Re: Rachel Maddow remarks on President Obama's kind words for Bush and avoidance of criticism of the failed architects of the Iraq War.

There must be, in this day of technological achievement read your
drivers license from the moon age, some shred of evidence to back up
what you are all saying. Providing some form of validity to a claim
lays waste the slag from the rebuttals, ie; the unsupported
rebuttals.

Or is this equally all posters personal bias born from tons of other
hearsay?

It doesn't matter because the real dilemma is having to decipher the
validity of opposing
evidences. Whose truth is the truth?
This is due to subjective interpretation of the incidents; some say
sin and others say so what.

How about................

All politicians are to some degree inept and in less technical terms,
all BS, and maybe all the people in this room could runs things
better.

In all the years we have been listening to political rhetoric not much
has changed, that is except the hands that stand at the helm and the
excuses as to why the citizens, who pay these people lot's of money to
take charge, are continually in a quagmire. At every election they
get up on the soap box and preach about how they are going to fix the
problems the other guy made.

It's too late to find fault that results in a rectified situation; at
this point fault only becomes the fodder for heated debate without
resolution, much of which we have here. Politics is a shouting match
and a mud slinging contest and on rare occasions some good shit
happens.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.