Thursday, December 30, 2010

Is there any weather pattern that would cast down on global warming?




Is there any weather pattern that would cast down on global warming?

I've asked the question to several global warming alarmists and generally all I get is "look at the IPCC reports." If it's a little warmer, global warming is blamed. If it's a little colder, global warming is blamed. It really is a 'convenient' scam. No matter what the weather conditions may be, just blame global warming and produce no facts.

Maybe the lack of global warming is the cause of global warming? See, it's really easy to use the logic of global warming alarmists.

From The Daily Caller:

Increased warm temperatures indicate global warming. Severe winter storms also help prove global warming, according to a recent op-ed in the New York Times. So is there any weather pattern that would disprove or call into question the existence of global warming?

"Basically anything that would appear like magic would throw the laws of physics into question," Brad Johnson, a climate editor at the Center for American Progress, a progressive Washington, D.C. think tank, told The Daily Caller. "The only way to disprove the global warming theory is if magic is real and that our understanding of the universe is completely wrong."

This 'think-tank' is funded by New World Order nut, and Obama pal, George Soros.

Johnson explained that weather does not prove or disprove global warming.

"The idea that weather proves or disproves global warming doesn't make sense," he said.

"Warm weather and cold weather aren't proof that the temperature of the planet is increasing," Johnson continued. "A temperature in one place on one day isn't very strong evidence of anything, and it's certainly not proof of anything."

Dr. Patrick J. Michaels, a senior fellow in environmental studies at The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington, D.C., told TheDC that global warming proponents wrongly try to justify numerous weather patterns as being the result of global warming.

"Global warming scientists say it will be warmer, colder, snowier, and less snowy all at the same time, which is impossible. Anyone who follows global warming knows the theory is rife with exaggeration," Michaels said. "What's disturbing is to see The New York Times put a really fringe idea on their editorial page. Obviously they're panicking about people's distrust of the political nature of global warming science. It struck me as desperation pass, knowing the people are abandoning global warming as a signature issue."

Michaels said many global warming proponents defer to "unfalsifiable science," which is science that cannot be tested.

"When it doesn't snow, global warming proponents blame global warming, and when winters are cold, they blame global warming, etc. This is what you call unfalsifiable science," Michaels said. "It's not science because it can't be falsified."

Using falsified science has made Al Gore and his global warming pals billions of dollars.

Continue reading>>>

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment