DOMA is very much Constitutional, This is where folks try and redefine the term and concept of marriage, which is a ecclisastical function. Tom and most militant Gays who wish to force their lifestyle down Americans' proverbial throats, (Note how Tom defined and described the term "Gay" above, yet a few days ago was attempting to claim that the term, "Gay" had nothing at all to do with sexuality) want to redefine the term and concept of marriage, in order to force their secularist beliefs upon the American public.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:27 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vincent@yahoo.com> wrote:
Tell the president. I did
> Yes, Greg.
>
> I believe that DOMA is indeed unconstitutuional.
>> On 1/7/11, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Well Tom, you just echoed the court on why DOMA is unconstitutional.
> > It IS.
>
> > On Jan 7, 8:22 pm, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Markie Mark-
>
> >> Your statements are naive and you are clearly uneducated.
>
> >> At the time the Constitution was written in the late 18th Century, "gay"
> >> simply meant festive, happy, or beautiful, and the term had nothing to do
> >> with sexuality whatsoever. Since the term did not refer to same-gendered
> >> "friendship", which was the term used for same gender relationships at
> >> that
> >> time, the term "gay" does not exist in the Constitution at all, as the
> >> term
> >> as we now use it did not exist. In fact, in the 1780's, Sex was rarely
> >> ever
> >> discussed or mentioned at all outside of close private encounters between
> >> "friends" and couples behind closed doors. The Constitution does, however,
> >> state in the 14th amendment that discrimination against any citizen is
> >> unlawful: " All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
> >> subject to the jurisdiction <glossary.html#JURIS> thereof, are citizens of
> >> the United States and of the State wherein they reside.( No ) State shall
> >> make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities
> >> of
> >> citizens of the United States; nor shall any State
> >> deprive<glossary.html#DEPRIVE>any person of life, liberty, or
> >> property, without due
> >> process <consttop_duep.html> of law; nor deny to any person within its
> >> jurisdiction <glossary.html#JURIS> the equal protection of the laws."
> >> Therefore, the current unequal second calss citizen status of gays in the
> >> United States is unlawful, unconstitutional, and discriminatory.
>
> >> So there you have it, Markie. I hope that this lesson in etymology and the
> >> Constitution enlightens you somewhat.
>
> >> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE
> >> <markmka...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> > Tommy,
>
> >> > Please list all rights as enumerated in the Constitution that Gays
> >> > (etc) do not have.
>
> >> > You constantly harp about "RIGHTS" .... You never list them. Just what
> >> > are those "Rights" that you feel are absent in your life that others
> >> > have.
>
> >> > Please DO NOT list "Privileges" or "Licenses" that can only be granted
> >> > on a State level.
>
> >> > ONLY "Rights" are meant to be universal... The different "privileges"
> >> > and "licenses" that are left to the "Several States" are not now nor
> >> > were they ever meant to be, "Rights".
>
> >> > Each State is in itself "Sovereign" with local rules being that which
> >> > makes a State attractive to one and repulsive to another. (I would
> >> > NEVER live in Texas)
>
> >> > Traffic laws, Domestic violence laws, noise laws, land use laws,
> >> > marriage/divorce laws, and even the death penalty laws ALL vary from
> >> > State to State because the "Several States" have the "Right" to make
> >> > it so. They must bow to to will of the people in that State as long as
> >> > it does not interfere with one of the Federally Guaranteed and
> >> > Constitutionally enumerated "Rights".
>
> >> > Just which of your Constitutionally Guaranteed and Enumerated "Rights"
> >> > are you lacking ??
>
> >> > I'll wait for the list and your personal explanation for each. Then we
> >> > can discuss it.
>
> >> > I am anxiously awaiting your well thought-out and accurate (remember,
> >> > Constitutionally Enumerated "Right") list to begin an earnest
> >> > discussion.
>
> >> > --
> >> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >> --
> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> >> Have a great day,
> >> Tommy- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment