Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Re: Racial profiling


http://bighomocon.blogspot.com/2012/02/on-daily-caller-they-says-brock-is.html

On Monday, April 2, 2012, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
> WASHINGTON, April 1, 2012—Since when is something we do every day
> taboo, like profiling? Every American who can think, profiles. If you
> are looking for a mate, you profile. In fact, if you search for a mate
> online, the first thing you do is establish a profile. You profile
> yourself.
>
> When you fill out a resume to look for a job, your resume is a
> profile. When you show up for the interview, you are profiled by your
> potential employer. When you hire a nanny or baby-sitter, you profile.
> How do you respond inside when a tattooed man with facial piercings
> shows up to interview for the job? Do you get the picture?
>
> Intelligent profiling is based on statistics—the propensity of certain
> demographics to do certain things. FBI profilers look for specific
> traits and characteristics of people who commit certain crimes. When
> they look for pedophiles, they have an idea of who they'll be and who
> they won't be.
>
> If you're the black victim of violent crime, know that there is a 93
> percent chance that your attacker will be black, hoodie or no hoodie.
> That's not the fault of statistics, those are the facts, and the facts
> are the fault of black thugs.
>
> Anybody remember Georgia teenager Bobby Tillman, who was stomped,
> kicked and punched to death by four young men, for no apparent reason,
> or the case of Derrion Albert, a Chicago honor student stomped to
> death by a group of his peers?
>
> But don't expect the race-baiters to sound any alarm bells.
>
> As Javier David wrote in The Griot, back in 2010, "far too many [black
> community leaders] remain on the sidelines when they should be
> forcefully addressing the dysfunctional behavior that is far too
> commonplace in black communities."
>
> Don't think the group that is supposed to be fighting for all "Colored
> People" is speaking out against black-on-black crime. As David further
> observes, "the NAACP has issued a blizzard of press releases and
> public statements on a range of issues, yet one searches in vain for a
> call to action on criminality in black neighborhoods…the
> organization's most noteworthy contribution to public discourse was
> [its] notoriously misguided feud with the Tea Party movement that
> alleged its members were motivated primarily by racism. Indeed, both
> the NAACP and the Urban League have largely devoted themselves to
> supporting President Obama's policies, while remaining silent on the
> near-apocalyptic violence that takes place in black communities on a
> daily basis."
>
> Translated: Neither the NAACP nor the Urban League will get involved
> in protesting any criminal activities against black people unless
> somebody white—or half white—is involved.
>
> And what of Muslim profiling?
>
> Recently the NYPD came under fire for profiling Muslim men ages 18-35,
> and there was massive outcry against them. The truth is that if
> Muslims in that demographic would stop blowing stuff up, they would
> cease to be profiled. Who do they expect the NYPD to watch, 80-year-
> old grandmothers, or 13-year-old Mexican girls?
>
> The NYPD didn't wake up one day and issue a fatwa on young Muslim men.
> In case people have forgotten, it was representatives from that the
> demographic who blew up the World Trade Center buildings. Further, the
> NYPD has thwarted many more attempts by young Muslim men to create
> havoc in America. Here are a few of the dozens of examples that we
> know about:
>
> Six Yemeni men arrested for providing material support for Al Qaeda
> and running a terrorist cell in Buffalo NY.
> Eleven members of the Virginia Jihad Network were arrested, accused of
> training for holy war around the globe.
> Seven men arrested after discovered plotting to bomb the Sears Tower
> and FBI offices.
> The list goes on and on, yet the Muslim community is silent on the
> issue.
>
> The ACLU and about every other Liberal imbecile wants you to believe
> that this type of profiling is against the rights of Muslims. NOT
> profiling Muslims, or more specifically, young Muslim men who are from
> or have spent time in the Arab world, is against the rights of all
> Americans, including Muslims.
>
> Radicalized Muslims in the U.S. and abroad plot world domination, and
> find more and more creative ways to blow up Americans, but we are not
> supposed to profile them to show our tolerance. Dead people are
> amazingly tolerant.
>
> Forget what you know, what you observe about the reality of your world
> is what the Left wants you to see. In the world of the Left, it is bad
> cops who have created the black-on-black crime statistics; it is not
> the fault of those black people who kill other black people.  As far
> as Liberals are concerned, everybody is equally suspicious when it
> comes to blowing up buildings, Americans, or the military, so profile
> everybody equally. We all get a trophy.
>
> I say, be proud profilers. Refuse to take Liberals' tolerance classes,
> and demand classes that teach you better profiling techniques. Let any
> challenger to your right to profile know that you have profiled them
> as an ignorant, racist, meddling Liberal, and that you stand firmly by
> that profile.
>
>  Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved.
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment