---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
The League of Ordinary Gentlemen Date: Sunday, August 12, 2012
Subject: [New post] Liberal Democracy is Viable, But Can We Do Better?
To:
majors.bruce@gmail.com Guest Authors posted: "Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Democracy. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here. ~ By James Hanley Synopsis: Liberal democracy is viable, but always " New post on The League of Ordinary Gentlemen |  | Note: This post is part of our League Symposium on Democracy. You can read the introductory post for the Symposium here. To see a list of all posts in the Symposium so far, click here. ~ By James Hanley Synopsis: Liberal democracy is viable, but always threatened, both in its liberal aspect and it's democratic aspect, by the inevitable fact that it creates losers. An alternative approach that I call Tiebout democracy creates more winners and fewer losers. Is it a better approach? This isn't the post I wanted to write, but writing a popular version of Arrow's Theorem still has me stumped. And this isn't a completely developed post, but more of an off-the-cuff assemblage of thoughts that have been rolling around in my skull, with lots of echo but not necessarily much coherent pattern. Take it for what it's worth; i.e., my measly two cents. Read more of this post | | | |
|
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see
http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at
http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment