members of Congress who are content with letting unconstitutional
political parties pull the strings; who accept unconstitutional,
spaced-put primaries; and who think it is OK to have the media, with
its weekly polls and 24/7 commentary, have more influence on the
outcome of elections than the brainwashed voters suppose that they
have. Our government is screwed-up, Greg! Only an angry outsider to
the political establishment, like Donald Trump now is, can fire-up the
voters. That makes sense, if the voters really want fucking results!
— J. A. Armistead —
>
On May 2, 11:09 am, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Let the dems kill off Trump like they did Palin.
>
> Its a good thing
>
> On May 2, 10:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Last week at the White House Correspondents Dinner in Washington,
> > 'humorist' Seth Meyers delivered a stream of put-downs of those
> > unfortunate enough to be a subject of the liberal media. The people
> > doing the most laughing were the most liberal ones in the large group—
> > that included self-appointed… 'celebrities' who were somehow 'lucky
> > enough' to get a ticket.
>
> > The person doing the least laughing at that bash was a possible
> > candidate for President, Donald Trump. I immediately wondered why
> > Trump would go to such a "roast", when it was so obvious that Barack
> > Obama would likely orchestrate the event so as to make issues like his
> > bogus birth certificate seem to be light, enjoyable humor in the look-
> > the-other-way-to-crime culture of the corrupt Washington
> > establishment.
>
> > If Donald Trump didn't already know that our two-party political
> > system is off-its-kilter, he should surely realize, now, the
> > inexcusable leverage the media has in determining who our elected
> > officials can be. I've characterized this country's problems as being
> > the approximate equal responsibility of: the media, government, and
> > our screwed-up public education system from start to finish. Of those
> > three, correcting our media will be the most difficult. It will
> > likely involve closing down 90% of all media outlets once they violate
> > even one on the provisions in my New Constitution:
>
> > "Representatives shall not intentionally communicate with any news
> > medium whose coverage area is predominately outside of their home
> > district. Nor shall they, or any government official, cultivate a
> > media personae, or make petty public speeches, introductions or
> > comments lauding any person, living or dead, nor any civil or private
> > projects or those responsible. Comments to media by representatives
> > or government employees shall be germane to pending legislation, or to
> > the exercise of their jobs. The media shall not solicit public
> > officials' opinions over those of the People."
>
> > "Other than the President or his agents, no person, news medium,
> > organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within government or
> > without, shall be allowed to contact representatives while such are in
> > Washington."
>
> > "Representatives shall not be polled concerning issues up for a vote,
> > nor shall Citizens be polled prior to any election on their support
> > for any candidate, amendment, or referendum item. It shall be a
> > felony to take, or to disseminate, the results of any such poll."
>
> > "No release of projected election or referenda results shall be made
> > until all polls have been closed one hour."
>
> > "It shall be a felony for any government official, celebrity or media
> > idol—past or present—to publicly endorse or campaign on behalf of any
> > candidate for public office or job."
>
> > "English, that is grammatically written and correctly spoken, is the
> > official language of the USA and shall be the model for every medium
> > and every public discourse."
>
> > "No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the freedom of
> > speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium;
> > the right of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any
> > Citizen or group to petition government or any of its branches or
> > departments for redress of grievances."
>
> > "Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be
> > reasonable truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth,
> > or deliberate omission of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction
> > or satire—is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news
> > medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is
> > prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly
> > occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by, or
> > ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named as
> > being authored by management; editorial comments by others that are in
> > any way ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments
> > occurring at specific times or designated locations that most would
> > come to associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
> > innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
> > its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
> > job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
> > license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
> > promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
> > analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> > pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others outside
> > of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the
> > candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed,
> > provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided
> > the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all
> > of the referenda issues. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
> > truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
> > medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by
> > others, but if a person is harmed by the medium's content, they shall
> > be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium shall
> > respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other
> > medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage shall
> > not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on
> > government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment—
> > being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing
> > thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the
> > truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive
> > commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any
> > candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive
> > campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a
> > felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special
> > interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for
> > public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall
> > display active public records without the free consent of the apt
> > parties."
>
> > Any "serious" candidate for President should be smart enough to
> > realize that the elitist media has no constitutional right to have an
> > influence on the outcome of an election that is greater than the per
> > capita votes of those employed in the media. In short, ALL political
> > commentary regarding pending elections or referenda shall be stopped!
> > Never more shall any candidate, or possible candidate, for public
> > office be the subject of inconsiderate humor or innuendo. And when a
> > cad like Britt Hume expresses his personal opinion that… 'Donald Trump
> > has no chance of becoming President', Hume would be immediately fired,
> > or Fox News would be permanently closed down for not being in the best
> > interest of the people.
>
> > When Donald Trump looks with disfavor on what is going on in our…
> > fucking government, there might be a GLIMMER of hope that the "Empty
> > Ritual" in politics, and elsewhere in the world, will finally be
> > experiencing the "Wring-the-neck" that has been so long overdue.
>
> > Respectfully submitted,
>
> > — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics news group.
>
> > Those who are interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest
> > Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity" available at Amazon, and Barnes
> > and Noble.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment