Oh hell yea. Its Massachusetts!
On May 3, 11:59 am, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why ?? Do you find your state to be incompetent ?? Think they could do
> something if all the Taxes collected in-state were used in-state ?
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:11 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > So long as the US Code is unconstitutional, we're kinda done.
>
> > On May 3, 10:55 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > You keep looking in the WRONG places.
> > > Try THIS:http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu.txtPointto the
> > Article, Section and Clause or Amendment.
> > > [do remember that naturalization deals with Citizenship and NOT
> > immigration]
> > > Regard$,
> > > --MJThe Constitution does not authorize the federal government to control
> > immigration. Nor does it say anything about illegal aliens. ... Sadly,
> > lawmakers have repeatedly interpreted this silence as license for
> > ill-conceived legislation. Congress began barring entry to the nation in
> > 1875 with prostitutes and convicts. Soon, all sorts of people fell short of
> > congressional glory: ex-convicts in 1882, along with Chinese citizens,
> > lunatics, and idiots. Paupers, polygamists, and people suffering from
> > infectious diseases or insanity made the list in 1891, while the illiterate
> > were banned in 1917. -- Becky AkersAt 10:49 AM 5/3/2011, you wrote:I just
> > don't know what to say, other than this:
> >http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/usc_sup_01_8_10_12_20_II_30_IV.html
> > > On May 3, 10:42 am, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Greg, The fed is not given the right to control immigration, just to
> > see
> > > > that migration "between the states" is unfettered, but the States
> > are.....
> > > > they simply may not control movements at "Interstate" crossings...
> > there is
> > > > no limit placed at ports of foreign entry for the states.
>
> > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:37 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > > Want better schools ?? move east
> > > > > -------------------------
>
> > > > > East of me is the ocean.
>
> > > > > Point taken, and I have made the same point RE Dept of Education is
> > > > > illegal BECAUSE of the very amendment you cite.
>
> > > > > But on one hand, MJ claims, the US govt has no power over
> > immigration,
> > > > > because its not explicit in the constitution (Naturalization,
> > > > > schmation), and that the FDA is illegal, yet then goes on to purport
> > > > > that no, explicit constitutional authority is not requisite.
>
> > > > > Allllllllllllllllll-righty then!
>
> > > > > On May 3, 10:27 am, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Greg,
>
> > > > > > ALL things not specifically mentioned in the Constitution as the
> > > > > > responsibility of the Federal Government was to be left to the
> > States to
> > > > > > each deal with separately.
>
> > > > > > What most people do not, or refuse, to see is that the USA was
> > always
> > > > > meant
> > > > > > to be a union of 50 separate and sovereign states. Each very
> > distinct and
> > > > > > offering to its citizens that which suited its specific citizens
> > most.
> > > > > There
> > > > > > was never an intension of "One law for all".
>
> > > > > > Citizens (and only citizens of the several states) were to be
> > allowed to
> > > > > > travel freely between the states, There was to be no import/export
> > tax
> > > > > > between the states only at ports handling foreign trade ...(the
> > biggest
> > > > > > failure of the Articles of Confederation, and the main reason for
> > the new
> > > > > > Constitution, and Lincolns excuse for Ft. Sumter...tax collection).
> > Only
> > > > > the
> > > > > > President is elected by all and only he was meant to be responsible
> > at
> > > > > > large. It is the responsibility of Congressmen to represent their
> > > > > > constituency only (pork was just fine as deals had to be made that
> > would
> > > > > get
> > > > > > enough votes...there was very little Federal money to go around),
> > > > > Senators
> > > > > > were originally designed to represent the needs of their state only
> > under
> > > > > > the guiding hand of each governor. The Feds were responsible for
> > only a
> > > > > VERY
> > > > > > LIMITED military (basically the "officer corps") with the "standing
> > army"
> > > > > > made up ENTIRELY of the forces supplied by the states (thus the
> > need to
> > > > > > "Declare War" only by Congress assembled as their constituents were
> > to be
> > > > > > "called up")
>
> > > > > > Laws about food safety, drugs, taxes, social welfare, medical,
> > schools,
> > > > > etc.
> > > > > > are the absolute responsibility of each separate state .....
> > separately.
> > > > > > This is what would make different states attractive to different
> > people
> > > > > and
> > > > > > cause migration from one to another of both people and industry.
> > States
> > > > > were
> > > > > > allowed to sue one another over (literally) bad things flowing
> > > > > > downstream...this was the interstate control factor... the federal
> > > > > courts.
>
> > > > > > That these things are now dealt with by the Feds is indeed a
> > usurpation
> > > > > of
> > > > > > and by the Feds.
>
> > > > > > Want better schools ?? move east, The Feds were never meant to make
> > > > > things
> > > > > > equal... the states were never meant to be equal, all laws were
> > never
> > > > > meant
> > > > > > to be equal....
>
> > > > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:34 AM, GregfromBoston <
> > greg.vinc...@yahoo.com
> > > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Dockside Greeters & Crew (Boston Harbor)
>
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > Date: 2011-04-28, 6:55PM EDT
> > > > > > > Reply to: job-tyes2-2351913...@craigslist.org [Errors when
> > replying to
> > > > > > > ads?]
>
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > > > > > > GREAT SUMMER JOBS!! Work outside or in our ticket booth on Long
> > Wharf
> > > > > > > or on one of the Boston Harbor Islands as a Dockside Assistant or
> > > > > > > Guest Services agent for Boston's Best Cruises. We need happy,
> > > > > > > energetic, outgoing people to provide information and assistance
> > to
> > > > > > > the public and passengers boarding our vessels for the only
> > official
> > > > > > > New England Aquarium Whale Watch, Boston Harbor Island Cruises,
> > our
> > > > > > > Boston Harbor Tour, the Salem Ferry, and the Harbor Express
> > Commuter
> > > > > > > boats. We are also looking for Cruise Directors and Narrators to
> > work
> > > > > > > onboard several vessels for additional compensation. Join our
> > crew and
> > > > > > > enjoy the excitement and fun interacting with the public, guiding
> > > > > > > passengers to our boats, and generally supporting Boston's finest
> > > > > > > fleet of passenger vessels. You can help us deliver an
> > outstanding
> > > > > > > recreational experience in and around Boston Harbor and the
> > Boston
> > > > > > > Harbor Islands. More than a dozen full time and part time jobs
> > still
> > > > > > > available right now through Labor Day.
>
> > > > > > > Location: Boston Harbor
>
> > > > > > > On May 2, 8:49 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > You're being silly.
> > > > > > > > Where in the constitution does it say government has the power
> > > > > > > toregulatefood and drugs?
> > > > > > > > Nowhere ... yet ANOTHER usurpation.The very reason for the US
> > Code
> > > > > (laws)
> > > > > > > is to pick up where the
> > > > > > > > constitution leaves off, AND to limit where it doesn't
> > > > > > > > ROTFLMAO!
> > > > > > > > Jeffrey Tucker, Ditch the PlannersNo one so much as suggested
> > such a
> > > > > > > thing as the US Code in the first hundred years after the US
> > > > > Constitution
> > > > > > > was enacted. It would have been only a little longer than the
> > > > > Constitution
> > > > > > > itself. The first attempt to create such a compilation of laws
> > occurred
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > 1878 but it languished because no one felt the need to update it.
> > Then
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > 1926, in the midst of Prohibition when the feds became deeply
> > involved
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > regulating the details of life, Congress made the thing come into
> > > > > existence.
> > > > > > > It is printed every six years.An institution was born, though
> > most
> > > > > people
> > > > > > > know nothing of it. The next printing will come out in 2012, but
> > the
> > > > > 2006
> > > > > > > with annotations was 356 thousand-plus-page volumes that cover
> > every
> > > > > aspect
> > > > > > > of life as we know it. The next one will add many new sections
> > and
> > > > > probably
> > > > > > > more than 100,000 pages.This is America's central plan -- or
> > > > > ownGosplan, so
> > > > > > > to speak -- and it is as elaborate and detailed as any set of
> > laws that
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > ever governed any society in the history of the world. Much of
> > this
> > > > > central
> > > > > > > plan is absorbed into our daily lives in ways that we don't
> > notice or
> > > > >...
>
> > > read more »
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> *
> *
> *
> *- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment