interventionism ... regardless of how his supporters make you feel
I find your partisanship toward a conservative republican interesting.
I suspect that you have financial incentives to want a continued
invasion on the middle east.
On Dec 22, 12:17 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good Afernoon PlainOl;
>
> As I pointed out above:
>
> *Fact: A lot of Ron Paul's supporters are incredibly irritating: *There
> are, without question, plenty of decent folks who support Ron Paul.
> However, for whatever reason, his supporters as a group are far more
> annoying than those of all the other candidates put together. It's like
> every spammers, truther, troll, and flake on the net got together under one
> banner to spam polls and try to annoy everyone into voting for Ron Paul
> (which is, I must admit, a novel strategy).
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:14 PM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Thanks for the Ron Paul promotion material and more proof that
> > imperialist interventionists in the GOP will vote for somebody other
> > than a conservative republican.
>
> > On Dec 22, 11:05 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Some very astute observations by Former Iowa Congressman Greg Ganske
> > > on crazy Uncle Ron:
>
> > > *"Right now it's an anybody-but-Romney primary. If Ron Paul wins Iowa, it
> > > will become anybody-but-Ron Paul going forward."*
>
> > > *"Ron is accusing the speaker of being a hypocrite, I mean that's how he
> > > ends this last ad. Well look, when I was in Congress with Ron, he used to
> > > put in, he would put in hundreds of millions of dollars of appropriations
> > > requests, earmarks. And then he would sit on the floor and he would wait
> > > until the vote was certain that his earmarks would be funded and then he
> > > would put his card in the slot and vote No. So that he could then say
> > with
> > > purity, 'I don't vote for earmarks.'"*
>
> > > *"He doesn't complete the deal. He'd vote against his own earmarks,
> > knowing
> > > that they were going to pass, so he could then have his cake and eat it
> > > too. And you know what, I don't think that that's a totally honest way of
> > > dealing with your fellow colleagues on that. If you truly are against the
> > > earmarks, then you don't put them in and you don't request them." In a
> > way,
> > > he was for the earmarks but he was against the earmarks, if you know
> > what I
> > > mean. I think that is kind of a hypocritical position to take. So I think
> > > people ought to be a little careful when they live in glass houses on
> > this."
> > > *
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment