Michael,
I agree, that we need to have some substantive changes in our foreign policy. For one, we should assert that Israel acknowledge Resolution 242 for starters.
Having said that, the premise that we are, "Demonizing Islam" is ludicrous. The bottom line, is that Islam is incompatible with Western values and culture, until such time as Islam reforms, period.
Anyone who doesn't acknowledge this, is either misinformed, or ignorant of the tenets of Islam and the current state of affairs in the Islamic theocracies throughout the Middle East, as well as the huge migration to Western Nation-States which is taking place throughout Europe and the United States.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:09 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
<<<<If a mosque was willing to publicly renounce the Koran and its 109I work daily with a few Moslems and except for "renounce Allah and
verses that call for the death of infidels, renounce Allah and his
messenger Mohammed, publicly condemn Osama bin Laden, Hamas, and
Abdelbaset al Megrahi (the Lockerbie bomber), maybe then they could be
allowed to build their buildings. But then they wouldn't be Muslims at
that point, now would they?>>>>
his messenger Mohammed" they have all renounced the rest of
it...actually condemn it.... and they are Mosque attending religious
people that are indeed Moslem.
This guy is an absolute jerk that got one thing right..... bin Laden
HATES the US and its policies for abandoning his people after sending
them to slaughter against the Russians.
On Feb 25, 9:29 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> "Anyone who thinks American security is served by demonizing Islam or Muslims is delusional. The way to prevent another 9/11 is to change U.S. foreign policy. Contrary to the neoconservatives, the attacks were not a manifestation of a "clash of civilizations." They were not about religion. They were about stopping U.S. aggression against the Muslim world -- and the U.S. government knows it. As a 2004 Pentagon Defense Science Board Task Force put it, "Muslims do not 'hate our freedom,' but rather, they hate our policies." Robert Pape's analysis of suicide terrorism confirms this."Park51 and Collective GuiltbyJames Bovard, Posted February 25, 2011This article originally appeared in the November 2010 edition ofFreedom Daily.
> If a YMCA or a YMHA were planned for 51 Park Place in Lower Manhattan, two blocks from the Twin Towers' former site, who would have noticed?> Must it be pointed out that several million Muslims live peacefully in the United States and have done so for generations? What more needs to be said?No bin LadeniteMoreover, it takes only minutes on the Internet to learn there are different Muslim traditions. Feisal Abdul Rauf, director of Park51, is no bin Ladenite. As William Dalrymple writes, Raufis one of America's leading thinkers of Sufism, the mystical form of Islam, which in terms of goals and outlook couldn't be farther from the violent Wahhabism of the jihadists. His videos and sermons preach love ... and reconciliation.... But in the eyes of Osama bin Laden and the Taliban, he is an infidel-loving, grave-worshiping apostate; they no doubt regard him as a legitimate target for assassination.Rauf's mainstream credentials are indisputable. President Bush used to send him on goodwill missions to the Middle East. President Obama continues to do so. Rauf was invited to speak at the memorial service for Daniel Pearl, the Jewish reporter for the Wall Street Journal whom jihadists brutally murdered in Pakistan. In his remarks, Rauf said,We are here to assert the Islamic conviction of the moral equivalency of our Abrahamic faiths. If to be a Jew means to say with all one's heart, mind, and soul ... hear O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is One, not only today I am a Jew, I have always been one, Mr. Pearl. If to be a Christian is to love the Lord our God with all of my heart, mind, and soul, and to love for my fellow human being what I love for myself, then not only am I a Christian, but I have always been one, Mr. Pearl.This hardly sounds like someone with sympathy for killers of the innocent. He is a conciliator, which makes the location near Ground Zero especially appropriate for an Islamic center. We don't have to agree with everything he says to understand that.
> Instead, the equivalent of a Muslim Y (without the implied male exclusivity) is to be built there. What's the big deal?
> I can think of only one answer: Consciously or not, a majority of Americans associate all American Muslims with the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center. Although the U.S. government's position is that the attacks were perpetrated not by Islam but rather by fanatics who warped the religion, the opposition to Cordoba House, now known as Park51, suggests that most Americans don't believe it. They seem to hold all Muslims responsible for the acts of a few. If so, that's disgraceful collective guilt based on religion and unbecoming a society that claims to judge individuals by their character.
> Just when one thinks that politics can't sink any deeper, conservatives and Republicans come along to prove one wrong. Who cares what Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, and their ilk really think about the Islamic cultural center located two vision-obstructed blocks from (not at) Ground Zero? What counts is that they are eager to exploit Americans' ignorant fears about Muslims and Arabs for political advantage. Gingrich, ever the pseudo intellectual, suggests that Nazis would not be permitted to build a center near the Holocaust Museum. He hopes you'll not realize that (1) the developers of Park51 are neither Nazis nor supporters of al-Qaeda, and (2) they own the property on which the center is to be built. He's also not likely to mention that Lower Manhattan has been home to actual mosques for years.
> Right-wing leaders have helped whip up hysteria among the populist Tea Partiers. TeaParty.org routinely sends out emails linking Park51 to the Muslim Brotherhood, implying that that "the objective ... is to convert the U.S. into an Islamic nation through sabotage and subterfuge."
> The idea that a public Muslim cultural center in New York City is part of a covert effort to turn the United States into a caliphate is ludicrous. The hysteria is not focused just on Manhattan. In Murfreesboro, Tennessee, residents opposed an Islamic center, although one has long existed in another part of town. Opponents say they are concerned about Islamic radicalism. CNN reported that one resident said, "In Islam, a mosque means 'We have conquered this country.' And where are they? They're in the center of Tennessee. They're going to say, 'We have conquered Tennessee.'"
> The anti-Muslim charges get even nuttier. One protester carried a sign with the inscription, "MOSQUE LEADERS SUPPORT KILLING CONVERTS."
> But that's nothing compared to the American Family Association's position. AFA's Bryan Fischer says,If a mosque was willing to publicly renounce the Koran and its 109 verses that call for the death of infidels, renounce Allah and his messenger Mohammed, publicly condemn Osama bin Laden, Hamas, and Abdelbaset al Megrahi (the Lockerbie bomber), maybe then they could be allowed to build their buildings. But then they wouldn't be Muslims at that point, now would they?Fischer earlier said he agreed with a Danish psychologist that "the integration of Muslims into Western societies is 'impossible.'" He wants the U.S. government to prohibit Muslims from moving to the United States. But he'd go further. "The most compassionate thing we can do for Muslims who have already immigrated here," he says, "is to help repatriate them back to Muslim countries, where they can live in a culture which shares their values, a place where they can once again be at home, surrounded by people who cherish their deeply held ideals."
> This sort of bigotry, whipped up by cynical politicians, can have no good end. As I write, the news carries a story about a man who slashed a New York City cab driver after learning he is a Muslim. It hasn't been that long since the U.S. government put Japanese-Americans in concentration camps simply because of their national origin. After 9/11, 1,200 Muslim and Arab immigrants were rounded up. According to analyst Jim Lobe,In a widely noted report released [in June 2003], [the Justice Department's inspector general] found "significant problems" in the way federal officials dealt with the post-Sep. 11 roundups. Dozens of detainees were subject to verbal and physical abuse by guards at the facility, where they were left to languish in "unduly harsh" conditions for months, some without access to family members or attorneys, it said.Has this country gone crazy?
> Fanatical Christians and Jews have killed many innocent people, even in modern times, believing they were doing God's will. But reasonable people do not hold Christianity and Judaism, or every Christian and Jew, culpable for those crimes. Why the double standard with Muslims? Some would say that Islam preaches violence. But Lawrence Wright, author of The Looming Tower, a history of al-Qaeda, points out that Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri went to great lengths to rationalize violating the Koran's prohibitions against suicide and the killing of innocents.
> Other major religions passed through stages in which traditionalists struggled with modernizers. Unfortunately, it did not always occur peacefully, but eventually some kind of accommodation was reached. Since World War II, Islam has been in a similar stage. The difference, however, is that Western imperialism disrupted the process. First the British government (with help from French) and then the U.S. government presumptuously and brutally intervened in the Muslim world using all the vicious tools of empire, including mass murder and torture. That has not only interfered with Islam's evolution in the modern world, it has spawned the desire for revenge against the empires that aggressed against them.Ground Zero and U.S. aggressionThe ignorance displayed in the opposition to Park51 cannot be separated from the general American ignorance of U.S. foreign policy. History did not begin on 9/11. It was the culmination of six decades of violence against and oppression of Muslims in the Middle East, both inflicted and sponsored by American regimes, Republican and Democrat. Predictably, that record provoked a tiny minority to strike at innocent people nine years ago, including many Muslims. We may be thankful that not all Muslims hold all Americans responsible for the U.S. government's continuing aggression. What message does it send when Americans persecute rather than applaud conciliatory Muslims?
> Glenn Greenwald of Salon writes,The campaign against the Park51 community center in Lower Manhattan is being condemned, rightfully so, because it is driven by a desire to stigmatize all Muslims and even institute a generalized war against Islam as American policy. But far from Ground Zero, having nothing whatsoever to do with the warped right-wing fanatics driving that campaign, we're increasingly engaging in actions perceived -- understandably so -- to be exactly the War against Muslims which, with our pretty presidential words, we renounce. Escalation in Afghanistan, a sustained bombing campaign in Pakistan, all sorts of increased covert actions in multiple Muslim countries, the ongoing imprisonment with no charges of Muslims around the world, bellicose threats to Iran, and now a proposed expansion of our drone campaign into Yemen: we can insist all we want that we are not waging a War Against Muslims, but it's going to look to a huge number of people as though we're doing exactly that.Or as Drew Hjelm wrote on Facebook, "The U.S. has been building ground zeros near mosques around the world for decades." If anything should be excluded from Lower Manhattan out of respect for the 9/11 victims, it's U.S. government buildings.
> Anyone who thinks American security is served by demonizing Islam or Muslims is delusional. The way to prevent another 9/11 is to change U.S. foreign policy. Contrary to the neoconservatives, the attacks were not a manifestation of a "clash of civilizations." They were not about religion. They were about stopping U.S. aggression against the Muslim world -- and the U.S. government knows it. As a 2004 Pentagon Defense Science Board Task Force put it, "Muslims do not 'hate our freedom,' but rather, they hate our policies." Robert Pape's analysis of suicide terrorism confirms this.
> It's time to change those policies. As things stand now, we have bin Laden exactly where he wants us.http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1011b.asp
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment