the Iraqi, supposedly-elite, Republican Guard troops. But then-
president George H. W. Bush wouldn't let General Norman Schwarzkopf
"finish the job" by marching into Baghdad and ousting Saddam Hussein
from power. Bush's pacifist decision allowed the Iraqis to lick-their-
wounds and harden their defenses for the next conflict with the USA.
We all know how costly the latter has been in American lives and in
taxpayer dollars that continue to be poured-down-the-drain.
Every American soldier killed in-the-line-of-duty, in whatever war or
conflict, is entitled to the heartfelt appreciation of the citizens.
But no soldier, solely by having died, is entitled to be elevated to
the status of "hero" and used as a figurehead to glorify the fighting
of a present or future war. The "glorification of war", which more
than one church congregation or group opposes, isn't in the best
interest of any should-be-peaceable nation, such as the USA.
It is unfortunate that the families of some fallen soldiers see the
free-speech opposition to war as a direct personal attach on those who
have died. But had there been no war, there would be no deaths to be
mourned. The major issue is whether or not public parades; government-
declared days of remembrance; US Flags being posted on public and on
private property; uniformed color-guards; guns firing solutes; plane
fly-overs; and bugles being played by those in well-pressed military
uniforms, are ever appropriate. I say the latter are NOT appropriate,
if the implication is that there is collective public support for a
present or future war, simply because there are groups of people
willing to watch, reverently, any of the above proceedings. But all
out-of-the-public-view solemn remembrances, in funeral homes,
churches, or in rented halls that are explicitly not open to the
public should be acceptable and inviolable by any public protester.
Fox's big, but mostly-shallow (and conversationally rude), Bill
O'Reilly doesn't understand the sanctity of free speech. This week he
had former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as a guest. Rice
pointed-out that her father, a Republican, had once told her mother
that he was willing to fight-to-the-death, if necessary, to defend his
family and his beliefs. Rice, an only child, became an accomplished
pianist and ice skater. Near the end of the interview, she
volunteered that she champions the INDIVIDUAL over groups. I was
absolutely THRILLED to hear a Black say what I have been saying all
these years while touting my New Constitution of the United States of
America! I couldn't stop clapping at the TV! The (collective)
individuals should (shall!) have supremacy over any group! The latter
is the essence of what democracy is. And democracy-on-demand is at
the heart of my New Constitution!
Bill O'Reilly was on The View this week. He touched a soft-spot for
Whoopi and Joy when he generalized that the USA was attacked by
Muslims on 9/11. Not by Muslim extremists, but by Muslims. If there
were such a thing as a "radical Catholic" doing bodily harm to
thousands of people, within 24 hours the Pope Himself would be
renouncing what had happened. But following 9/11, there was this
great echo of SILENCE from the moderate or otherwise Muslim community
about what some Muslims had just done in the name Islam.
The mass-minded Muslim communities are ritualistically brainwashed not
to speak out, and especially not to say anything negative about other
Muslims. So, by their silence, Muslims throughout the USA are giving
their tacit approval to violence. It's good that patriotic Americans
now know for sure that the general Muslim population in this country
is "worshiping" to the detriment of the USA. Does our Constitution
grant 1st Amendment Freedom of Religion protection to those whose
"religion" has as an objective the OVERTHROWING of our (should be)
Representative Republic? Does our Constitution assent having our
MANDATED Representative Republic be replaced by a socialist, barbaric
and cruel Muslim oligarchy? No it does not!
If Whoopi, Joy or anyone else is offended by what I've just said,
"moderate Muslims" can get reprieves if they will begin buying large
ads in newspapers and magazines that state the legal names of every
Muslim who thinks terrorism in the name of Allah is wrong. Unless and
until the… "general Muslim community" begins decrying terrorism, by
their silence—which is encouraging terrorism—they become known enemies
to the USA, residing in our midst.
The biggest known enemy of the USA is treasonous Pres. Barack Obama, a
COMMUNIST who is squatting in the White House. Analogous to "moderate
Muslims" are the no-brain 40% or so of supposed Americans who continue
to… support… Obama. Those are the core of the socialism-bent, destroy-
the-American-economy faithful who wish to "get" while there is still
currency being printed expressly for "getting." Rush Limbaugh said
this week that "the enemy is us." Actually, the enemy is 100% of
those who support socialism. My New Constitution requires taking this
life-or-death oath: "Fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in
the USA!" Socialism lets the poor steal from the "rich" (those who
actually WORK to survive) and gives to the lazy good-for-nothings who
won't work. The Holy Bible says: "Thou shalt not steal; and thou
shalt not covet…" Do Rev. Sharpton and Jackson not understand that?
Rush Limbaugh points out that when the economy collapses, there will
be no "social" anything, nor handouts, anywhere.
Since Barack Obama has been in office polls show a decline from 60% to
10% the number of people in America who think "race relations" in this
country are good. Folks, simply by supporting THE most criminal
person in US history, Blacks, like "moderate Muslims" who don't speak-
out against terrorism, are now a huge enemy of the USA. But that can
only be so because Blacks are more willing than the general population
to look favorably on those who commit crimes. For Blacks crime is
"justified", because life isn't "fair enough". It doesn't matter that
Obama is the treasonous Anti-Christ, who steals from, and is indebting
generations of Americans. It only matters that Blacks feel they are
entitled to "get" because they haven't been treated fairly in the
past.
A big victory by Republicans is a real possibility in the upcoming
election. However, without the structural changes in government made
possible only by ratifying my New Constitution, the wounded-but-not-
dead… Democratic Party will raise from the ashes, again. GROUPS are
the cause of every major problem in America. And the most divisive
groups are our political parties. As long as those, rather than the
voices of the people, determine what happens in Washington, we are in
a constant lose-lose situation. But there could be hope! If and when
Blacks begin following the lead of Condoleezza Rice and identify more
with other INDIVIDUALS rather than with doomed-to-fail, block-voting
and racist groups, then the USA will have turned-the-corner to
survival. In their hearts Blacks know that common sense economics
matters. And most of the 40% "for" Obama understand that they will
sleep better at night after having spent a day at work, rather than a
day… waiting for the next hand-out from our big, bad and failing
government.
"United we stand; divided we fall." May we all unite to SAVE the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
— John A. Armistead — Patriot
AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics News Group.
For millennia, people have banded together to have the strength of
unity to win disputes over land or resources. If victories resulted
in inequitable allocation of the spoils of those disputes, few of the
victors felt guilty. They knew that they would be subject to the same
inequities should they ever loose a dispute.
Due to the contrasts in lifestyles between the haves and the have-
nots, it's understandable how the successful get lumped with the
pillagers of old, and are seen as having undeserved wealth.
Colonialists in past centuries occupied and conquered, if necessary,
other lands and people in order to have new sources of wealth and
trade. Seldom was there concern for the welfare of the people of the
colonies that approached parity with the assumed welfare of the
citizens of the colonizing nations. To be from a colony was
tantamount to being of less importance.
This week on his Fox TV show, Glenn Beck is discussing Barack Obama's
anti-colonial, socialist/communist leanings. His mother, though
white, rejected any connection with the 'haves' of this world, and
instead wanted her son to champion the 'have-nots'. From about age
10, Obama was raised by his leftist, socialist/communist grandparents
to be like his mother and biological father wished. Amazingly,
thousands of US troops have died in Korea, Vietnam and other wars
fighting communism. But few Americans are rebelling over having a
communist like Barack Obama get into the White House. Nor are many
rallying around the fact that the entire "social justice" movement is
unconstitutional. Sadly, there's a tacit acceptance of socialist/
communist corruption, simply because the processes that are allowing
such to even be considered, have happened so slowly.
There is the perception that our "elected leaders" are better than the
populace, and are thus above the law… and above the Constitution. The
general lack of concern of about 40% of the US population is greatly
reducing the chances of ever correcting our broke and corrupt
government. But there IS a way! My New Constitution expands on
principles of fair play and democracy (on demand) to, for the first
time in world history, make it advantageous for everyone to
disassociate from the many divisive groups, and instead to experience
the common bonds of all mankind.
This week there have been riots in Belgium between the police and
members of labor unions who don't wish to have their "take" from
government be reduced. There is the same latent expectation of labor
unions in the USA. Most political insiders realize that they can't
get elected without continuing to make promises to labor unions that
will keep the standard of living of those in unions above that of the
general population. Barack Obama, and his treasonous, leftist
bastards, consider it to be unthinkable for school teachers, police,
or firefighters to be laid off because there aren't enough taxes to
pay the salaries. So, Congress passed a bill giving wet-ink money to
state and local governments only if no one gets laid off. In short,
once someone gets hired by government, there is this expectation that
they are… "fixed" for life. Government is prevented from being made
more efficient. It can only grow… one way, bigger.
The Tea Party Movement, rightly, wants smaller government, less taxes,
less control over our civil liberties and less control over our
capitalist system. The latter of which is what is so depressing the
employment picture. Sarah Palin talks about the conservative wins
needed in 2012 so that the many hurtful spending laws can be
rescinded. I'm amazed that few people seem to realize that by
ratifying my New Constitution, every single Bill that passed by fewer
than 55% of Congress will become an UN law from day one! And Congress
will be prevented from voting to increase taxes, without a 60% yea
vote of the people.
Obviously, those Americans who get from, but don't contribute to
government must be placated if the USA is to survive. By cutting the
colossal waste in public education, government, entitlements, and
social programs, the purchasing power of the dollar starts going up.
The demand for workers to produce the products that those dollars can
buy creates a huge new demand for workers. Even those fringe groups
that had shunned work in favor of getting government handouts will
find their numbers dwindling once the promise of prosperity for all
can be seen.
This one sentence—as important as the Golden Rule—promises to create a
climate for just prosperity: "Fair play and democracy shall have
supremacy in the USA!" Having all public office holders swear to
uphold that sentence, on penalty of death, will stop in their tracks,
any group—minority or otherwise—from ever trying to get more from
government than is fair. Suddenly, one's success will be seen as the
result of one's fair labors, not the result of taking unfair
advantages of others. My New Constitution will prevent businesses
from being exploitive of other people and nations, and will make those
in government be deferential to the People, here.
A Republican candidate for public office, candidly, suggested that
husbands should not expect their wives to be "submissive". His
Democratic challenger took those words completely out of context and
had the Republican saying a wife SHOULD be submissive to her husband.
My New Constitution says the following:
"Every medium shall favor the truth over supposition, without parity
nor bias. False or deceptive commercial advertising is prohibited.
*** Deliberate use by any candidate, their staffs or election
committees, of false or deceptive campaign speeches, slogans,
advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor
part of the media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way
endorse a slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is
a felony."
The following clauses will close down any USA company that is unfairly
exploitive of other people, resources or countries:
"Incorporation doesn't protect those in such from personal
responsibility for maliciousness in: harming any person; irremediably
harming local or world environs; or endangering the likely health and
safety of local or world Citizens."
and… "Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures that are in the
best interest of the People and the world environment shall be passed,
enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be allowed
to prosper."
When the USA starts punishing those who exploit the resources of other
people or nations, few in the world will see our presence in any
nation as "colonialism". We must teach poorer nations the principles
of capitalism. The prosperity which can result will reduce the hatred
for America that threatens us daily. When we clean-up-our-act, and
the safety and security of this country will go up!
"United we stand; divided we fall." May we all unite to SAVE the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
— John A. Armistead — Patriot
AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics
Start the Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the People!
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/c6047e7611e3f2db/4ed5ce8feba4bb37?hl=en#4ed5ce8feba4bb37
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment