yes, I read it and still find fearmongering useless.
fund and fight your own religious war withe the muzzies
On Jun 8, 2:57 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good article.
>
> Folks like Plain Ol' will never read this.....
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ****
>
> > Sean Hannity's turn toward Islam follows the influx Saudi Dollars into Fox
> > ****
>
> > ****
>
> > ** **
>
> > "Tell the truth; use their words."
> > General George Marshall to Frank Capra
> > in commissioning the "Why We Fight" series. ****
>
> > ****
>
> >http://www.shoebat.com/2012/06/07/a-challenge-to-every-muslim/****
>
> > ****
>
> > *Walid Shoebat* <http://www.shoebat.com/>* **. . . **Former Muslim
> > Brotherhood Member Now Peace Activist** *****
> > A Challenge to Every Muslim****
>
> > *By Walid Shoebat*****
>
> > Yesterday, I received this question and comment from sociologist-historian
> > and scholar Mr. Alvin Schmidt, whom I greatly respect:****
>
> > I have for some time said that Sean Hannity seems to be an ignorant
> > supporter of the politically correct ideology when he keeps talking about
> > "Radical Islam." He either has never read the Koran or he is blinded by
> > political correctness. Or is it because he knows he would lose his job if
> > he were to say 'the problem lies with Islam and its Koran?' But by
> > saying 'Radical Islam,' he can keep his job. As I have pointed out in my
> > book *The Great Divide: The Failure of Islam and the Triumph of the West* (2004),
> > anyone who follows the Koran is by definition a radical, because the Koran
> > is a radical book. The so-called 'Radical Muslims' are individuals who
> > follow the Koran right down to the line. When will people like Hannity
> > wake up?****
>
> > To answer the questions laid by our scholar Mr. Schmidt, Hannity's reasons
> > for not calling a spade a spade is both his "fear of losing his job" and
> > his "ignorance."****
>
> > Ignorance on Islam is a result of forgetting history. How often do you
> > ever see Hannity discuss issues on Islamic history? I have met with Hannity
> > and interviewed with him on a few occasions and I still love the guy, even
> > though Hannity on few other occasions crucified friends of mine for using
> > the term "Islam" instead of "radical Islam".****
>
> > The naiveté of Hannity and many on the left, as well as on the right, is
> > this: they say that since there are so many Muslims who are 'peace-loving'
> > then we should distinguish between 'Radical Islam' and 'Islam'.****
>
> > Alright then, let's conduct a survey of the 'peace-loving' Muslims Hannity
> > refers to. And to these peace-loving Muslims I ask: ****
>
> > Will you denounce terrorism?****
>
> > After we tally the number of all the Muslims that would condemn terrorism,
> > we should ask them this:****
>
> > Will you denounce Islam's historic invasions against Christendom?****
>
> > Once we tally the numbers of Muslims who come forth, we should ask:****
>
> > Under inheritance law, if a will is not written by the deceased, would you
> > accept that a daughter should inherit an equal portion to her brother?****
>
> > Once you see how few Muslims are left, ask this:****
>
> > Are you willing to denounce Shariah as it stands today in the Muslim World?
> > ****
>
> > The ones who remain after the survey, I can assure you will be very few.
> > These are cultural Muslims who identify with Islam to remain alive and
> > could care less about religion altogether. These are not the individuals we
> > are surveying. What we are surveying are religious Muslims. After all, we
> > are questioning Islam, the religion and not a culture. I am not asking
> > Muslims to denounce pork but primitive laws.****
>
> > The question I ask Hannity is this:****
>
> > Does "radical Islam" exist or is Islam inherently "radical"?****
>
> > There is no third choice.****
>
> > If Hannity is correct<http://barracknow.blogspot.com/2012/05/hannity-stakes-his-weak-public...>and the first is true, and if indeed it was a few radicals that hijacked
> > Islam, then we should be able to find the un-radical Islam.****
>
> > To date, *no one can find a single Islamic reference manual, from main
> > Islamic sources, that is not in its essence radical*.****
>
> > Muslims like to use this phrase from the Quran: ****
>
> > "bring your proof if indeed ye are truthful" (Quran 2:111)****
>
> > In turn, I ask every Muslim on earth:****
>
> > *Where is the peaceful reference manual on the Quran, in the Islamic
> > world that shows Islam is indeed peaceful, so we can all examine its
> > contents?*****
>
> > The best way to prove the point is to quote Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi who is
> > probably the most respected Muslim scholar in the Sunni Muslim world today.
> > In an article written<http://qaradawi.net/component/content/article/4285.html>by Qaradawi, which I translated from the Arabic, he states:
> > ****
>
> > One of the reviled expressions used by secularists and modernists is the
> > expression "political Islam", which is alien to our Islamic society without
> > a doubt. What they mean by this is the Islam that manages the affairs of
> > the Muslim Nation and their relationships at home and abroad…The reason for
> > this application is a master plan by the enemies of Islam to fragment it
> > into different divisions. It is not a one Islam as revealed by God but they
> > manufactured "Islams", plural, several different Islams, which they desire
> > to accomplish. Sometimes they even divide Islam by regions: there is the
> > Asian variety of Islam, and then we have the African Islam. And sometimes,
> > according to the ages: there is the Prophet's era of Islam, and Rashidi
> > Islam, Umayyad Islam, Abbasid Islam, Ottoman Islam and modern Islam. And
> > sometimes, according to race: there is Arab Islam, Indian Islam, Turkish
> > Islam, and the Islam of the Malaysian … And so on and so forth. And
> > sometimes, according to the doctrine: There is Sunni Islam and Shiite
> > Islam. They even divide the Sunni into divisions and the Shia into
> > divisions.****
>
> > They even added new divisions; there is revolutionary Islam, reactionary
> > Islam, radical Islam, classical Islam, right-wing Islam, leftist Islam,
> > orthodox Islam, modern Islam and, finally, political Islam, and spiritual
> > Islam and theological Islam. We do not understand, why they invent such
> > divisions that are rejected in Islam? The truth is that these divisions are
> > all unacceptable in the eyes of a Muslim, there is only one Islam, which
> > has no partners which recognizes no other; it is the first Islam, the Islam
> > of the Quran and Sunnah.****
>
> > Well put, Mr. Qaradawi.****
>
> > Why can't Westerners like Hannity believe him, especially if it is coming
> > right from the donkey's (horse's) mouth? Would Sean Hannity ever ask the
> > Muslims he interviews, the questions we ask here? The answer is never.****
>
> > In other words, if we please the Muslims and point the finger at "radical
> > Islam," they will not be happy because there is only one Islam. If we
> > identify the cause of all this chaos as "Islam" itself, they still won't be
> > happy. Why?****
>
> > It is because Islam is inherently radical. Period.****
>
> > The question I always ask is this: Why can't we simply just tell the truth
> > and call a spade a spade?****
>
> > Some actually consider that phrase racist because spades are black (I'm
> > not kidding).****
>
> > The answer is simple—It's political correctness as Mr. Schmidt so
> > correctly pointed out.****
>
> > *The media, regardless of left or right, is a political entity and
> > nothing more. Truth is not found amongst politicians, but comes from honest
> > scholars and historians.*****
>
> > Scholars like Mr. Schmidt.****
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment