On Apr 6, 12:40 pm, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Lucky*
> Date: Monday, April 2, 2012
> Subject: [TruthSeekersElection2004] Are Earthlings an 'invasive species'
> soon to be exterminated by a technologically advanced race of beings who
> protect life?
> To: !TheMulti-D <TheMulti-DimensionalNewsPor...@yahoogroups.com>
>
> **
>
> **
>
> ttp://www.naturalnews.com/035420_human_beings_invasive_species_intelligent_...<http://www.naturalnews.com/035420_human_beings_invasive_species_intel...>
>
> **
>
> Are Earthlings an 'invasive species' soon to be exterminated by a
> technologically advanced race of beings who protect life? Saturday, March
> 31, 2012
> by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
> Editor of NaturalNews.com
>
> [image: earth]
>
> (NaturalNews) An important new study in the realm of astrophysics has
> revealed that up to 40 percent of red dwarfs (a type of star or "sun") may
> harbor a large Earth-like planet orbiting at just the right distance to
> support life as we know it. The study was led by Dr Xavier Bonfils of
> the*Grenoble
> University in France*.
>
> Why is this a big deal? Because the number of stars in our own galaxy, the
> Milky Way, is believed to contain from 200 to 400 billion stars. Each of
> those stars is a "sun" to its local solar system, and an estimated 70% to
> 90% of those stars are red dwarfs. (See sources below.)
>
> Let's do the math on this, using the most conservative numbers: 200 billion
> stars in the Milky Way, 70% of them are red dwarfs, and 40% of those
> contain an Earth-like planet orbiting within the habitable zone. That
> number comes to*56 billion planets*that may harbor life*in our own galaxy
> alone!*(Not to even mention all the other billions of galaxies which are
> much farther away.)
>
> Some of those potentially life-harboring planets are practically next-door
> neighbors in a galactic sense: As many as 100 such planets may exist within
> just*30 light years*of Earth.
>
> Again, why does this matter? Because*the Milky Way is 13.2 billion years old
> *(or so, according to estimates). While the rise of human civilization and
> modern technology has occurred in just the last few*thousand*years, that
> same epoch of scientific advancement could have taken place on other planets
> *millions of years ago*.
>
> This could mean that other living beings in our own Milky Way are quite
> literally*millions of years ahead of us*in technology, consciousness,
> philosophy and other areas of knowledge and understanding.
>
> We Earthlings are but ignorant infants compared to something like that.
> Here we are on Earth, still shooting lead bullets at each other over fossil
> oil reserves and mined metals. More advanced civilizations have undoubtedly
> unlocked secrets of free energy, elemental transmutation, faster-than-light
> travel, bioenergy, mind-matter interactions, the nature of consciousness
> and much more. They must be laughing at us right now, it would seem.
>
> There is almost certainly other intelligent life in our galaxyWhat's
> important to realize here is that*the chance that far more advanced
> civilizations exist in our Milky Way is as close to 100 percent*as humanly
> imaginable. Conversely, the idea that Earth is the only civilization in the
> entire Milky Way where intelligent life exists is flat-out absurd and
> nonsensical.
>
> We already know, for example, that the seeds of life -- DNA -- quite easily
> survive rides on meteorites which are dispersed around the galaxy on a
> regular basis. The very first seeds of DNA might have arrived on Earth from
> precisely such an*intragalactic*"seeding" event.
>
> As this is leading into a discussion about the*origins of life*, Creation,
> intelligent design and Darwinism, I have placed such a discussion at the
> end of this article. The upshot of that discussion is that it is my belief
> our entire universe (starting from the Big Bang itself) only exists because
> of an intelligence -- a Creator -- which seeded not just our own universe,
> but the entire*multiverse*. See the bottom of this article for that
> discussion and a short recommended reading list.
>
> Getting back to the question of intelligent life beyond Earth, given that
> an estimated*56 billion life-supporting planets*may exist in our own
> galaxy, it's a slam dunk to acknowledge that there must be a very, very
> large number of civilizations that have been around far longer than our
> own. As in*millions of years longer*. That's a lot of time to acquire
> knowledge, develop technology, expand consciousness and even develop
> faster-than-light travel so that visitation of other worlds becomes as easy
> as you or I driving down to the corner grocery store.
>
> Again, why does any of this matter? Because it means our own planet is
> almost certainly being routinely monitored by non-Earth societies. If they
> have the technology to travel faster than light, it seems, they would
> easily have the technology to avoid being easily spotted by us.
>
> In fact, it seems logical to realize there may be hundreds, thousands or
> even*millions*of such advanced societies that are keeping an eye on Earth
> right now.
>
> Why are we not already widely aware of non-Earth civilizations and beings?If
> that's true, then it raises this question: Why haven't they intervened with
> Earth in a substantial way? Or have they already? There is convincing
> evidence of*ancient civilizations*across our planet, some of which may have
> been visited by advanced races of beings and shown some breakthrough
> technology. How were the Pyramids built, for example? There are even more
> convincing artifacts in Bolivia and throughout South America. Early human
> history, including Biblical history, is absolutely full of accounts of
> encounters with non-Earth beings. "Ancient astronauts" is a term worth
> Googling.
>
> So what are intelligent beings in the galaxy doing with Earth, anyway? Here
> are some of my own thoughts and theories on what might be happening:
>
> Seven theories behind the lack of present-day "contact"• Theory #1 - Earth
> has been declared a "non-intervention" zone and all non-Earth civilizations
> have agreed to stay "hands off" while simply observing our planet and our
> species. This would, of course, imply some sort of galactic governing body,
> which is a fascinating subject all by itself.
>
> • Theory #2 - There are no advanced aliens in the galaxy. We are the only
> intelligent life in the universe. God help us if this turns out to be true,
> as there will be nothing to stop human-led corporations from pillaging and
> destroying entire worlds if inexpensive space travel technology can be
> developed. Imagine Jupiter renamed "Planet Microsoft, Inc." Technology
> without ethics is extremely dangerous.
>
> • Theory #3 - There are aliens, but they just haven't noticed us yet. Maybe
> they only get around to checking each life-supporting planet every 50,000
> years or so, and since our entire civilization is only about 10,000 years
> old (or so), we haven't yet showed up on their radar. Our use of nuclear
> weapons -- a series of events easily visible from space -- has only taken
> place in the last 75 years or so. The light from such events has only begun
> to reach many advanced civilizations that might be gearing up to take
> action against Earth as a result.
>
> • Theory #4 - Our own present-day human species was created by non-Earth
> beings genetically seeding or altering native primates in order to create a
> more intelligent race for some purpose that we don't yet know about. (A
> slave race of obedient workers, perhaps? That trait seems to have been made
> quite prominent among present-day humans...)
>
> • Theory # 5 - Extraterrestrials know all about us, but they're waiting to
> see if we will destroy ourselves first. If we somehow get through the next
> couple of hundred years without decimating our own planet, then perhaps
> they will make contact. This is a question of*species maturity*-- are human
> beings mature enough to even bother being contacted? Or are we still just
> fair-skinned apes who beat each other over the heads with sticks and rocks
> while poisoning our own planet and destroying life? Earth's "advanced
> weapons" are a joke in a galactic sense, and our focus on weapons and war
> only proves how stupid we are when it comes to wisdom and maturity.
>
> • Theory #6 - Extraterrestrials are already here, and they're already
> taking over with some sort of nefarious infiltration agenda. Remember the
> "V" television series? Yeah, lizard people and all that... The "David Icke
> theory."
>
> • Theory #7 - Earth has already been claimed as "property" by one of the
> non-Earth races, and they will soon come to the planet to claim its
> resources. If you think about it, if earthlings had the technology of
> faster-than-light space travel, wouldn't we run around the Milky Way
> staking claim to all the valuable planets we could find? And the most
> valuable planets of all, it seems, would be*water planets*, as water is
> really the "gold" of life (as we know it) in the galaxy. A big blue planet
> like Earth would look like a valuable gem floating in a sea of mostly
> inhabitable rocks. Every advanced civilization in the universe would want
> to "own" Earth if, indeed, ownership was still one of their functioning
> tendencies.
>
> Humans are an infant species that lacks wisdom and is steeped in the
> destruction of lifeOf all these theories, I personally believe #5 is the
> most likely to be real. Sadly, human beings remain an infant species --
> steeped in selfish motivations and the destruction of our own planet. An
> advanced non-Earth species must look upon all our GMOs, pesticides, nuclear
> weapons testing, HAARP, fluoride poisoning and other bizarre "scientific"
> agendas with total disgust. "Wow," the aliens might say. "These Earthlings
> are really, really destructive. Let's make sure they don't discover space
> travel anytime soon."
>
> "Yeah," says another alien. "And I'm taking bets with 2-to-1 odds on
> whether they just destroy their own civilization within the next 100 sun
> orbits."
>
> It is amusing, of course, to hear arrogant scientists on Earth talk of
> themselves as geniuses. They're still stuck in the physical reality model
> of the universe, for one thing, and haven't even yet acknowledged the
> existence of biofields or even consciousness. It was physicist Stephen
> Hawking, again, who openly stated in his recent book, "The Grand Design"
> that humans are nothing more than biological robots who have no
> consciousness an
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment