--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2011-04-28, 6:55PM EDT
Reply to: job-tyes2-2351913445@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to
ads?]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GREAT SUMMER JOBS!! Work outside or in our ticket booth on Long Wharf
or on one of the Boston Harbor Islands as a Dockside Assistant or
Guest Services agent for Boston's Best Cruises. We need happy,
energetic, outgoing people to provide information and assistance to
the public and passengers boarding our vessels for the only official
New England Aquarium Whale Watch, Boston Harbor Island Cruises, our
Boston Harbor Tour, the Salem Ferry, and the Harbor Express Commuter
boats. We are also looking for Cruise Directors and Narrators to work
onboard several vessels for additional compensation. Join our crew and
enjoy the excitement and fun interacting with the public, guiding
passengers to our boats, and generally supporting Boston's finest
fleet of passenger vessels. You can help us deliver an outstanding
recreational experience in and around Boston Harbor and the Boston
Harbor Islands. More than a dozen full time and part time jobs still
available right now through Labor Day.
Location: Boston Harbor
On May 2, 8:49 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> You're being silly.
> Where in the constitution does it say government has the power toregulatefood and drugs?
> Nowhere ... yet ANOTHER usurpation.The very reason for the US Code (laws) is to pick up where the
> constitution leaves off, AND to limit where it doesn't
> ROTFLMAO!
> Jeffrey Tucker, Ditch the PlannersNo one so much as suggested such a thing as the US Code in the first hundred years after the US Constitution was enacted. It would have been only a little longer than the Constitution itself. The first attempt to create such a compilation of laws occurred in 1878 but it languished because no one felt the need to update it. Then in 1926, in the midst of Prohibition when the feds became deeply involved in regulating the details of life, Congress made the thing come into existence. It is printed every six years.An institution was born, though most people know nothing of it. The next printing will come out in 2012, but the 2006 with annotations was 356 thousand-plus-page volumes that cover every aspect of life as we know it. The next one will add many new sections and probably more than 100,000 pages.This is America's central plan -- or ownGosplan, so to speak -- and it is as elaborate and detailed as any set of laws that have ever governed any society in the history of the world. Much of this central plan is absorbed into our daily lives in ways that we don't notice or aren't aware of. This is supplemented by an additional layer of state and local regulations that have been pushed on these governments by higher government or grew up from within to adapt the central-planning ethos to the particular circumstances of place and time. The effect is the same: life amidst an impossibly tangled legal thicket that grows more elaborate and complex by the day.It defies human comprehension but it is not without human effect. Every aspect of our lives is subjected to it from birth to death. Every product we buy, every service we use, every decision we make is filtered through this morass. You can try this on your own by going togpoaccess.govand typing in anything from chicken stock to funerals, and observe the state at work, managing the whole of life as we know it in the most minute detail one can imagine. Think of anything and search it, and then see if you think we enjoy "free enterprise."Regard$,
> --MJ"It is hard for the plain people to think about a thing, but easy for them to feel. Error, to hold their attention, must be visualized as a villain, and the villain must proceed swiftly to his inevitable retribution. They can understand that process; it is simple, usual, satisfying; it squares with their primitive conception of justice as a form of revenge…. [The average reader] is not at all responsive to purely intellectual argument, even when its theme is his own ultimate benefit…. But he is very responsive to emotional suggestion, particularly when it is crudely and violently made, and it is to this weakness that the newspapers must ever address their endeavors. In brief, they must try to arouse his horror, or indignation, or pity, or simply his lust for slaughter. Once they have done that, they have him safely by the nose. He will follow blindly until his emotion wears out. He will be ready to believe anything, however absurd, so long as he is in his state of psychic tumescence." -- H. L. MenckenOn Apr 30, 3:50 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > That Government has AGAIN usurped Power nowhere provided it notwithstanding, your claim makes no sense.
> > What about all those seeking to exercise their right to migrate who have ZERO interest in Naturalization? Oh well.
> > Here is the Constitution:http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu.txtNowhere is Congress empowered to make any laws/rules or otherwise concerning Immigration.
> > It is a necessity for the Nanny State to infringe rather than secure this right which is why we see this usurpation occurring at the outset of the (unconstitutional) Nanny State.
> > Regard$,
> > --MJ"Bryan Caplan has a damn good argument against the welfare state: Its existence will always be raised as a reason why free immigration cannot be permitted. Thus the theory of human rights is set against itself. The winner is power." -- Sheldon RichmanAt 12:26 PM 4/30/2011, you wrote:Oh for christ's sake MJ, controlling how people can become citizens
> > once they get here certainly includes whether or not then can get
> > here, and what we can do when they do.
> > Here is the US Code, as constitutionally enacted by Congress.http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/usc_sec_08_00001227----000-.html
> > You're not very good at playing bullshitsemantics, and thats a
> > compliment.
> > On Apr 30, 12:09 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Only Congressmen and federal reps are given the right to "Travel" between or
> > > within States of which they are not citizens.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 9:10 AM, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Naturalization, of course, is the acquisition of citizenship and
> > > > nationality by somebody who was not a citizen or national of that country
> > > > when he or she was born and has absolutely NOTHING to do with Immigration.
> > > > You actually PROVE the point as such would have been the ideal place to
> > > > provide such a power.
> > >
> > > > Regard$,
> > > > --MJ
> > >
> > > > Modern nationalism and collectivism have, by the restriction of migration,
> > > > perhaps come nearest to the "servile state." …Man can hardly be reduced more
> > > > to a mere wheel in the clockwork of the national collectivist state that
> > > > being deprived of his freedom to move.... Feeling that he belongs now to his
> > > > nation, body and soul, he will be more easily subdued to the obedient state
> > > > serf which nationalist and collectivist governments demand. -- Wilhelm Röpke
> > >
> > > > At 10:35 AM 4/30/2011, you wrote:
> > >
> > > > The Constitution does not authorize the federal government to control
> > > > immigration.
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > > Uhm, yes it does:
> > >
> > > > The Congress shall have Power ...
> > >
> > > > To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, Article 1, section 8
> > >
> > > > Next
> > >
> > > > On Apr 30, 9:02 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > At 07:38 AM 4/30/2011, you wrote:Just another illegal alien waiting to be
> > > > deported by Republitards.
> > > > > ----
> > > > > at it should ... our law says illegal aliens are to be deported
> > > > > they are criminals/parasites
> > > > > Actually, the Law of the Land provides no authority to the Congress to
> > > > make such laws in the first place.
> > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > --MJThe Constitution does not authorize the federal government to control
> > > > immigration. Nor does it say anything about illegal aliens. ... Sadly,
> > > > lawmakers have repeatedly interpreted this silence as license for
> > > > ill-conceived legislation. Congress began barring entry to the nation in
> > > > 1875 with prostitutes and convicts. Soon, all sorts of people fell short of
> > > > congressional glory: ex-convicts in 1882, along with Chinese citizens,
> > > > lunatics, and idiots. Paupers, polygamists, and people suffering from
> > > > infectious diseases or insanity made the list in 1891, while the illiterate
> > > > were banned in 1917. -- Becky Akers
> > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > >
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > <http://www.politicalforum.com/%A0>
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > >
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *- Hide quoted text -
> > >
> > > - Show quoted text -
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment