That may be how you keep them, and as you even admit, "protect" them, but that is not where they originate. Again, where do unalienable rights come from? Where are they generated?
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:31 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
where, prey tell, do you believe that one's "unalienable" rights may---
come from?
from your ability to protect them.
A mythical god or political party can't give them to you.
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
On Sep 10, 2:49 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then where, prey tell, do you believe that one's "unalienable" rights may
> come from?
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:38 PM, plainolamerican
> Atheism..jpg>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > No speculation about it PlainOl......."It Is, What It Is".
> > ---
> > an old myth
>
> > On Sep 10, 2:26 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > No speculation about it PlainOl......."It Is, What It Is".
>
> > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:26 PM, plainolamerican
> > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > > All unalienable rights are from God
> > > > ---
> > > > speculation noted
>
> > > > On Sep 10, 11:18 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hello John,
>
> > > > > Although it was difficult to get through that long winded
> > disortation,
> > > > > (reminds me of someone who graduated from Clemson!) and I agree
> > that the
> > > > > Obama Administration has by executive order installed
> > unconstitutional,
> > > > > communistic mandates upon "We, The People"; I am at a loss as to
> > how
> > > > you
> > > > > believe that our two party system is unconstitutional.
>
> > > > > Far from it.
>
> > > > > There is nothing in the Constitution, (or maybe you can point out
> > the
> > > > > Article and paragraph for us?) that restricts the association of
> > like
> > > > > minded politically thinking individuals from forming associations or
> > > > groups
> > > > > to further their political cause.
>
> > > > > I also take exception to your notion that the "weak govern the
> > strong".
> > > > > Examples please. With regard to bias within the law.....Yes. It's
> > true,
> > > > > and has been since the beginning of recorded history. The United
> > States
> > > > is
> > > > > no exception, and I can cite numerous instances within our 235 year
> > > > > history, beginning with the "Shea's Rebellion" of bias contained
> > within
> > > > > the law. To some degree, it is these "biases" that you refer to,
> > that
> > > > > shape and form our "culture" and our "morals".
>
> > > > > All unalienable rights are from God, not government and they cannot
> > be
> > > > > stripped by government, unless one "volunteers" to waive his God
> > given
> > > > > unalienable right.
>
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:46 PM, NoEinstein <
> > noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > Yes, Studio, but "the two major political parties" are 100%
> > > > > > UNCONSTITUTIONAL under our present Constitution! The USA isn't a
> > > > > > democracy, but is supposed to be (but never has been) a
> > Representative
> > > > > > Republic. The Founding Fathers were totally committed to the
> > > > > > principle that the PEOPLE control government. Nowhere in the
> > > > > > Constitution is it sanctioned to allow political parties to
> > substitute
> > > > > > biased group power for the "close to a Democracy" power of the
> > voters
> > > > > > on election day. Yes, there were Whigs and Tories in the 18th
> > > > > > century. But those were mechanisms for government control far
> > > > > > different from a Representative Republic! Note: That treasonous
> > > > > > BASTARD in the White House, Barack H. Obama, still supposes that
> > the
> > > > > > USA is "our great Democracy", while he acts as our
> > communist-socialist
> > > > > > dictator. As numbers of you have pointed out a year or two ago,
> > > > > > Democracies—if that's the only stipulated 'control' of
> > government—will
> > > > > > allow the weak to control the strong. And that isn't just if it is
> > > > > > like: two wolves and a sheep deciding what is for supper. Having
> > > > > > controls in the Constitution that mandate justice and fairness will
> > > > > > allow the voters to decide controversial issues WITHIN the bounds
> > of
> > > > > > justice and fairness. No biased group gets to define justice and
> > > > > > fairness so as to allow them to exploit others for their own
> > selfish
> > > > > > gain. The best route to saving the USA, as well as our entire
> > > > > > socioeconomic system, is to strip all biased groups of power over
> > the
> > > > > > course of government. Once that happens, there won't be any more
> > > > > > pressure to have governments become all things for all people,
> > which
> > > > > > as we should know by now ( but Obama doesn't), doesn't work! —
> > John
> > > > > > A. Armistead —
>
> > > > > > On Sep 6, 11:48 am, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sep 5, 5:39 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Dear Studio:
> > > > > > > > Since both of those are issues of
> > > > > > > > high controversy, the American People should be allowed to
> > decide
> > > > once
> > > > > > > > and for all in direct referenda.
>
> > > > > > > I'm in TOTAL agreement with that!
> > > > > > > However, Republitards will remind you we live in a Republic, not
> > a
> > > > > > > Democracy.
> > > > > > > And neither of the 2 major parties actually want people to
> > decide by
> > > > > > > referendum.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>
>
> 106KViewDownload
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment