Why Islamic Radicals Don't Last
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htterr/articles/20120206.aspx
February 6, 2012: A major problem with Islamic radicalism and terrorism is
that it has been around for over a thousand years and is endemic to Moslem
nations. This is because Islam is based on the belief that government, and
the lives of all Moslems, should be ruled by Islamic law (sharia). Yet
through most of its history (since Islam arrived 1,500 years ago) Moslems
have been ruled by secular laws (or a combination of sharia and secular,
with non-clerics having the final say). In other words, the concept of
sharia never caught on in a big way. Yet all Moslem religious education
stresses that living according to sharia is the ideal lifestyle for a
Moslem. Moslem clerics continue to believe this, although many recognize
that the reality of secular rule and do not encourage rebellion. But it's
easy for a Moslem cleric to go old-school and start preaching the primacy of
sharia.
The problem is that most Moslems do not want to live according to sharia.
Those that do, because they have no choice, are usually unhappy with how it
is applied. Some of this unhappiness springs from the fact that there is no
one interpretation of sharia accepted by all Moslems. There is no Islamic
pope, thus there is no doctrinal unity. Then there are the divisions within
Islam. There are two main forms of Islam; Sunni (about 80 percent of all
Moslems) and Shia (about ten percent, most of them in Iran). Even within
these two branches of Islam, there are many further divisions. For over a
thousand years, disputes, and often wars, have arisen because of theological
disputes between the factions. For the last century, the major source of
fatalities from religious violence has been Islamic factionalism, which
often includes attacks on non-Moslems by Islamic radicals who believe this
is what God wants.
This violence usually begins locally, with a particularly articulate and
charismatic Islamic cleric gathering together enough holy warriors to
attract the attention of secular leaders. This would often lead to fighting,
which might last for months or years, and cause widespread death and
devastation. But the secular rulers would always prevail. The secular rulers
could be as ruthless as they had to be, while Holy Warriors eventually
suffered from money, supply and recruiting problems. The secular rulers were
usually quick to go after the clerics who were stirring everything up, and
once these men were captured or killed, the uprising would fall apart. This
policy prevented many religious uprisings from even getting started. This
policy is still standard for rulers of Moslem populations.
The 20th century brought with it electronic media and world-wide
communications. Moslem nations tended to be economically and technically
backward (because so many clerics considered this stuff, and so much more
from the West, as un-Islamic) and these revolutionary technologies were late
to appear. But when radio and tape cassettes showed up, they made it easier
for radical clerics to inspire young Moslem men to take up the sword (or
rifle or bomb) in defense of Islam. This changed the nature of Islamic
radicalism. Before radio, cassettes and, currently, the Internet, secular
rulers could quickly stamp out any new cases of Islamic radicalism. But with
the Internet, a radical cleric can stir up trouble around the world. As long
as they behave where they are operating from, they are relatively safe from
retaliation.
At least that was the case until September 11, 2001. In a case of "be
careful of what you ask for, as you might get it", the Islamic terror
attacks against New York and the Pentagon that day gave the West an
incentive to go after Islamic radical preachers in many, but not all, their
sanctuaries. Since then, radical clerics have had to be careful what they
say. If they go too far, either the local government will hit them
(sometimes fatally) or the U.S. or Israel will do so. As has happened many
times in the past, new technology or tactics that helped the Islamic
radicals was quickly countered by secular forces. Unfortunately, as long as
Islam remains in its present form, there will continue to be Islamic
radicals.
==========================================
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment