Tuesday, September 4, 2012

AntiSec hackers leak 1,000,001 Apple device IDs allegedly obtained from FBI breach






 

AntiSec hackers leak 1,000,001 Apple device IDs allegedly obtained from FBI

breach

http://thenextweb.com/apple/2012/09/04/antisec-hackers-leak-1000001-apple-device-ids-allegedly-obtained-fbi-breach/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheNextWeb+%28The+Next+Web+All+Stories%29

 

4th September 2012 by Josh Ong

hack

 

The AntiSec hacking group claims to have released a set of more than 1

million Apple Unique Device Identifiers (UDIDs) obtained from breaching the

FBI. The group claims to have over 12 million IDs, as well as personal

information such as user names, device names, notification tokens, cell

phone numbers and addresses.

 

The hackers issued a statement with the following description on how the

data was obtained:

 

    "During the second week of March 2012, a Dell Vostro notebook, used by

Supervisor Special Agent Christopher K. Stangl from FBI Regional Cyber

Action Team and New York FBI Office Evidence Response Team was breached

using the AtomicReferenceArray vulnerability on Java, during the shell

session some files were downloaded from his Desktop folder one of them with

the name of "NCFTA_iOS_devices_intel.csv" turned to be a list of 12,367,232

Apple iOS devices including Unique Device Identifiers (UDID), user names,

name of device, type of device, Apple Push Notification Service tokens,

zipcodes, cellphone numbers, addresses, etc. the personal details fields

referring to people appears many times empty leaving the whole list

incompleted on many parts. no other file on the same folder makes mention

about this list or its purpose."

 

They published the UDID numbers to call attention to suspicions that the FBI

used the information to track citizens. Much of the personal data has been

trimmed, however, with the hackers claiming to have left enough for "a

significant amount of users" to search for their devices.

 

If AntiSec's account of the breach is accurate, the NCFTA acronym in the

filename would likely refer to the National Cyber-Forensics & Training

Alliance, a non-profit corporation of experts from both the private and

public sector that investigates cyber-crimes.

 

TNW has contacted the FBI for comment. Meanwhile, AntiSec says it will not

provide further statements or interviews until a mysterious request is

fulfilled - to have a photo of a Gawker staff writer dressed in a tutu

featured on the company's homepage.

 

==========================================

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this

message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to

these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed

within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with

"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.

The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The

Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain

permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials

if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,

teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria

for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies

as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four

criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is

determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not

substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use

copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you

must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS

PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 

 

 

 

 


 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment