Thursday, June 14, 2012

U.S. security threatened after CIA put 'out of business' of getting intel from terror leaders, former CIA chief says

 






 

U.S. security threatened after CIA put 'out of business' of getting intel

from terror leaders, former CIA chief says

http://freebeacon.com/the-dark-knight/

 

 

BY: Bill Gertz - June 13, 2012 5:00 am   

 

The Obama administration has taken the CIA "out of the business" of

interrogating high-value terrorists and the lack of data is endangering the

U.S. security, according to former CIA counterterrorism chief Jose A.

Rodriguez.

 

If U.S. intelligence or military personnel capture a senior terror leader

today, no system is in place or facilities set up where he could be

questioned, said the 31-year agency veteran who was awarded several medals

for his intelligence work before retiring in 2007.

 

"We are out of the business of doing that," he said of terrorist leader

interrogations in an interview with the Free Beacon. "We don't have anywhere

to take them. If you capture a high-value target outside the war zone, where

[are] you going to take them? They are not taking prisoners in Guantanamo,

[and] the black sites have been closed."

 

When U.S. special operations forces recently captured a terrorist in Sudan,

the only place he could be questioned was aboard a Navy ship at sea, he

said.

 

"So we don't have anywhere to take them, but even if we did, we are

restricted by the Army field manual, so we are basically out of the

interrogation business." The manual restricts all interrogations to tactics

outlined under international rules for questioning and treatment of

prisoners of war in conventional conflicts.

 

Rodriguez, author of the bestselling book Hard Measures, also said he and

fellow CIA colleagues were disgusted by President Obama's 2009 speech in

Cairo asserting that U.S. officials were guilty of torture for harshly

questioning terrorists.

 

On the current state of terrorist interrogations, Rodriguez said al Qaeda is

damaged but the CIA lacks current intelligence on the group that is needed

to prevent future attacks.

 

Since 2009, the Obama administration canceled presidential directives

allowing harsh interrogations, closed down covert CIA interrogation sites in

Europe and elsewhere, and sought to shut down the terrorist prison at

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Additionally, current interrogation practices are

limited to those outlined in the Army field manual, such as requiring

captured prisoners to provide their name, rank, and serial number.

 

Now that details of harsh interrogation are known, terrorists who are

captured will be able to exploit their knowledge of the rules to avoid

giving up information, Rodriguez said.

 

"The problem is, of course, we've given away the playbook," he said. "We've

given away how far we can go legally interrogating, there are not many

options left."

 

If a new administration comes into office next year, "they are going to have

take this issue on and figure out what we can do" to gain intelligence from

captives, he said.

 

Rodriguez said he has not been in touch with the presidential campaign of

Gov. Mitt Romney, but knows several advisers, including another former CIA

counterterrorism chief Cofer Black, and former CIA Director Michael Hayden.

 

Some intelligence specialists have mentioned Rodriguez as a candidate for

CIA director if Romney wins in November.

 

On current CIA counterterrorism operations, Rodriguez said the CIA is

relying too much on drone strikes and expressed concerns that the policy of

killing but not capturing key terror leaders has led to a lack of

intelligence.

 

Armed Predator strikes play an important role in hitting terrorists hiding

out in remote locations, he said.

 

"The problem is that when you over-rely on the Predator, you miss out on the

intelligence," Rodriguez said. "We are still living off the intelligence

that was collected over the first eight or nine years of post-9/11."

 

"At some point, you are going to be needing information regarding the actual

status of al Qaeda, and what they are thinking, and what they are planning,

what their intentions are. So I think we're going to pay for this [lack of

intelligence] at some point."

 

Rodriguez expressed outrage over Obama's major speech to the Muslim world in

Cairo, Egypt June 4, 2009 when he said, "I have unequivocally prohibited the

use of torture by the United States."

 

"I was just disgusted to hear my own president basically saying those of us

who stepped up to the plate after 9/11 and went ahead and implemented

programs that were authorized and sanctioned by the U.S. government were

then being labeled as torturers by our president," Rodriguez told the Free

Beacon. "I just could not believe it, especially when all of this was

approved."

 

Equally upset were colleagues in the counterterrorism intelligence business

who took part in what became known as the enhanced interrogation program

designed to elicit information from captured al Qaeda leaders.

 

"That was the reaction of some of my friends that I worked with. The

feelings are shared by many people in the counterterrorism center who

participated in all of these [policies] thinking we had the full support and

the legality and the approvals from the White House to proceed."

 

At least 10 terrorist plots were preempted as a result of harsh

interrogations, Rodriguez said. They included an al Qaeda plan to conduct

hijacked plane attacks on the U.S. West Coast; planned terror strikes on

London's Heathrow Airport; planned attacks in Djibouti using water trunks

filled with explosives; and an attack planned against the U.S. Consulate in

Karachi.

 

Al Qaeda agents inside the United States were also uncovered as a result of

the interrogation program.

 

"I can tell you that interrogation of high-level detainees produced such

valuable intelligence, intelligence that allowed us to destroy the al Qaeda

organization that attacked us on 9/11," he said.

 

On other topics in Hard Measures, Rodriguez disclosed new details of the

shadow war on terrorism, including:

 

    The CIA set up its own black site secret detention facilities to make

sure key detainees were not mistreated by contractors. "It is more than a

little ironic that the secret detention facilities that the CIA established,

at which we have been widely accused of abusing prisoners, were established

in part for the express purpose of making sure that these critical detainees

were not mistreated," he wrote.

    A Muslim FBI agent tried to take control of CIA interrogations but was

rebuffed, and the Bureau pulled out of cooperation with the agency's

interrogation program in 2002. However, once valuable secrets were gained,

the FBI asked to be allowed back into the program but was turned down over

concerns it would compromise the locations.

    One FBI agent tried to "turn" an al Qaeda leader into a Bureau informant

by offering him a Snickers candy bar. The terrorist, Abu Zubaydah, called

the agent a traitor and told him, "What makes you think I would turn my back

on Allah for money?"

    Rodriguez personally led a team of CIA officials to brief senior House

leaders on CIA interrogation techniques and was surprised that Rep. Nancy

Pelosi falsely claimed she was never briefed on the program and told

reporters that the CIA routinely lied to Congress. "I couldn't believe it

that someone of that seniority in Congress making statements like that,

especially when I knew that not to be the case," Rodriguez said.

    Videotapes obtained at the time of the capture of al Qaeda terrorist Abu

Zubaydah revealed that he had "been to Iran or was somehow cooperating with

the Iranians."

    A corrupt Pakistani police officer learned of U.S. efforts to locate

terror mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in Karachi and tipped him off

before he could be caught. He was eventually captured.

    The CIA turned down a request from Sen. Bill Nelson (D., Fla.) to be

waterboarded so he could see its effect because the agency feared he would

have a heart attack and die during the simulation.

 

Rodriguez defended his decision to destroy CIA interrogation videos in 2005

as legal and appropriate since the action protected CIA personnel in case

the videos leaked. Such a leak could have resulted in CIA officers being

hunted down by al Qaeda.

 

"The enhanced interrogation program was effective, legal, and protected

American lives," Rodriguez said in the interview. "I made the decision to

destroy to protect the people who work for me. And I'm very proud of the

work the agency did following 9/11 that allowed us to destroy the

organization that attacked us on 9/11. So I think it's a good story for the

agency."

 

==========================================

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this

message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to

these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed

within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with

"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.

The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The

Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain

permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials

if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,

teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria

for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies

as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four

criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is

determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not

substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use

copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you

must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS

PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 

 

 



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment