— J. A. A. —
>
On Mar 11, 5:16 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> Re: "Unless one understands the hundreds of problems solved, most don't
> have the smarts to realize how much more personal liberty and how much
> less government control there will be that would otherwise have affected
> most Americans."
>
> John,
>
> Perhaps a definition of liberty is needed for your perusal. From
> Webster's 1828 dictionary:
>
> *LIB''ERTY,* n. [L. libertas, from liber, free.]
>
> 1. Freedom from restraint, in a general sense, and applicable to the
> body, or to the will or mind. The body is at liberty, when not
> confined; the will or mind is at liberty, when not checked or
> controlled. A man enjoys liberty, when no physical force operates to
> restrain his actions or volitions.
>
> How does one gain liberty from YOUR New Constitution? From what little
> you have provided, for every problem YOUR New Constitution claims to
> solve, YOUR New Constitution creates ten new problems.
>
> On 03/11/2011 12:46 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Mark: Your pet one-page constitution was unknown to me when I
> > wrote my New Constitution�which is based on and expanded from, the
> > original. So, don't fault me for not following your lead. At no time
> > is the input of any outsider, like you, being sought to... "evaluate"
> > what I have done. Most of the content was for solving very specific
> > governmental problems highlighted in the news. Unless one understands
> > the hundreds of problems solved, most don't have the smarts to realize
> > how much more personal liberty and how much less government control
> > there will be that would otherwise have affected most Americans. Even
> > YOU will be a beneficiary! � J. A. Armistead �
> > On Mar 11, 9:34 am, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public acts,
>
> >>>> records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more
> >>>> strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the
> >>>> states having laws governing such.
> >> THERE GOES MY STATES RIGHT TO THE DEATH PENALTY AND LIFE IN PRISON FOR
> >> REPEAT OFFENDER PEDOPHILES...
>
> >> English, that is grammatically
>
> >>>> written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and
> >>>> shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. Laws,
> >>>> documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written
> >>>> concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average
> >>>> people,
> >> JUST WHAT IS "AVERAGE"... DEFINE "LEGALESE".... DOES THAT MEAN (IT CERTAINLY
> >> IMPLIES) THAT ANY "OFFICIAL" LANGUAGE MUST BE IN A FORM THAT WOULD ALLOW
> >> IDIOTS AND DROPOUTS TO UNDERSTAND..(EBONICS).. THIS WOULD MEAN THAT ANYONE
> >> WITH AN EDUCATION COULD NOT UNDERSTAND IT.
>
> >> or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed.
>
> >>>> Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages
> >>>> in civil court.
> >> EXPLAIN WHAT IS CONFUSING ABOUT A THOUSAND YEAR OLD LANGUAGE??
>
> >> No person shall be punished for violations of laws
>
> >>>> that: aren�t common knowledge;
> >> SO IF I CLAIM THAT I DID NOT KNOW THAT KILLING UNCLE JOE WAS "ILLEGAL" I
> >> CAN'T BE PROSECUTED.
>
> >> disagree with the macro moral consensus
>
> >>>> of the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first
> >>>> year and passed by less than 60% of the House.
> >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:56 AM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> >>> Jonathan, a socialist-communist masquerading as a conservative, is
> >>> undeserving of being replied to. � J. A. A. �
> >>> On Mar 10, 9:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> It is so sad that you spent 14 years writing this incoherent statist
> >>>> hodge-podge.
> >>>> On 03/10/2011 06:25 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> Folks: About 1/3rd of my New Constitution relates to straightening-
> >>>>> out the Judiciary. Here, in sequence, is...
> >>>>> " Article IV:
> >>>>> Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public acts,
> >>>>> records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more
> >>>>> strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the
> >>>>> states having laws governing such. English, that is grammatically
> >>>>> written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and
> >>>>> shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. Laws,
> >>>>> documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written
> >>>>> concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average
> >>>>> people, or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed.
> >>>>> Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages
> >>>>> in civil court. No person shall be punished for violations of laws
> >>>>> that: aren�t common knowledge; disagree with the macro moral
> >>> consensus
> >>>>> of the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first
> >>>>> year and passed by less than 60% of the House.
> >>>>> Citizens in any state are entitled to the same privileges and
> >>>>> immunities as the Citizens of the several states. Anyone charged with
> >>>>> treason or other crime in any state who flees to another state, shall,
> >>>>> on demand of the executive authority of the state from which he fled,
> >>>>> be delivered up, to be removed to the state having jurisdiction in
> >>>>> such crime. No imprison-ment, slavery, nor involuntary servitude�
> >>>>> except as punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been
> >>>>> duly convicted�shall exist within the United States or any place
> >>>>> subject to its jurisdiction.
> >>>>> The House may create new states if such aren�t within the
> >>>>> jurisdiction of another state that dissents, and aren�t formed by
> >>>>> joining two or more dissenting states or parts thereof. The House can
> >>>>> make rules and regulations respecting the territory or property of the
> >>>>> United States. The New Constitution shall not prejudice claims of the
> >>>>> USA or a particular state, and shall guarantee to each state in the
> >>>>> union a government that is a democracy or a republic, and shall
> >>>>> protect states against invasion. Upon request by the legislature or
> >>>>> the executive of a state (when the legislature cannot be convened),
> >>>>> the United States shall protect such state from domestic violence."
> >>>>> � John A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>> On Mar 6, 6:39 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> Dear Keith in Koln: I lived in Charlotte for over two decades. My
> >>>>>> father, in his childhood, lived in Tarpon Springs. One of my most
> >>>>>> frightening times was driving over the Tampa Bay bridge. The
> >>>>>> "starting point" for me in rewriting the constitution was to correct
> >>>>>> the rampant injustices in our courts, and to allay our (You have to
> >>>>>> experience it to know it.) police state. As happened with O. J., the
> >>>>>> police target who they want to convict whether they are guilty or
> >>>>>> not. The police are especially unfair to Blacks. I make it a felony
> >>>>>> for any prosecutor to be overly zealous to convict someone who is
> >>>>>> latter proved to be innocent. At every turn, justice demands that the
> >>>>>> presumption of innocence be there throughout the trial until the jury
> >>>>>> has reached a unanimous decision for guilt. Never again will there be
> >>>>>> the converse requirement for a unanimous decision of innocence... ***
> >>>>>> Only one of twelve jury members is required to find someone not
> >>>>>> guilty. The latter is exactly what the Founding Fathers intended!
> >>>>>> I'm flattered that someone with a Law background, like you, has said
> >>>>>> anything favorable about my essays or my daily battles with others.
> >>>>>> Here is the entire Article III relating to the Justice System:
> >>>>>> "Article III:
> >>>>>> Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and
> >>>>>> such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
> >>>>>> interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
> >>>>>> rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
> >>>>>> laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
> >>>>>> Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never
> >>>>>> as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor
> >>>>>> from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of
> >>>>>> such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal
> >>>>>> executive or legislative office. The President shall nominate new
> >>>>>> justices who are between the ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on
> >>>>>> good behavior, serve a single term of up to 10 years. The President,
> >>>>>> or his agents, shall not work to win the confirmation of any
> >>>>>> nominee. Judges and justices shall be selected for their intellect,
> >>>>>> high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable
> >>>>>> nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office. Such
> >>>>>> shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their judgments,
> >>>>>> yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly. They shall
> >>>>>> make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution�never on
> >>>>>> their personal ideologies. Every two years an unbiased review panel
> >>>>>> shall apprise the Citizens of the job performance grade, as herein, of
> >>>>>> seated judges and justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters
> >>>>>> nationwide, the latter can be unseated. Judges and justices aren�t
> >>>>>> royalty, nor do they have an implied moral judgment inherently
> >>>>>> superior to public macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered
> >>>>>> lavishly, sit in throne-like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress
> >>>>>> in a style that differentiates them from the People. They shall not
> >>>>>> socialize with, nor privately be in conference with, members of the
> >>>>>> Executive or Legislative branches of government; nor shall
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment