I think Gingrich's message should be taken seriously by those anti-American, anti-Western civilization Grand Muftis and the theological ruling elite in Iran.
Again, Good on Newt!
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:07 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
An offhand statement made five and a half years ago.---
November 19, 2011 forum in Des Moines, Iowa:
"I agree entirely with Senator Santorum. I would say to the
government of Iran today, you have a very short time to solve this on
your own, and if you don't we will solve it for you. And we frankly
couldn't care less what the rest of the world thinks. We're going to
get it done." - NG
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:51 AM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
On Nov 21, 9:59 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So let me make sure I understand. You have gone back to a statement that
> Senator John McCain and Former House Speaker Gingrich made on July 17,
> 2006, dealing with the Syrian and Iranian internal interference of
> Lebanon, and an off hand remark by McCain and Gingrich, that this could be
> the beginning of World War III, as somehow suppporting Gingrich as pushing
> for war with Iran?
>
> An offhand statement made five and a half years ago.
>
> Come on PlainOl, please tell me that this is not the basis of your logic!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > Tell me what it is that you disagree with, that
> > Gingrich purports or stands for.
> > ----
> > I disagree with almost everything he says and supports.
>
> > example:
> > Looking to their American counterparts on Monday, Knesset members were
> > surprised at the solidarity and support being shown among key US
> > politicians.
> > Several top US political figures, including former House Speaker Newt
> > Gingrich (Rep.) called the current Middle East crisis the beginning of
> > "World War III" and said they were "gravely concerned" in an interview
> > on CNN's Larry King Live.
>
> > Gingrich, who called the crisis World War III in several interviews
> > over the weekend, said that the US and Israel were acting with much
> > restraint and that the US should shoot down Iranian planes sending
> > supplies to Lebanon.
> > "I have to say that I'm a bit nervous about what they mean," said MK
> > Danny Yatom (Labor). "To be honest, I'm a bit nervous about the US
> > intervening. Let them send us money, supplies... we can do the rest
> > ourselves."
> > Many MKs said that while they were happy to hear US politicians taking
> > a strong line in support of Israel, they were concerned about how US
> > intervention would play itself out.
> > "It is not World War III because there are no armies involved," said
> > Vice Premier Shimon Peres (Kadima). "They must remember that this is
> > an entirely different type of conflict."
> > "In many ways they are completely disconnected from what is going on
> > here," said MK Zahava Gal-On (Meretz). "They might make calls for
> > something that is completely unnecessary."
> > "They haven't learned anything and they don't understand anything. I
> > hope that they understand more about America than they understand
> > about the Middle East," said MK Colette Avital (Labor).
>
> > On Nov 21, 9:37 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > PlainOl';
>
> > > I have now watched the first video you sent, (and I will get around to
> > the
> > > second video later today).
>
> > > Again, I ask you, what can you point to, anything, that supports your
> > > statement that Gingrich is pushing for war in Iran? It is clearly not in
> > > this video, and EVERYTHING that Gingrich says in this video, I agree
> > with.
>
> > > What in the video, other than he is appearing on Shalom TV, do you
> > > disagree with?
>
> > > Specifics please. Tell me what it is that you disagree with, that
> > > Gingrich purports or stands for.
>
> > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:31 AM, plainolamerican <
> > plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > Newt Gingrich is a warmonger and a propagandist for zionist fascism
> > > > that supports military intervention in the middle east.
> > > > He should already be political history.
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RtJYib1O4g
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtqrpAkmP6Y
>
> > > > On Nov 21, 9:05 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > How sad for you PlainOl'.
>
> > > > > I suggest you take another look at Gingrich.
>
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:12 AM, plainolamerican
> > > > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > > > Newt's decision making making abilities are impaired and bound to
> > > > > > fail.
>
> > > > > > On Nov 20, 9:40 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Gingrich: The "smartest, most electable conservative in the race"
>
> > > > > > > Posted by NN&V Staff
> > > > > > > <http://nevadanewsandviews.com/archives/author/admin>on Nov
> > 10th,
> > > > 2011
>
> > > > > > > *(Charlie Smith/Time for Newt)* – "Smartest guy in the room." "A
> > > > genius."
> > > > > > > "Brilliant." "Fantastic to listen to." "I would love to see him
> > > > debate
> > > > > > > Obama."
>
> > > > > > > "But he can't win."
>
> > > > > > > If you're like me, every time Newt Gingrich's name comes up,
> > this is
> > > > the
> > > > > > > kind of thing you hear. Conservatives love him. He's clearly the
> > > > smartest
> > > > > > > guy on the stage and the candidate best suited to take the fight
> > to
> > > > > > Obama.
> > > > > > > So why does he always get ignored?
>
> > > > > > > Because the liberal media and the establishment have been
> > telling us
> > > > all
> > > > > > > for a year that Newt Gingrich can't possibly win. Well, I'm here
> > to
> > > > tell
> > > > > > > you that all that's changed. Newt Gingrich is now leading Mitt
> > > > Romney in
> > > > > > > Iowa.
>
> > > > > > > *Consider this email your permission slip to do what you've
> > wanted
> > > > to do
> > > > > > > all along: get behind Newt Gingrich and fight for the smartest,
> > most
> > > > > > > electable conservative in the race.*
>
> > > > > > > Mitt Romney came up with the idea that became the template for
> > > > Obamacare.
> > > > > > > Without Mitt Romney, there IS no Obamacare. Rick Perry thinks
> > you're
> > > > > > > heartless if you don't want to give free college tuition to
> > illegal
> > > > > > aliens.
> > > > > > > (He actually SAID that!) And Herman Cain is a nice man, but he
> > can't
> > > > win
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > > this point.
>
> > > > > > > That leaves Newt, right where he's been all along, articulating
> > real
> > > > > > > solutions that will allow us to take our country back, turn this
> > > > economy
> > > > > > > around and make us freer, stronger, and safer as a country.
>
> > > > > > > Just stop with me a second and think about something: Next Fall,
> > > > there's
> > > > > > > going to be a Presidential debate between Obama and the GOP
> > nominee.
> > > > Who
> > > > > > do
> > > > > > > you want to be in it?
>
> > > > > > > Mitt Romney? The guy who has taken different positions on every
> > > > single
> > > > > > > major issue?
>
> > > > > > > Rick Perry, the guy who can't articulate his positions, and when
> > he
> > > > does,
> > > > > > > seems to offend conservatives every time he talks?
>
> > > > > > > Herman Cain?
>
> > > > > > > The answer is clear: Newt Gingrich. He will absolutely wipe the
> > floor
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > Obama. He won't be cowed, he knows policy better, and he has the
> > > > backbone
> > > > > > > to tell it like it is. He has the guts to say to the American
> > people,
> > > > > > > "President Obama has failed."
>
> > > > > > > As the leading pro-Newt SuperPAC, we're going to go into the
> > states
> > > > and
> > > > > > > rally the activists, and build the organization Newt needs to win
> > > > this
> > > > > > > nomination and beat Obama in the Fall.
>
> > > > > > > The media and the establishment don't get to pick our nominee.
> > We do.
>
> > > > > > > Will you join us?
>
> > > > > > > It's time.
>
> > > > > > > Newt.2012.gif
> > > > > > > 16KViewDownload
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment