Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Re: Zimmerman shooting not a hate crime

Your handle paints you like a member of the Tea
Party. But you are deaf to the many instances of Blacks getting
wrongly sent to jail.
---
oh, cry us another river for the niggers

One 'law' which my New Constitution strikes
down is having more severe sentences for repeat offenses. There was a
case where someone found a mountain cabin with the door left
unlocked. There was a wooden rocking chair in there worth about
$100. The young man stole the chair, but because that was his third
PETTY theft, he was sentenced to life in prison.
---
he got lucky as he could have been killed by the owner

There are as high or
higher percentage of criminals in government and in Law Enforcement as
in the general population!
---
cite source

The architectural firm I worked for in Charlotte designed prisons.
So, I was most interested in who got sent to those places. The exact
percentages of bad convictions isn't as important as the fact hundreds
and hundreds are wrongly convicted.
---
and hundreds and hundreds of criminals are not prosecuted or given
lenient sentences because of civil rights groups and liberal judges

Under my N. Constitution, it
becomes a FELONY for any prosecutor to be over zealous to convict.
---
their job is to prosecute according to the law.

He or she can expect to spend at least three years in prison for being
"a
party" to a wrong conviction.
---
prosecutors don't convict criminals ... the judge or jury does

There are at least a hundred specific
things I've included in my document to protect putting people through
the WRINGER of jury trials when the evidence is thin.
---
so you're going to continue to whine about criminals who are
prosecuted and found guilty?

I invite those
who can to go back into my threads and read the 85% of my document
thus far presented. Each sentence was put there to correct some flaw
in governments past.
---
present the whole document or let it die in obscurity


On Jul 23, 9:50 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Dear plainolamerican:  Your handle paints you like a member of the Tea
> Party.  But you are deaf to the many instances of Blacks getting
> wrongly sent to jail.  One 'law' which my New Constitution strikes
> down is having more severe sentences for repeat offenses.  There was a
> case where someone found a mountain cabin with the door left
> unlocked.  There was a wooden rocking chair in there worth about
> $100.  The young man stole the chair, but because that was his third
> PETTY theft, he was sentenced to life in prison.  There are as high or
> higher percentage of criminals in government and in Law Enforcement as
> in the general population!
>
> The architectural firm I worked for in Charlotte designed prisons.
> So, I was most interested in who got sent to those places.  The exact
> percentages of bad convictions isn't as important as the fact hundreds
> and hundreds are wrongly convicted.  Under my N. Constitution, it
> becomes a FELONY for any prosecutor to be over zealous to convict.  He
> or she can expect to spend at least three years in prison for being "a
> party" to a wrong conviction.  There are at least a hundred specific
> things I've included in my document to protect putting people through
> the WRINGER of jury trials when the evidence is thin.  I invite those
> who can to go back into my threads and read the 85% of my document
> thus far presented.  Each sentence was put there to correct some flaw
> in governments past.  — J. A. Armistead —
>
> On Jul 20, 10:40 am, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > my voracity is high enough that I don't
> > have to go citing sources
> > ---
> > when you make the statement that 40% of the blacks in prison are there
> > for
> > crimes they never committed you do.
> > I checked the DOJ records and haven't found anything close to 40%
> > being true.
> > It is true, however, that blacks make up about 40% of the prisoners.
>
> > If you are a bigot, plainol..., no mere statistics
> > being cited can help you.
> > ---
> > everyone is a bigot to some degree ... but that doesn't change facts
> > about black crime.
>
> > the enforcement of our laws is what separates Americans from the other
> > animals on the planet.
>
> > On Jul 19, 8:10 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > Dear plainol...:  Unlike most, my voracity is high enough that I don't
> > > have to go citing sources at the drop of a hat.  Almost every day,
> > > now, a black who has spent decades in jail for "raping" a white woman
> > > is set free because the DNA doesn't match.  I wrote my New
> > > Constitution SPECIFICALLY to make certain that no person of any race
> > > ever goes to jail or is put to death for a crime they didn't
> > > commit!!!!!  I once, single handedly, got a black man freed from a
> > > second degree murder of another black charge.  I did so by showing
> > > that the 36" long 2 x 4 that was the purported murder weapon could not
> > > have been wielded in the confines of an open screen door to a duplex.
> > > I was able to prove to everyone's satisfaction in the jury that all of
> > > those biased witnesses in that duplex could not have witnessed the
> > > crime!  Such fact easily showed that it was the dead man was the
> > > aggressor, who came out of the apartment and threatened the other man
> > > with a knife.  The blow to the head was a sideways blow delivered in
> > > self defense.  If you are a bigot, plainol..., no mere statistics
> > > being cited can help you.  — J. A. Armistead —  P. S.:  When the judge
> > > realized our verdict, he said, with much anger: "Jury Dismissed!"  At
> > > that, I knew my calling was clear:  Make our God Damned "justice
> > > system" just!
>
> > > On Jul 18, 4:42 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > a minimum of 40% of the blacks in prison are there for
> > > > crimes they never committed
> > > > ---
> > > > cite source
>
> > > > The only "damn" racists, here, are the whites who don't
> > > > value the civil liberties of ALL Americans.
> > > > ---
> > > > most white do value civil liberties ... even among racist minorities
> > > > who use their skin color for an advantage through affirmative action
>
> > > >   If there is anything that
> > > > I am, it is color blind.
> > > > ---
> > > > poor feller ... does your wife dress you?
>
> > > > Everyone is a racist to some degree. Those who deny it are also liars.
>
> > > > On Jul 18, 1:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:> Dear Keith:  If you were walking through a 7-11 parking lot and saw a
> > > > > piece of jewelry lying on the pavement, you would pick it up, right?
> > > > > In the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution (and in my New
> > > > > Constitution, as well), unreasonable searches and seizures are
> > > > > prohibited.  Possessing jewelry is NOT a capital crime!  And nothing
> > > > > that Zimmerman did was the result of his being privy to the contents
> > > > > of that bag.  Most of you are implying that since whites are fed up
> > > > > with crime, that every person who MIGHT be guilty of petty theft can
> > > > > be shot and killed.  I particularly take issue with your making the
> > > > > spurious statement that there is no evidence for what I just
> > > > > explained.  FOX News repeatedly ran video of Zimmerman getting out of
> > > > > the police car, in handcuffs.  He didn't seem to be in any pain; and
> > > > > the (distant) view of his head showed no apparent injuries.  Having
> > > > > his injuries be SEEN was crucial to the majority bigot position at
> > > > > FOX.  That network got police to release a photo made just after the
> > > > > police had arrived on the scene.  That photo, taken from about three
> > > > > feet away, and on axis with his right mastoid bone (behind the ear),
> > > > > clearly shows FLOWING blood, trailing vertically, without any
> > > > > smudges.  Since the body tries to seal off bleeding, automatically, it
> > > > > is probable that Zimmerman had self-inflicted ALL of those short
> > > > > lacerations to his head no more than a minute before the police got
> > > > > there.  If you, or anyone, doubt my voracity, you had better get
> > > > > prepared to see the PROSECUTION have forensic experts confirm
> > > > > everything that I have said and reasoned.
>
> > > > > Lastly, when a minimum of 40% of the blacks in prison are there for
> > > > > crimes they never committed, it is understandable that the Black
> > > > > "establishment" would be most insistent that justice be done in the
> > > > > Martin case.  The only "damn" racists, here, are the whites who don't
> > > > > value the civil liberties of ALL Americans.  If there is anything that
> > > > > I am, it is color blind. If everyone would be like me, and take the
> > > > > high moral ground, there wouldn't be so much unjustified hatred in the
> > > > > world.  Consider being like that, Keith.  — J. A. Armistead —
>
> > > > > On Jul 17, 12:58 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > I'm not sure how John came to the conclusions that he has come to.   There
> > > > > > is nothing as of yet on the record that establishes such a scenario, and
> > > > > > all of Armistead's "theories"  are just that,  "speculative theory".
>
> > > > > > What we do know, is that Trayvon Martin was a young black male, dressed in
> > > > > > dark, non-descript clothing, (save for the dark "Hoodie" that he was
> > > > > > sporting) and at the time that he was shot, was found with jewelry that was
> > > > > > not his; in a neighborhood which had been having frequent home
> > > > > > invasions/burglaries.
>
> > > > > > We know that law enforcement looked at this case for a month,  and could
> > > > > > not come up with any conclusive evidence that this was in fact anything
> > > > > > more than a tragic scenario but nevertheless, a tragic scenario that was
> > > > > > self defense.  We then had numerous race baiters flock to the scene in
> > > > > > Central Florida,  their sole purpose was to stir up trouble, and "race
> > > > > > bait".  We have seen mainstream media even attempt to modify the actual
> > > > > > recordings of Zimmerman, and portray Martin as some sweet cherub teenager
> > > > > > who was non-threatening, when in fact,  Mr. Martin was a thug who had been
> > > > > > suspended from his school for drugs; whose moniker was "No_Limit_Nigga"  on
> > > > > > Twitter;  who had unaccountable jewelry on his person at the time of the
> > > > > > incident.
>
> > > > > > On the other hand,  contrary to the media hype,  Mr. Zimmerman is far from
> > > > > > "White";  Mr Zimmerman and his wife tutored underprivileged black youths at
> > > > > > their home;  and there is nothing whatsoever to date that would suggest
> > > > > > that Mr. Zimmerman shot this man because he is a racist, or under the
> > > > > > scenario that John Armistead has surmised and attempted to portray.
>
> > > > > > I think a more likely scenario, is that after being told not to pursue
> > > > > > Martin by law enforcement,  Martin circled around,  and confronted
> > > > > > Zimmerman.   Martin asked him,  "Are you followimg me?"  and when Zimmerman
> > > > > > replied, "No",  Martin said something to the effect of,  "Well you got me
> > > > > > now", when Martin attacked him, and they tumbled to the ground.
>
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:23 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com>wrote:> Einstein... I guess Zimmerman is afraid of his Grandfather... a proud
> > > > > > > BLACK man... Zimmerman thinks his Grandfather is a thief and all the
> > > > > > > other negatives that you have implied...
>
> > > > > > > The race card does NOT fly when you need it to, does it?
>
> > > > > > > Poor Martin was shot after he elevated a tense VERBAL confrontation
> > > > > > > into a physical one..Why would any reasonable person do this??.... if
> > > > > > > I were 5'7" and weighed in at a chubby 190 and was attacked physically
> > > > > > > by a 6'1" physically fit individual I would fear for my
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment