If you followed this thread with an open mind, you would know that Sage2 stated, "We all saw the planes crash into the towers piloted by Islamofascist terrorists." It was then that I asked a simple question, "How did you determine the pilots were Islamic?" I asked that because, while the names of passengers on the flights involved with the 9/11/2001 events were Arabic, not all Arabs have Islamic beliefs.
I have yet to receive a reply from Sage2. It could be that he has been too busy to answer. It could because he realizes he does not have a definitive answer. It could be he doesn't want to engage in an intelligent conversation. I don't know why Sage2 hasn't answered my question any more than I factually know who the terrorists were on 9/11/2001.
Is the mere presence on a flight manifest of someone with an Arabic name factual evidence that that individual is Islamic? No! Is the mere presence on a flight manifest (for one of the planes that was hijacked) of someone with an Arabic name factual evidence that he was one of the hijackers. No!
(It should also be noted that not once in my posts did I ever refer to anyone as "Moslem." Yet you want to claim I did. Why?)
As to the Marc Stevens quote: It not only applies to politicians. It can also apply to their brethren in deceit, the major media outlets.
Example: This year politicians and the media seemed Hell-bent (sorry if I offend) on keeping the public from reviewing the events of 9/11/2001 in any significant way. First, the media created a local anti-Mosque/Community Center debate into an anti-Muslim controversy. Then Obama declared 9/11/2010 a "national day of service," whatever that is supposed to mean. Then the media somehow found an unknown pastor (from a Florida church with 50 members) who wanted to burn the Qur'an and added him to their "let's not think about what happened in 2001," "let's create an anti-Islam controversy." They turned a day of mourning into an "Americans hate Muslims" event. (It should be noted that actual burnings of the Qur'an on 9/11/2010 were never covered by the media.)
Why the distraction? What is the agenda of the detractors?
As to, "...to all imply...you know who the real conspiritors (sic) are who are misleading and manipulating us for their own nefarious purposes." The point of my asking questions is that I don't know who the terrorists were on 9/11/2001. I would like to know the truth. So would six of the ten NIST report commissioners, as well as hundreds of government officials, law enforcement officers, firefighters, engineers, and architects. We all want answers. One has to wonder why so many Americans are willing to stick their heads in the sand and not ask questions?
Sorry, Belial, if I am wasting your time "with this balderdash." If you don't want to view my posts, learn how to use your email filters and stop reading them.
On 9/18/2010 9:30 PM, Belial wrote:
OK, Jonathan, what's REALLY happening? Your Marc Stevens quote, the question you raise [were they REALLY Moslems?] and the You Tube you refer us to all imply that what we know about 9/11 is false and you know who the real conspiritors are who are misleading and manipulating us for their own nefarious purposes. Well come on, man, give us the scoop!! At the very least, explain why you are wasting our time with this balderdash. On Sep 16, 10:58 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:How did you determine the pilots were Islamic? On 9/16/2010 7:53 PM, Sage2 wrote:Well I guess these groups are " deniers " ! We all saw the planes crash into the towers piloted by Islamofascist terrorists. Terrorists who made jihad propaganda videos of why they were going to do it and Osama Bin Laden saying that he had ordered it. Damn! Some people are dumb! What a bunch of dolts !*************************************************************************************************************************************On Sep 16, 7:05 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:Former Military Officers& Scientists Join 9/11 Truth Movementhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDnhBIuNzSU-- *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government**"The 'art' of politics is diverting attention from what's really happening. What separates politicians from other criminal organizations is superior public relations." - Marc Stevens"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects something that cannot be." - Thomas Jefferson*-- *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government* *"The 'art' of politics is diverting attention from what's really happening. What separates politicians from other criminal organizations is superior public relations." - Marc Stevens "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects something that cannot be." - Thomas Jefferson*- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -
--
I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government
"The 'art' of politics is diverting attention from what's
really happening. What separates politicians from other
criminal organizations is superior public relations."
- Marc Stevens
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it
expects something that cannot be."
- Thomas Jefferson
I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government
"The 'art' of politics is diverting attention from what's
really happening. What separates politicians from other
criminal organizations is superior public relations."
- Marc Stevens
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it
expects something that cannot be."
- Thomas Jefferson
No comments:
Post a Comment