Thursday, December 30, 2010

Re: Empirical Proof and Documentation

Keith and I have already shown that the major media who checked the
voting after the election all agreed that Bush did in fact win the
election and all were media who were anti-Bush when they did the
checking. You then claim that they were "yellow journalists" (NYT?,
McClatchey?, WaPo? - do you really want to call them "yellow
journalists" since you are forever quoting them here). What you are
doing is cutting the legs out from under all the people you try to claim
are unbiased. I am not sure you really want to do that.

On 12/29/2010 09:22 PM, Tommy News wrote:
> No, that is the truth.
>
> It is you who lie.
>
> On 12/29/10, dick thompson<rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> And I quote:
>>
>> All of this proves the one salient fact in this matter. Bush was not
>>>> elected President of the United States. All his actions and
>>>> "governance" were ILLEGAL and Illegitimate. So much for the fairness
>>>> of our "Representative Republic."
>> Once again you lie.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/29/2010 01:42 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>>> All of this proves the one salient fact in this matter. Bush was not
>>>>> elected President of the United States. All his actions and
>>>>> "governance" were ILLEGAL and Illegitimate. So much for the fairness
>>>>> of our "Representative Republic."
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment