Saturday, March 19, 2011

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

No. Every SENTENCE of my New Constitution speaks volumes! You don't
have the smarts to objectively discuss anything with anyone! — J. A.
A. —

On Mar 17, 9:00 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> John,
>
> If someone is proposing to change the Constitution under which I am
> forced to live, I would - if at all possible - like some input into the
> creation of that document.
>
> The fact that you deem yourself to be exempt from any input or
> questioning regarding YOUR New Constitution speaks volumes.
>
> On 03/17/2011 05:44 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jonathan: Be assured that nothing you say nor do, now or later, will
> > give you any sway over the content of my New Constitution.  Do this:
> > For the next 14 years, write your own version of a US constitution.
> > Maybe then you will have learned to be a bit more respecting of
> > others.  ï¿½ J. A. A. �
> > On Mar 16, 3:38 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> As usual, "no specifics are open for discussion." What an ego this guy
> >> has. Mustn't let anyone ask any questions. His head might explode.
>
> >> On 03/16/2011 11:53 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> Folks:  The vast majority of the still apt portions of our original
> >>> Constitution remains within my New Constitution.  Issues relating to
> >>> having government be deferential to the people, and placing reasonable
> >>> limits of the type and scope of the laws that may be passed, is the
> >>> subject of much that I have expanded on in my New Constitution.  I've
> >>> placed great importance on seeing to it that the corruption in
> >>> government�state, local and federal�which I have observed first hand,
> >>> shall never again negatively impact any law-abiding citizen.
> >>> There are dozens of well-defined, unconstitutional acts by government
> >>> employees or elected officials that will either get the persons fired
> >>> or sent to prison.  Working for government, even for the President, is
> >>> not a license to violate laws, or to have privileges that good
> >>> citizens don't have.  Other than my eliminating the unconstitutional
> >>> (in the SPIRIT) US Senate, and excluding 'career politicians',
> >>> lobbyists and elitist media from ever setting foot in the Capital, the
> >>> changes in the daily operation of government won�t be too obvious to
> >>> most Americans.
> >>> Not specifically written into the New Constitution, I am personally
> >>> recommending that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Unemployment
> >>> Insurance ALL be privatized�while continuing to "cover" only those
> >>> older or sicker people who have no other means of surviving or of
> >>> getting first rate care.  When most taxes and restrictions on the FAIR
> >>> operation of businesses in this country have been removed, the US
> >>> economy will experience a BOOM so large, that most people will be
> >>> making enough money (Prosperity!) to provide for their own futures
> >>> without needing to look to government for any handouts.
> >>> The next sentence will assure that socialism�now closely associated
> >>> with the Democratic Party�will never again influence any future action
> >>> taken by government: "Fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in
> >>> the USA!"  Those in government employment must swear, on penalty of
> >>> death, to agree with that one sentence and to act accordingly.
> >>> Democrats, who consistently want better things without requiring any
> >>> work on their part, must learn that they will get no more free lunches
> >>> or free medical care.  It is my sincere hope that the hard-core 40% of
> >>> socialist democrats in this country will realize that they will be far
> >>> better off working in an efficient capitalist economy than from
> >>> continuing to seek government-doled, socialist mediocrity.
> >>> I invite the readers to comment on the general people-oriented-tone of
> >>> my document.  *** However, no specifics are open for discussion. ***
> >>> � John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>> On Mar 15, 9:36 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>    wrote:
> >>>> Folks:  I've now presented over 50% of my New Constitution.  That,
> >>>> plus the following, should give you a good idea of the love and
> >>>> devotion I've put into this long project.  My efforts, aided by
> >>>> computer, exceed the combined total time spent by the actual
> >>>> contributers to writing the original Constitution by a factor of ten.
> >>>> At each step, I asked myself what the Founding Fathers would say.  I'd
> >>>> bet they are happy people!
> >>>> "Article VI:
> >>>> Section 1, 2, 3, 4&    5:  Laws in effect at the time of the adoption of
> >>>> this New Constitution shall remain in effect while such are
> >>>> systematically reviewed, debated and revoted in the House.  Whether
> >>>> for the revoting of existing laws and regulations or for new bills,
> >>>> early and conspicuous public notice in the media shall invite Public
> >>>> input.  Bills passing without broad and substantiated Public input,
> >>>> especially by those law-abiding Citizens most affected by the
> >>>> legislation, shall not become laws.  The House shall make new laws and
> >>>> define procedures for implementing this New Constitution.  Federal
> >>>> functions to be returned to local or state governments shall be phased
> >>>> out gradually and considerately for those to be displaced or relo-
> >>>> cated.  Under this New Constitution the future state taxes of Citizens
> >>>> or businesses, typically, shall not exceed their com-bined former
> >>>> total of state and federal taxes.  At any level of services provided,
> >>>> streamlining government and minimizing bureaucracy via wise laws shall
> >>>> always be primary goals.
> >>>>        Local, state and federal law enforcement, the courts, or any
> >>>> branch or branches of the military or their respective parts shall at
> >>>> no time be used in support of corruption in government by any public
> >>>> official(s) at any level.  Legal authority of law enforcement or the
> >>>> courts over the Citizens is voided if used in support of corruption.
> >>>> Local, state and federal law en-forcement agencies shall not be
> >>>> organizationally affiliated, and persons or groups, therein, shall not
> >>>> be presumed by law enforcement to be acting lawfully solely because of
> >>>> such auspices.
> >>>>        All local, state and federal officer holders and employees�upon
> >>>> taking office or assuming employment�shall take the following oath:
> >>>> �I, (Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to
> >>>> be unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness
> >>>> ideology.  I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the
> >>>> citizens, as guaranteed by the Constitution, and I shall expect my
> >>>> coworkers and superiors to do the same.   I understand that my
> >>>> employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to
> >>>> this oath.�   No employee nor office holder shall be sanctioned for
> >>>> making complaints against another office holder, employee or
> >>>> superior.  No government employee nor office holder shall be coerced
> >>>> into wrongdoing, immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real
> >>>> or implied threat of the loss of one�s job, promotion or benefits, nor
> >>>> by any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits.   Making such a
> >>>> threat, bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year
> >>>> prison sentence�and if part of a pattern�making such threats, bribes
> >>>> or promises is treason.  Acqui-escing to such is a felony.  Government
> >>>> officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in
> >>>> government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive
> >>>> Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony.  With
> >>>> impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law
> >>>> nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral
> >>>> conscience or their oath.
> >>>>        Local governments shall have 10 or more councilmen or a direct
> >>>> vote of the People is required to pass ordinances or raise taxes.
> >>>> Upon request by the Executive or 1/5 of the larger governing body,
> >>>> federal, state or local law making authority shall defer to the People
> >>>> on controversial issues where the Will of the People is in doubt.  No
> >>>> law nor previous or subsequent vote on any issue shall usurp the right
> >>>> of an informed Public to decide controversial issues in direct
> >>>> referenda; the vote for passage shall be 60%.  The apt macro-Will of
> >>>> the People in elections or referenda, as manifested by their votes,
> >>>> shall take precedence over any contrary existing or subsequent law,
> >>>> governmental hierarchy or judicial ruling.  Because conditions change,
> >>>> older laws aren�t necessarily the Will of the People.
> >>>>        Laws shall be concise and well defined.  If�due to brevity,
> >>>> simplicity or lack of foresight, etc.�such laws have consequences
> >>>> outside the intended or implied scope, for justice and expediency, a
> >>>> judge may decree rightful, specific exceptions without new
> >>>> legislation.  Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures that are in
> >>>> the best interest of the People and the world environment shall be
> >>>> passed, enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be
> >>>> allowed to prosper.  No business, organization nor alliance shall use
> >>>> their auspices to sway the House for selfish gain.  No business shall
> >>>> exist that uses computer invasion to coerce sales or to monitor others�
> >>>> regardless of any disclaimer or pact.  There shall be no
> >>>> discrimination against any law-abiding Citizen, business or
> >>>> organization due to arbitrary categorization.  No public nor private
> >>>> regulation shall require disclosure of a person�s stand or vote on any
> >>>> issue which might cause them discrimination.  Laws shall respect the
> >>>> People�s diverse mores without setting arbitrary social standards.  No
> >>>> government shall criminalize behavior that the Public considers to be
> >>>> innocuous, or is macro-typical, or where government isn�t being
> >>>> deferential to the Public; nor shall they: prosecute victimless crimes
> >>>> other than gross
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment