On 03/19/2011 08:03 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
Of course that is possible. You simply haven't shown that to be the case.Jonathan: The number of people working on a project doesn't determine the quality of the final result. One dedicated and qualified person can produce superior quality.
I have read the Constitution on numerous occasions. I tend to agree with Lysander Spooner. It is the Constitution of no authority. From what I have read of your writings, YOUR New Constitution would be even worse.If you had transcribed the original constitution word-for-word as I did, you would realize how crudely such was composed.
From what I have read of YOUR New Constitution, it is sometimes more clearly worded. But it is also at times more draconian.With due credit to computers, I streamlined the original Constitution into a clearer-worded document about 60% as long.
If you think you can do better, get started. I'll check how you are doing sometimes in the next decade! Ha, ha, HA! — J. A. A. —On Mar 18, 5:51 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:The dictator speaks again! On 03/18/2011 02:44 PM, NoEinstein wrote:No. Every SENTENCE of my New Constitution speaks volumes! You don't have the smarts to objectively discuss anything with anyone! � J. A. A. �On Mar 17, 9:00 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:John,If someone is proposing to change the Constitution under which I am forced to live, I would - if at all possible - like some input into the creation of that document.The fact that you deem yourself to be exempt from any input or questioning regarding YOUR New Constitution speaks volumes.On 03/17/2011 05:44 PM, NoEinstein wrote:Jonathan: Be assured that nothing you say nor do, now or later, will give you any sway over the content of my New Constitution. Do this: For the next 14 years, write your own version of a US constitution. Maybe then you will have learned to be a bit more respecting of others. � J. A. A. � On Mar 16, 3:38 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:As usual, "no specifics are open for discussion." What an ego this guy has. Mustn't let anyone ask any questions. His head might explode. On 03/16/2011 11:53 AM, NoEinstein wrote:Folks: The vast majority of the still apt portions of our original Constitution remains within my New Constitution. Issues relating to having government be deferential to the people, and placing reasonable limits of the type and scope of the laws that may be passed, is the subject of much that I have expanded on in my New Constitution. I've placed great importance on seeing to it that the corruption in government�state, local and federal�which I have observed first hand, shall never again negatively impact any law-abiding citizen. There are dozens of well-defined, unconstitutional acts by government employees or elected officials that will either get the persons fired or sent to prison. Working for government, even for the President, is not a license to violate laws, or to have privileges that good citizens don't have. Other than my eliminating the unconstitutional (in the SPIRIT) US Senate, and excluding 'career politicians', lobbyists and elitist media from ever setting foot in the Capital, the changes in the daily operation of government won�t be too obvious to most Americans. Not specifically written into the New Constitution, I am personally recommending that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Unemployment Insurance ALL be privatized�while continuing to "cover" only those older or sicker people who have no other means of surviving or of getting first rate care. When most taxes and restrictions on the FAIR operation of businesses in this country have been removed, the US economy will experience a BOOM so large, that most people will be making enough money (Prosperity!) to provide for their own futures without needing to look to government for any handouts. The next sentence will assure that socialism�now closely associated with the Democratic Party�will never again influence any future action taken by government: "Fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA!" Those in government employment must swear, on penalty of death, to agree with that one sentence and to act accordingly. Democrats, who consistently want better things without requiring any work on their part, must learn that they will get no more free lunches or free medical care. It is my sincere hope that the hard-core 40% of socialist democrats in this country will realize that they will be far better off working in an efficient capitalist economy than from continuing to seek government-doled, socialist mediocrity. I invite the readers to comment on the general people-oriented-tone of my document. *** However, no specifics are open for discussion. *** � John A. Armistead � Patriot On Mar 15, 9:36 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:Folks: I've now presented over 50% of my New Constitution. That, plus the following, should give you a good idea of the love and devotion I've put into this long project. My efforts, aided by computer, exceed the combined total time spent by the actual contributers to writing the original Constitution by a factor of ten. At each step, I asked myself what the Founding Fathers would say. I'd bet they are happy people! "Article VI: Section 1, 2, 3, 4& 5: Laws in effect at the time of the adoption of this New Constitution shall remain in effect while such are systematically reviewed, debated and revoted in the House. Whether for the revoting of existing laws and regulations or for new bills, early and conspicuous public notice in the media shall invite Public input. Bills passing without broad and substantiated Public input, especially by those law-abiding Citizens most affected by the legislation, shall not become laws. The House shall make new laws and define procedures for implementing this New Constitution. Federal functions to be returned to local or state governments shall be phased out gradually and considerately for those to be displaced or relo- cated. Under this New Constitution the future state taxes of Citizens or businesses, typically, shall not exceed their com-bined former total of state and federal taxes. At any level of services provided, streamlining government and minimizing bureaucracy via wise laws shall always be primary goals. Local, state and federal law enforcement, the courts, or any branch or branches of the military or their respective parts shall at no time be used in support of corruption in government by any public official(s) at any level. Legal authority of law enforcement or the courts over the Citizens is voided if used in support of corruption. Local, state and federal law en-forcement agencies shall not be organizationally affiliated, and persons or groups, therein, shall not be presumed by law enforcement to be acting lawfully solely because of such auspices. All local, state and federal officer holders and employees�upon taking office or assuming employment�shall take the following oath: �I, (Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to be unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the citizens, as guaranteed by the Constitution, and I shall expect my coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to this oath.� No employee nor office holder shall be sanctioned for making complaints against another office holder, employee or superior. No government employee nor office holder shall be coerced into wrongdoing, immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real or implied threat of the loss of one�s job, promotion or benefits, nor by any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits. Making such a threat, bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year prison sentence�and if part of a pattern�making such threats, bribes or promises is treason. Acqui-escing to such is a felony. Government officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony. With impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral conscience or their oath. Local governments shall have 10 or more councilmen or a direct vote of the People is required to pass ordinances or raise taxes. Upon request by the Executive or 1/5 of the larger governing body, federal, state or local law making authority shall defer to the People on controversial issues where the Will of the People is in doubt. No law nor previous or subsequent vote on any issue shall usurp the right of an informed Public to decide controversial issues in direct referenda; the vote for passage shall be 60%. The apt macro-Will of the People in elections or referenda, as manifested by their votes, shall take precedence over any contrary existing or subsequent law, governmental hierarchy or judicial ruling. Because conditions change, older laws aren�t necessarily the Will of the People. Laws shall be concise and well defined. If�due to brevity, simplicity or lack of foresight, etc.�such laws have consequences outside the intended or implied scope, for justice and expediency, a judge may decree rightful, specific exceptions without new legislation. Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures that are in the best interest of the People and the world environment shall be passed, enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be allowed to prosper. No business, organization nor alliance shall use their auspices to sway the House for selfish gain. No business shall exist that uses computer invasion to coerce sales or to monitor others� regardless of any disclaimer or pact. There shall be no.. read more »
--
Never, ever interact with a government official without having a recorder running.
Never, ever interact with a government official without having a recorder running.
Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft
No comments:
Post a Comment