meetings of 3M, Bank of
America and Target. They also plan to file shareholder resolutions at
those meetings.
The group, alongside Public Citizen, has been pushing the Securities
and Exchange Commission to issue a rule that would require publicly
traded companies to disclose their political giving.
"We plan to let corporations know that there will be a great cost to
playing politics," said former Rep. Bob Edgar (D-Pa.), president of
Common Cause.
The coalition has the backing of the SEIU, which is one of the most
active unions in the political sphere. The groups' representatives
said they are focusing on corporate money because companies' resources
dwarf unions and they can disclose less of their political spending.
"There's a world of difference between corporations and unions," Rome
said. "We're here because corporations don't have to disclose their
donations, to (c)4s and (c)6s, for example. Unions have to disclose
all of their activity. … They have enormous disclosure requirements
that corporations are not subject to."
Advocates said companies' secret donations would be challenged
regardless of whether they are made to groups supporting Democrats or
Republicans.
"If you donate to a Republican-leaning, independent organization,
trade association, we're coming after you. You donate to a
Democratic-leaning one, same deal," said Robert Weissmann, president
of Public Citizen.
That could lead to action against Priorities USA Action, a super-PAC
that supports President Obama's reelection. Last month, Obama's
campaign announced it would have senior administration and campaign
officials appear at the group's fundraising events, which should boost
its contributions.
De Blasio said the coalition will pull no punches, and that organizing
boycotts could be one of the tactics used.
"The point of what we said is every tool is on the table today. We as
a coalition are going to systemically pursue a range of options," de
Blasio said. "At some point, we may decide as a coalition that there
is a company worthy of a consumer boycott. We haven't made that
decision yet, but it's the kind of tool we could use."
More:
http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/215613-liberal-groups-unions-vow-to-expose-corporate-donors
--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy
--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment