preceded it, recodified by democrats overwhelmingly.
The 9th Circuit Court (yes, THEM!) just did that in one swell foop,
and Obama is challenging it. Let it go and DADT ended 3 months ago!
F congress, they are unnecessary here!
On Dec 10, 12:49 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lil' TommyTomTom,
>
> This is where your hate, lies and smear get in the way of your cognitive
> thinking.
>
> Because I am opposed to those individuals who put what they do in the
> bedroom at the forefront of their lives; in other words, because I am
> opposed to those individuals that define their very existence by their
> sexuality, this does not make me a "Homophobe".
>
> What you do behind closed doors might be wonderful. I don't know. I will
> never know. I don't care what it is that you do sexually.
>
> I am opposed to those militants who are attempting to force their sexuality
> upon me, and the rest of America. I am opposed to parades in front of
> children with you donned in assless chaps, boas, and/or dressed as the
> Statute of Liberty. I am opposed to you, and any other group or entity
> demanding more rights than what the rest of Americans enjoy, because of who
> you sleep with.
>
> You are correct, that there have been Gays in our United States military
> since 1776. None of them chose to get out and parade around, announcing
> who it is that they are boffing or honking on. This is how it should be.
>
> KeithInDC
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Wrong again Keith.
>
> > Your homophobia is showing.
>
> > Gays have been serving in the military, well, since before Alexander
> > The Great and his lover Hephaesteon.
>
> > The existing military code of conduct shoold be adequate for any
> > behavior issues from a very few.
>
> > By your logic, heterosexuals should be banned from the military as
> > well due to criminals like Dubya, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, variuus
> > felons, etc.
>
> > Please also note that Military Enlistment of Felons Doubled under the
> > Bush Administration.
>
> >http://www.palmcenter.org/press/dadt/releases/military_enlistment_of_...
>
> > Top Ten American War
> > Criminals Living
> > Freely Today
>
> > Rense Exclusive
> > By Douglas Herman
> > 12-14-5
>
> > A war crime is a punishable offense, under international law, for
> > violations of the law of war by any person or persons, military or
> > civilian. Every violation of the law of war is a war crime. Also, war
> > crimes are those committed during wartime in violation of
> > international conventions intended to protect civilian populations and
> > prisoners of war. You will note that many on this list, categorized as
> > war criminals, ironically, are among the most powerful and wealthy US
> > citizens
>
> > Robert McNamara. Former US Secretary of Defense, helped kill
> > approximately 2-3 million, mostly poor Vietnamese, Cambodians and
> > Laotians. Not to mention a sizeable portion of the 58,000 dead US
> > servicemen pressed into that war. Not to mention that equal number of
> > US veterans who committed suicide in the years to follow. McNamara is
> > an Elder Statesman now, walking around freely today.
>
> > Henry Kissinger. Former US Secretary of State, had a hand in the
> > killings mentioned above. Plus condoned thousands of additional
> > killings in Chile, under the sponsorship of US foreign policy. Won a
> > Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts. Elder Statesman, walking around
> > freely today.
>
> > George HW Bush. Former super spy, former US President, the first to
> > graduate from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) into the
> > presidency and bring lessons learned at CIA headquarters directly into
> > US policy. While serving under Ronald Reagan, helped encourage the
> > Iraq-Iran war, resulting in deaths of one million people, allowing US
> > oil and arms dealers to profit greatly. During the 'Eighties, helped
> > encourage US sponsored military dictators in Latin America, guilty of
> > extermination of thousands of ordinary citizens, via US-trained "death
> > squads." Conducted pre-emptive war with Panama, resulting in
> > 1,000-4,000 deaths, simply to topple former CIA henchman and drug
> > lord, Manuel Noriega. Elder Statesman, walking around freely today,
> > basking in limelight.
>
> > George W. Bush. Two term US president, elected using electronic,
> > "black box" voting methods that permit no verification of actual vote
> > count. Conducted two pre-emptive wars, resulting in excess of 100,000
> > US. Iraqi and Afghani deaths. Condones the use of torture as US
> > policy. Condones rejection of the Geneva Convention, becoming the
> > first US president to openly do so. Considers the US Constitution "A
> > Goddamned piece of paper." Embattled Statesman, walking around freely
> > today.
>
> > Dick Cheney. Former US Secretary of Defense, and signator of the PNAC,
> > and current Vice President. Accused mastermind of the 911 "terrorist"
> > attack against the US (unproven), Cheney has been called "The Vice
> > President For Torture" by the Washington Post. A staunch supporter of
> > the Middle Eastern War Without End, Cheney, like Wolfowitz and
> > Rumsfeld bears particular responsibility for the conduct of the war.
> > Elder Statesman, walking around freely today.
>
> > 8. Paul Wolfowitz. Former US Deputy Secretary of Defense and architect
> > of the Middle Eastern War Without End. Casualties in two pre-emptive
> > wars now exceed 100,000 deaths, not including the estimated 2,000+ US
> > deaths and 15,000 wounded. Won a Presidential Medal of Freedom for his
> > work and a promotion to the head of the World Bank. Elder Statesman,
> > walking around freely today.
>
> > Donald Rumsfeld. US Secretary of Defense during the Middle Eastern War
> > Without End. A signator of the PNAC document that calls for
> > pre-emptive hostile acts of US imperialism conducted by overwhelming
> > military means (War) against weaker nations possessing scarce
> > resources. Aside from the estimated 100,000 Iraqi deaths, the
> > estimated 15-20,000 US casualties (dead and injured), and the untold
> > tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands (millions?) who will suffer
> > from the effects of depleted uranium in the years to come, Rumsfeld
> > remains convinced the "war on terror" is just. A long time political
> > appointee, Rumsfeld is an Elder Statesman, walking around freely
> > today.
>
> > Ruppert Murdoch. Token American. Media baron. Never met a war he
> > didn't like. Responsible for tens of thousands of deaths and untold
> > millions of refugees through media encouragement of harsh, US foreign
> > policy. Owns a sizable chunk of the US news media. Murdoch is the most
> > visible Godfather of the Mainstream News Mafia (MNM). Elder Statesman
> > and multi-billionaire news baron, walking around freely today.
>
> > Former USAF veteran (Honorably Discharged) and Elder Statesman,
> > Douglas Herman writes regularly for Rense and is the author of The
> > Guns of Dallas
>
> > More:
> >http://www.rense.com/general69/tpten.htm
>
> > On 12/10/10, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Two words, a whole bunch of syllables, as to why DADT should NOT be
> > > repealed: "Bradley Manning".
>
> > > *According to Bradley's online chats, he was in "an awkward place" both
> > > "emotionally and psychologically." So in a snit, he betrayed his country
> > by
> > > orchestrating the greatest leak of classified intelligence in U.S.
> > history.
>
> > > Isn't that in the Army Code of Conduct? You must follow orders at all
> > times.
> > > Exceptions will be made for servicemen in an awkward place. Now, who
> > wants a
> > > hug? Waitress! Three more apple-tinis!"
>
> > > *
>
> > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >> Many Democratic Activists are fighting DADT both in and out of the
> > >> courts..
>
> > >> On 12/10/10, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> > What part of "in the courts", are you missing?
>
> > >> > On Dec 10, 10:16 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> Wrong again.
> > >> >> Many Democratic Activists are indeed fighting DADT.
>
> > >> >> You are quite mistaken, yet again.
>
> > >> >> On 12/10/10, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > Not in the courts they aren't Tom. Drop the suit and DADT AND the
> > >> >> > complete ban vanish.
>
> > >> >> > On Dec 9, 12:10 pm, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> >> No, that is false. Many Democrats and actvists are fighting
> > AGAINST
> > >> >> >> both.
>
> > >> >> >> On 12/8/10, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> >> > I emailed POTUS and told him to drop his challenge in the
> > courts.
>
> > >> >> >> > It didn't work.
>
> > >> >> >> > DOMA too.
>
> > >> >> >> > Dems own BOTH!!! And dems are fighting FOR both!
>
> > >> >> >> > God this is easy
>
> > >> >> >> > On Dec 8, 12:08 pm, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> ACTION Alert: Call and Fax your two US Senators on DADT Repeal
> > >> NOW!
>
> > >> >> >> >> The Federal Eye: Senate plans procedural vote on 'don't ask,
> > >> >> >> >> don't
> > >> >> >> >> tell'
> > >> >> >> >> Network NewsX Profile
>
> > >> >> >> >> View More Activity
>
> > >> >> >> >> TOOLBOX
> > >> >> >> >> Resize Print E-mail Reprints
> > >> >> >> >> COMMENT
> > >> >> >> >> 0 Comments
> > >> >> >> >> BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT
> > >> >> >> >> You must be logged in to leave a comment. Log in | Register
> > >> >> >> >> Why Do I Have to Log In Again?
> > >> >> >> >> Log In Again? CLOSEWe've made some updates to
> > washingtonpost.com
> > >> 's
> > >> >> >> >> Groups, MyPost and comment pages. We need you to verify your
> > >> MyPost
> > >> >> >> >> ID
> > >> >> >> >> by logging in before you can post to the new pages. We
> > apologize
> > >> for
> > >> >> >> >> the inconvenience.
>
> > >> >> >> >> Discussion PolicyYour browser's settings may be preventing you
> > >> from
> > >> >> >> >> commenting on and viewing comments about this item. See
> > >> instructions
> > >> >> >> >> for fixing the problem.
> > >> >> >> >> Discussion Policy CLOSEComments that include profanity or
> > >> >> >> >> personal
> > >> >> >> >> attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be
> > >> removed
> > >> >> >> >> from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or
> > contain
> > >> >> >> >> "signatures" by someone other
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment