Improving the quality of life in the USA and in the World could well
be boring to sleepy ones like you. — J. A. A. —
>
On Mar 13, 3:59 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Guaranteed to put you to sleep within half a page.
>
> On 03/13/2011 03:26 PM, Keith In K�ln wrote:
>
> > Hey Jonathan!
> > Send the link! I might opt to buy it....I am looking for some reading
> > material, on some upcoming (long assed) flights that I see I will be
> > enduring here soon.....
>
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Jonathan Ashley
> > <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>>
> > wrote:
>
> > Has anyone besides Mark and myself noticed that John (a.k.a.
> > NoEinstein) never answers a single question posed to him? When all
> > he can do is cut and paste "the socialist-communist, is
> > undeserving of a reply," does he actually think anyone will buy
> > HIS New Book?
>
> > (HIS New Book is not the title of his new book. That's just me
> > poking fun at John.)
>
> > HIS New Book was published by Outskirts Press (a business that
> > helps folks self-publish) in September 2010. It is available
> > through Amazon.com. However, I was not enticed into making a
> > purchase simply because "There are no customer reviews yet." So, I
> > went to the Barnes & Noble website, which allows folks to rate
> > books on a scale of 1 to 5. It has no ratings for the book.
>
> > One would think that a book that has been out close to six months
> > would have had at least one person post a review - even if it were
> > a negative review.
>
> > I hope John didn't purchase too many copies of HIS New Book!
>
> > On 03/13/2011 08:38 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >> Jonathan Ashley, the socialist-communist, is undeserving of a reply.
> >> � J. A. A. �
> >> On Mar 11, 5:16 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Re: "Unless one understands the hundreds of problems solved, most don't
> >>> have the smarts to realize how much more personal liberty and how much
> >>> less government control there will be that would otherwise have affected
> >>> most Americans."
>
> >>> John,
>
> >>> Perhaps a definition of liberty is needed for your perusal. From
> >>> Webster's 1828 dictionary:
>
> >>> *LIB''ERTY,* n. [L. libertas, from liber, free.]
>
> >>> 1. Freedom from restraint, in a general sense, and applicable to the
> >>> body, or to the will or mind. The body is at liberty, when not
> >>> confined; the will or mind is at liberty, when not checked or
> >>> controlled. A man enjoys liberty, when no physical force operates to
> >>> restrain his actions or volitions.
>
> >>> How does one gain liberty from YOUR New Constitution? From what little
> >>> you have provided, for every problem YOUR New Constitution claims to
> >>> solve, YOUR New Constitution creates ten new problems.
>
> >>> On 03/11/2011 12:46 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>>> Dear Mark: Your pet one-page constitution was unknown to me when I
> >>>> wrote my New Constitution�which is based on and expanded from, the
> >>>> original. So, don't fault me for not following your lead. At no time
> >>>> is the input of any outsider, like you, being sought to... "evaluate"
> >>>> what I have done. Most of the content was for solving very specific
> >>>> governmental problems highlighted in the news. Unless one understands
> >>>> the hundreds of problems solved, most don't have the smarts to realize
> >>>> how much more personal liberty and how much less government control
> >>>> there will be that would otherwise have affected most Americans. Even
> >>>> YOU will be a beneficiary! � J. A. Armistead �
> >>>> On Mar 11, 9:34 am, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com> <mailto:markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> > Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public acts,
> >>>>>>> records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more
> >>>>>>> strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the
> >>>>>>> states having laws governing such.
> >>>>> THERE GOES MY STATES RIGHT TO THE DEATH PENALTY AND LIFE IN PRISON FOR
> >>>>> REPEAT OFFENDER PEDOPHILES...
> >>>>> English, that is grammatically
> >>>>>>> written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and
> >>>>>>> shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. Laws,
> >>>>>>> documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written
> >>>>>>> concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average
> >>>>>>> people,
> >>>>> JUST WHAT IS "AVERAGE"... DEFINE "LEGALESE".... DOES THAT MEAN (IT CERTAINLY
> >>>>> IMPLIES) THAT ANY "OFFICIAL" LANGUAGE MUST BE IN A FORM THAT WOULD ALLOW
> >>>>> IDIOTS AND DROPOUTS TO UNDERSTAND..(EBONICS).. THIS WOULD MEAN THAT ANYONE
> >>>>> WITH AN EDUCATION COULD NOT UNDERSTAND IT.
> >>>>> or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed.
> >>>>>>> Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages
> >>>>>>> in civil court.
> >>>>> EXPLAIN WHAT IS CONFUSING ABOUT A THOUSAND YEAR OLD LANGUAGE??
> >>>>> No person shall be punished for violations of laws
> >>>>>>> that: aren�t common knowledge;
> >>>>> SO IF I CLAIM THAT I DID NOT KNOW THAT KILLING UNCLE JOE WAS "ILLEGAL" I
> >>>>> CAN'T BE PROSECUTED.
> >>>>> disagree with the macro moral consensus
> >>>>>>> of the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first
> >>>>>>> year and passed by less than 60% of the House.
> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:56 AM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> <mailto:noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
> >>>>>> Jonathan, a socialist-communist masquerading as a conservative, is
> >>>>>> undeserving of being replied to. � J. A. A. �
> >>>>>> On Mar 10, 9:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> It is so sad that you spent 14 years writing this incoherent statist
> >>>>>>> hodge-podge.
> >>>>>>> On03/10/2011 <tel:03%2F10%2F2011> 06:25 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Folks: About 1/3rd of my New Constitution relates to straightening-
> >>>>>>>> out the Judiciary. Here, in sequence, is...
> >>>>>>>> " Article IV:
> >>>>>>>> Section 1, 2& 3: States shall recognize other states� public acts,
> >>>>>>>> records and judicial proceedings, and shall pass no laws much more
> >>>>>>>> strict on common issues than are in effect in the majority of the
> >>>>>>>> states having laws governing such. English, that is grammatically
> >>>>>>>> written and correctly spoken, is the official language of the USA and
> >>>>>>>> shall be the model for every medium and every public discourse. Laws,
> >>>>>>>> documents, contracts, instructions and forms shall be written
> >>>>>>>> concisely, without legalese, and shall be understandable by average
> >>>>>>>> people, or no person shall be bound thereby, even if endorsed.
> >>>>>>>> Persons harmed by confusing language or verbiage may sue for damages
> >>>>>>>> in civil court. No person shall be punished for violations of laws
> >>>>>>>> that: aren�t common knowledge; disagree with the macro moral
> >>>>>> consensus
> >>>>>>>> of the People and this constitution; or are in the probationary first
> >>>>>>>> year and passed by less than 60% of the House.
> >>>>>>>> Citizens in any state are entitled to the same privileges and
> >>>>>>>> immunities as the Citizens of the several states. Anyone charged with
> >>>>>>>> treason or other crime in any state who flees to another state, shall,
> >>>>>>>> on demand of the executive authority of the state from which he fled,
> >>>>>>>> be delivered up, to be removed to the state having jurisdiction in
> >>>>>>>> such crime. No imprison-ment, slavery, nor involuntary servitude�
> >>>>>>>> except as punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been
> >>>>>>>> duly convicted�shall exist within the United States or any place
> >>>>>>>> subject to its jurisdiction.
> >>>>>>>> The House may create new states if such aren�t within the
> >>>>>>>> jurisdiction of another state that dissents, and aren�t formed by
> >>>>>>>> joining two or more dissenting states or parts thereof. The House can
> >>>>>>>> make rules and regulations respecting the territory or property of the
> >>>>>>>> United States. The New Constitution shall not prejudice claims of the
> >>>>>>>> USA or a particular state, and shall guarantee to each state in the
> >>>>>>>> union a government that is a democracy or a republic, and shall
> >>>>>>>> protect states against invasion. Upon request by the legislature or
> >>>>>>>> the executive of a state (when the legislature cannot be convened),
> >>>>>>>> the United States shall protect such state from domestic violence."
> >>>>>>>> � John A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 6:39 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> <mailto:noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Dear Keith in Koln: I lived in Charlotte for over two decades. My
> >>>>>>>>> father, in his childhood, lived in Tarpon Springs. One of my most
> >>>>>>>>> frightening times was driving over the Tampa Bay bridge. The
> >>>>>>>>> "starting point" for me in rewriting the constitution was to correct
> >>>>>>>>> the rampant injustices in our courts, and to allay our (You have to
> >>>>>>>>> experience it to know it.) police state. As happened with O. J., the
> >>>>>>>>> police target who they want to convict whether they are guilty or
> >>>>>>>>> not. The police are especially unfair to Blacks. I make it a felony
> >>>>>>>>> for any prosecutor to be overly zealous to convict someone who is
> >>>>>>>>> latter proved to be innocent. At every turn, justice demands that the
> >>>>>>>>> presumption of innocence be there
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment