FINAL REPORT: Obama's Birth Announcements Fail To Indicate "Natural Born"
Status
http://networkedblogs.com/gcNU0
FINAL REPORT: Obama's Birth Announcements Fail To Indicate "Natural Born"
Status
By Penbrook Johannson
<http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/04/final-report-obamas-birth-announcem
ents.html> Editor of the Daily Pen
<https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVtnHIM3sOnr2JsHNj-L6OlDQl8As9Rjtwft07QoOd4oD7gREFPZhR9z3zZuyxk5G-ybTeSobCaDtoI9IOHOF_GYBlQFoC6QZUsPtoXmiz8zq302uCBVdxMB6g6Dlq1PmKUDhfi80qiqg/
1600/%2521aobamalie.jpg>
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVtnHIM3sOnr2JsHNj-L6OlDQl8As9Rjtwft07QoOd4oD7gREFPZhR9z3zZuyxk5G-ybTeSobCaDtoI9IOHOF_GYBlQFoC6QZUsPtoXmiz8zq302uCBVdxMB6g6Dlq1PmKUDhfi80qiqg/
20/%2521aobamalie.jpg
A new investigation of Obama's birth announcements appearing in Hawaii's two
primary newspapers in August, 1961 shows, conclusively, they were the result
of a registration record taken by the municipal health authority, not a
medically verified "Live" birth documented as occurring at a Hawaiian
hospital, per an officially defined "vital event" designated by the U.S.
Department of Health, National Vital Statistics Division protocols.
In August, 1961, two announcements allegedly showing a "native" birth for
Barack Obama were published in Hawaii's two primary newspapers, the Sunday
Advertiser and the Honolulu Star. For more than three years since Obama
engaged his unvetted candidacy for the presidency, many of his supporters
have mistakenly lauded these blurbish announcements as the "holy grail" of
proof that he was born in the state of Hawaii.
However, a detailed investigation of the history and procedures used by
Hawaii's municipal health department, and its relationship with the
newspapers, shows that not only was it a matter of official policy that
Obama's birth would have been announced in the paper regardless of where he
was born, the information used to publish the announcements is not even
confirmed through any eye-witness medical authority or hospital in the
state.
Also, in 1961, the two newspapers shared the same address and facility which
means they received only one copy of the same vital records information from
the Department of Health. Therefore, the format and content of information
used in public announcements were published identically by both papers,
including any mistakes, omissions, order or context, and no investigation
was carried out by the editors to determine if the information provided by
the DOH was actually accurate. The two newspapers have long since
collaborated into one organization.
Now, however, collaborative information from the archive of the U.S.
Department of Health's 1961 Report on Vital Statistics of the U.S - Volume
1: Natality, and Hawaii's Administrative rules governing the creation of
vital records finally reveals the truth about how these announcements were
published and why they are mistakenly used by pundits to promote a misguided
message about Obama's natal history.
The Daily Pen's, Dan Crosby, engaged a two month long research project on
location in Hawaii, to, once and for all, close the door on questions about
the facts and bring the long-due invalidation of the authority of these
fallow Hawaiian birth announcements, in quaint newspapers, to support
Obama's eligibility to be president.
Recall, for more than two years, major media personalities, such as Bill
O'reilly, Chris Matthews and recently fired, Keith Olbermann have enjoyed
poking fun with the announcements essentially saying to their viewers that
the very presence of these announcements means one of only two exclusive
options: 1. They are a legitimate and accurate indication of Obama's
geographic birth in Hawaii, or 2. They are the result of some crazy
50-year-long conspiracy concocted by members of Obama's family and newspaper
editors at the time in order to enable Obama to use the announcements some
time later as primary evidence that he was born in Hawaii in the event he
might run for president some day.
In his investigation, Crosby found confirmed and easily accessible evidence
that neither of these choices apply to Obama's records. In fact, the
explanation is far less sensational and simple that it reveals that Mr.
Obama (Soetoro) simply benefitted from a commonly used practice in the state
of Hawaii applied for thousands of births which were registered there, but
which did not occur there. In doing so, Obama appears to have benefitted
from a coincidental set of circumstances in which the choice to register his
birth in Hawaii also allowed him to engage native U.S. citizenship status,
not Natural Born status. The announcements were a fringe benefit to his
eligibility facade which merely occur as a consequence of the non-native
birth registration process. However, the primary reason for his family
registering his birth in Hawaii was to make sure he was eligible for
something less significant than the presidency. His grandparents wanted to
make sure Obama could receive state financial assistance and medical care as
an infant of an unemployed, wayward teenage mother and a foreign dead-beat,
alcoholic, bigamist.
"The birth announcements were printed from unconfirmed information provided
to the Newspapers by the Department of Health without the DOH or newspaper
editors confirming the actual location of the birth with any hospital in
Hawaii," says Crosby in a phone call from Oahu, "I found thousands of birth
registration records of children born outside of Hawaii who have their
announcements published in these two newspapers by cross referencing the
announcements with the U.S. Department of Health Vital Records Report for
Hawaii."
Recall that Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8 allows the state Health
Department to register the foreign birth of any child as a native Hawaiian
birth if the parents of that child can be proven to the satisfaction and
criteria of the Director of the Department of Health only, they were
residence of Hawaii within one year of the birth, regardless of the location
of the birth. This law then mandates that the vital records registrar must
register the birth with the vital records office in coordination with an
official, original Hawaiian birth record.
"They (newspaper editors) don't confirm "native" birth status," continued
Crosby, "The newspaper doesn't care if the birth occurred in the local
hospital. They don't even print that. They merely published information
provided to them directly and exclusively from the Department of Health in
1961, which means that any birth meeting the criteria of this law can be
registered, and therefore published in a newspaper announcement."
"The birth location is mistakenly implied by people because it appears in
this newspaper. I also found several birth records in Japan for birth's
registered in Hawaii." A review of all the birth announcements in Hawaii in
1961 reveals other evidence suggesting a disconnect between the Department
of Health and Hawaii's hospitals.
First of all, as shown by Crosby, all the announcements show the parents as
married and living at the same address.
"This is not merely a majority of the announcements, this is actually all of
them. Every single one! Approximately 16,000 in all!" Crosby said.
He continued, "This is a significant indication that the newspapers actually
do not investigate the information provided by the DOH (Department of
Health). If they did, they would have seen that there are more than 1000
births recorded in Hawaii in 1961 in which the parents were not married
and/or only the mother is recorded as the parent, yet the papers still
publish Mr. and Mrs. 'Whoever' in the announcement because that is the
information registered, not medically verified."
If the DOH doesn't include accurate information about the parents for birth
announcements, in all cases, what makes people conclude a native birth even
though the DOH also omits accurate information about the location of the
birth, as well? Crosby also discovered that the announcements are in a
tale-tell order which exposes a shocking fact about Obama's birth
announcements.
"Did anyone notice the announcements are not in any alphabetic order, or in
order of birthdate? This is because, in 1961, birth registration numbers
were issued based on the location of the local Vital Records office in which
the registration was recorded. The hospital does not assign these numbers,
the DOH does. It appears that Obama's birth was registered in an office not
used by any of the birth registrations offices who received birth
certification from either Kapi-olani Medical Center, or Queens Medical
Center which use two local offices near those facilities," said Crosby.
He continued, "It appears Obama's birth was registered with the satellite
office near his grandparent's home some distance from the offices nearest to
and most used by the hospitals. This particular office was commonly used by
indigenous people of Hawaii wanting to record births of children outside of
the city. This is why the U.S. Department of Health created the Certificate
of Live Birth template in 1959 with a check box indicating whether or not
the child was born in the city limits and if the residence of the mother was
a farm or not. It appears Obama's birth at least did not occur in the city
of Honolulu and, at most, did not even occur in the state of Hawaii."
In 1956, the National Vital Statistics Division of the U.S. Department of
Health issued a revised template version of the "Certificate of Live Birth"
form to be used by state municipalities to record and medically verify
births. Since Hawaii had not yet become a state, these revisions to the
template would not be used in Hawaii until 1959. Therefore, birth records
created after 1959 were subject to demographic clarifications and metrics
prescribed by the federal authority of the U.S. Department of Health, not
the state of Hawaii.
"This also explains why Obama's birth announcements appear in the succession
of announcements where and when they do. His alleged "Certification of Live
Birth" is not approved by any federal authority as an official source of
demographic data or medical verification of his birth. It is merely a record
of birth registration. Therefore, the order of printing of announcements in
the local papers comes directly from the list which is ordered based on the
birth registration office location, not the chronological or alphabetical
order of the medically verified birth."
Crosby says the difference between a "medically verified" live birth and a
"birth registration" are significant. A live birth is witnessed by a doctor,
a birth registration is simply recorded by administrative authority without
witnessing the birth. ...Continued at source:
<http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/04/final-report-obamas-birth-announcem
ents.html>
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/04/final-report-obamas-birth-announceme
nts.html
Previous research conducted on the questionable Obama newspaper "birth"
announcements can be found here
<http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/06/new-research-on-obama-n
ewspaper-birth.html> .
Note to the Obots: "When Obama was born in 1961, Hawaii had in effect the
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth Program which it established in 1911 and which
it terminated in 1972. Someone could under Act 96 get a certificate claiming
a Hawaiian birth even if he was physically born in a foreign country by an
adult or parent falsely claiming to the director of health that he was born
in Hawaii when in fact he was born abroad." (
<http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-putative-president-obamas.html>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-putative-president-obamas.html)
and (
<http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/HawaiiPoliciesAndProcedures.htm>
http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/HawaiiPoliciesAndProcedures.htm)
Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice: Obama's eligibility could be biggest
political fraud in the history of the world; time for a new approach
-Details here
<http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/02/notre-dame-professor-ch
arles-rice.html> .
Attorney Mario Apuzzo: All presidents born after 1787, except for Chester
Arthur and Barack Obama, met the "natural born Citizen" criteria. -Details
here
<http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/02/attorney-mario-apuzzo-a
ll-presidents.html> .
Commander Charles Kerchner: List of U.S. Presidents - Eligibility under
Article II Grandfather Clause (GFC) or Natural Born Citizen (NBC) Clause or
Seated due to Election Fraud -Details here
<http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/02/list-of-us-presidents-e
ligibility-under.html> .
Jack Cashill Discusses Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number Reserved
for Connecticut Applicants -Video here
<http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/03/author-jack-cashill-dis
cusses-obamas.html> .
Visit the Birther Vault
<http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-
attorney-on-cnn.html> for the long list of evidence against Hawaii
officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility;
[http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-
attorney-on-cnn.html].
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, discuss-osint@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
bisoldi@intellnet.org
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: osint-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: osint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment