Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Re: FBI Expands Agents’ Investigative Power

What is your definition of a "crime"??? I believe interventions upon the individual should be confined to punishing those crimes against person or property which are classified by law as malum in se, as distinguished from malum prohibitum. Thus, murder, arson, robbery, assault, for example, are so classified. On the other hand, selling whiskey, possessing gold, and the planting of certain crops, are examples of the malum prohibitum, concerning which there is no such general agreement.

The "tools they need to catch the bad guys" -- those accused of the violation of laws classified as malum in se -- already exist.

On 06/15/2011 08:36 AM, plainolamerican wrote:
give the FBI the tools they need to catch the bad guys and prosecute them for violating our trust and any crimes they commit  On Jun 15, 9:27 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote: 
*FBI Expands Agents� Investigative Power *  The New York Times First published Jun 12 2011 07:40PM Updated Jun 12, 2011 11:28PM  Washington � The Federal Bureau of Investigation is giving significant new powers to its roughly 14,000 agents � allowing them more leeway to search databases, go through household trash or use surveillance teams to scrutinize the lives of people who have attracted their attention.  The FBI soon plans to issue a new edition of its manual, called the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide, according to an official who has worked on the draft document and several others who have been briefed on its contents. The new rules add to several measures taken over the past decade to give agents more latitude as they search for signs of criminal or terrorist activity.  The FBI recently briefed several privacy advocates about the coming changes. Among them, Michael German, a former FBI agent who is now a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, argued it was unwise to further ease restrictions on agents� power to use potentially intrusive techniques, especially if they lacked a firm reason to suspect someone of wrongdoing.  "Claiming additional authorities to investigate people only further raises the potential for abuse," German said, pointing to complaints about the bureau�s surveillance of domestic political advocacy groups and mosques and to an inspector general�s findings in 2007 that the FBI had improperly used "national security letters" to obtain information like people�s phone bills.  Valerie E. Caproni, the FBI general counsel, said the bureau had fixed the problems with the national security letters and had taken steps to make sure they would not recur. She also said the bureau � which does not need permission to alter its manual so long as the rules fit within broad guidelines issued by the attorney general � had carefully weighed the risks and the benefits of each change.  Some of the most notable changes apply to the lowest category of investigations, called an "assessment." The category, created in December 2008, allows agents to look into people and organizations "proactively" and without firm evidence for suspecting criminal or terrorist activity.  Under current rules, agents must open such an inquiry before they can search for information about a person in a commercial or law enforcement database. Under the new rules, agents will be allowed to search such databases without making a record about their decision.  http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/world/51992858-68/agents-fbi-search-bure...  --        Freedom is always illegal!  When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free. 
 

--

Freedom is always illegal!

When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free.

No comments:

Post a Comment